Rosie,
Not really an 'OpenSolaris/Solaris' question. Also, you may want to consolidate
down to an Oracle/Solaris 10 architecture - removing MySql /SyBase overhead
maintenance.
~ Ken
--- On Mon, 3/15/10, Bayard Bell wrote:
From: Bayard Bell
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] job interview help
--- On Wed, 3/3/10, Danek Duvall wrote:
From: Danek Duvall
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [pkg-discuss] OSOL 2010.3 vs. dev repository
To: "Alan Coopersmith"
Cc: "Gary Gendel" , opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org,
"pkg discuss"
Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 12:04 PM
Alan Coopersmith wrot
nd server VAS distributions. Some of these ISVs are using the OpenSolaris
kernel for their primary business technology model. Oracle would only do damage
by removing something depended on 'so much' by many of these small businesses
and organizations - as well as legacy customers wantin
So removing SXCE just removes a lot of historical parts that Sun wants to
change into the more modern infrastructure. Will everyone be happy and like it?
Well, do all kids like anchovies?
This is probably like the time when people had to cross the Red Sea. Either
you wait and stay
--- On Wed, 12/23/09, Masafumi Ohta wrote:
> Ken,
>
> Can I find the patch and some stuff for building
> Secondlife(Snowglobe) in your Blastwave?
> And Can I try to use the package (you build)? if so,could
> you please tell me how to download or more information?
> I tried to find the package or
Masafumi,
You'll need the Solaris related patches for SnowGlobe/Second Life clients and
SCons build system (I've added the scons package for Blastwave).
I was working on it awhile ago so I've updated some of the Blastwave packages
accordingly. You can also use what is available in IPS for
OS200
latest viewer on
> Solaris(OpenSolaris)
> To: "ken mays"
> Cc: "OpenSolarisDiscuss" ,
> indiana-disc...@opensolaris.org
> Date: Sunday, December 20, 2009, 4:53 AM
> Hi Ken,
>
> Thanks information :) sorry replying late.
>
> On 2009/11/25, at 0:4
to check to see
if star needs tweaking to properly implemented into the Core OS environment (if
approved) and go through the review/voting cycle for /contrib insertion.
Or, whatever Sun thinks is the right process moving forward.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ref: http://jucr.opensolaris.org/files/3117/7545/specs/star.spec
Well, congrats on getting it into the SourceJuicer system and I think it is
passing.
Do we want star v1.5.1 version to review as the final spec??
~Ken
--- On Thu, 12/17/09, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> From: Joerg Schilling
> S
--- On Thu, 12/17/09, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
>
> > > I see absolutely no need for GNU tar. What
> features are
> > > unique to GNU tar that
> > > "require" GNU tar?
> >
> > Well GNU tar is just a tool so 'requirements' and a
> tool based on those requirements is not so much in equality.
> Mos
--- On Thu, 12/17/09, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> From: Joerg Schilling
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] star [was: Some Why?-Questions]
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org, maybird1...@yahoo.com
> Date: Thursday, December 17, 2009, 6:28 AM
> ken mays
> wrote:
>
>
self.
>
The issue is availability from the source - not Sun. Your star package should
come
by way of inclusion into the package repository. Have Star (i.e. star v1.5.1)
added
in as a RFE and package it for inclusion into pkg.opensolaris.org
velopes in providing a "hip" and "current"
operating systems on both the server and desktop client.
We are still a week away from OSOL SNV_130. So time to jot down the notes on
what we'd like to see and improvements Sun needs to make before they &#
Here you go. These docs should tell you ALMOST everything you want to know
about IPS-style packaging versus the SVR4 packaging method. You can also
do direct SVR4 publishing to an IPS repo.
http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenSolarisInfo200906/Deploying+Your+Application
~ Ken Mays
--- On Sat, 12
we have SVR4 packaging support and options of various shells. People chose
whether to use hammers versus nail guns - so you pick what suits you.
Hopefully, these questions will only make the final product release much better
due to user comments like the ones provided in this email thread.
Ken Mays
Atlanta, GA
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hen
things go wrong on an important business presentation.
Hope that helps,
~ Ken Mays
--- On Fri, 12/11/09, Moises Castellanos wrote:
> From: Moises Castellanos
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Migration from windows to Linux
> To: "Nibal"
> Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.
Nvidia 190.42 driver. I'm
expecting this IPS update will come out right before the Xmas holiday.
The Xorg 7.5/Xserver 1.7.3 update will come after that AFAIK.
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
ive
2. SnowGlobe 1.2.4 and Second Life Viewer 1.23.5
3. SnowGlobe is the new community viewer.
Enjoy,
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
--- On Sun, 11/22/09, Masafumi Ohta wrote:
> From: Masafumi Ohta
> Subject: [osol-discuss] about Secondlife latest viewer on Solaris(OpenSolaris)
> To: "
a cookbook
requirement for file servers and hardware compatibility.
(http://eonstorage.blogspot.com)
So, you have options. ;o)
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
lidations.
Especially, existing SPARC workstation/server customers owning legacy 'PCI' 3D
workstation graphics cards like the Sun XVR-500/XVR-600/XVR-1200 in which
buying the Sun XVR-2500 PCI-E graphics card is not an option.
Anyhow, we'll always have Paris...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Martin,
Well, ok. Things are starting to unfold now with
more code and posts being made by Sun.
I'll just wait till OSOL 2010.02 is released. (grin)
~ Ken Mays
--- On Fri, 11/13/09, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> From: Martin Bochnig
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [xwin-discuss] Sun
r those interested in helping out. Hope this was just enough for
a bit of 'alien mindbending' by interested parties.
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
Atlanta, GA
- >11/12/09, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> From: Martin Bochnig
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [xwin-discuss] Sun UltraSparc: XVR
don't need the full XSun, CDE, OpenWin consolidations on SPARC for
the future redistributable OS. Let sleeping dogs lie. You can still
use SXCE until then or Solaris 10 for whatever legacy apps you may be using on
those SPARC stations.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ftp://download.nvidia.com/solaris/190.42/README/README.txt
The new Nvidia 190.42 driver works very well with my Nvidia GPU-based laptop
and FlightGear v1.9.1 on OSOL 2010.02_snv_126.
No major problems yet. Good job!!
~ Ken Mays
them. Ask Alan C. what is possible before they
finalize the freeze of snv_129/130 or OS2010.02.
Stay away from the Intel 2.8.x device drivers. Period.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Studio 12 version you are using...
Since SXCE_b126 is built and there are spinned builds of snv_127, I'd think
Sun has a build environment that is working.
Oddly, I wonder why "Sun Studio 12 Update 1" isn't certified to build snv_127 -
or has that changed as well in a recent patch?
Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
t parts.
>
> count me in along with everyone interested.
>
> p,s. it is all of us's spare time.
>
> thank you!!
>
>
> %mab
>
>
> >
> > --
> > -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com
> > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System
> Engineering
+1. I think we needed the Xwin->Xorg wrappers or conversion utilities
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
n help you with old XVR cards up to the XVR-2500. I've used most of
these graphic cards or maintained them...
Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
XVR cards posted (see:
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/downloads/sparc_graphics)and they are still
included in SXCE and Solaris 10u8. Driver engineering resources for the older
MAJC, 3Dlabs, and ATI-based cards may be very limited or defunct by now.
Get one of the latest SXCE releases and stick with So
in 2D resolutions up to 1920x1080.
OSOL-snv_126 does not have official 2D driver support for those specific cards
yet. I'm hoping this will be implemented by OSOL-snv_129 but this
is based on announcements from the Xorg RadeonHD team.
Ken Mays
Bla
info is a little outdated and may need an improved
support section for Solaris 10/OpenSolaris users.
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
--- On Sun, 10/25/09, ken mays wrote:
> From: ken mays
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] No sound in Firefox/Flash, GNOME and other apps
> work (snv_118)
> T
Lenz,
It is a bug in the flash 10 plug-in.
Ken Mays
Blastwave.org
--- On Sun, 10/25/09, Lenz Grimmer wrote:
> From: Lenz Grimmer
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] No sound in Firefox/Flash, GNOME and other apps
> work (snv_118)
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date:
Hugh,
Review the GigaByte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P and Asus M4A78T-E.
Enjoy,
Ken Mays
--- On Sat, 10/24/09, Hugh McIntyre wrote:
> From: Hugh McIntyre
> Subject: [osol-discuss] AMD based motherboard recommendations?
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Saturday, October 24
ek wants a hand held device with 16GB of ECC memory and a
> 64bit CMT
> processor that also includes mirrored SSD storage. All
> about the size of
> an iPhone but at lower cost than say, a Porsche.
>
> --
> Dennis
Hi Dennis,
There are the "64-bit" VIA Nano and Intel Atoms like the Intel Atom 330 you may
have overlooked. Also, modern PowerPC chips are 64-bit.
You can pop in that 16GB RAM and explore strange new worlds...today...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
can read the information from the hardware in most cases I use to
test on the Intel and Asus motherboards. As said elsewhere, BIOS updates
can be very helpful.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Wed, 9/23/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
> From: Ignacio Marambio Catán
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SNV_124: Worth the Wait!!!
> To: "ken mays"
> Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Wednesday, September 23, 2009, 10:36 PM
> why is that?
>
Hello,
For our OpenSolaris distributors, this release may be worth the wait. I think
we are in for a big suprise...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
isk in connected and at least be able to use the 1TB.
>
>
> Is there a way to achieve this?
>
> Thanks a lot for your support,
> Vassilis
Yes, but it requires a bit of work as the underlying tools have to conform as
well. Some of us are using 2TB externa
ity.
In the "Community" we are calling the new Oracle/Sun OS "Solaris 11" although
there is no offically 'sworn-in' OS binary release or distribution named as the
"Solaris 11" operating system yet.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
working on solutions
using OpenSolaris for desktop environments, application development, and FOSS
porting efforts.
Dresden is a great historical city in Eastern Germany (i.e. just Germany now).
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
efficient in what it does with huge datasets. Wouldn't want a snow leopard to
perform like a snow turtle...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
server to run the radeon(hd) driver for 2D graphics. You can usually use the
VESA driver to get you to the main screen overwise.
You can't get 3D HW acceleration yet on the newer ATI cards under Solaris, but
if you need this then I suggest the Nvidia GeForce 8400 G
hopefully this announcement will put a 'nail in the coffin' on Python 2.6.x
issues on OpenSolaris and Solaris.
Onward to Python 3.1
~ Ken Mays
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection arou
th their core ISP
services to make sure it will handle them. If a major app, then you'd probably
want certification or assurance from the vendor that it will work (or you just
get your admins/engineers to validate it). So, it
is really up to the customer to do a bit of &quo
ckaging may be different. Sun may want one main production
kernel to "rule them all" instead of the various Solaris kernels it maintains
today (i.e. and maybe a next gen kernel).
This will help the current ON kernel get more widely used in the data
centers/embedded devices and surpass the
added software with yearly support.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
a) to update
SUNWPython26 to v2.6.2 with the official Python.org/Sun patches in place for
OpenSolaris-based platforms (and maybe have the Python team use OpenSolaris
2009.06 as a supported test platform).
Sounds good?
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Tue, 7/14/09, Dave Lin wrote:
> From: Dave Lin
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Upgrade OSOL2010.02-beta to GNOME 2.26.3
> To: "Jerry Tan" , "ken mays"
> Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 3:57 AM
> Dave Lin wrot
ics of this was under Bug 9444:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=9444
to update binutils, GMP, and MPFR to improve GCC/GCCfss 4.4.x builds.
Bug reports were made to be more specific in those GCC-related libs and
utilities in being updated but they were consolidated to related project
his is where you get to see the
difference in how a server performs when you are running a web app versus a
database app requiring computational performance.
The SPARC64-VIIIfx addresses the needs from the multi-core computational side
while the UltraSPARC-T2+/KT addresses a balance of multi-core computational and
highly-scalable multi-threading needs.
The question is now if Sun's 'engines' will compete well with the
high-computational engine products like the Itanium-2 or IBM Cell/POWER 7??
Can these new CPUs provide around 800-1,000 double-precision petaFlops in a
'general purpose' or 'specialized' environment and have highly scalable
threading capabilities??? Hmm
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
rely as little as possible
> upon Blastwave.
No worries. Both VLC 1.x and MPlayer 1.0rc2 are being maintained so
you'll have them through various resources on Solaris/OpenSolaris.
The issue with Blastwave IPS is just a minor fix that needs the repo
resynced to the latest snapshots.
~
lated "the Rock" naming.
Maybe we should call it the "T3++" ?? Seriously, I think Sun
could dominate the arena with the new UltraSPARC-KT (a 16 core x 16 thread
wilderbeast >= four UltraSPARC T2+ CMTs).
Guess a name like "CometCrusher" would be too glamourish?
w deals with the crossroad of using the ATI open source driver
versus focusing on the ATI fglrx driver. The closed source drivers dropped
support for anything below the ATI Radeon HD 2xxx cards a few years ago. The
ATI open source driver is not ready for full 3D programming
t driver project.
I expect this to change by Nov 2009 - but the workaround is to use Nvidia-based
cards for any 3D rendering/OpenGL work for now. You can get decent Nvidia
Quadro FX and GeForce FX 8xxx-based cards for about $35-50 USD.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
wait till November 2009 for a GNOME 2.81.1 build,
why not request an update to GNOME 2.26.3 for OSOL2010.02-b119???
This gives us the whole summer to ponder over the latest stable release
of GNOME 2.26.
Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
updated to more recent versions.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> From: Moinak Ghosh
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] GCC 4.4: Can we handle it?!?
> To: "ken mays"
> Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 11:18 AM
> I have already started using Gcc 4.4.0
--- On Fri, 6/12/09, George Vasick wrote:
> From: George Vasick
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] GCC 4.4: Can we handle it?!?
> To: "Alan Coopersmith"
> Cc: "ken mays" , opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 5:21 PM
> Alan
--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Milan Jurik wrote:
> From: Milan Jurik
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] GCC 4.4: Can we handle it?!?
> To: "ken mays"
> Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 10:36 AM
> Hi Ken,
>
> V čt, 11. 06. 2009
C 4.4.0.
That's it in a nutshell! Time and resource issues withstanding.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
price of admission for users/developers to enter the gates of GCC
4.4.x ??
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
moment. A few quirks, but workarounds come in handy.
You don't need Sun Studio 12 if you have a OS capable of installing the
Express edition successfully. Just make sure you are consistent in compiling
your C++ code with the same compiler (
g. Submit the report to Sun for review and open a bug
report on related issues (i.e. not already reported elsewhere).
You can let them know if this doesn't work for you.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. I'd consider a decision to end such a 'project' very
unwise...
Two pennies for the slot machine...
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
n.php?page=article&item=opensolaris_200906&num=1
Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
HD.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
Seems like if you run into issues running a certain application with OS 2009.06
(i.e. using Nvidia driver 180.44), Nvidia has proved an updated 180.60 driver
at:
ftp://download.nvidia.com/solaris/180.60/NVIDIA-Solaris-x86-180.60.run
Ken Mays
ing in /etc/driver_aliases.
I'm usually certifying OpenSolaris on various hardware in which I'll
help pull together the drivers and info for the Nvidia nForce 790i Ultra SLI
motherboard and legacy Nvidia MCPs.
SXCE b116 and OS 2009.06-b111b were our test targets to start our updated
ev
ta from genunix.org (i.e. OS2009.06-b111a) if you
just want to check it out for now.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Nvidia Quadro graphic cards
and advanced UNIX-based technology for ISP applications.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
as well as
continued help desk support on Solaris x64 AMD/Intel and UltraSPARC platforms.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
through economic recessions, this might be all you need to do to
turn the tide...
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
t;
> --
> Regards,
> Cyril
Check back around Fri, 10 Apr 2009. People are still hacking away at snv_112
consolidations and internally testing/reviewing SXCE b111.
Actually, you'll want to skip SXCE b111 and wait till the o
hes and virus protections
So far, Windows is the only operating system known to be vulnerable to
Conficker."
What you do from here is up to you.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
s more of a money and resource issue for the
team - not a technological one.
The hardware that the distro was originally based on is now defunct, but
new PPC hardware is available through other companies.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
other IPS servers like Belenix and
Sunfreeware, as well as the newer distros.
~ Ken Mays
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
3 packages
pkg.opensolaris.org (b109 dev, 2009-03-06): 30,719 packages
Nexenta 2.0.2b2 (apt-get): 13,000 packages (Ubuntu 8.04-Hardy based, x86-only)
Blastwave.org: 2,118 packages (for either SPARC/x86 platforms)
~ Ken Mays (Atlanta, GA)
--
This message posted from opens
well. ;o)
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
lobal-x86.iso
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the apps they used were 'out-of-the-box' with no tweaking
on their (i.e. Phoronix) part. Whatever was on the CD is what they used.
A few of the 'optimized libraries and apps' are over at Blastwave.org
so we can easily retest the benchmarks to see if GCC optimizations were the
case.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
using Mac OS X 10.5.6 and OS
2008.11-b107, and Ubuntu 8.10_64 on the same hardware. We can even toss in a
benchmark for the optimized application binaries for OS 2008.11. Let us see if
the 'optimization theory' really was the problem versus the 'out-of-the-box'
debate... :o)
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. You may look at
the test and go "it was GCC that caused the failure" but this is not true.
The concern is why so slow 'here and here' and how do we fix it?
~ Ken Mays
--- On Mon, 2/16/09, Tomasz Kloczko wrote:
> From: Tomasz Kloczko
> Subject: [osol-discuss] Pho
nds to Solaris 8
a few years ago. I can say that the GNU commands have worked
for what we needed back then so would be a good starting point where
legacy Solaris core commands didn't suffice (due to updates or compatibility
issues).
Ken Mays
Atlanta, GA
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--- On Thu, 1/1/09, Roland Mainz wrote:
> From: Roland Mainz
> Subject: [osol-discuss] Memory requirements of Solaris/OpenSolaris... / was:
> Re: [tools-discuss] Project Proposal -- Port to MIPSarchitecture
> To: "Mark Martin"
> Cc: emancipation-disc...@opensolaris.org, "Open Solaris"
> , too
X & SSE
> acceleration, that is something we can improve for x86.
>
> Ginn
>
> >
> >
> > - Virtually any graphics card on a PC of today is
> several
> > generations newer
> > than any SPARC graphics
Look at the Hauppauge WinTV-Nova PCI/PCIe cards.
~ Ken
--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Q: DVB support ?
> To: "John Weekley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "homerun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, opensola
.2 (b99)
6. MartUX Natamar 0.4 (b96, IceWM 1.2.35, SPARC)
7. SchilliX 0.6.7 (b92)
8. NexentaCore 1.0.1/2.0a1 (b85+)
9. NexentaStor 1.0.9 (b85+)
Note:
Current ON consolidation release: snv_b100, 08-Oct-2008
Current stable GNOME release: 2.24.0, 24-Sept-2008
Current stable KDE release: 4.1.2, 25-Sept-2
Darn, I think it is more than enough...
1. 32-bit kernel = 32 cores
2. 64-bit kernel = 256 cores / 16 Exabytes
--- On Fri, 10/10/08, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Max number of CPUs and memory in OpenSolaris
> To
I mentioned that Milak 0.3.2 runs on a lot of older hardware with 256 MB or
more, and Solaris 10 covers most legacy computers. OpenSolaris 2008.11-b98 and
above for everything else.
Ken Mays
--- On Sat, 10/4/08, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Richard L.
. Milax 0.3.2 (b95, JWM 2.0.1)
8. Martux Natamar 0.4 (b96, IceWM 1.2.35)
Note:
Current ON Build release: snv_b99, 25-Sept-2008
Current stable GNOME release: 2.24.0, 24-Sept-2008
Current stable KDE release: 4.1.2, 25-Sept-2008
~ Ken Mays (Atlanta, GA)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Latest features of GNOME 2.24.0:
http://library.gnome.org/misc/release-notes/2.24
"Powered by the GStreamer multimedia framework, GNOME 2.22 introduced digital
television (DVB) capabilities into its Movie Player. Determined to make things
even better, developers have worked to enhance this suppo
sentations.
Just tossing a bone out there for all those user groups...
Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ploy:
1. KDE 4.1
2. GNOME 2.22.3
3. XFCE 4.4.2
Sun X.org
--
1. X Consolidation 96 (Xorg 7.2-based)
Xorg-compatible Video Drivers
1. Intel 2.4.1
2. Nvidia 173.14.12
3. XVR-100/300/2500 (SPARC)
~ Ken Mays
This message posted from opensolaris
www.sun.com/download/index.jsp?intcmp=hp2008aug19_students_download
SXCE may be around for another few months, but once the new OpenSolaris distro
gets off the ground... you might as well expect a new enterprise release of
Solaris (or whatever they call it).
~ Ken Mays
--- On Tue, 8/19/08, W.
om the help of Blastwave.org maintainers and the work being done
from Blastwave.org.
So I only hope we will just say THANK YOU to Dennis and the maintainer team at
Blastwave.org for the many years of supporting open source packaging and
sup
I've updated Blastwave's CSW tree to GNOME 2.22 which will allow developers and
students to develop and port all current GNOME-based applications to Sun
Solaris and any OpenSolaris-based distribution.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolar
there.
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
to deploy:
1. KDE 4.1
2. GNOME 2.22.2
3. XFCE 4.4.2
~ Ken Mays
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
TI 6.8.0 driver, just that it is
an 'unknown' card since I haven't added the patch to let it properly ID the
card - yet I can modify all my display resolutions properly and it works FINE.
I'll submit this over to Sun's HCL...
~ Ken Mays
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
(b89)
8. Martux 0.2 (b37)
Superceded:
1. SXDE 01/08 (b79) - replaced by OpenSolaris 2008.05 binary distro
Standard C/C++ compilers:
1. Sun Studio 11/12
2. GCC 3.4.3 / 4.3.1
3. GCCfss 4.2.3
* Note: OpenSolaris 2008.05 and SXCE will receive updates to ON b93 very soon.
~ Ken Mays
101 - 200 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
