On Thu 11/15/07 at 23:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that does not work, just tell MathLab that you are going to go to
Mathematica :-)
It's not so much me but rather my users (I'm talking about a
research university here)
They already have years of built up Matlab programs and
I think this is a bit nuts, but if you really want to go down that path...
You might want to look at Xen. The hypervisor has been ported to IA64 and
Solaris has been ported to the hypervisor. There would still be a huge
amount of work to do, but running Xen instead of bare metal might make the
On Thu 11/01/07 at 15:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While developing a proposal now is a positive thing to do, I suggest
waiting until closer to when we actually need a decision (which would
be the middle of next year) before we try to crystalise a veto like
that. We may find our
On Fri 07/20/07 at 15:38 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I know that /usr directory is mounted as read-only in default in a sparse
root zone.
Is there no way to give specific users write privileges to /usr in a
sparse root zone either using Solaris's role privileges or using sudo?
On Fri 07/20/07 at 10:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But is there a way to install zone with its own /usr that is not taken
from globalzone right?
Sure. That's a whole root zone.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-1592/6mhahuoor?l=ena=view
On Tue 05/15/07 at 17:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My larger point: There's a big difference between ABI breakage (something
Linux does regularly, and you're absolutely right to criticize it for
doing that--but that's OPPORTUNITY) and tweaking the default output of a
utility that may be
On Sat 04/14/07 at 19:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, gns wrote:
Posting - Allow for members only
Non-member postings - Should either get rejected or should go into a
message queue and await the moderator's approval
Are the spams inspite of the above !?
Very
On Tue 10/03/06 at 02:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When you say that there is procedure to compile NON DEBUG. Does it mean
that the distribution of Solaris Express Comunity Edition is DEBUG
version? And likewise, the Solaris Express from SUN website is DEBUG
version too?
How slow
On Thu 09/28/06 at 10:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicolas Linkert wrote:
The question is: What can SUN do to put things straight? Because it
desperately needs to get things straight. In terms of OSS not SUN is the
authority, butr the FSF is. If that authority advises you not to use the
On Tue 09/26/06 at 22:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is fairly damning I think :
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
Clearly it dictates :
Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL)
This is a free software license which is not a
On Wed 09/27/06 at 15:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given how much time and effort the FSF spends bitching about other licenses
being incompatible with GPL, isn't it obvious that the GPL is buggy?
Instead of modifying all the other Open Source licenses to work around the
GPL's bugs,
On Wed 09/27/06 at 16:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nils Nieuwejaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed 09/27/06 at 15:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given how much time and effort the FSF spends bitching about other
licenses
being incompatible with GPL, isn't it obvious
As of about 2AM (EDT) last night, BrandZ is in the mainline Solaris tree.
Barring any hideously embarrassing disasters, it will be available in the
snv_49 release.
Thanks to everybody who has used and tested BrandZ as a pre-integration
project, and for all the feedback you've sent in the past 10
On Mon 08/07/06 at 17:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 August 2006 03:47 pm, Christof Pintaske wrote:
CDDL is an OSI approved open source license
(http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.php). What other criteria are
there to make an open source license a good open source
Greetings,
It's been quite a while, but a new BrandZ build is now available. This
build brings us into sync with nv43, fixes more than the usual number of
bugs, and introduces our new installer.
The new installer will continue to support tarballs, but we can finally
install Linux zones directly
On Tue 06/13/06 at 23:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried it in BrandZ?
Adam
Why? Do you think BrandZ is going to have a serious supported roadmap
into Solaris?
Are you asking if BrandZ is going to be integrated into Solaris? If so,
the answer is yes. If that's not
Yes, and it works. I don't have native OpenGL drivers on my desktop
machine, so the performance is pretty terrible. I'll have to find a
machine with an Nvidia card and see how it performs then.
On Mon 06/12/06 at 17:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone tried it in BrandZ?
Adam
On
On Tue 06/13/06 at 13:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My suggestion would be to use mozilla, or get a copy of an IRC
client appropriate for your platform-- the better IRC clients
can use an HTTP proxy to help you get out.
Xchat can do this. It runs under Solaris or (ObPlug) BrandZ.
Nils
On Wed 06/07/06 at 14:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Ingenthron wrote:
Sara Dornsife wrote:
How about Turn up your environment with AMPS?
Seems to fly in the face of that whole green computing/low power thing
the hardware guys have going on. :) But it's catchy...
AMPS: This one
On Thu 06/01/06 at 09:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solaris is a better Linux than Linux ?Marc Andreessen
You know what...that ticked me off. I love Sun but such viral marketing
campaigns?
Anyways, here is a response on that topic
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/55094/index.html
The BrandZ DVD is not part of the standard Solaris release flow. There are
no patches issued for it, and patches issued for Solaris should not be
applied to it. BrandZ will be integrated into Nevada within the next few
months, and will become a part of the standard Solaris release cycle.
Having
On Mon 05/22/06 at 12:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does rather beg the question of what expectations we're building from
a customer point of view with the update releases - clearly they're not
just bug fixes anymore. And with the possibility, as Glenn mentioned, of
Solaris 11 not
On Fri 05/12/06 at 13:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 03:32:43PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Also, I'm getting tired of replying to some e-mail only to get a post
awaits moderator approval reply.
I understand why we do that for non-subscribers.
And I guess
On Thu 04/13/06 at 09:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are a couple of requests I need to get more specific
instructions on. Specifically, unassociated mailing lists are
expensive for support (because we hadn't intended to support any
other than the top-level ones from the
On Sat 04/01/06 at 17:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By relaxing the limit to 132 characters you are *forcing* everybody to
switch to 132 wide xterms.
You are wrong.
1. Many of those tools support horizontal scrolling and continuation.
2. I did not say to
On Thu 03/16/06 at 17:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Things were setup that way before projects existed and everything had to be
a community. The Nevada community (which is misnamed to begin with),
should
become a ONNV project of an ON community which could also host your
internals
We would like to propose a solaris-internals community. The initial
leaders would be Jonathan Chew, Eric Lowe, Eric Saxe, and me. We hope to
expand this list quickly, with engineers from inside of Sun and from the
community.
There are quite a few communities dedicated to specific parts of
On Thu 03/16/06 at 11:12 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nils Nieuwejaar wrote:
The solaris-internals community would host one or more discussion groups.
Initially there would just be a single group: solaris-internals. If the
traffic warranted, we could create more specific discussions within
On Wed 03/01/06 at 11:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Rushmore wrote:
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 14:02 -0500, Laura Ramsey wrote:
Just this week, Linux Format magazine has asked to bundle DVDs of
either an OpenSolaris build or an OpenSolaris Distribution for a
promotion with their upcoming
On Tue 02/28/06 at 10:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, I should be able to deliver it today. Though, while you're all
waiting eagerly in anticipation, might I suggest reading this:
http://whacked.net/2006/02/28/when-a-nightly-that-closes-on-a-build-date-isnt-a-build/
to explain why a
On Tue 02/28/06 at 11:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alternatively, we could base our releases on the OpenSolaris source tree
rather than on the final snapshot tree. To make that work, we would just
need you to give us a pointer to the full teamware workspace you base your
release on. If
On Mon 02/13/06 at 07:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
J?rgen Keil wrote:
Btw. what happened to the A. Changes since MMDD part of
the releasenotes file? In previous opensolaris source releases it
contained a hint on the corresponding Solaris Nevada build, for
the source drop. Like this:
On Mon 02/13/06 at 08:43 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Nils,
We do intend to still keep delivering builds synchronised with
build-close dates. I just felt that we could increase the frequency of
deliveries from every 2 weeks to every week.
Sounds good. Right now you have to do a
Will the presentation be available on line for those of us who can't be
there? I'm sure there will be a lot of interest in this.
Yes. I'll put the slides up on the BrandZ community site.
Oh, did I mention? We just went live about 15 minutes ago. Please
visit us here:
Welcome to the BrandZ Community!
Today we are opening the Branded Zones (BrandZ) community and starting to
move the BrandZ development to opensolaris.org. You can find the community
at:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/brandz
There is a new brandz-discuss forum available at:
- a verification that the proposed community's leads and the Zones
community leads were not able to share the Zones community with the
union of those sets of leads, and
While it would be possible for BrandZ and Zones to share a single community,
the amount of overlap would likely be fairly
On Mon 12/05/05 at 14:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Al and Nils. Now that some consensus has been reached, the
BrandZ community will be created. Community leads can make the
decision to make the community visible when their content is ready.
monty_burns Excellent.
Hi There. What about a new forum regardig the Redhat linux binary execution
in solaris zone feature, which are realeased very soon according to Sun ?
The community will be coming very soon. The timeout on the naming proposal
expired over the weekend, so hopefully we'll have a 'brandz'
is there a solaris containers for linux apps (SCLA?) thread/forum/whatever
here somewhere?
Not yet, but the timeout on the naming proposal expired over the weekend, so
hopefully there will be a community within a few days.
You can find the naming discussion archived on opensolaris.org:
It appears that BrandX as a name is not going to fly as somebody already
has that name trademarked. We have an alternative name in mind, and
I'm told the lawyers are doing their lawyerly stuff with it now.
We have gotten all the sign-offs we need to go with the new name: BrandZ.
This is
I think it makes sense to create this as a top-level community now, and
then to move it into an overall Virtualization meta-community (or whatever)
along with Zones and Xen if/when that capability exists.
It appears that BrandX as a name is not going to fly as somebody already
has that name
On Mon 11/07/05 at 21:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon 07 Nov 2005 at 11:57AM, Adam Leventhal wrote:
Dan,
I think the type of discussion and interest around BrandX is likely to
be orthogonal to that of Zones. Without completely spoiling the
surprise, BrandX hopes to publish
to support Tim's request for a community to discuss the creation
and support of non-Solaris zones. Since the framework to support this will be
called BrandX, I suggest that the community also be called BrandX.
Nils Nieuwejaar, Solaris Kernel Development
This message posted from opensolaris.org
43 matches
Mail list logo
