Hi John,
John Martin píše v út 20. 07. 2010 v 13:53 -0400:
For media players I always recommend Fluendo before
trying to roll your own.
Cannot test OS support for SSE, leaving disabled.
.
When I get some time I will look into the SSE message.
See the fix for SSE/SSE2 below in
Interesting. Do you have any comparative numbers between
OSOL and others: RHAT, Ubuntu for instance ?
I had the impression SMF did improve things. As I read your post
it seems, sometimes in past but not anymore ... why is that ?
Probable somebody should fill in some bugs regarding this ?
Thanks for the suggestion.
Any idea how to check the specific chipset number?
At bootup, the BIOS says: 88SE91xx, and doesn't give the last couple of numbers.
I've tried to look within OSOL itself, say using the device driver manager on
the LiveCD, but it just says SATA controller.
--
This
Try
scanpci
or a
prtconf -pv
You might even try to scan the /var/adm/messages file... ;-)
Matthias
You (valrh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion.
Any idea how to check the specific chipset number?
At bootup, the BIOS says: 88SE91xx, and doesn't give
Why isn't Larry slapping his marketing personnel? Can they spell communication?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
@dre2kse:
I can't get either of these cards to work at all. I tried the suggestion to
boot the LiveCD, and it shows the AHCI driver attached to the SATA controller.
When I run format, I don't see the drive attached to the card. I've tried this
with an SSD and a regular HD, switched all the
Why isn't Larry slapping his marketing personnel? Can
they spell communication?
Non-communications is the policy, right? So he'd have to
slap himself.
I'd like a video of that...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
On 20/07/2010 21:42, Joerg Schilling wrote:
John Plocherjohn.ploc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Bart Smaaldersbart.smaald...@oracle.com wrote:
.
Joerg (et.al.)
This all
Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
Interesting. Do you have any comparative numbers between
OSOL and others: RHAT, Ubuntu for instance ?
I had the impression SMF did improve things. As I read your post
it seems, sometimes in past but not anymore ... why is that ?
Probable
On 20/07/2010 20:56, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Robert Milkowskimi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
I must admit that I actually like IPS. Of course it is work-in-progress
but for most of the part it already works better than the old packaging
tools.
IPS is not yet inside OpenSolaris and I am
right. Good point is to keep all these things logged somewhere and we could
track them down
in time.
Btw: if community thinks for a itself distro, which I salute more than
anything, we could think first to have a defect management system where we
could freely
log these sort of defects and a
Robert Milkowski mi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
Of course IPS is included in the OSOL distribution for a long time now.
One might argue that the OSOL is a community distribution as apart from
Sun many community members contributed to it in one way or another.
Sure, most of the work has been done
Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
Interesting. Do you have any comparative numbers
between
OSOL and others: RHAT, Ubuntu for instance ?
I had the impression SMF did improve things. As I
read your post
it seems, sometimes in past but not anymore ... why
is that ?
Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
right. Good point is to keep all these things logged somewhere and we could
track them down
in time.
Do you believe you need bugzilla or would the bugtracker at Berlios be
sufficient?
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home)
On 21/07/2010 11:01, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Robert Milkowskimi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
Of course IPS is included in the OSOL distribution for a long time now.
One might argue that the OSOL is a community distribution as apart from
Sun many community members contributed to it in one way or
--- On Wed, 7/21/10, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
wrote:
- There is no Xorg package from
Blastwave, is there such a beast
from other sources besides Indiana?
Hmm, that is incorrect. BW had successful Xorg packaging since Xorg 6.4
(I thank Sun's X team for
Stefan Parvu stefanparv...@yahoo.com wrote:
Do you believe you need bugzilla or would the bugtracker at Berlios be
sufficient?
any defect managemetn system would be enough. Probable easier would
be to have bugzilla since we might need to have a compatibility with vendor
which uses
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
I am not sure about where you live but in the real world, there is NO IPS
in Solaris. IPS was introduced in Indiana (why not in Solaris) and Indiana
is a nice proof of concept on how to slow down things by working against the
community.
In the world
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Why use the latest source tree if this causes lots of problems?
Why cause lots of problems by refusing to work with the other community
members
and refusing to use the latest available code?
Do you really believe I did not try newer
With a community distro would it be possible to capture drivers that are being
dropped by Oracle from future editions of OpenSolaris? If these drivers can be
captured to maintain the existing hardware support, then going forward if the
community edition is fully GPL compliant then porting GPL
Im running this in a Dell PowerEdge T410, 2 GHz Xeon (Core i7) with 8
GB of RAM. There are six 2TB drives attached to a Dell SAS 6i/R card,
which are recognized just fine. I wanted to add the the SSD as an
L2ARC, and am using the same PCIe SATA card that is running the CD-ROM
drive (which boots
Berlios.de is a service that exists already and after we moved to berlios.eu
we will have plenty of space.
sounds good. nginx I was thinking since is small, compact and does not
require pre-forking ala Apache. wise consumption is always better.
Here you have some details:
Do you believe you need bugzilla or would the bugtracker at Berlios be
sufficient?
any defect managemetn system would be enough. Probable easier would
be to have bugzilla since we might need to have a compatibility with vendor
which uses bugzilla. We need to think a bit. As well:
fully gpl compliant? what do you mean?
If the driver being dropped is open source, you can always take the
source code and keep updating it outside ON. Several people already do
this
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:21 PM, russell str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
With a community distro would it be
On 21/07/2010 16:28, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
fully gpl compliant? what do you mean?
If the driver being dropped is open source, you can always take the
source code and keep updating it outside ON. Several people already do
this
I would recommend in such a case to package it in IPS
russell wrote:
With a community distro would it be possible to capture drivers that are
being dropped by Oracle from future editions of OpenSolaris?
For the ones that are either open source or redistributable, I don't see
why not.
If these drivers can be captured to maintain the existing
Have you tried it compile VLC via OpenSolaris spec-files? They are basically
a diff to the ordinary make file, so you can compile on OSol without any
greater problems. Google on spec-files
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
russell str...@willows7.myzen.co.uk wrote:
With a community distro would it be possible to capture drivers that are
being dropped by Oracle from future editions of OpenSolaris? If these
drivers can be captured to maintain the existing hardware support, then going
forward if the community
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Why use the latest source tree if this causes lots of problems?
Why cause lots of problems by refusing to work with the other community
members and refusing to use the latest available code?
Do you really believe I did not try newer
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
The community edition can only be fully GPL compliant if the community
rewrites the kernel, at which point it's really a new OS, not a community
distro. The community can't change the license terms for the code Oracle
owns/releases from
You can try changing the linker to gld instead of ld
my technique
cp -p /usr/bin/ld /usr/bin/ld.sun
cp -p /usr/sfw/bin/gld /usr/sfw/bin/gld.gnu
then I symlink ld to ld.sun or gld as needed
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Alan Coopersmith alan dot coopersmith at oracle dot com wrote:
The community edition can only be fully GPL compliant if the community
rewrites the kernel, at which point it's really a new OS, not a community
distro. The community can't change the license terms for the code Oracle
Peter Jones wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan dot coopersmith at oracle dot com wrote:
The community edition can only be fully GPL compliant if the community
rewrites the kernel, at which point it's really a new OS, not a community
distro. The community can't change the license terms for the code
AH HA +1 Let me know if I can help anywhere on the project. I have contacted
one person already that has blown the community rally bugle.
Actually I kinda liked the GUI from SXCE, I can find a replacement graphic for
the menu button :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Have you tried it compile VLC via OpenSolaris
spec-files? They are basically a diff to the
ordinary make file, so you can compile on OSol
without any greater problems. Google on spec-files
I just tried, but with no luck.
Did a fresh install of pkgtools and then
$ /opt/pkgbuild/bin/pkgtool
mplayer -vo vdpau \
-vc ffmpeg12vdpau,ffwmv3vdpau,ffvc1vdpau,ffh264vdpau hd-video.m2ts
I found a BDAV sample file (test1.m2ts - Cars trailer) and it plays
smoothly with the combination of mplayer built with earlier instructions
and NVIDIA driver 256.35 on Atom N330 + ION.
It is
When I press Shut down in gnome menu I see Skip boot menu on restart
checkbox which ON by default. I'd like to ALWAYS see boot menu,
so I'd like to turned off this checkbox once and forever.
How?
--
Best regards, Aleksey Cheusov.
___
+1 from me as well. Sometime back I communicated same to Joerg privately. I
don't code but am fairly seasoned sysadmin so there's bound to be some
thankless but necessary dirty work along those lines that needs doing. If so,
feel free to give me a holler.
P.S.; Dennis, it would also be
Why not apply for a free open source project license for Jira?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 07/21/10 04:03 PM, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
It is good to know that OpenSolaris supports VDPAU in theory
and works for someone.
But unfortunately it still doesn't work for me :-(.
I'm certain VDPAU is supported and works.
It is part of the performance and regression testing
done for each
On 07/22/10 02:43 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
I am not sure about where you live but in the real world, there is NO IPS
in Solaris. IPS was introduced in Indiana (why not in Solaris) and Indiana
is a nice proof of concept on how to slow down things
I'm certain VDPAU is supported and works.
It is part of the performance and regression testing
done for each driver release.
Hm, it is interesting to know how QA is organized in OpenSolaris. Is
this information available online anywhere or entire process is made
intirely inside Oracle?
How
Hello All,
What: OpenSolaris Hackathon!
When: Saturday 31st July Sunday 1st August 2010, 10am to 9pm both days
Where: London, UK (For full address see below) (Also Worldwide on IRC)
Link: http://osolhackathon.eventbrite.com/
Misc: Food Drinks will be provided both days, and the Hackathon will
interesting...I guess Oracle is still in the process
integrating SUN.
er at WEBMINK blog, I found a link that leads to an
Oracle site title Oracle's Support for Open Source
and Open Standards and has OpenSolaris as one of
their KEY OPEN SOURCE INITIATIVES. along with
it will take a long time til oracle can digest an animal like sun... linux
is pretty much in oracle DNA.. maybe the silence about osol is about to kill
or disperse de community formed around it...
i dont think a smart company like oracle would consciouslly forget a project
like this..
i think is
45 matches
Mail list logo
