I've just looked at it. It looks rather interesting. I've thought about
migration from SXCE b97 to OpenSolaris 2010.x on our terminal (SRSS) servers.
However, it didn't happen on obvious reason. Later we decided to wait for
CentOS 6.0 and move there... It would allow us to use legacy SRSS termin
Just downloaded and installed OIndi in virtualbox. Installed srss5, followed
the instructions on the forums, added a couple of missing packages for dhcp and
bang! it works great.
Fantastic.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 3:25 AM PDT, Ian Collins wrote:
> Except for those of us who don't fancy getting up at 5:30AM!
Are you somewhere between Hawaii and the int'l date line? It takes
place at 10:30am Pacific time (1730 UTC).
-Gary
___
opensolaris-di
On 09/14/10 09:23 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
That's today the presentation!!! :)
the press conference will be held in London at 6:30pm UK Time.
so in my area, Los Angeles that converts to about 10:30 am
here is a time converter so no body will miss this conference.
http://www.timezon
> That's today the presentation!!! :)
the press conference will be held in London at 6:30pm UK Time.
so in my area, Los Angeles that converts to about 10:30 am
here is a time converter so no body will miss this conference.
http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc
--
This message pos
That's today the presentation!!! :)
2010/9/13 Orvar Korvar
> Great news! :) I will surely run OpenIndiana. I would like to try
> something else than b134.
>
> I hope you make clear instructions how to upgrade from b134. Preferably
> "copy & paste" commands. Looking forward to the announcement t
Great news! :) I will surely run OpenIndiana. I would like to try something
else than b134.
I hope you make clear instructions how to upgrade from b134. Preferably "copy &
paste" commands. Looking forward to the announcement tomorrow! :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> Upgrades work perfectly :-)
> It's just a case of adding the OpenIndiana repo, setting --non-sticky on
> opensolaris.org,
> and doing an image-update.
That's great.
I see there was a whole discussion regarding the name of the new distribution:
http://openindiana.org/pip
> On Tuesday 14th September, we will be unveiling
> OpenIndiana – an
> exciting new distribution of OpenSolaris!
>
> OpenIndiana is a continuation of the OpenSolaris
> operating system.
the news of this great milestone is already hitting the news wave and i think
this event will be 100x better
On 12 Sep 2010, at 20:59, Hillel Lubman wrote:
> Ken Mays wrote:
>
>> So far, the OpenIndiana distro is a 'rock solid' solution and
>> a great evolution from the Opensolaris project.
>
> Great news. Will it be possible to upgrade existing installation of
> OpenSolaris snv_134 to OpenIndiana, or
Ken Mays wrote:
> So far, the OpenIndiana distro is a 'rock solid' solution and
> a great evolution from the Opensolaris project.
Great news. Will it be possible to upgrade existing installation of OpenSolaris
snv_134 to OpenIndiana, or it will require a fresh install?
Thanks,
Hillel.
--
This
Yes, I have my own licensed srss 4.2, I want to install it on newer versions of
opensolaris.
I have tried to shoe horn it with what I have found online but most of the
hints and tricks stop at 2009 /06
for example
http://wiki.sun-rays.org/index.php/SRSS_4.1_on_OpenSolaris_2008.11#OpenSolaris_2
Huh? I have got Srss 4.2 running on b134 for a long time. It is documented on
the internet how to make it run. What is your problem, what happened and what
are the symptoms?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing li
However, I got read speed for NTFS is like 3MB/sec. Not really useable for much
data. But of course, it is good to be able to read small documents.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@open
I just hope that OpenIndiana will intergrate the Heirloom tools rather
than completely GNU-ifying the userland like Nexenta.
Mike
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
;rock solid' solution and a great evolution
from the Opensolaris project.
~ Ken Mays
--- On Sat, 9/11/10, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> From: Orvar Korvar
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] OpenIndiana - a new OpenSolaris Distribution!
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Saturd
On 12 Sep 2010, at 12:57, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Daniel Kjar wrote:
>
>> Will it be compatible with the newest sunray software (srss 5 (4.2))?
>
> AFAIK, the Sunray server is closed source and cannot be redistributed.
>
> If this is true, the related code cannot be made part of a free dist
Daniel Kjar wrote:
> Will it be compatible with the newest sunray software (srss 5 (4.2))?
AFAIK, the Sunray server is closed source and cannot be redistributed.
If this is true, the related code cannot be made part of a free distro.
I believe the most important current problem is the fact th
On 09/11/2010 07:54 PM, Gary Driggs wrote:
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Cia Watson wrote:
I have one question at the moment: Will there be ext3 and/or ext4 support? I
have a shared data partition in ext3 that I would need to be able to mount
periodically.
There is already a read only files
Excellent. I am glad to hear you think that may be valuable.
Sadly though srss 4.2 does not work (easily, or even moderately easily with
b134). Not saying somebody couldn't figure out why and create simple scripts
to make it work though!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
On 12 Sep 2010, at 01:42, Daniel Kjar wrote:
> Will it be compatible with the newest sunray software (srss 5 (4.2))?
If SunRay Software runs on OpenSolaris b134 then theres a fairly good chance it
will run on OpenIndiana. It's something we would be very keen to ensure works
on our /stable branc
Will it be compatible with the newest sunray software (srss 5 (4.2))?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
This is interesting. b147 you say? Cool!
It is not based on illumos. When will it be based on illumos?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Cia Watson wrote:
> I have one question at the moment: Will there be ext3 and/or ext4 support? I
> have a shared data partition in ext3 that I would need to be able to mount
> periodically.
There is already a read only filesystem package that allows mounting of NTF
Given the new license details for what will be Oracle Solaris 11
Express, it appears I won't be upgrading my snv_134 osol to Sol11
express (since I'm not a developer), and so am looking forward to
details about OpenIndiana.
I have one question at the moment: Will there be ext3 and/or ext4
su
On Sep 10, 2010, at 4:44 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> Copyright a state?
>>
>> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be
>> in conflict with Sun because of a codename on a
>> project?
>>
>> I guess people have sued for dumber things to try and
>> get money.
>
> I think that Inte
On 10 Sep 2010, at 16:20, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Calum Benson wrote:
>> On 10 Sep 2010, at 12:20, usafverteran wrote:
>>
>>> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be in conflict with Sun
>>> because of a codename on a project?
>>
>> If Sun had copyrighted the Indiana project code
Calum Benson wrote:
> On 10 Sep 2010, at 12:20, usafverteran wrote:
>
>> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be in conflict with Sun
>> because of a codename on a project?
>
> If Sun had copyrighted the Indiana project codename, then sure, it would be a
> strong possibility. (But
On 10 Sep 2010, at 12:20, usafverteran wrote:
> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be in conflict with Sun
> because of a codename on a project?
If Sun had copyrighted the Indiana project codename, then sure, it would be a
strong possibility. (But AFAIK they didn't.)
Cheeri,
Ca
> Copyright a state?
>
> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be
> in conflict with Sun because of a codename on a
> project?
>
> I guess people have sued for dumber things to try and
> get money.
I think that Intel and Zilog both trademarked letters
of the alphabet (i and z, respect
Copyright a state?
So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be in conflict with Sun
because of a codename on a project?
I guess people have sued for dumber things to try and get money.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolari
--- On Fri, 9/10/10, Nikola M wrote:
> From: Nikola M
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] OpenIndiana - a new OpenSolaris Distribution!
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Friday, September 10, 2010, 1:21 AM
> Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14th September,
Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> On Tuesday 14th September, we will be unveiling OpenIndiana – an
> exciting new distribution of OpenSolaris!
>
Great! Hope more people will join in to make it happen.
I suppose there will be some kind of webcast?
Few cameras to record event and also public access and p
I'll be looking forward to trying it out. Wish I could make it to the
unveiling... :)
-Alex Smith, Server+, Network+
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 17:53, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> On Tuesday 14th September, we will be unveiling OpenIndiana – an
> exciting new distribution of OpenSolaris!
>
> OpenIndian
All the best
Looking forward to use it
regards;
Ashish Nabira
Enterprise IT Architect
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
7th floor , Prestige Obelisk, Kasturba Rd
Bangalore, KN 560025 IN
Phone x89854/+91 8066930 854
Mobile +919845082183
Email ashish.nab...@sun.com
On 10-Sep-10, at 4:23 AM, Alasd
On Tuesday 14th September, we will be unveiling OpenIndiana – an
exciting new distribution of OpenSolaris!
OpenIndiana is a continuation of the OpenSolaris operating system. It
was conceived during the period of uncertainty following the Oracle
takeover of Sun Microsystems, after several months pa
36 matches
Mail list logo
