Thanks a lot
Actually I did all these before, even I reinstall fresh working image ( remove
OS then install Thunderbird again ) but same as it I’m still receiving unwonted
mail instead of actual mail
Thanks
nnnddd
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I'm pretty green with both zfs and nfs. Only started using nfs since
I got involved with opensolaris (linux background before that)
I'm finding that when I have a zfs filesystem exported from zfs server
as NFS 3, and mounted on a linux client that my user can read/write
freely on it, but the
Ok, The Acer I bought specifically to experiment with Open Solaris (OS) with,
has some rather new devices, that OS 2009.06 does not natively support.
There are so many pages here at O.S. that I got lost and couldn't find my way
back to some drivers that were posted.
I'm not a programmer or
I'm a newbie to Open Solaris also. I can not help you. But you might want to
update this with a full description of your system . Brand model, factory built
or any self added cards, and the brand and model of your card.
wish you luck.
I haven't had to manually enter commands since DOS and
I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free version of Solaris. The
one where the community helps develop future releases of Solaris, and Solaris
was the commercial product that cost money to obtain.
Just went to the website and it says I can have Solaris 10 free?
So if I'm not a
That's normal!
You need to set the root= option...
Like in:
zfs set sharenfs=ro...@192.168.2 pfuetz/smb-share
See man share_nfs...
Matthias
You (Harry Putnam) wrote:
I'm pretty green with both zfs and nfs. Only started using nfs since
I got involved with opensolaris (linux
You (jay krik) wrote:
I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free version of Solaris. The
one where the community helps develop future releases of Solaris, and Solaris
was the commercial product that cost money to obtain.
Just went to the website and it says I can have Solaris 10
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of jay krik
I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free version of
Solaris. The one where the community helps develop future releases of
Solaris, and Solaris was the
You (Edward Ned Harvey) wrote:
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of jay krik
I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free version of
Solaris. The one where the community helps develop future releases
Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de
writes:
That's normal!
You need to set the root= option...
Like in:
zfs set sharenfs=ro...@192.168.2 pfuetz/smb-share
See man share_nfs...
Thanks, it appears I need to add:
root_mapping=uid
as well
The man page indicates it would be
You (Harry Putnam) wrote:
Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de
writes:
That's normal!
You need to set the root= option...
Like in:
zfs set sharenfs=ro...@192.168.2 pfuetz/smb-share
See man share_nfs...
Thanks, it appears I need to add:
root_mapping=uid
as
From: Matthias Pfützner [mailto:matth...@pfuetzner.de]
Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2010 10:59 AM
Some small corrections, if I'm not mistaken:
It's not 30, but 90 days...
I think you're right. My mistake.
And you're talking about the OpenSolaris.COM binary distribution
identifing
You (Edward Ned Harvey) wrote:
And you're talking about the OpenSolaris.COM binary distribution
identifing
itself as SunOS 5.11... Don't know, if that applies to Nexenta,
Schillix,
Belenix et.al...
I dont know about Nexenta etc, either. But the emphasis on COM isn't
right. I got
So if I'm not a developer or programmer and don't want to be, Maybe I and
others like me should get Solaris 10 a finished product.behind the completed??
True Solaris pre-installed inside one of their production machines might be a
better way to go. You could still try it in another machine
Hi,
I am trying to compile this (under svn_134)
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Dfu-util#Source_Code
The autogen.sh says
Can't exec aclocal: No such file or directory at
/usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 326.
autoreconf: failed to run aclocal: No such file or directory
How can I
On 04/10/10 01:21 PM, Chris Syntichakis wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile this (under svn_134)
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Dfu-util#Source_Code
The autogen.sh says
Can't exec aclocal: No such file or directory at
/usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 326.
autoreconf: failed to
thanx!
Chris
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
This is what I get:
~$ /usr/bin/audiotest
Sound subsystem and version: SunOS Audio 4.0 (0x00040003)
Platform: SunOS 5.11 snv_134 i86pc
*** Scanning sound adapter #1 ***
/dev/sound/usb_ac:0dsp (audio engine 0): usb_ac#0
- Performing audio playback test...
left OK
right
Gosling resigns from Oracle. http://www.taranfx.com/father-of-java-resigns.
I would have thought that Oracle would have tried to keep him on board the
good yacht Oracle.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I was under the impression Open Solaris was the free
version of Solaris. The one where the community helps
develop future releases of Solaris, and Solaris was
the commercial product that cost money to obtain.
Just went to the website and it says I can have
Solaris 10 free?
It's kind of
Graham McArdle graham.mcar...@ukaea.org.uk wrote:
It's kind of ironic timing that a newcomer to OpenSolaris Solaris would
discover and be surprised that Solaris 10 is free, when we've just had a long
thread discussing how annoying it is that Solaris 10 is no longer free!
Solaris 10 was
On 04/10/10 01:21 PM, Chris Syntichakis wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile this (under svn_134)
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Dfu-util#Source_Code
The autogen.sh says
Can't exec aclocal: No such file or directory at
/usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 326.
autoreconf: failed
I am being critical here but I'm not angry. Just not
really impressed.
several years ago Sun was kind of promoting Open
Solaris as being a viable alternative to MS Windows.
But they didn't really inform people that it really
was not user friendly, plug and play and for the
common person.
On 04/11/10 09:53 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Graham McArdlegraham.mcar...@ukaea.org.uk wrote:
It's kind of ironic timing that a newcomer to OpenSolaris Solaris would
discover and be surprised that Solaris 10 is free, when we've just had a long
thread discussing how annoying it is that
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Michael Lee mle...@gmail.com wrote:
Gosling resigns from Oracle. http://www.taranfx.com/father-of-java-resigns.
I would have thought that Oracle would have tried to keep him on board the
good yacht Oracle.
That's not surprising. Gosling was for research and
choochoo wrote:
I am being critical here but I'm not angry. Just not
really impressed.
several years ago Sun was kind of promoting Open
Solaris as being a viable alternative to MS Windows.
But they didn't really inform people that it really
was not user friendly, plug and play and for the
He means, if you test transfer speeds on the server where the disks are
actually located instead of over the network via ISCSI, what sort of transfer
speeds do you see? What are the speeds if you try from where the disk
physically are instead of remotely?
Ah. OK.
I set up a test and
I somehow ran into a hanging iscsitgt. Is there any way to kill/restart it
without rebooting the machine? svcadm restart or disable does not work, kill -9
iscsitgt does not work, svcs -a shows iscsitgt as online*, so it's stuck.
There must be a way to kill it without rebooting, right?
--
This
On 04/10/10 08:55 PM, Ron Mexico wrote:
He means, if you test transfer speeds on the server where the disks are
actually located instead of over the network via ISCSI, what sort of transfer
speeds do you see? What are the speeds if you try from where the disk
physically are instead of remotely?
29 matches
Mail list logo
