On Fri, 29 Jul 2005, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 01:07:37AM -0700, Ferdinand O. Tempel wrote:
[ ... ]
As time progresses OpenSolaris will run ahead of the
music, and introduce incomaptibilites with Solaris. That's
This is not the plan and is not our announced
Why? That's not that important. You can not know now
what other distros will be good for. It could be that
there is a distro you can put in your coffee-cup and
that coffee-cup communicates with the computer you
are in front of - so probably there is not enough
space for ksh in such a distro
On 7/28/05, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
POSIX documentations (man pages) are written in a way that allows you
to implement all features of the program from only reading the apropriate
man page.
I'm not certain how that point is relevant. All we know in this case
is that ksh88 may
On 7/27/05, Helmar Wodtke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ext2fs:
http://www.sun.drydog.com/faq/9.html#9.24
Well, that's like this access to some misconfigured Windows-Partitions on
Linux... It's read-only and I can access only one partition (question: also
only one if I have two disks?):
Not
On 7/27/05, Helmar Wodtke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
discussing about interfaces and standards is a good
thing, standards are
a good thing, the hackslay
mentality often shown in the so-called open source
community is not.
Try to understand it from a different view: the source is not
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 23:31, Helmar Wodtke wrote:
I'm really impressed by the discussion about ksh.
discussing about interfaces and standards is a good
thing, standards are
a good thing, the hackslay
mentality often shown in the so-called open source
community is not.
patrick mauritz
Shawn Walker wrote:
a) may be the safer way but is not always necessary. Your example of
Postscript interpreter doesn't fit nearly as well because you're
talking about (as far as I know) is an undcoumented proprietary file
format,
Not that it matters a whole lot to this discussion, but I