when Oracle says
Oracle Solaris, that includes the OpenSolaris
distro.nbsp; For instance,
if you buy Oracle Solaris support, it *includes*
support for running
the OpenSolaris distro on that machine.
that clarifies everything for me. for now on when Oracle mentions oracle
solaris, now I
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com wrote:
How is that any different from how Sun positioned it? I always got the
impression
that OS was the development platform for Solaris Next. How has that changed?
fpsm
I had the impression with a stable release and
The question of Support for Solaris/OpenSolaris has been discussed close ad
infinitum here already. Please check the archives!
And, the decision to use OpenSolaris on a production server is CU's (or
yours), not Sun's, nor Oracle's...
Matthias
You (Fredrich Maney) wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28,
Matthias oh god of the forum shut the 4uck up you are an annoying
koolaid drinking asshole!!!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
testing the waters to see if I can get away with treating Oracle employee's the
same way they treat us community members and hope that I don't get banned from
this one way free for all.
I hope there is someone that can realign the employee's attitudes when it comes
to treating people right on
Chad,
that's getting personal now... At least in Germany, the country where I live,
I would be allowed to sue you for such words...
So, please, stop that!
Matthias
Du (Chad Welsh) schreibst:
Matthias oh god of the forum shut the 4uck up you are an annoying
koolaid drinking
Chad,
again:
I would love to tell you more, if I would know, and if I would be allowed to.
So, again: You're using the WRONG forum to ask these questions. All those,
working for Oracle/Sun here on this alias simply can not tell you anything,
either because they don't know, or because they are
On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:16, Chad Welsh wrote:
testing the waters to see if I can get away with treating Oracle employee's
the same way they treat us community members and hope that I don't get banned
from this one way free for all.
If you're aware of Oracle employees personally abusing
Chad Welsh wrote:
testing the waters to see if I can get away with treating Oracle employee's
the same way they treat us community members and hope that I don't get banned
from this one way free for all.
It doesn't matter if the person you're attacking is an Oracle employee or
not - that
On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:16, Chad Welsh wrote:
testing the waters to see if I can get away with
treating Oracle employee's the same way they treat us
community members and hope that I don't get banned
from this one way free for all.
If you're aware of Oracle employees personally
abusing
Matthias Pfützner and company,
It has nothing to do with what you know or not, you sir are a pompus ass and
treat people with total disrespect!!!
Just because you work at Oracle and drink the Koolaid you can tell someone to
go piss up a rope and use the forums as a personal insult
I do hope the development branch of solaris called opensolaris can become a
more autominous community in the future.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
For those that were not able to watch the webcast.
quote:
Extending its leadership in the x86 clustered systems market, Oracle announced
its next-generation Sun Fire x86 Clustered Systems, including rackmount
servers, blades and a 10 GbE cluster fabric.
These systems, which ship with
Will be interesting to see benchmarks! :o)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Will be interesting to see benchmarks! :o)
For X4800 see,
http://blogs.sun.com/BestPerf/entry/20100628_x4800_spec_cpu2006_rate
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 28-6-2010 21:41, dd pn wrote:
Will be interesting to see benchmarks! :o)
For X4800 see,
http://blogs.sun.com/BestPerf/entry/20100628_x4800_spec_cpu2006_rate
Let's hope this is just an omission , so far, but on the OS
compatibility list of all these new servers, Opensolaris doesn't
In Oracle's mind, one is a development work in progress, the other is a
revenue product. Guess which one gets the corporate focus?
-John
Let's hope this is just an omission , so far, but on the OS
compatibility list of all these new servers, Opensolaris doesn't
appears...Only Oracle VM,
Maybe i'm not seeing the big picture, but i thought that the all ZFS
appliance line runned in some custom OpenSolaris, making OSOL a
revenue product.
But than again...what do i understand about business anyway...
Bruno
On 28-6-2010 21:52, John Plocher wrote:
In Oracle's mind, one is a
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com wrote:
I guess OpenSolaris was position only as a developmental platform,
something similar to fedora.
How is that any different from how Sun positioned it? I always got the
impression that OS was the development platform
On 06/28/10 15:59, Bruno Sousa wrote:
Maybe i'm not seeing the big picture, but i thought that the all ZFS
appliance line runned in some custom OpenSolaris, making OSOL a
revenue product.
But than again...what do i understand about business anyway...
Bruno
No, that makes the ZFS
John Plocher john.ploc...@gmail.com wrote:
In Oracle's mind, one is a development work in progress, the other is a
revenue product. Guess which one gets the corporate focus?
Whether OpenSolaris is a revenue product can only be proven by cutting it off
and then checking how much the sales go
On 6/28/2010 12:52 PM, John Plocher wrote:
In Oracle's mind, one is a development work in progress, the other is
a revenue product. Guess which one gets the corporate focus?
-John
Don't make the mistake of thinking that OpenSolaris is going to somehow
be finished at some point, and
How is that any different from how Sun positioned it?
I always got the
impression that OS was the development platform for
Solaris Next. How
has that changed?
fpsm
I had the impression with a stable release and a service contract,
OpenSolaris could be also be used in production
message -
From: Brian Utterback brian.utterb...@oracle.com
Date: Mon, Jun 28, 2010 22:17
Subject: [osol-discuss] Oracle Unveils Next Generation Sun Fire x86
Clustered Systems
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 06/28/10 15:59, Bruno Sousa wrote:
Maybe i'm not seeing the big picture
of Oracle...
So my best bet is to wait until the next Oracle conference...
Bruno
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com
Date: Mon, Jun 28, 2010 22:35
Subject: [osol-discuss] Oracle Unveils Next Generation Sun Fire x86 Clustered
Systems
To: John Plocher
25 matches
Mail list logo
