Solaris 10 can be used for strictly self-educational purposes..
Not even for self-education. The (developer) license text at
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/licenses/solaris-cluster-express-license-167852.html
says:
only for the purpose of developing, testing, prototyping and demonstrating
So write some shell scripts, compile some software, test some software. That
should be more than enough to meet the requirements;)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Octave J. Orgeron
Solaris Virtualization Architect and Consultant
Web:
So write some shell scripts, compile some software,
test some software. That
should be more than enough to meet the requirements;)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Octave J. Orgeron
Solaris Virtualization Architect and Consultant
Web:
It's pretty hard to care about a company that craps all over it's development
community. About all I expect these days is that they'll do more to make me
recommend other choices in the enterprise than their products. But hey, that's
just business right?
New license sleaze just means more
It is not clear if Sun provided enough information to invalidate all the
patents that ZFS was threatened with. PJ @ Groklaw does not appear to have
updated the status of the ZFS dispute since 2008.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
This would only matter if they were still worth doing development for. It's not
a wise investment of time at this point, and probably never will be again. This
matters to dimwit suit wearing fracktards, but to everyone else it's pretty
irrelevant in the bigger picture.
--
This message posted
I use ATI4850 with OpenSolaris. It works. But no 3D. Only 2D.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/10/2010 6:11 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
It appears this is the license Solaris 11 Express wil be under and it's
solaris 10 new license, an OTN lincese.
On Sep 11, 2010, at 6:59 AM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
They make it sound like they feel threatened by OpenSource software, the GPL
in particular. While I have no love for the GPL, I've never thought that any
OSS license would create the need for language like that.
It's probably much less
Given the new license details for what will be Oracle Solaris 11
Express, it appears I won't be upgrading my snv_134 osol to Sol11
express (since I'm not a developer), and so am looking forward to
details about OpenIndiana.
I have one question at the moment: Will there be ext3 and/or ext4
Bug 7467 is still active in snv_134. Do I need to report this to 'OpenSolaris
or Oracle M Even More Unbelievably Unbreakable than Linux Solaris 11?
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7467
Who do we report bugs to!!!??
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 11 Sep 2010, at 18:59, Paul Harper wrote:
Bug 7467 is still active in snv_134. Do I need to report this to 'OpenSolaris
or Oracle M Even More Unbelievably Unbreakable than Linux Solaris 11?
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=7467
Who do we report bugs to!!!??
You're
Alternatively on Tuesday you can try
OpenIndiana b147 to see if that resolves the
issue
_
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
There is one bug still affecting opensolaris b134. i filed this to bugzilla
but it
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Cia Watson wrote:
I have one question at the moment: Will there be ext3 and/or ext4 support? I
have a shared data partition in ext3 that I would need to be able to mount
periodically.
There is already a read only filesystem package that allows mounting of NTFS,
This is interesting. b147 you say? Cool!
It is not based on illumos. When will it be based on illumos?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/10/2010 6:11 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
It appears this is the license Solaris 11 Express
wil be under and it's
solaris 10 new license, an OTN lincese.
http://c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6891-Licensing-Change-for
To give you an idea of how self destructive this is, I am now moving all of my
operations to ubuntu (not my opensolaris desktop/file server though!). Today I
was able to get my sunrays running on 9.10 and tomorrow I will move them up to
10.04. I can buy licenses for my sunrays for 100 dollars
Will it be compatible with the newest sunray software (srss 5 (4.2))?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 12 Sep 2010, at 01:42, Daniel Kjar wrote:
Will it be compatible with the newest sunray software (srss 5 (4.2))?
If SunRay Software runs on OpenSolaris b134 then theres a fairly good chance it
will run on OpenIndiana. It's something we would be very keen to ensure works
on our /stable
Excellent. I am glad to hear you think that may be valuable.
Sadly though srss 4.2 does not work (easily, or even moderately easily with
b134). Not saying somebody couldn't figure out why and create simple scripts
to make it work though!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
+--
| On 2010-09-11 17:37:52, Daniel Kjar wrote:
|
| I am a professor and all of my work is non-commercial and I require no
support besides security updates. I would pay for those just as I pay for them
with my
On 09/11/2010 07:54 PM, Gary Driggs wrote:
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Cia Watson wrote:
I have one question at the moment: Will there be ext3 and/or ext4 support? I
have a shared data partition in ext3 that I would need to be able to mount
periodically.
There is already a read only
Hi,
I really think people like you are reading too much into the license and over
reacting. So Oracle is going to give Solaris, Solaris Express, etc away for
free
for non-Production use. They say things like it's free for development,
testing,
etc. Why is this not flexible enough? Hell, just
Edward Martinez wrote:
i filed this to bugzilla but it did not really got fix,
Reporting kernel/driver bugs to bugzilla was always a waste of time,
since the kernel/driver engineers wouldn't see them until someone
copied to the bugster bug database behind bugs.opensolaris.org.
bugzilla is
24 matches
Mail list logo
