[osol-discuss] Question about privilege levels for project.max-shm-memory

2006-11-16 Thread Takeshi Kurokawa
Hi all, I have a basic question about resource controls through project. OS : Solaris 10 Generic_118833-24 Machine physical memory : 16GB When I added the following project info. to /etc/project, kurotest user was able to get 16GB shared memory. --- kuroproject:1000::kurotest:kurog

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: About graphical desktops and Solaris future

2006-11-16 Thread De Togni Giacomo
If I have to decide between another release of Solaris and his stabilityI'm sure,I prefer stability.Solaris is a little great jewel of tecnology and is normal to desire the best solution for specific use.I'm seeing a great work to release Solaris 11 and community appreciates this.But it i

[osol-discuss] Re: [storage-discuss] Re: [arc-discuss] Status of PSARC 2006/384 [Was: [Attempt #3] AHCI SATA support]

2006-11-16 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 11/17/06, Rick McNeal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Nov 16, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: > Of course, there's still no way to force them to respond even once > you've > sent them personal email, but one would hope they'd get the message > (so to > speak). Unless they've got filters

[osol-discuss] Re: [storage-discuss] Re: [arc-discuss] Status of PSARC 2006/384 [Was: [Attempt #3] AHCI SATA support]

2006-11-16 Thread Rick McNeal
On Nov 16, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: Of course, there's still no way to force them to respond even once you've sent them personal email, but one would hope they'd get the message (so to speak). Unless they've got filters enabled which toss out mail from the outside world exc

[osol-discuss] Re: [arc-discuss] Status of PSARC 2006/384 [Was: [Attempt #3] AHCI SATA support]

2006-11-16 Thread Danek Duvall
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 12:34:00AM +0200, Cyril Plisko wrote: > What would a Sun' engineer do if s/he would like to > find out the status of the case ? We'd go check the IAM file for the case to see who owned it, and ping them. In this case, the case exposure is open, so the IAM file is available

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: About graphical desktops and Solaris future

2006-11-16 Thread Ignacio Marambio Catán
On 11/16/06, De Togni Giacomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I see another problem.In my opinion,the question is about maintaining a single version of Solaris for Enterprise and Desktop market.These two enviroments are quite different for many reasons.Ten years ago,we had Motif an CDE for all env

[osol-discuss] Status of PSARC 2006/384 [Was: [Attempt #3] AHCI SATA support]

2006-11-16 Thread Cyril Plisko
Folks, I have a question - how would an opensolaris developer find out a status of a particular PSARC case ? Like who is working on it, what is the progress, any status updates, etc. (A developer in hand happens to not be employed by Sun and only has access to opensolaris.org materials) The reas

Re: [osol-discuss] Project Proposal: Caiman, Solaris install revisted

2006-11-16 Thread Eric Boutilier
Thanks, Sarah. Your project proposal has seconds. I'll contact you offline to get you set up. On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Sarah Jelinek wrote: Project Proposal: Caiman, Solaris Install Revisited I would like to propose the Caiman project for OpenSolaris. Caiman is the code name for the project to cre

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: About graphical desktops and Solaris future

2006-11-16 Thread De Togni Giacomo
>Why? What additional cost (apart from CDE) is there in distibuting >CDE? No additional cost.It was an idea to explain the differences between two types of enviroments.CDE in the enterprise enviroment represents a good desktop and a good solution for many configurations,however in the desktop e

[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] ON b52 delivered

2006-11-16 Thread Stephen Lau
Cyril Plisko wrote: On 11/16/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This should be fixed now.. Should the on-changelog-b52.html list all the changes ? 'cause there is a new package SUNWamd8111s in usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWamd8111s/* and it is mentioned nowhere in the changelog. Are there an

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Non-expert users

2006-11-16 Thread David Lloyd
Max, Well Bill, i would use it on a desktop with adsl and would like to keep on using web applications mainly, such as IM, browsing, etc. There should be no particular problem using it for the above requirements, providing as others noted, all your hardware is supported. I guess there wo

[osol-discuss] Re: OpenSolaris for Sony Playstation 3

2006-11-16 Thread Ken Mays
People are correct on many topics. This is quite a challenge, but also easy in the fact that the hardware platform is pretty much locked for the next five years (no major changes in the motherboard or hardware expected). Since this is PowerPC-based on the core part of the Cell, I'll post follow

[osol-discuss] Re: Non-expert users

2006-11-16 Thread Max Cooper
Well Bill, i would use it on a desktop with adsl and would like to keep on using web applications mainly, such as IM, browsing, etc. I guess there would be no problem to install solaris on a partition, right? From where would you recommend me to download the soft? Thanks a lot Max This me

Re: [osol-discuss] Non-expert users

2006-11-16 Thread Bill Rushmore
Max Cooper wrote: Hello people. After discovering OpenOffice.org and doing some more browsing i discovered this project. I'm currently using Windows and was about to migrate to Linux, which, as far as i know and as per some peoples advice, is really friendly to non-expert users, which of cour

[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] ON b52 delivered

2006-11-16 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 11/16/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This should be fixed now.. Should the on-changelog-b52.html list all the changes ? 'cause there is a new package SUNWamd8111s in usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWamd8111s/* and it is mentioned nowhere in the changelog. Are there any other changes that

[osol-discuss] Non-expert users

2006-11-16 Thread Max Cooper
Hello people. After discovering OpenOffice.org and doing some more browsing i discovered this project. I'm currently using Windows and was about to migrate to Linux, which, as far as i know and as per some peoples advice, is really friendly to non-expert users, which of course is my case. I wa

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: About graphical desktops and Solaris future

2006-11-16 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello De, Thursday, November 16, 2006, 5:32:13 PM, you wrote: DTG> I see another problem.In my opinion,the question is about DTG> maintaining a single version of Solaris for Enterprise and DTG> Desktop market.These two enviroments are quite different for many DTG> reasons.Ten years ago,we had Mo

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: About graphical desktops and Solaris future

2006-11-16 Thread James Carlson
De Togni Giacomo writes: > Desktop release: drop CDE,add boot splash,more new code from opensolaris new > projects into the system,more GTK+ apps and tools (for example...) > Enterprise Release: maintain a strong compatibity with old software and > hardware (for example...) One reason not to do

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: About graphical desktops and Solaris future

2006-11-16 Thread Casper . Dik
>Desktop release: drop CDE,add boot splash,more new code from opensolaris new >projects into the sys tem,more GTK+ apps and tools (for example...) Why? What additional cost (apart from CDE) is there in distibuting CDE? >Enterprise Release: maintain a strong compatibity with old software and >

[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] ON b52 delivered

2006-11-16 Thread Stephen Lau
Cyril Plisko wrote: On 11/16/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry for the delay, build 52 is up now: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b52 I can't see the files there - only the standard header ON (OS/Net) Consolidation - b52 ON Mercurial repository blah-blah-blah Common Files

[osol-discuss] Re: About graphical desktops and Solaris future

2006-11-16 Thread De Togni Giacomo
I see another problem.In my opinion,the question is about maintaining a single version of Solaris for Enterprise and Desktop market.These two enviroments are quite different for many reasons.Ten years ago,we had Motif an CDE for all enviroments and this was ok.Then,with the arriving of Gnome an

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] ON b52 delivered

2006-11-16 Thread Paul Durrant
On 11/16/06, Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/16/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for the delay, build 52 is up now: > http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b52 I can't see the files there - only the standard header ON (OS/Net) Consolidation - b52 ON Mercurial repo

[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] ON b52 delivered

2006-11-16 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 11/16/06, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry for the delay, build 52 is up now: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b52 I can't see the files there - only the standard header ON (OS/Net) Consolidation - b52 ON Mercurial repository blah-blah-blah Common Files FilenameL