Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl-users] Kerberos

2015-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
On 5/13/2015 10:19 AM, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 08/05/15 09:40, Matt Caswell wrote: >> >> >> On 08/05/15 02:28, Jeffrey Altman wrote: >> >>> Regardless, the inability to improve the support in this area has left >>> the those organ

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl-users] Kerberos

2015-05-08 Thread Jeffrey Altman
the IETF Kitten WG are the appropriate places to hold discussions. Or perhaps hold an IETF BOF first to explore the interest. The last time I was involved the work product was https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-santesson-tls-gssapi-03 I still believe that is a reasonable approach. Jeffrey Altman

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl-users] Kerberos

2015-05-07 Thread Jeffrey Altman
choice of use insecure protocols or re-implement the applications. I do not believe that any sane OS or application vendor can with a straight face continue to ship 2712 support. As such it should be removed from OpenSSL master. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signatu

Re: If you use kerberos/ssl

2014-08-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
hat did rely upon it. OpenSSL does not build with this support by default and it would bad form to remove it from an existing release series. Removal on the current master branch should not be an issue. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: FIPS Module 1.2 build with Visual Studio 2010 fails self-tests

2010-10-18 Thread Jeffrey Altman
pace layout randomization (ASLR). Visual Studio 2010 is the first version of Windows development tools to turn ASLR on by default for EXEs and DLLs. To disable, use /DYNAMICBASE:NO when linking. (Or disable the "Randomized Base Address property in Visual Studio.) Jeffrey Altman Secure Endpoints, Inc. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Draft FIPS Module v1.2 User Guide

2008-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Altman
at nasm is no longer supported and yet the instructions still refer to configuring and building with nasm. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: valgrind and openssl

2008-05-15 Thread Jeffrey Altman
I'm afraid I'm dreadfully ignorant of the blogosphere. The Debian patch is the highly publicized patch that kills the PRNG outright. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Static global - bug? (Re: Two valgrind warnings in OpenSSL-possible bug???)

2008-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
s that were not prevented by locks, I think you are being foolish. It is not worth the cost of a production system going down or valuable data being lost or corrupted. Jeffrey Altman Secure Endpoints Inc. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Two valgrind warnings in OpenSSL - possible bug???

2008-01-22 Thread Jeffrey Altman
assed to the BN_get_flags() macro are parameters passed into the BN_mod_inverse() and BN_div() functions. In BN_MONT_CTX_set() those BIGNUM objects are initialized. I do not see why this warning is being triggered. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Loophole in Windows RNG

2007-11-13 Thread Jeffrey Altman
This paper justifies the decision not to rely on the Windows Random Number Generator. http://eprint.iacr.org/2007/419.pdf Quoting: "We analyzed the security of the algorithm and found a non-trivial attack: given the internal state of the generator, the previous state can be computed in O(223) wo

Re: RAnd_Poll crashes in Vista

2007-10-07 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Shobhit Gupta wrote: > Thanks all for responses. > > Andy::I will try appending your piece of code in the end of md_rand.c > > -- > > >I would like to see a minidump with heap for an instance of an > >application crashing in this c

Re: RAnd_Poll crashes in Vista

2007-10-07 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Andy Polyakov wrote: > Yes, of course. It's just that as you answered "yes" to question "has > anyone else had problem" I assumed that you ran into it at some point > too. I mean my "where was it" targeted you as potential "somebody > else":-) A. > The 'yes' applies to the complaints that have been

Re: RAnd_Poll crashes in Vista

2007-10-07 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Andy Polyakov wrote: >> The purpose of the CreateToolhelp32Snapshot function is to permit >> walking data structures that are constantly changing by creating a >> read-only copy that will not change. The returned HANDLE points to a >> unique snapshot. Walking the contents of the data structures i

Re: RAnd_Poll crashes in Vista

2007-10-07 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Shobhit Gupta wrote: > Hi, > > We were using OpenSSL in our product, but lately after testing on > Vista, our application was was crashing (only in Vista) in > SSL_Connect(). (It worked fine in XP) > > After debugging through OpenSSL we found that within RAND_poll() it > was crashing in a win32 api

Re: Emails not getting through?

2006-09-18 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Testing from [EMAIL PROTECTED] which subscribed to the list on 17 Sep 2006. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Extending OpenSSL ASN.1 for Kerberos

2006-09-17 Thread Jeffrey Altman
I need to extend the OpenSSL ASN.1 support to include the PKINIT SubjectAltName extension and the Kerberized Certificate Authority extension. Is there any documentation or guidelines available to assist developers wishing to add new extensions? Thanks. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description

TSU Notification - encryption was Re: [openssl.org #1336] OpenSSL support for Kerberos

2006-09-17 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Any possibility of GPL-based license in the future?

2006-05-16 Thread Jeffrey Altman
ink against GnuTLS. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Peter Runestig has passed away

2005-07-23 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Last month, Peter Runestig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> passed away from a heart attack. Peter was an active participant in the openssl community. He will be dearly missed by all that knew him. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[openssl.org #1112] 0.9.8 beta 5 build issue on windows

2005-06-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
The following build issue exists: cl /Fotmp32dll\c_zlib.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32dll -DZLIB_SHARED -DZLIB -DKRB5_MIT /MD /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox /O2 /Ob2 /Gs0 /GF /Gy /nologo -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_WIN32 -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WINNT -DOPENSSL_USE_APPLINK -I. /Fdout3

Re: Finally time for IPvn support

2004-10-05 Thread Jeffrey Altman
ong), which I don't see the benefits of. Cheers, Richard As long as OpenSSL only accepts the extended behavior as input and never generates the extended behavior on output I do not see there being a problem. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: possibly bug in crypto/rand/rand_win.c

2004-07-13 Thread Jeffrey Altman
part of the DLL initialization. This would solve many problems. Jeffrey Altman Jiang Lei wrote: Hi, Sorry if this message is sent twice. I got problem running RAND_poll() in multi-threaded programs. The function sometimes crashes at "heap_next(&hentry)": ... if (heaplis

Re: Common Name and IDNA

2004-06-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
entries; one for each of the UTF8 representation and the ACE representation. Jeffrey Altman Gisle Vanem wrote: How is the /CN= supposed to be encoded for a host/domain- name using international characters? In some specified charset (utf8?) or in the ASCII Compatible Encoded form? I ask since in an

Re: Inclusion of FIPS

2004-05-13 Thread Jeffrey Altman
can only be useful to applications which statically link in all libraries.  Therefore, the openssl distributions which are shipped by Linux vendors in RPMs cannot be considered FIPS certified.  Correct? Jeffrey Altman Marquess, Steve Mr JMLFDC wrote: RE: Inclusion of FIPS Jeffrey

Re: Inclusion of FIPS

2004-05-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
ing altered and not the crypto library?" Can you provide some insight? Thanks. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-10 Thread Jeffrey Altman
will be the same. I know that with other packages such as Kerberos you absolutely do not get the same result when building under cygwin because the environment is more Unix like and therefore different assumptions are made. Jeffrey Altman Steven Reddie wrote: Jeffrey, Are you saying that using

Re: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-10 Thread Jeffrey Altman
The libssl.a and libcrypto.a binaries are linked to cygwin1.dll. This is not what you want. You do not want to be using the cygwin build process but the MS Visual Studio build environment. Perhaps you can use the cygwin environment to kick off a normal OpenSSL build in the background. Jeffrey

Re: Win32 compiles under cygwin

2004-05-10 Thread Jeffrey Altman
1.dll. I may very well be wrong but I believe that they are simply using the cygwin environment as a means to remote login via SSH for the purpose of automating the execution of the build process on Windows in a manner equ

Re: No CAs in CertificateRequest message

2004-05-06 Thread Jeffrey Altman
cated in TLS 1.1 is that the specification of a certificate authority should not be required. TLS 1.1 has passed last call and is currently being reviewed by the IESG. Jeffrey Altman Erik Tkal wrote: Jeff,   Look in s3_srvr.c - ssl3_send_certificate_request calls SSL_get_client_CA

Re: No CAs in CertificateRequest message

2004-05-06 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 6 May 2004 08:24:57 -0400, "Erik Tkal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: etssl> Can anyone answer this? How do I tell if this is a known etssl> problem with OpenSSL or if the RFC is incorrect, or if this is etssl> just a a

Re: Windows DLL naming inconsistency

2004-02-02 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Andy Polyakov wrote: Now let's imagine we pick Microsoft compiler. I'd suggest to perform an MT build and link it dynamically with MSVCRT.DLL. Idea is to use MSVCRT primarily for BIO and other strictly internal purposes (keep in mind that MSCVRT.DLL can be redistributed). At the same time I'd sani

Re: Windows DLL naming inconsistency

2004-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
* from its callers. All of the use of fopen() is local to its own implementation. Threading issues if any are handled internally by ensuring that calls are not made outside of a mutex semaphore lock. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Windows DLL naming inconsistency

2004-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: That I believe is the main problem: all the runtime library dependencies which directly or indirectly call incompatible library functions. There was an attempt to fix this back in SSLeay where the application called one function which passed pointers to the malloc routine

Re: Windows DLL naming inconsistency

2004-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
nsure that there are no such crossings then you do not have a dependency. However, with the BIO code I am not sure this is a possibility. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Windows DLL naming inconsistency

2004-01-26 Thread Jeffrey Altman
y the easiest to implement. Jeffrey Altman Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:02:06 -0500, Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: jaltman> I think there are two very different markets. One is the jaltman> cygwin (unix o

Re: Windows DLL naming inconsistency

2004-01-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Martin Germann wrote: Jeffrey Altman wrote: Why do you believe that stunnel represents the most widely used naming? I just thougt that gcc represents the most widely used naming. openssl built using Unix style tools certainly has a significant deployed base. There are widely deployed

Re: Windows DLL naming inconsistency

2004-01-21 Thread Jeffrey Altman
. If anything I would argue that the naming convention needs to be modified to include the version number so as to prevent conflicts between 0.9.5, 0.9.6, 0.9.7, and 0.9.8 all of which have incompatible ABIs. Jeffrey Altman Martin Germann wrote: Hi, I noticed an inconsistency in the windows library

[openssl.org #806] 0.9.8 snapshot patches for compilation on Windows

2004-01-05 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[openssl.org #807] 0.9.7 snapshot patches for compilation on Windows

2004-01-05 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [openssl.org #753] 0.9.6l does not compile on Windows

2003-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:42:39 +0100 (MET), "Jeffrey Altman via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> rt> The inclusion of "e_os.h" in crypto\des\cfb_enc.c must be specified as rt> e

[openssl.org #753] 0.9.6l does not compile on Windows

2003-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
The inclusion of "e_os.h" in crypto\des\cfb_enc.c must be specified as either #include "openssl/e_os.h" or #include "../e_os.h" This is not performed in a consistent manner in OpenSSL 0.9.6. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Slow heap walking in rand_win.c

2003-10-03 Thread Jeffrey Altman
If that is the case, then THAT is the bug to be fixed. - Jeffrey Altman Lee Dilkie wrote: You can always implement your own source of random data and push it into the OpenSSL engine. If you do that the rand_win code will not be executed. Jeffrey Altman As far as I can tell from reading

Re: Slow heap walking in rand_win.c

2003-10-02 Thread Jeffrey Altman
d be exposed openssl library calls that the application can pick and choose. -lee You can always implement your own source of random data and push it into the OpenSSL engine. If you do that the rand_win code will not be executed. Jeffrey Altman smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Slow heap walking in rand_win.c

2003-10-02 Thread Jeffrey Altman
hundred megs. You should be initializing the random number generator when your application starts; not when you have to perform your first SSL/TLS handshake. Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know this has been brought up a few times on this list - but since I consider it a severe

HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA

2003-08-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
-- This KB article explains why exceptions may be thrown or why the data returned from a performance data call would be invalid: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;178887 We may need to wrap calls probing HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA in an exception handling bl

Re: AW: AW: AW: BUG: CreateToolhelp32Snapshot, check if running asNT service

2003-08-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Ingo: In other words, this test cannot work in all cases based upon the knowledge of the OpenSSL developers because the account under which the program executes is determined by the local system administrator OR the application developer. All three of these tests would fail for my use of OpenS

Re: HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA

2003-08-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
crashes on some servers and not others. There is still an issue of dependence on the COM engine. Services employing OpenSSL must be loaded after the DCOM service has started. Jeffrey Altman Martin Kochanski wrote: If we're going to try exception handling then I suppose

Re: BUG: CreateToolhelp32Snapshot

2003-08-14 Thread Jeffrey Altman
mine if we were running as a service. If so, we might be able to tailor this code to behave differently. Jeffrey Altman Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: cardbox> As for the Windows 2003 Server crash: I agree that disabling cardbox> sections of code is a Bad Thing. What I've done

Re: AW: BUG: CreateToolhelp32Snapshot, check if running as NT service

2003-08-09 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Ingo: Thanks for the function. Can you provide a complete blackbox solution that is simply BOOL IsService(void) Please keep in mind that within the RAND_poll() function we have no input from the application as to the service name, logon session or account. All of that information would n

Re: [openssl.org #655] Kerberos: solaris 9 openssl-0.9.7b compileproblem

2003-07-24 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Remove "FAR" from the two locations it is specified in the KSSL_CTX data structure. MIT Kerberos 1.3 no longer provides dummy definitions for "FAR" as all support for 16-bit platforms (MS-DOS) has been removed. Jeffrey Altman Wayne Rasmussen via RT wrote: config -t results

Re: [openssl.org #550] bug report - library and header version mismatch

2003-03-27 Thread Jeffrey Altman
This is not a bug. You must recompile SSH if you want the header version within the executable to change. [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote: Hi Folks I have noticed that the internal version number of of opensslv.h (0x0090701fL) and the internal version number of libcrypto.so.0.9.7 and libssl.so.

Re: [ADVISORY] Timing Attack on OpenSSL

2003-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Altman
This is a different vulnerability. The one you patched two weeks ago was caused by a failure to decrypt messages when the MAC comparison failed. This vulnerability is a timing attack against the RSA algorithms. The Slashdot discussion is here: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/03/14/0012

Re: [openssl.org #536] Bug in kssl ?

2003-03-13 Thread Jeffrey Altman
I will look into this in a few days.  I am sorry but I do not have the time at the moment.  - Jeff Markus Moeller wrote: On Wednesday 12 Mar 2003 16:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote: A further check showed it is in kssl_TKT2tkt after the kssl_build_principal_2, because asn1ticket->en

Re: [openssl.org #481] (0.9.7 on Win32) openssl ca crashes when exiting...

2003-01-31 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Richard Levitte via RT wrote: OK, does anyone know a good way to detect (in run-time!) when the program is running as a service? If there's a way, the rest should be easy. Sorry I have been out of contact on this issue but the problems here are not about OpenSSL being used within a service b

Re: [openssl.org #441] bug in win32 test

2003-01-07 Thread Jeffrey Altman
By any chance did you install the Visual C++ Processor Pack? It replaces the Back End compiler (C2.DLL). Apparently, this upgrade to support new processors is a bit buggy. If you need support for new instruction sets upgrade to VC++ 7.0. Michael Hunley via RT wrote: OpenSSl v0.9.7 on Windo

Re: [openssl.org #425] Build error on Windows NT4?

2003-01-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: cl ... -c .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c(96) : error C2370: 'NETSCAPE_ENCRYPTED_PKEY_it' : redefinition; different storage class .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c(93) : see declaration of 'NETSCAPE_ENCRYPTED_PKEY_it'

TSU NOTIFICATION - encryption was Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/sslkssl.c

2002-12-20 Thread Jeffrey Altman
SUBMISSION TYPE: "TSU" SUBMITTED BY: Jeffrey Altman SUBMITTED FOR: POINT OF CONTACT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PHONE and/or FAX: MANUFACTURER: (if relevant) PRODUCT NAME/MODEL #: openssl 0.9.7 ECCN: 5D002 NOTIFICATION: The attached patch is against the 20021220 snapshot of

Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/ssl kssl.c

2002-12-20 Thread Jeffrey Altman
comments inline: Lutz Jaenicke wrote: OpenSSL CVS Repository http://cvs.openssl.org/ Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Lutz Jaenicke Root: /e/openssl/cvs Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl CHANGES

2002-12-12 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Not entirely true. I implemented the dynamic locks on Windows in Kermit 95. I do not have any hardware to test it with though. + *) The hw_ncipher.c engine requires dynamic locks. Unfortunately, it + seems that in spite of existing for more than a year, no application + author h

Re: [openssl.org #395] Problem with OpenSSL

2002-12-10 Thread Jeffrey Altman
know if this is the same problem reported by Jeffrey Altman. File crypto\rand\rand_win.c - OpenSSL 0.9.6g 9 Aug 2002 Code from the RAND_poll() function. Line: 253/* It appears like this can cause an exception deep within ADVAPI32.DLL 254 * at random times on Windows 2000. Reported

Re: Concerns about the use of OPENSSL_cleanse()

2002-12-09 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Rich Salz wrote: Hmm, so OpenSSL is depending on NULL being all-bytes-zero. :) Funny about that. :-) Probably a safe assumption, although theoretically you shouldn't do that. It really wouldn't matter what assumption you made. At some point there needs to be a test: Is this structure

[openssl.org #393] 0.9.7 beta 5 crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c X509_STORE_CTX_init() memset required

2002-12-09 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
Please ignore my previous e-mail, the problem is located in X509_STORE_CTX_init() The memset(&(ctx->ex_data),0,sizeof(CRYPTO_EX_DATA)) that was commented out needs to be restored due to the use of OPENSSL_cleanse() on that data structure. In previous releases this data structure would have

[openssl.org #392] X509_STORE_CTX_cleanup 0.9.7 beta 5

2002-12-09 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
I'm tracking down the cause of an exception that did not occur with Kermit 95 with previous 0.9.7 builds. In the process I noticed that in X509_STORE_CTX_cleanup the buffer ctx->ex_data is freed with CRYPTO_free_ex_data prior to it being cleansed with OPENSSL_cleanse I'm pretty sure

Concerns about the use of OPENSSL_cleanse()

2002-12-08 Thread Jeffrey Altman
I think we need to take a very close look at the situations when it is safe to replace memset(buf,0,sizeof(buf)) with OPENSSL_cleanse(buf,sizeof(buf)). It is clearly safe to make this replacement when the buffer is a stack allocation because there can be no future use of the data can take pl

OpenSSL on VMS - default locations for CERTS, KEYS, ...

2002-11-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman
for the storing of CERTS/KEYS and CRLs. Could some post a description of what is considered standard practice? Thanks. Jeffrey Altman * Volunteer Developer Kermit 95 2.1 GUI available now!!! The Kermit Project @ Columbia University SSH, Secure Telnet, Secure FTP, HTTP

[openssl.org #367] s3_clnt.c ssl3_get_server_hello and SSL_SESSION cipher_id 0.9.7-b4

2002-11-27 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
id=s->session->cipher_id; else id=s->session->cipher->id; if (s->hit && (id != c->id)) I do wonder why the SSL_SESSION cipher_id field is not consistently set when the cipher itself is set. Jeffrey Altman * Volunteer D

Re: [openssl.org #360] crypto/dsa/dsa_lib.c DSA_size()

2002-11-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
Then the assertion should be removed because as it is now it will always fail. > > Jeffrey Altman wrote: > > The code is the same in both 0.9.6- and 0.9.7-beta4. in 0.9.7-b4 > > there is an assertion added that is being triggered because the buf > > size is consid

Re: [openssl.org #360] crypto/dsa/dsa_lib.c DSA_size()

2002-11-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Then the assertion should be removed because as it is now it will always fail. > > Jeffrey Altman wrote: > > The code is the same in both 0.9.6- and 0.9.7-beta4. in 0.9.7-b4 > > there is an assertion added that is being triggered because the buf > > size is consid

RE: OpenSSL and compression using ZLIB

2002-11-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman
ECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: OpenSSL and compression using ZLIB > > - Original Message - > From: "Jeffrey Altman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PRO

Re: [openssl.org #360] crypto/dsa/dsa_lib.c DSA_size()

2002-11-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
other bytes could not be touched in the future though. > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:32:30 >+0100 (MET), "Jeffrey Altman via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > rt> > rt> What is the appropriate size for 'buf' in D

Re: [openssl.org #360] crypto/dsa/dsa_lib.c DSA_size()

2002-11-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman
bytes could not be touched in the future though. > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:32:30 >+0100 (MET), "Jeffrey Altman via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > rt> > rt> What is the appropriate size for 'buf' in D

Re: [openssl.org #360] crypto/dsa/dsa_lib.c DSA_size()

2002-11-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Thanks. That is very reassuring. > > Jeffrey Altman via RT wrote: > > What is the appropriate size for 'buf' in DSA_size()? > > > > 4 bytes is certainly not correct. > > Hi Jeffry, > > I think it's correct :-) > > int DSA_size(

[openssl.org #361] Re: OpenSSL and compression using ZLIB

2002-11-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
> for more info. > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PR

[openssl.org #360] crypto/dsa/dsa_lib.c DSA_size()

2002-11-25 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
What is the appropriate size for 'buf' in DSA_size()? 4 bytes is certainly not correct. My guess is that we want to support at least 256 bits and so it needs to be at least 32 bytes. Does anyone have a better recommendation? Jeffrey Altman * Volunteer Developer Kermit

Re: BIO broken

2002-11-24 Thread Jeffrey Altman
un time library, hence FILE* from > > the exe cannot work inside the DLL. > > > > > > Jan Kuznik > > __ > > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > > Development Mail

Re: OpenSSL and compression using ZLIB

2002-11-24 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> for more info. > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PR

[openssl.org #349] 0.9.7 b4 kssl patches

2002-11-19 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
The following minor problems need to be corrected in 0.9.7 b4 compiled against the MIT Kerberos distribution: diff -cw openssl-0.9.7-beta4\ssl/kssl.h openssl-0.9.7-beta4-modified\ssl/kssl.h *** openssl-0.9.7-beta4\ssl/kssl.h Tue Nov 12 08:23:26 2002 --- openssl-0.9.7-beta4-modified\ssl/kssl.h Tue

Re: OpenSSL Bug

2002-11-19 Thread Jeffrey Altman
according to the SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 > > specifications. If the IBM SSL library does not tolerate the empty > > fragments, then this is a bug that should be fixed in that library. > > I have passed this on to the IBM SSL developers. Thank you all for your > responses.

Re: IMPORTANT: Please try these specific snapshots

2002-11-15 Thread Jeffrey Altman
h the current PATH environment variable. Hard Links allowing a file to have multiple directory entries are supported in NTFS however very few shells understand how to manipulate them. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer Kermit 95 2.0 GUI available now!!! The Kermit Project @ Columbia

Re: OOB Data with SSL

2002-10-31 Thread Jeffrey Altman
TED] > http://pgina.cs.plu.edu > > > __ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > J

Re: [openssl.org #189] Kerberos Ciphersuite IDs

2002-10-15 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
s in ssl.h are wrong. > > > > > > There, I finally got the time to put this in. Just commited. > > Please test the next 0.9.7 snapshot and make sure I got it all right. > > > > This ticket is now resolved. > > > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Sep 30 18:55:

Re: [openssl.org #189] Kerberos Ciphersuite IDs

2002-10-15 Thread Jeffrey Altman
s in ssl.h are wrong. > > > > > > There, I finally got the time to put this in. Just commited. > > Please test the next 0.9.7 snapshot and make sure I got it all right. > > > > This ticket is now resolved. > > > > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Sep 30 18:55:

Re: [openssl.org #189] Kerberos Ciphersuite IDs

2002-10-15 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
erberos ciphersuites in > OpenSSL do > > not use the IDs defined in RFC2712, which obviously has negative > effects > > on interoperability. > > -- > Richard Levitte > ______ > OpenSSL Project

Re: [openssl.org #189] Kerberos Ciphersuite IDs

2002-10-15 Thread Jeffrey Altman
erberos ciphersuites in > OpenSSL do > > not use the IDs defined in RFC2712, which obviously has negative > effects > > on interoperability. > > -- > Richard Levitte > ______ > OpenSSL Project

Re: DES_CBC_CKSUM in SSL and Kerberos.

2002-10-10 Thread Jeffrey Altman
AAAKAAIB > DwAQMQBUAGEAYgBsAGUA > AA4AAgEBBgAAAP8A > AAAX6RUAAABXAG8AcgBkAEQA > bwBjAHUAbQBlAG4AdAAA

Re: heap walk in rand_win.c is quite slow

2002-09-28 Thread Jeffrey Altman
__ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer Ker

Re: Question about the latest security patch - malicious usage

2002-08-11 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> Jeffrey Altman wrote: > > The answer to your questions is 'yes'. As I understand it, the > > patches were released as they are "for the time being" because it is > > better to crash your application then allow the attacker to compromise > > your

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-08-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
gt; > > bit wrong (i.e. in ssl2_generate_key_material(). this is void > function, so > > > i cannot indicate error). > > > > Thanks for the patch. For static functions, you can safely change > > void into int so that you can indicate the errors properly. >

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-08-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
gt; > > bit wrong (i.e. in ssl2_generate_key_material(). this is void > function, so > > > i cannot indicate error). > > > > Thanks for the patch. For static functions, you can safely change > > void into int so that you can indicate the errors properly. >

RE: Question about the latest security patch - malicious usage

2002-08-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
I submitted an analysis of the changes to be made shortly after the patches were issued. I won't have time to try and work on patches until the weekend. Perhaps someone from the OpenSSL team will beat me to it. > > Thanks for the reply. > > Do you know when a full fix is to be expected? > >

Re: [openssl.org #189] Kerberos Ciphersuite IDs

2002-08-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
with this. > > If it wasn't for this, I'd apply the needed changes immediately. As > it is now, I'd like to see this issue cleared first. > Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer Kermit 95 2.0 GUI available now!!! The Kermit Project @ Columbia University SSH,

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 30 Jul >2002 11:31:17 EDT, Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > jaltman> since they do not compile on two major platforms. > > On VMS, creating OpenSSL shared libraries is not the norm yet, so > it'll

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 30 Jul >2002 11:31:17 EDT, Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > jaltman> since they do not compile on two major platforms. > > On VMS, creating OpenSSL shared libraries is not the norm yet, so > it'll

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
rrors to the caller. ssl2_return_error() is always called from locations that are already in the process of returning errors to the caller. server_verify() is safe to return an error value < 0 server_finish() is safe to return an error value < 0 So it seems that we should be able to

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman
rrors to the caller. ssl2_return_error() is always called from locations that are already in the process of returning errors to the caller. server_verify() is safe to return an error value < 0 server_finish() is safe to return an error value < 0 So it seems that we should be able to

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
checks For example, in ssl_sess.c ssl_get_new_session() the error SSL_R_SSL_SESSION_ID_HAS_BAD_LENGTH is returned if tmp > ss->session_id_length. I don't see why we need to call abort() (via die()) if s->sid_ctx_length > sizeof ss->sid_ctx. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Desig

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman
checks For example, in ssl_sess.c ssl_get_new_session() the error SSL_R_SSL_SESSION_ID_HAS_BAD_LENGTH is returned if tmp > ss->session_id_length. I don't see why we need to call abort() (via die()) if s->sid_ctx_length > sizeof ss->sid_ctx. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Desig

Re: OpenSSL patches for other versions

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman
/r$ > Or when the new OpenSSLDie() is called. That is why we want it removed. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer Kermit 95 2.0 GUI available now!!! The Kermit Project @ Columbia University SSH, Secure Telnet, Secure FTP, HTTP http://www.kermit-project.org/Se

Re: [openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> rt> Need to add it to the exports list. > > For anyone who has the time, the fix is to move the declaration (but > not the macro die()) from cryptlib.h to crypto.h, then do a make > update. And this will auto-generate the entry for util/libeay.num ? Cool. Jeffrey Al

[openssl.org #170] OpenSSLDie not exported in Win32

2002-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Altman via RT
Need to add it to the exports list. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer Kermit 95 2.0 GUI available now!!! The Kermit Project @ Columbia University SSH, Secure Telnet, Secure FTP, HTTP http://www.kermit-project.org/Secured with MIT Kerberos, SRP, and [EMAIL PROTECTED

  1   2   3   4   >