Windows 2000 (MSVC 6.0)
Did:
perl Configure VC-WIN32
ms\do_ms
nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak
Got the error:
cl /Fotmp32dll\s3_pkt.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32dll /MD /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox
/O2 /O
b2 /Gs0 /GF /Gy /nologo -DWIN32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_WIN32
/Fd
out32dll /GD -D_WINDLL -D_DLL -c
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002, Michael Bell wrote:
>
> I found a small problem with -nameopt RFC2253:
>
> The X509v3 Authority Key Identifier doesn't use -nameopt for DirName. Is
> this DN stored as a string?
>
Yes it is and fixing this would need some non trivial changes to pass the
nameopt flags to
Hello,
Where in 9.6x is the session cache limit being imposed ?
I have looked in the openssl/ssl directory, but all I could
find is a reference to SSL_SESSION_CACHE_MAX which session_cache_size
is set to when a new CTX is allocated. Hopefully I'm missing something
...
- Tom
Tom Tang
Array
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 29 Apr 2002
7:32:18 EDT, Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jaltman> I would be happy to work on this with you if you give me some
jaltman> direction on how you would like it to go.
jaltman>
jaltman> It seems to me that there is no reason that Conf
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> I would be happy to work on this with you if you give me some
> direction on how you would like it to go.
>
> It seems to me that there is no reason that Configure could not
> actually do the work of the .bat files for the Windows platforms
> pr
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:48:48PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Well, here's an even bigger and better patch. Thanks for the continued
> feedback.
Thank you for the patch.
I'll test this one when I'm back from CanSecWest. Unfortunately, I
don't have enough time left until my flight there.
--
/s
Thus spake Lutz Jaenicke:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:29:46PM +0700, Satria Bakti (13297096) wrote:
> > I'm working on integrating new cipher suite in 0.9.7,
> > and now I come to part where I have to put my block
> > algorithm code in crypto/ directory.
> >
> > Is there any guidelines/hints on
Hi Pratap,
one possible reason for a memory leak is the
way you use the BN_bn2hex() function.
[...]
> BN_CTX_free(ctx);
> return;
> }
> strcpy((char *)A,(const char *)BN_bn2hex(d));
>
[...]
from the BN_bn2hex manpage :
[...]
BN_bn2he
Solar Designer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > Solar Designer wrote:
> > > Thank you for working on this!
> >
> > OK, try the attached patch...
>
> It's almost right, except:
>
> > - do_fp(out, buf,inp,separator, out_bin, sigkey, sigbuf, si
Have you considered using "include" files in the Makefiles? This way
one can
place all the interesting variables in a single file and include that
from all other
Makefiles. This would also help those gnarly make calls with a million
arguments
to lower Makefiles. I am not sure if that would h
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:33:10AM +0200, Michael Bell wrote:
> Lutz Jaenicke schrieb:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:07:43PM +0100, Dr S N Henson wrote:
> > > However a new FAQ entry might be in order or possibly changing the
> > > default display options so that the old behaviour is no long
i've discovered that `req -nameopt` is implemented but undocumented.
`req -subject` is implemented and documented in the usage, but not in
the manual.
`crl -nameopt` was not implemented, i quickly hacked it in (we want a
sane output format for openca), patch is attached.
documentation should be
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:24:34 -0700,
Guillermo Maturana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
matute> Have you considered using "include" files in the Makefiles?
matute> This way one can place all the interesting variables in a
matute> single file and include that from all othe
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:49:51AM -0700, Tom Tang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Where in 9.6x is the session cache limit being imposed ?
> I have looked in the openssl/ssl directory, but all I could
> find is a reference to SSL_SESSION_CACHE_MAX which session_cache_size
> is set to when a new CTX is a
Lutz Jaenicke schrieb:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:33:10AM +0200, Michael Bell wrote:
>
> > The only problem for the future is the support of this flag in all the
> > other tools (especially ca and req have problems with their option
> > -subj).
>
> Robert Joop sent a patch last week (not ap
On 02-04-30 10:59:08 CEST, Michael Bell wrote:
> Lutz Jaenicke schrieb:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 10:33:10AM +0200, Michael Bell wrote:
> >
> > > The only problem for the future is the support of this flag in all the
> > > other tools (especially ca and req have problems with their option
I received a lot of virus alerts in my mailbox, and a mail appearing to be
from me, with a Base64 content.
I'd like to say that I'm not infected by any virus, and especially not by
a Windows one (I only read/write my mails with Pine under Linux). I do
have a Windows PC, but it has an antivirus in
On 02-04-29 10:33:10 CEST, Michael Bell wrote:
> I found a small problem with -nameopt RFC2253:
>
> The X509v3 Authority Key Identifier doesn't use -nameopt for DirName. Is
> this DN stored as a string?
it depends on what you mean by string.
it is stored as an OCTET STRING that contains an ASN.1
Hello,
I have a simple question:
Currently EVP_Encrypt* interface doesnt support
encryption of multiple data streams with a single
symmetric key. Is there any chance patches to
allow this to be accepted in the official OpenSSL
codebase ? Currently I'm thinking to modify EVP_EncryptFinal
so it le
> I have a simple question:
>
> Currently EVP_Encrypt* interface doesnt support
> encryption of multiple data streams with a single
> symmetric key. Is there any chance patches to
> allow this to be accepted in the official OpenSSL
> codebase ? Currently I'm thinking to modify EVP_EncryptFinal
> s
20 matches
Mail list logo
