"Martin Bochnig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, I agree with you. That's what GCC(1) offers the [-std=standard]
> options for (of course Studio has a limited similar functionality,
> which supports less standards unfortunately). However, it is not
> GCC(1)'s fault if many folks tend to write c
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Joerg Schilling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alfred Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>> > I like gcc because it has repeatedly helped me to get things working,
>> > which not only would first need to be ported to Studio, but which in
>> > s
Alfred Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
> > I like gcc because it has repeatedly helped me to get things working,
> > which not only would first need to be ported to Studio, but which in
> > some cases cannot even be ported to Studio at all. Another example is
> > Qemu.
> >
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> I like gcc because it has repeatedly helped me to get things working,
> which not only would first need to be ported to Studio, but which in
> some cases cannot even be ported to Studio at all. Another example is
> Qemu.
>
gcc is the choice for a lot of open source projec
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Alan Coopersmith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ginn Chen wrote:
>> Currently on Solaris, libpixman in system cairo or Firefox doesn't build
>> with MMX & SSE
>> acceleration, that is something we can improve for x86.
>
> Both copies of libpixman (are there really two?
Ginn Chen wrote:
> Currently on Solaris, libpixman in system cairo or Firefox doesn't build
> with MMX & SSE
> acceleration, that is something we can improve for x86.
Both copies of libpixman (are there really two?) should go away soon anyway,
now that the shared libpixman is integrated to X for n
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Ginn Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Ginn Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] FF3 stability and performance
> concerns
> To: "Alan Coopersmith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: opensolari
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Ginn Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 3, 2008, at 11:52 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>>
>>> Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen
commends it for bei
On Nov 3, 2008, at 11:52 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen
>>> commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its
>>> predecessor.
>>>
>>> It's certa
Jason King wrote:
>
> Even worse than that, even on a Ferrari 4000 2ghz w/ 1gb ram, starting
> with around sxce b98, the desktop in general seem to be suffering from
> a critical performance regression, FF3 seems to be the worst in this
> respect. I've seen systems where actual swapping (not pagi
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:30:02 +1300
Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord/
>
> indicates that there's pretty big demand generally for Firefox 3, so
But copies downloaded does not equal copies in use. So that indicates
there's a big demand to che
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 31/10/2008, at 3:58 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>>
>>> But shipping FF3 as default browser undermines efforts like this (in
>>> your own distro
More Firefox Bloat? Say It Ain't So, Mozilla
http://www.wired.com/software/coolapps/news/2007/05/firefox_bloat
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:34 AM, Jason King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Martin Bochnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:30 AM,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:30 AM, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 31/10/2008, at 3:58 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>
>> But shipping FF3 as default browser undermines efforts like this (in
>> your own distros SXCE and Indiana), because on this end you waste 10
>> times the resources that
On 31/10/2008, at 3:58 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> But shipping FF3 as default browser undermines efforts like this (in
> your own distros SXCE and Indiana), because on this end you waste 10
> times the resources that others are trying to save piece for piece (in
> their distros). Why don't you mo
15 matches
Mail list logo
