I'm trying to change the default logo of nevada svn_92 by
changing /etc/dt/C/Xresources according to
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/802-6486/6ia6232cc?a=view. But
it
doesn't work. Who have ever done that on nevada?
Jeff
Did the BIOS update help ?
It was looking like one of 3 possibilities - HBA firmware/BIOS, drive
firmware or the Solaris ahci(7D)
driver - or some incompaibility between them.
Looking at the manpage for ahci, I see the NOTES indicate that the HBA mode can
usually be
changed in the BIOS between
I don't know about all the changes in nv_91, I
know
one set of
changes was made for:
6679786 [nevada] poor fonts displayed in
gnome-terminal
Unfortunately, the universal law of changing font
display is,
no matter what you change you will get angry mail
from a bunch
of
Paul Gress schrieb:
You could try the Universal Disk Format (UDF). I believe all three
platforms should support it. Check into this.
Hmmm, interesting idea... I haven't so far bothered even dealing with it
as I just happened to know UDF in relation to any kind of recordable
media, but
Paul Gress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could try the Universal Disk Format (UDF). I believe all three
platforms should support it. Check into this.
Sure?
Did you verify that?
UDF file systems as written by mkisofs (and thus unchangeable) can be read by
all platforms but once you start
NO,NO,NO Please don't !
rpm is bad idea on any planet.
THis is not Linux.
Please, could you expand on your statement? Why would it be a bad idea?
To me, it would solve most of the problems we have today with OpenSolaris on
having to create redundant sub-installations of most of the
Mauro Mozzarelli schrieb:
Please, could you expand on your statement? Why would it be a bad
idea? To me, it would solve most of the problems we have today with
OpenSolaris on having to create redundant sub-installations of most
of the operating system dependencies, only to install a package
On 26 Jun 2008, at 12:16, Kristian Rink wrote:
Way to go, is there a project like this up and running? Surely can't
wait checking this out...
It's not a project in the opensolaris.org sense (perhaps it should
be?), and there's certainly nothing to play with yet. But there are
some Sun
Calum Benson schrieb:
It's not a project in the opensolaris.org sense (perhaps it should
be?), and there's certainly nothing to play with yet. But there are
some Sun folks working on it, and hopefully if I keep nagging them
enough, they'll get around to sharing their ideas/code sooner
Paul Gress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could try the Universal Disk Format (UDF). I
believe all three
platforms should support it. Check into this.
Sure?
Did you verify that?
UDF file systems as written by mkisofs (and thus
unchangeable) can be read by
all platforms but
Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UDF file systems as written by mkisofs (and thus
unchangeable) can be read by
all platforms but once you start to use writable UDF,
compatibility usually
ends.
Jörg
Is the specification too immature or incomplete (or in too
many
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Gress [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could try the Universal Disk Format (UDF). I
believe all three
platforms should support it. Check into this.
To get from a Linux machine to OpenSolaris or Solaris, with
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Kristian Rink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks;
another migration-related question: I do have a fairly well sized USB
drive to hold data so far to share between Linux, Windows and
OpenSolaris, thus the lowest common denominator (in terms of file
systems) being
Kristian Rink writes:
Mauro Mozzarelli schrieb:
Please, could you expand on your statement? Why would it be a bad
idea? To me, it would solve most of the problems we have today with
OpenSolaris on having to create redundant sub-installations of most
of the operating system dependencies,
James Carlson schrieb:
Please, could you expand on your statement? Why would it be a bad
idea? To me, it would solve most of the problems we have today with
OpenSolaris on having to create redundant sub-installations of most
of the operating system dependencies, only to install a package like,
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:39 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kristian Rink writes:
Mauro Mozzarelli schrieb:
Please, could you expand on your statement? Why would it be a bad
idea? To me, it would solve most of the problems we have today with
OpenSolaris on having to create
2008/6/27 Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:39 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kristian Rink writes:
Mauro Mozzarelli schrieb:
Please, could you expand on your statement? Why would it be a bad
idea? To me, it would solve most of the problems we have today
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:31:34 PDT
Mauro Mozzarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NO,NO,NO Please don't !
rpm is bad idea on any planet.
THis is not Linux.
Please, could you expand on your statement? Why would it be a bad idea?
To me, it would solve most of the problems we have today with
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:55:09 PDT
Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not adopt rpm?
No way! IPS is awesome, it just needs more time to
mature.
As far as I'm concerned, a package system (whatever it looks like):
* bundles a set of files that must be installed as a unit
Kristian Rink writes:
Talking about OpenSolaris though, I (honestly) don't see much use in
keeping a vast bunch of different builds of the same libraries
maintained - who should possibly spend time and effort doing so? Maybe
in terms of OpenSolaris, people should leave aside the self-contained
Hi all,
I had such high hopes that this would solve my problem. But it doesn't,
and I think it's telling me that my rpool is just too small to continue.
I've managed to promote opensolaris-5/opt, and destroyed all
the...-4/[EMAIL PROTECTED] pools, but:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# zfs list
NAME
Kristian Rink wrote:
Dave Miner schrieb:
Theoretically, yes, but since OpenSolaris can't use multiple fdisk
partitions on the same disk, your options are fairly limited.
Thanks for your comments on that... so, rude idea: Messing with the
partitions, using (g)parted or something the like
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kristian Rink writes:
Talking about OpenSolaris though, I (honestly) don't see much use in
keeping a vast bunch of different builds of the same libraries
maintained - who should possibly spend time and effort doing so?
2008/6/27 Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kristian Rink writes:
Talking about OpenSolaris though, I (honestly) don't see much use in
keeping a vast bunch of different builds of the same libraries
maintained - who should
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kristian Rink writes:
Talking about OpenSolaris though, I (honestly) don't see much use in
keeping a vast bunch of different builds of the same libraries
maintained - who should possibly spend time
2008/6/27 Dave Miner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:37 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kristian Rink writes:
Talking about OpenSolaris though, I (honestly) don't see much use in
keeping a vast bunch of different builds of the same libraries
Moinak Ghosh writes:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:39 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No matter _what_ packaging mechanism is used, that's a tall order. I
certainly don't blame anyone for not tackling it. I suspect it might
not be fixable in any real sense at all.
It appears
I'm trying to change the default logo of nevada
svn_92 by
changing /etc/dt/C/Xresources according to
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/802-6486/6ia6232cc?a=
view. But
it
doesn't work. Who have ever done that on nevada?
I've done it, but not like that - I just
could this be the issue?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/x86_64# fmadm faulty
--- -- -
TIMEEVENT-ID MSG-ID SEVERITY
--- --
Team,
I would like to throw out there a suggestion for OpenSolaris that I have never
known to have been previously mentioned. There is such a lot of great ideas
being floated here but I have not seen anything mentioned about the desktop
including an integrated utility supporting Blackberry
Folks;
another migration-related question: I do have a
fairly well sized USB
drive to hold data so far to share between Linux,
Windows and
OpenSolaris, thus the lowest common denominator (in
terms of file
systems) being FAT32. Taken into account I do have
also to backup a few
2008/6/27 W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks;
another migration-related question: I do have a
fairly well sized USB
drive to hold data so far to share between Linux,
Windows and
OpenSolaris, thus the lowest common denominator (in
terms of file
systems) being FAT32. Taken into account
i'm trying to compile a hello mysql C program.
i compiled it with:
cc -o hellomysql $(mysql_config --cflags) hellomysql.c $(mysql_config --libs)
but the problem is after executing it:
..libmysqlclient.so.15: open failed..
my mysql_config --libs is : -L/opt/SUNWspro.40/SS11/lib -lCrun -lrt
Not the Solaris ufs at last check -- just ufs as seen
in older BSDs.
--
Shawn Walker
I take it that Solaris won't r/w the BSD-ufs?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/27 W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks;
another migration-related question: I do have a
fairly well sized USB
drive to hold data so far to share between Linux,
Windows and
OpenSolaris, thus the lowest common
2008/6/27 Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/6/27 W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks;
another migration-related question: I do have a
fairly well sized USB
drive to hold data so far to share between Linux,
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008/6/27 Moinak Ghosh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2008/6/27 W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks;
another migration-related question: I do have a
This paper is now available as an early access release from the below URL:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/Docs/getting_started_with_crossbow.pdf
It will be published on the bigadmin portal,
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/home/index.html sometime in July.
- NN
This message
Newbie here. Also a Mac consultant of 20 years (read graphically minded, not
CI). Trying to set up a zfs home server that I can run headless (at this point,
I wish I were headless - less headache).
Anyway I've done a bunch of work to move the VNC server over to Xvnc,
downloaded the package,
I would say so. The error appear to identify a single SATA port if I read it
right.
Could be the port/cable/drive. Though you had 2 slow drives... Are you using
long (3') SATA
cables or 18 ones ? I imagine you have checked connector seating.
Do Intel provide diags ? An Ultimate Boot CD
Reading further into it, it seems like I am not the only one with this issue.
Everything might be fine with the motherboard, just the OS returning that
result.
I remember checking everything out with the motherboard when updating the
firmware/bios on it.
I am not the only one with this
41 matches
Mail list logo
