Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Plocher wrote:
Putting /usr/gnu at the head of PATH causes incompatibilities
Failure to put /usr/gnu at the head of PATH will cause
I'm not at all sure that this change would actually affect me - or most
of y'all either.
John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Putting /usr/gnu at the head of PATH causes incompatibilities
Failure to put /usr/gnu at the head of PATH will cause
I'm not at all sure that this change would actually affect me - or most
of y'all either.
Since our target growth market for
Sarah Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There simply wasn't time. And, since this is a prototype we felt that
the way we did this was ok. In actuality though, some of Indiana has
been ARC'd. The installer pieces were ARC'd as part of Dwarf Caiman(SXDE).
Oh, a couple of other things
On Tue, 2007-11-06 at 13:58 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, I tried to configure a recent mplayer its configure has now
deteriorated to requiring GNU grep (grep -q, what does that mean?)
grep -q is accepted by /usr/xpg4/bin/grep. According to the precedent
set by PSARC 2005/683, it's a
As I've mentioned numerous times before, it's not the particular
implementation users are after, it's functionality.
users don't want gnu tar per se, they want tar -z... or tar -j. We can
have a standards compliant tar with the -z or -j options, and I'm sure
ARC won't complain too much.
Putting /usr/gnu at the head of PATH causes incompatibilities
Failure to put /usr/gnu at the head of PATH will cause
I'm not at all sure that this change would actually affect me - or most
of y'all either.
Since our target growth market for OpenSolaris is users of linux systems
where gnutools
John Plocher wrote:
Putting /usr/gnu at the head of PATH causes incompatibilities
Failure to put /usr/gnu at the head of PATH will cause
I'm not at all sure that this change would actually affect me - or most
of y'all either.
I think there is something being missed
Shawn Walker wrote:
Tell that to whoever violated ARC by putting /usr/gnu at the head of
$PATH in the indiana preview ;)
No violation of ARC occurred. ARC is not a required process until
consolidations are integrated, etc.
On the other extreme, it would be extremely stupid^H^H^H^H^H^H
On 05/11/2007, John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Tell that to whoever violated ARC by putting /usr/gnu at the head of
$PATH in the indiana preview ;)
No violation of ARC occurred. ARC is not a required process until
consolidations are integrated, etc.
On the
John Plocher wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Tell that to whoever violated ARC by putting /usr/gnu at the head of
$PATH in the indiana preview ;)
No violation of ARC occurred. ARC is not a required process until
consolidations are integrated, etc.
On the other extreme, it
hasn't been completed, but that they many of them haven't even been started!
There simply wasn't time. And, since this is a prototype we felt that
the way we did this was ok. In actuality though, some of Indiana has
been ARC'd. The installer pieces were ARC'd as part of Dwarf
11 matches
Mail list logo
