On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:00:32 -0700
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Ken,
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:15:33 -0600
Jim Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Brian,
Was there a flag day for this? If not, I would think about
Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey,
Brian Nitz wrote:
A few things happened to make crashes more common in recent GNOME builds:
1) The GNOME community enabled coreing on ASSERTs in default builds, so
some subtle bugs became less subtle.
I'm confused. Has something changed recently? or is
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used both Gnome and KDE off and on since 0.x days but ditched both
in favor of Xfce in more recent years. In my opinion Sun (along with
other US corps) bet on the wrong horse with Gnome. I'm looking forward
to
Brian Nitz wrote:
Do you happen to know if any individual desktop components look at their
own version number and attempt to override this setting? For example in
SNV_82:
gtkam --version gives 0.1.14
fc-cache --version gives fontconfig version 2.3.2.
fc-cache fontconfig don't use gtk or
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:46:38 -0500
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used both Gnome and KDE off and on since 0.x days but ditched both
in favor of Xfce in more recent years. In my opinion Sun (along with
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:00:32 -0700
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Ken,
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:15:33 -0600
Jim Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Brian,
Was there
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:46:38 -0500
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've used both Gnome and KDE off and on since 0.x days but ditched
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:07:31 -0700
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:00:32 -0700
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Ken,
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:15:33
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ok, but that's different from what's being talked about in this thread.
FWIW, I use Gnome in Indiana DP2 every day (and have been since DP2
released) and haven't had a Gnome crash yet.
This thread has discussed a few different things - I must be
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:10:24 -0500
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:46:38 -0500
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Ken Gunderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:52:18 -0700
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ok, but that's different from what's being talked about in this thread.
FWIW, I use Gnome in Indiana DP2 every day (and have been since DP2
released) and haven't had a
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:52:18 -0700
Glenn Lagasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ok, but that's different from what's being talked about in this thread.
FWIW, I use Gnome in Indiana DP2 every day (and have
Ken Gunderson wrote:
This thread has discussed a few different things - I must be confused
but I thought current context was Gnome dumping core, at least in some
cases due to ASSERT being enabled for debugging purposes. I'm just
reporting that I have Gnome dumping core on _both_ 79 and 84
Ken Gunderson wrote:
I'm very familiar with it. It's *nice*, but I don't have a reason to
leave Gnome at this point (and if I did, it'd probably be to something
like OpenBox/FluxBox).
OpenBox Rocks! Hint, hint Blastwave ;)
Hint, hint *patch*.
Glynn
1) The GNOME community enabled coreing on ASSERTs in default builds, so
some subtle bugs became less subtle.
Can/Will this be disabled in the JDS builds?
-mg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Mario Goebbels wrote:
1) The GNOME community enabled coreing on ASSERTs in default builds, so
some subtle bugs became less subtle.
Can/Will this be disabled in the JDS builds?
-mg
Yes core on ASSERT should be disabled before any product release. The
intention is to uncover
Thanks Brian,
Was there a flag day for this? If not, I would think about
making one. Finding the bugs is a good thing, but impacting
users that don't have time to be beta testers at the moment
isn't.
I'm focused on testing myself, so understand both view points.
My system is still crashing
Jim Walker wrote:
Thanks Brian,
Was there a flag day for this? If not, I would think about
making one. Finding the bugs is a good thing, but impacting
users that don't have time to be beta testers at the moment
isn't.
I'll ask the RE team about this.
I'm focused on testing myself, so
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:15:33 -0600
Jim Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Brian,
Was there a flag day for this? If not, I would think about
making one. Finding the bugs is a good thing, but impacting
users that don't have time to be beta testers at the moment
isn't.
+1. Makes OS
Hey Ken,
* Ken Gunderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:15:33 -0600
Jim Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Brian,
Was there a flag day for this? If not, I would think about
making one. Finding the bugs is a good thing, but impacting
users that don't have time
Hey,
Brian Nitz wrote:
A few things happened to make crashes more common in recent GNOME builds:
1) The GNOME community enabled coreing on ASSERTs in default builds, so
some subtle bugs became less subtle.
I'm confused. Has something changed recently? or is this still the code in
21 matches
Mail list logo
