Okay thanks, any news on a 64bit version for x86?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi Harry, I get files created with UID GID set by client. See below (some
names have been altered to protect the innocent, any inconsistencies are due to
that editing)
from mount list:
192.168.0.110:/darkstar/nebulae on /home/chris/osolnfsmount type nfs
(rw,nolock,addr=192.168.0.110)
Okay thanks, any news on a 64bit version for x86?
Assuming you mean Firefox, remember that (Open)Solaris x86 runs on
both 32-bit and 64-bit with a single binary distro (unlike Linux, where AFAIK
a 64-bit kernel normally runs only 64-bit binaries, so 32-bit and 64-bit are
separate binary
Assuming you mean Firefox, remember that (Open)Solaris x86 runs on
both 32-bit and 64-bit with a single binary distro (unlike Linux, where AFAIK
a 64-bit kernel normally runs only 64-bit binaries, so 32-bit and 64-bit are
separate binary distros*). So to have 64-bit Firefox and still be able to
Chris chris.sola...@jalakai.co.uk writes:
Hi Harry, I get files created with UID GID set by client. See
below (some names have been altered to protect the innocent, any
inconsistencies are due to that editing)
[...]
Thanks... nothing like some actual data to see how it ends up.
So
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
That info from your linux client `mount' cmd may tell whats wrong
here. Mine has one extra item in there:
OSOL_SERVER:/pub on /pub type
nfs (rw,users,addr=192.168.0.29,vers=4,clientaddr=192.168.0.2)
Notice the `vers=4' so apparently my linux
Hey, Harry, no problem! Sometimes we all can't see the forest for the
trees... We all assumed, it must have been something like that.
Glad it worked out finally!
Matthias
You (Harry Putnam) wrote:
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
That info from your linux client `mount' cmd may
Harry Putnam wrote:
Man, I'm really sorry to the list for all my huffing and puffing when
I'm pretty sure I had been claiming I had the right settings in
/etc/default/nfs (but didn't).
This makes a lot more sense. NFSv4 should have worked for
you if you had the client and server both set to
On 03/15/10 06:50 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
...
*And also unlike Mac OS X, where a 32-bit kernel can run 64-bit applications,
provided the CPU is 64-bit capable. On Solaris, a 64-bit kernel is required to
run 64-bit applications, but can still run 32-bit applications. Additionally,
On 3/14/10 11:57 AM, Raphael Barabas wrote:
Hi,
I did a fresh installation of osol-dev-134-x86.iso to a notebook pc. After
turning on time slider for rpool/export/home/xxx i waited for about 90 minutes
to gather a few automatic snapshots.
When starting nautilus via Places - Home folder
Robert Thurlow robert.thur...@sun.com writes:
Harry Putnam wrote:
Man, I'm really sorry to the list for all my huffing and puffing when
I'm pretty sure I had been claiming I had the right settings in
/etc/default/nfs (but didn't).
This makes a lot more sense. NFSv4 should have worked for
Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de
writes:
Hey, Harry, no problem! Sometimes we all can't see the forest for the
trees... We all assumed, it must have been something like that.
Glad it worked out finally!
You put quite a bit into it, thanks for you patience and time.
Hi there - our server running 2009.06 is not able to boot thru stage 2 because
I inadvertinatly deleted /dev/zvol/rdsk/rpool/dump - I don't have a Live CD at
our NOC and have been reading information about booting from another instance
of OpenSolaris 2009.06. Right now I have another physical
Hi all,
Is there any way to install openha cluster on a machine without the Internet
access? The only hint that I came across is available here,
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+ha-clusters/buildingcore
but it pertains to express edtition which, afaik, is not available. I am
On 03/15/10 11:58 AM, Bart Jurek wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any way to install openha cluster on a machine without the Internet access? The
only hint that I came across is available here,
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+ha-clusters/buildingcore but it
pertains to express
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15188
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
No I meant a 64bit version of OpenSolaris. Right now it's only available in
64bit for SPARC if I'm not mistaken.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
+--
| On 2010-03-15 12:43:05, Don Quichotte wrote:
|
| No I meant a 64bit version of OpenSolaris. Right now it's only available in
64bit for SPARC if I'm not mistaken.
Solaris has been a mixed 32/64bit install for many
On 03/15/10 02:43 PM, Don Quichotte wrote:
No I meant a 64bit version of OpenSolaris. Right now it's only available in
64bit for SPARC if I'm not mistaken.
A 64-bit kernel will be loaded when you boot OpenSolaris on x86 systems
if your system supports it.
Although, not all applications are
Harry Putnam wrote:
Robert Thurlow robert.thur...@sun.com writes:
This makes a lot more sense. NFSv4 should have worked for
you if you had the client and server both set to the same
NFSv4 domain - if you care to work on this, we can.
Thanks for the offer. Is there something NFSv4 offers
| No I meant a 64bit version of OpenSolaris. Right
now it's only available in 64bit for SPARC if I'm not
mistaken.
Solaris has been a mixed 32/64bit install for many years.
The installer runs 32bit.
This has changed in OpenSolaris.
The OpenSolaris x86 installer / livecd runs the 64-bit
If you're doing cross-building question, a significant question is the
network failover model: is service provision dependent on providing
consistent service access at the IP or network name level? If it's
currently tied to an IP address, does your network topology support
address
Rosie,
Not really an 'OpenSolaris/Solaris' question. Also, you may want to consolidate
down to an Oracle/Solaris 10 architecture - removing MySql /SyBase overhead
maintenance.
~ Ken
--- On Mon, 3/15/10, Bayard Bell buffer.g.overf...@googlemail.com wrote:
From: Bayard Bell
23 matches
Mail list logo
