> I'd love to hear suggestions *because* I do have code
> that I'd like to see
> run on both Solaris and Linux which reports fine
> grained timing information
> with some degree of accuracy.
gethrtime() is available on Linux if you install the RTLinux extension to the
kernel.
The easiest way to d
> Actually, gethrtime is in section 3C:
>
> "(3C)These functions, together with those of Section 2,
> constitute the standard C library"
>
> And indeed, if we do some further digging:
>
> http://docs.hp.com/en/B2355-60130/gethrtime.3C.html (HP-UX 11iv3)
>
> So, this says more a
> > It's a matter of pride to deliver a quality product that "just works" and>
> > > doesn't break something else.> > I write things for my own purposes and I
> > often need to use the high> resolution timers. I have no idea if that is
> > portable into the Linux world> and I guess I never care
On 7/29/07, Doug Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please drop this thread. It is a pure waste of bandwidth and time.
>
Yes. And my apologies for contributing to the drag.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
UNIX admin wrote:
>> To many community members *gratis* doesn't mean
>> anything as long as it
>> is proprietary and the status can change as and when
>> a corporate
>> pleases.
>>
>
> That's just too radical and borders on religion, for all the wrong reasons.
>
> History teaches us that ideol
> To many community members *gratis* doesn't mean
> anything as long as it
> is proprietary and the status can change as and when
> a corporate
> pleases.
That's just too radical and borders on religion, for all the wrong reasons.
History teaches us that ideologies almost always end up in a fiasc
On 7/29/07, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One point I would like to bring to notice.
> > When talking about "opensolaris", "free/open source
> > software" and the
> > community, *gratis* doesn't mean anything at all.
>
> What does that have to do with it?
>
That was in response to(belo
> One point I would like to bring to notice.
> When talking about "opensolaris", "free/open source
> software" and the
> community, *gratis* doesn't mean anything at all.
What does that have to do with it?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> That might work for you but but for those who
> volunteer their focus is
> on their platform of choice - if it happens to work
> on others then its a
> bonus, but unless they're getting something in return
> for supporting and
> maintaining support for other platforms, I hardly
> blame them.
Oh,
On 7/28/07, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we? Probably. Will we? I most certainly *won't*. People need to be made
> sensitive to these issues!
> There's tons of GCC-only garbage out there precisely because the majority
> doesn't have a clue that there are better, professional compil
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 03:35 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> > One could argue that since the code is written by
> > volunteers it would be
> > highly hypocritical to pass judgement and yet the
> > individual making the
> > statements doing very little in contribution to
> > improving the 'code
> > quali
>> One could argue that since the code is written by
>> volunteers it would be
>> highly hypocritical to pass judgement and yet the
>> individual making the
>> statements doing very little in contribution to
>> improving the 'code
>> quality'.
>
> So what if the code is written by volunteers? We'r
> One could argue that since the code is written by
> volunteers it would be
> highly hypocritical to pass judgement and yet the
> individual making the
> statements doing very little in contribution to
> improving the 'code
> quality'.
So what if the code is written by volunteers? We're all volun
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 07:22 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> > Can we remove the anti-gnu, anti-Linux rhetoric from
> > this list, as it
> > get us nowhere.
>
> Can we? Probably. Will we? I most certainly *won't*. People need to be
> made sensitive to these issues! There's tons of GCC-only garbage out
> Can we remove the anti-gnu, anti-Linux rhetoric from
> this list, as it
> get us nowhere.
Can we? Probably. Will we? I most certainly *won't*. People need to be made
sensitive to these issues! There's tons of GCC-only garbage out there precisely
because the majority doesn't have a clue that t
UNIX admin wrote:
>
> That's a positive trend which begun only recently. However, it's still
> plagued with problems:
>
> - GCC generates crappy, slow code
>
Sometimes, sometimes not.
> - GCC allows one to write crappy, non-portable code (and doesn't even blink)
>
If you don't use "-Wall - p
UNIX admin wrote:
>> Meh, generally speaking Solaris + GCC, and everything
>> works nicely out
>> of the box.
>>
>
> That's a positive trend which begun only recently. However, it's still
> plagued with problems:
>
> - GCC generates crappy, slow code
>
Sometimes yes, Sometimes no. Usually
> Meh, generally speaking Solaris + GCC, and everything
> works nicely out
> of the box.
That's a positive trend which begun only recently. However, it's still plagued
with problems:
- GCC generates crappy, slow code
- GCC allows one to write crappy, non-portable code (and doesn't even blink)
-
Ok, I tried these instructions and they worked too. The problem is, I have
already fontforge installed (by following Doug Scotts instructions):
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=35866&tstart=0
So could be that your instructions worked, only because I already had the
infrastruc
> The problem is that a lot of
> authors are no longer
> interested in portable code besides their Linux home
> system.
>
> This is a problem that was not present in former
> days.
This is unfortunately true. I remember those days well.
People actually *coded* software, and it was a matter of *
Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In former times, all software did follow Open Source ethics and was made
> > cleanly portable to all important platforms.
>
> Read on ...
>
> >
> > I really hope that the free availability of Solaris and Sun Studio will
> > change things back to a state
> If I had invested all that time into Unix I would
> have become an expert now.
Well, certainly can't argue with that logic. That's exactly why I refused to
*waste my time* with all the other OSes out there. I did two "rounds" of Linux
sysadmin, and then Linux system engineering, but coming fro
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 13:06 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Orvar Korvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In my opionion, Blastwave and the likes, should be high on Sun's
> priority list. It seems that to compile a program under Solaris takes
> years of experience. Sun and you all guys are doing a
> It looks like all of you just did a compile as it was
> a trivial thing! How the &%&&" did you do it?
OK, I admit, I'm guilty as charged. I could have documented the whole process
better, as in step-by-step, but what I wrote was after the fact, and next day
on top of that, so I had to do it fr
Orvar Korvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my opionion, Blastwave and the likes, should be high on Sun's priority
> list. It seems that to compile a program under Solaris takes years of
> experience. Sun and you all guys are doing a terrific job with Solaris, and I
> and many more really appr
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Orvar Korvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In my opionion, Blastwave and the likes, should be high on Sun's priority list. It seems
that to compile a program under Solaris takes years of experience. Sun and you all guys
are doing a terrific job with S
Argh! Now Im getting frustrated AGAIN! ¤/&%(/#"¤"#!
It looks like all of you just did a compile as it was a trivial thing! How the
&%&&" did you do it? Its feels like, when you really struggle and struggle to
do something really difficult, and there comes a guy and does the thing on the
fly
Update: I also have gotten wine compiled without any problems. Didn't have the
time to test it yet though. Here is what I did:
1. downloaded the latest wine (0.9.41) from winehq (or some such)
2. set up the environment (I use `tcsh`, so these will need to be adapted for
Bourne shell family):
se
On 7/27/07, Orvar Korvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now I have really good hope to get Wine going with two instructions sets
up to date. I am active at several user forums, and I will post your
instructions there. At the forums, there are several questions on Wine and
Solaris, all answered nega
Hey guys, I am sorry that I yelled a bit. I was in a bad mood and I shouldnt
have done that. It was stupid of me. Please accept my apologizes!
I have got a very nice answer from DOUG SCOTT at
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=35866&tstart=0
that almost seems to work. I will dig
> I am using snv_b67 w. SUNWcxall cluster installed, I
> downloaded the mauture wine, and I get a rundll32.exe
> not found:
...
> Last time I had used a few years ago, windows dll's
> were not needed, so much for MS independence, so is
> there a work around?
I've no idea; I haven't had the resour
John Brewer writes:
> I downloaded gcc (GCC) 3.4.6,
Why? Gcc comes with Solaris, and works.
> gnu bin tools , freetype-2.3.5 and fontforge_full-20070723 configure and
> compiled ok, however wine-0.9.41 compiled with this error:
> ="" -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
> -Wdec
Orvar Korvar wrote:
> For instance, when I try to get VLC player running, _no one_ has ever
> succeeded to compile it for Solaris. That... sounds scary.
VLC builds and runs on Solaris Express using pkgbuild. The only problem
is that playing mp4 files seg-faults at the moment. All other formats
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 01:55 -0700, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> I am trying to migrate totally to Solaris Express community build 67, and I
> want DC++ however, in some DC++ hubs they only allow certain DC++ clients
> from the Windows environment. (For bittorrent I use the java klient Azarus
> which I
Well, I certainly can not pay what your work is worth, thats for sure. Say it
takes you 2-3 hours to figure this out. That would be some serious money (for
me as a private person). A company would have no problems to pay you what your
time is worth, though. Maybe it is better to drop Solaris ins
Hi,
I also remmeber one of the members from BOSUG having compiled wine
without issues using pkgbuild : pkgbuild.sourceforge.net
You could try that..
~Anil
On 7/26/07, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Shit Im frustrated right now. Anybody knows how to get Wine on this "#"#&%&
> > S
I downloaded gcc (GCC) 3.4.6, gnu bin tools , freetype-2.3.5 and
fontforge_full-20070723 configure and compiled ok, however wine-0.9.41
compiled with this error:
="" -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o
po
The Wine can be so good, the seeds of dll's can be bitter, as we all know so
well, back to the old drive c: we go and along with it's licenses!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensola
>> but you may find the grapes to be sweet at :
>> http://www.blastwave.org/wine
>
> No Dennis, seriously now, I'm intrigued:
>
> why does wine have its own URI @Blastwave? No other app is treated that way.
>
> Why isn't Wine just another `pkg-get` package, just like all the others?
>
It
I am using snv_b67 w. SUNWcxall cluster installed, I downloaded the mauture
wine, and I get a rundll32.exe not found:
bash-3.00# cd /opt/cfw/wine/bin
bash-3.00# echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/dt/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/opt/cfw/wine/bin:.
bash-3.00# wine s
I am using snv_b67 w. SUNWcxall cluster installed, I downloaded the mauture
wine, and I get a rundll32.exe not found:
bash-3.00# cd /opt/cfw/wine/bin
bash-3.00# echo $PATH
/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/sfw/bin:/usr/dt/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/opt/cfw/wine/bin:.
bash-3.00# wine s
> but you may find the grapes to be sweet at :
> http://www.blastwave.org/wine
No Dennis, seriously now, I'm intrigued:
why does wine have its own URI @Blastwave? No other app is treated that way.
Why isn't Wine just another `pkg-get` package, just like all the others?
This message
> This compile thing is a very very messy business
> indeed. Maybe a company that compiles your stuff to a
> desired platform, would be profitable?
Funny you should mention it, today I had been thinking about starting a
consulting business for exactly that. (:-)
It took me many years to figure o
Dear OpenSolaris community;
I have tried for several days to get Wine working on Solaris, where Ive
downloaded Wine from
blastwave/wine
Ive tried the package, and I tried to compile it. To no avail. I would really
really much appreciate any hints as this drives me mad. Did I say mad?
Madd
> Shit Im frustrated right now. Anybody knows how to get Wine on this "#"#&%&
> Solaris
>
With language like that I have no idea why I bother to respond.
I will pretend that you wrote :
Dear OpenSolaris community :
I am trying in vain to get wine to flow on Solaris and am reall
Shit Im frustrated right now. Anybody knows how to get Wine on this "#"#&%&
Solaris
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Ive tried to compile it yesterday, but I had some problems. : o ) I will try
again today.
This compile thing is a very very messy business indeed. Maybe a company that
compiles your stuff to a desired platform, would be profitable?
I found the "games" section here. It seems that several people
hi
tried linuxdcpp[1]? never tried on solaris, but worth a try imho:)
[1] http://linuxdcpp.berlios.de
On 7/25/07, Orvar Korvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to migrate totally to Solaris Express community build 67, and I
> want DC++ however, in some DC++ hubs they only allow certain
I am trying to migrate totally to Solaris Express community build 67, and I
want DC++ however, in some DC++ hubs they only allow certain DC++ clients from
the Windows environment. (For bittorrent I use the java klient Azarus which I
found a Solaris package for. For VLC player and Winamp I use mp
49 matches
Mail list logo
