Hi all,
While trying to set the keyboard layout using the kbd -s layout name I
see that no matter what I set the layout as , It defaults to
US-english..(or so i guess!)
Recently I tried kbd -s German.
Exit status says 0, But ,
# eeprom |grep keyboard
keyboard-layout=Unknown
This is the same
On 2010年03月24日 12:40, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
And the forum's are now apparently now programmed to
censor comments, although they don't even have basic
functionality like displaying boldface. I can and
bu_gg_er got turned into asterisks.
Brilliant.
That's not new, it's been censoring
Haulyn Jason wrote:
Many things changed, we must face to these, but, can anybody tell me,
how can we still believe oracle will keep opensolaris as now? Who can
make sure opensolaris will not change it's own way?
is it the time to migrate from sun(now as oracle/sun) productions to
linux,
Erik,
Bottom line: it's very premature to bail right now. That's a huge
thing to do, given that what is said today may not be the reality
tomorrow. I'm not saying sit on your hands and do nothing, but
certainly jumping ship at the first sign of trouble is equally foolish.
What you say is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24.03.2010 11:13, Erik Trimble wrote:
Haulyn Jason wrote:
Many things changed, we must face to these, but, can anybody tell me,
how can we still believe oracle will keep opensolaris as now? Who can
make sure opensolaris will not change it's
Sean Sprague s...@cvok.co.uk wrote:
What you say is absolutely correct; and OpenSolaris users should read it
at face value. Oracle now has at its command the best set of
developers/sustainers/supporters that exist, IMO; and unless Oracle is
infinitely short-sighted, then OpenSolaris will
Wow! We've just upgraded(?) to snv_134 (Feb 2010), and are seeing [i]both[/i]
of the problems you describe:
ON SSH: PTY allocation request failed on channel 0
and the various hotplugging error messages.
and don't have a /dev/ptmx directory [i]at all[/i] after our recent upgrade to
snv_134 -
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 05:39 -0700, Dr Lou wrote:
Wow! We've just upgraded(?) to snv_134 (Feb 2010), and are seeing
[i]both[/i] of the problems you describe:
ON SSH: PTY allocation request failed on channel 0
and the various hotplugging error messages.
and don't have a /dev/ptmx
HI all,
cpuinfo -v yields (see file cpuinfo.txt ).
I noticed one interesting thing:
When preparing to catche the hang i opened the console and pre-typed mdb -K
to crash the system if needed to.
When the system hang i pressed ENTER but nothing happened. While digging
around in the core dump i
Thanks for that tip - I'll certainly try it. For the moment, though, I can't
even type into a terminal window. Weird, right?
Of course, we do not (yet) have the 'root' role authorized to log in, so this
is not an option.
Additionally, cannot log in to an xterm session now.
Not sure at the
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
recently I've discovered that b134 sometimes freezes for few seconds -- usually
after some GUI activity is performed or during it. First I've though this is
similar to this thread:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=126157tstart=0 but I'm
not sure now since it does
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12528
which has been closed in favour of
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6936915
Brian
Karel Gardas wrote:
Hello,
recently I've discovered that b134 sometimes freezes for few seconds -- usually after some
GUI
Mike DeMarco wrote:
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Because most of the Sun/Oracle people here are engineers and have
absolutely no idea what's happening in the world of issuing licenses
and selling support contracts - at
Already reported by a number of users, and reproduced by an external
developer who found a fix, but not yet reproducible by the internal
developer assigned to integrate the fix:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6936915
FWIW, we're seeing the same problem on a Gigabyte GA-X38T-DQ6
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mike,
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
gagging order might be present.
Regards... Sean.
___
Mike,
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
gagging order might be present.
This is just too funny.
Casper
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 15:44 +0100, casper@sun.com wrote:
Mike,
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
gagging order might be present.
This is
Mark,
On Wed, 2010-03-24 at 15:44 +0100, casper@sun.com wrote:
Mike,
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Aside to AlanC's (always) measured response, I suspect an implicit
gagging order might be
Hello all,
I am a complete newbie to OpenSolaris, and must to setup a ZFS NAS. I do have
linux experience, but have never used ZFS. I have tried to install OpenSolaris
Developer 134 on a 11TB HW RAID-5 virtual disk, but after the installation I
can only use one 2TB disk, and I cannot partition
Hello,
I've tried booting OS 2009.03 and also textinstall of b134 on my 4x opteron 875
box and both kernels complains about opteron erratum 123 not being patched by
bios. However I've contacted HP support and the guy there claims that their
latest BIOS (which I'm using) patches this issue. So
Erik,
first of all for all those information provided. I do have some further
questions below.
For a 4-socket 800-series Opteron, there are two CPU
groups -
CPU0/CPU1 in group 0, and CPU2/CPU3 in group 1. Each
group has local
memory, which it can access at about 50ns speeds.
Memory on
Erik,
thank you once again for very valuable recommendation. I'm distributed systems
guy and plan to use the box for testing various messaging/rpc implementations
with CORBA on the start going thorough various SOAs and MOMs. Now, with CORBA,
MICO concretely (www.mico.org). Imagine this is just
Is it possible for you to destroy virtual drive and present 12 discs
independently to the OS? Someone is using a term JBOD for it. If so, then you
might leave the RAID job to ZFS pool.
Karel
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
B133 works perfectly (for the freeze/atge and wireless).
I'll see what b135 does, provided I can upgrade to that (upgrade uses too much
memory - known problem).
The swap on zfs on sd unreliability remains, removing compression makes
probability of unkillable process smaller but non-zero. Let's
hi
i installed webmin on blade 1500 .
pkg install SUNWwebmin
/usr/sfw/lib/webmin/setup.sh
parametre : /etc/webmin/webmin.acl
parametre : /etc/webmin/miniserv.users
svcadm restart webmin
i can to loging webmin with firefox at remote blade 1500.
but I find webmin the blade with only 5 or 6
On 03/24/10 02:01 PM, Jouko Holopainen wrote:
B133 works perfectly (for the freeze/atge and wireless).
I'll see what b135 does, provided I can upgrade to that (upgrade uses too much
memory - known problem).
Upgrade generally only uses excessive amounts of memory when crossing a
rename
From the bug report, the bug will be reproduced several times a day
under heavy activities. Compiz was launched on my M10 which I believe
would cause heavy activities, but I didn't catch the freeze. The patch
created by Jurgen is a possible fix for the potential bug and at least two
users
Hi Ronny,
How are you getting the crash dump if your system is hung
and you are not getting into kmdb? To get into kmdb,
you need to type f1-a on the console (based on the addresses,
you are on x64, not SPARC).
max
Ronny Egner wrote:
HI all,
cpuinfo -v yields (see file cpuinfo.txt ).
I
Imho I'm not sure how any of the above communication based on the present
silence from Sun Oracle helps the project, because no engineer is supposedly
- not looking at defects.OpenSolaris.org it makes sense to have a tool
that keeps track of bugs on the project as long as anyone is putting man
This being funny how?
I would guess that some of the people on this list are using the
OpenSolaris as a testbed for Solaris Next, to prospect options for
their coming solutions for their commercial products.
For some the possibility that only Sun HW is supported in the
commercial product might be
I just tried this on OpenSolaris 2009.06 and it simply doesn't work. The system
hangs and reboots when I try, does anyone know what's wrong?
First it complained that I don't have permissions even though I used pfexec,
this is not a big deal although I think unprivileged users should be able to
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 07:22:45AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Mike DeMarco wrote:
I do not notice anyone from Sun/Oracle making any comment on this thread.
Why are you guys so quiet?
Because most of the Sun/Oracle people here are engineers and have
absolutely no idea what's
Karel Gardas wrote:
Erik,
to be honest I quite don't get what you write here. The reason is engineering.
4 socket server means that 1 cpu is connected to another 2 and forms kind of
ring. Nice simple picture is here:
http://ixbtlabs.com/articles2/cpu/rmma-numa2.html
Now, from this picture I
Karel Gardas wrote:
Erik,
thank you once again for very valuable recommendation. I'm distributed systems
guy and plan to use the box for testing various messaging/rpc implementations
with CORBA on the start going thorough various SOAs and MOMs. Now, with CORBA,
MICO concretely (www.mico.org).
It's probably just a typo, but I noticed that you had to run pfexec
mount -t ntfs-3g (long time since I've run that command, I may be
slightly wrong. Either -t or -F, check the man page).
Also, try mkdir a directory in /mnt that you can then use as a
mountpoint. That's what mount is complaining
37 matches
Mail list logo
