On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Hi, I believe he means, that the dependency resolution algorithm used
by csw (in the past with pkg-get, and also now) is suboptimal (which
is not a shame, as most others are, too).
For example,
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
blastwave's packages are built with the assumption that libaries live
relative to the rest of the programs (such as under /opt/csw), are compiled
with different flags, and generally assume
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
My point was that a dependency algorithm was not the cause of the issue
with the blastwave packages. It is primarily an issue of how they are
built.
There is no issue with Blastwave packages. These packages just make use from
the binary
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
My point was that a dependency algorithm was not the cause of the issue
with the blastwave packages. It is primarily an issue of how they are
built.
There is no issue with Blastwave packages. These packages just make use
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
My point was that a dependency algorithm was not the cause of the issue
with the blastwave packages. It is primarily an issue of how they are
built.
There is no issue
Hi,
is possible to install Crossbow on Solaris 10 10/08 sparc ?
Thanks bye...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
That's not the problem.
The problem is, that 5.9, 5.10, 5.10.1 and 5.11 are only symlinks to
5.8 most of the time, inside the csw repo.
For simplicity it would have been sufficient to concentrate only on 2
build targets,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker swal...@opensolaris.org wrote:
My point was that a dependency algorithm was not the cause of the issue
with the
I'm using OSOL snv_101b on a pair of HP DL360 G5.
I've configured AVS, and it was running fine during testing.
One of the 350's is used as a NFS server, and the other one being a
standby server.
Now AVS fails with the message entered logging mode: net write failed.
I've configured autosync to
Try their list at http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=110
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi.
I would like to install a device driver during the boot process of the Live CD
so that it correctly identifies my hardware?
Is this a feature that the Live CD supports?
Could this feature be added to subsequent Live CDs?
This message is relates to the posting below in OpenSolaris:Discuss
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 05:37 -0700, russell aspinwall wrote:
Hi.
I would like to install a device driver during the boot process of the Live
CD so that it correctly identifies my hardware?
Is this a feature that the Live CD supports?
Could this feature be added to subsequent Live CDs?
Thanks for the reply but building my own Live CD distro is not a very elegant
solution.
Surely a more practical approach would enable drivers to be added during the
boot process either by automatically scanning USB drives or a second DVD drive
if present.
This would allow a Live CD to
Gian Paolo writes:
is possible to install Crossbow on Solaris 10 10/08 sparc ?
No.
You could reinstall your system with OpenSolaris, and thus get
Crossbow (plus a lot of other new features), but there's no way to
install Crossbow on Solaris 10.
If you have a support contract, then I would
I have to agree with Russell on this one. Not to start an OS war here,
but this feature has been available on Windows for years and they have a
much broader support for devices that does Solaris/Open Solaris... Is
there an architectural reason why it could not be done?
-Original Message-
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:58 PM, russell aspinwall
7will...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
Thanks for the reply but building my own Live CD distro is not a very elegant
solution.
Surely a more practical approach would enable drivers to be added during the
boot process either by automatically scanning
Hi,
It is great that it can be done using the methods you have outlined but the
user is not prompted
Do you wish to add a device driver? Press Y to add driver
so the process is not that user friendly compared to Windows or Ubuntu.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Hay, Mausul W mausulw@xerox.com wrote:
Martin,
I did not mean to imply that Windows had a Live product. What I was
referring to is that while installing Windows, there is a point at which
you may insert a manufacturer supplied diskette for drivers for
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:03 PM, russell aspinwall
7will...@dsl.pipex.com wrote:
Hi,
It is great that it can be done using the methods you have outlined but the
user is not prompted
Do you wish to add a device driver? Press Y to add driver
so the process is not that user friendly
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
For any of the dependencies, it should be obvious that the dependencies that
are valid for Solaris 8 need to be installed for Solaris 11 too as any
blastwave package need to use the other probrams from it's own
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Hay, Mausul W mausulw@xerox.com wrote:
I have to agree with Russell on this one. Not to start an OS war here,
but this feature has been available on Windows for years and they have a
Which feature? That you can add a driver into a running LiveCD system?
I
Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
In 2005 I got banned from the csw mailing lists (because I didn't like
Dennis' ***intransparent*** ***business model*** , where all work
I have no idea why you don't like Dennis
...
And: During times of non-dictatorship COMMUNITY effort,
Martin,
I did not mean to imply that Windows had a Live product. What I was
referring to is that while installing Windows, there is a point at which
you may insert a manufacturer supplied diskette for drivers for hardware
that is not supported by the media you are using (for example, you may
not
Sun hosts a set of free forums which have been used for a long time to
discuss Solaris 10 issues. You need to register to post, but there is no
other cost involved:
http://forums.sun.com/category.jspa?categoryID=65
Since the Solaris 10 codebase is over 4 years old, the forums can be
more
!!! ONLY 5 MORE DAYS !!!
Remember the deadline for package submissions is May 8th.
The Software Porters Community can help if you have questions:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/sw-porters/
Make sure to register your pkgs as soon as possible, you can
always add more later.
BTW. You can
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
For any of the dependencies, it should be obvious that the dependencies
that
are valid for Solaris 8 need to be installed for
I have reasons.
What I didn't like were a few questions of how things were handled.
Nevertheless, I do respect him.
It is a thing of the past, it is ok.
%martin
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
Running powertop is showing the following errors. Anyone know what the problem
may be
eon:16:/deep/ips/usr/bin#truss -v all -w all -r all -o /tmp/foo ./powertop
OpenSolaris PowerTOP version 1.1 (C) 2008 Intel Corporation
powertop: ../cpufreq.c : cpu-change-speed probe unavailable
powertop:
The only reason I pointed it out was that I tried to install OpenSolaris as my
base OS and found the feature missing. Sometimes, knowing what question to ask
is almost as difficult as answering the question.
Thanks for the feedback.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Joerg Schilling wrote:
But please note that at the time Solaris 8 was created, Sun was just in a
state
where the managers believed in closed source. With Solaris 8, there are only
thre OSS packages:
- mkisofs
- gzip
- bash
Even Solaris 8 had a lot more than just 3 open
Hi Martin,
Nearly two years ago I tweaked the SUNWlsimega driver to recognise the LSI
MegaRAID SATA 300-8X raid controller and have been using ever since (as I used
to manage the ftp site so know from which locations it was downloaded which
included Sun). It was a minor change and I found the
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
But please note that at the time Solaris 8 was created, Sun was just in a
state
where the managers believed in closed source. With Solaris 8, there are only
thre OSS packages:
-
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
But please note that at the time Solaris 8 was created, Sun was just in a
state
where the managers believed in closed source. With Solaris 8, there are
only
thre OSS packages:
- mkisofs
- gzip
-
Didn't work; it's not generating a core file, but running it from mdb gave
this, if it helps:
::stack
hash_lookup_pidthr+0x38()
::status
debugging PID 25513 (32-bit)
file: /export/home/alan/top/i386/top
threading model: raw lwps
status: stopped on SIGSEGV (Segmentation Fault)
event: stop on
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Andre Lue sik3...@yahoo.com wrote:
Running powertop is showing the following errors. Anyone know what the
problem may be
eon:16:/deep/ips/usr/bin#truss -v all -w all -r all -o /tmp/foo ./powertop
OpenSolaris PowerTOP version 1.1 (C) 2008 Intel Corporation
Hi All,
This is to announce availability of NexentaCore Platform 2.0 RC2.
The release has stabilized. This release will become the final release
if no major bugs are reported.
Release Highlights:
--
* OpenSolaris build 104+ based with critical patches.
* Over 13000 packages
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 08:55 +0530, Anil Gulecha wrote:
...
* StormOS: An XFCE based derivative of NCP2 is in the works. For those
looking for a desktop variation of NCP2, keep a lookout on the StormOS
website. The beta release of StormOS Hail is in the offing.
Nice to see one more
This exact thing happened to me again, except I had removed the empty line
after the previous incident. I have two systems with otherwise identical root
crontabs (one still has a blank line) and this happened only on one. It
appears it happened just after or before a reboot, but it was a
38 matches
Mail list logo
