Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-05 Thread Bruce D Porter
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:45:13 -0800, Erik Trimble wrote: > Bruce wrote: >> On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:27:48 +0100, Casper.Dik-UdXhSnd/wVw wrote: >> >>> Unless, of course, google is now sponsoring people to post such >>> remarks; then it is fruitful for the person who tells you to use >>> google? >>>

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-05 Thread Erik Trimble
Bruce wrote: On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:27:48 +0100, Casper.Dik-UdXhSnd/wVw wrote: Unless, of course, google is now sponsoring people to post such remarks; then it is fruitful for the person who tells you to use google? Are you in the pay of Big Oil^H^H^H^H^H^H^HGoogle I wish :-) Be careful

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-05 Thread Bruce
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:27:48 +0100, Casper.Dik-UdXhSnd/wVw wrote: > >>On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:33:27 -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> PLEASE GO READ THE MAILING LIST ARCHIVES. This question has been asked, discussed, and answered by several folks (myself included) in fairly e

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-04 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> Are you in the pay of Big Oil^H^H^H^H^H^H^HGoogle? LOL. ;-) I know this will start a flame war, but it's a joke: Only in solaris will you see the ^H nowadays. ;-) An oh-so true joke. ;-) ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@ope

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-04 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
> > PLEASE GO READ THE MAILING LIST ARCHIVES. > > > > This question has been asked, discussed, and > answered by several folks > > (myself included) in fairly exhaustive detail, a > large number of times. > > Most recently, I think, LAST WEEK. > > > > Google - use it. > > Big deal. I say contin

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-04 Thread Casper . Dik
>On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:33:27 -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: > >>> PLEASE GO READ THE MAILING LIST ARCHIVES. >>> >>> This question has been asked, discussed, and answered by several folks >>> (myself included) in fairly exhaustive detail, a large number of times. >>> Most recently, I think, LAST

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-04 Thread Bruce
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:33:27 -0500, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> PLEASE GO READ THE MAILING LIST ARCHIVES. >> >> This question has been asked, discussed, and answered by several folks >> (myself included) in fairly exhaustive detail, a large number of times. >> Most recently, I think, LAST WEEK. >

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-03 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
> PLEASE GO READ THE MAILING LIST ARCHIVES. > > This question has been asked, discussed, and answered by several folks > (myself included) in fairly exhaustive detail, a large number of times. > Most recently, I think, LAST WEEK. > > Google - use it. Big deal. I say continue talking about anyth

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris vs OpenSolaris (NOW: Read The ARCHIVES)

2010-02-03 Thread Erik Trimble
Ian Collins wrote: Gary wrote: Does anybody really know what OpenSolaris really is since I've read the OpenSolaris is NOT Solaris. Then I read OpenSolaris will become the next Solaris 10 release. Both of those statements can't be true. The next Solaris release will be based on OpenSolari