On 05/11/2007, John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shawn Walker wrote: > >> Tell that to whoever violated ARC by putting /usr/gnu at the head of > >> $PATH in the indiana preview ;) > > > > No violation of ARC occurred. ARC is not a required process until > > consolidations are integrated, etc. > > On the other extreme, it would be extremely stupid^H^H^H^H^H^H ineffective > to bundle up all the changes made to Indiana and produce them at the end > of February in one un-reviewablely large "we're done, here is everything > we did" ARC case.... > > There seems to be a bunch of stuff that got started, is being prototyped > and played with, has gotten integrated into a gate somewhere and was > shipped as part of a developer prototype release that still isn't on the > ARC radar. > > That's the point that has a bunch of us concerned - not that the review > hasn't been completed, but that they many of them haven't even been started!
Yes, but I think we all trust them as a group of peers to do the right thing. I have complete faith that the strong engineering and robust review that has always been the mark of Solaris will happen here as well. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
