On 3/24/21 9:53 PM, Embedded Devel wrote:
On 3/23/21 11:06 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 23/03/2021 15:47, Embedded Devel wrote:
Do you know if your application is statically linked or dynamically
linked to OpenSSL?
Ive attached the code in question if it helps
and nope still have the err
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021, 10:54 PM Embedded Devel wrote:
>
> On 3/23/21 11:06 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 23/03/2021 15:47, Embedded Devel wrote:
> >>> Do you know if your application is statically linked or dynamically
> >>> linked to OpenSSL?
> >> Ive attached the code in question if it
On 3/23/21 11:06 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 23/03/2021 15:47, Embedded Devel wrote:
Do you know if your application is statically linked or dynamically
linked to OpenSSL?
Ive attached the code in question if it helps
original code was deprecated, and changed from
/* if ((ssl_con->ct
On 3/23/21 11:06 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 23/03/2021 15:47, Embedded Devel wrote:
Do you know if your application is statically linked or dynamically
linked to OpenSSL?
Ive attached the code in question if it helps
Looks like the original developer already tried to print the contents
On 23/03/2021 15:47, Embedded Devel wrote:
Do you know if your application is statically linked or dynamically
linked to OpenSSL?
Ive attached the code in question if it helps
Looks like the original developer already tried to print the contents of
the OpenSSL error stack:
load_verify_locations()\n");
return -1;
}
SSL_CTX_set_default_verify_paths(ssl_con->ctx);
SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file(ssl_con->ctx, ssl_con->cert_file, SSL_FILETYPE_PEM);
SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file(ssl_con->ctx, ssl_con->key_file, SSL_FILETYPE_PEM);
On 23/03/2021 15:02, Embedded Devel wrote:
IM inclined top think the code for the certs is ok, but can really say,
and im not an openssl programmer by any means... just need someone to
put eyes on the code and fix it really.
The cert looks ok - at least nothing obviously wrong. 2048 bi
On 3/23/21 9:31 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 23/03/2021 02:37, Embedded Devel wrote:
I have an application previously written for us 10+ years ago that no
longer seems to be happy
Has something happened that might have caused this? Did you upgrade
OpenSSL, or do some other kind of update to
On 23/03/2021 02:37, Embedded Devel wrote:
I have an application previously written for us 10+ years ago that no
longer seems to be happy
Has something happened that might have caused this? Did you upgrade
OpenSSL, or do some other kind of update to your code?
Which version of OpenSSL are
te_fds);
return rc;
}
and like wise i get this error on the server side
Mar 23 03:13:58 optim04 ac_server[597280]: ac_ssl_server_accept(): Error
SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL - return code: -1. SSL_accept()
Mar 23 03:13:58 optim04 ac_server[597280]: ac_ssl_server_accept(): Error
code: -3
which
Riddle solved:
Must call BIO_new_accept("0.0.0.0:") and it works.
Von: openssl-users Im Auftrag von
Karsten Gorkow
Gesendet: Montag, 12. November 2018 18:26
An: openssl-users@openssl.org
Betreff: [openssl-users] Win32 BIO server, no accept
Hello,
I'm pretty new to O
m is the server role. I
don't get a valid (second) accept call, no client is able to connect. Inside
the app this is done via a non-blocking listening socket (return value is
always -1 with "WOULDBLOCK" set), but I even copied the sample code from the
blog (blocking mode) into th
This may indeed be the problem, but some of the changes in 1.0.2 do not
easily merge back to 1.0.1i. Specifically, this diff seems to have no
equivalent code to merge into in 1.0.1i.
We may need to consider reverting back to 1.0.1h until 1.0.2 is released.
--- a/ssl/s3_lib.c
+++ b/ssl/s3_lib
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 05:41:13PM -0700, Norm Green wrote:
> Thanks Viktor. I did get some fixes (via this list) from Steve a while back
> because SRP authenication was completely broken out of the box with 1.0.1i.
> However I don't know if all the changes in the commit you mentioned have
> been m
Thanks Viktor. I did get some fixes (via this list) from Steve a while
back because SRP authenication was completely broken out of the box with
1.0.1i.However I don't know if all the changes in the commit you
mentioned have been merged. I will investigate further.
Norm
On 9/8/14 17:30,
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 03:10:47PM -0700, Norm Green wrote:
> I will try to capture traffic in the next run.
Looking at the commit history after 1.0.1i, I think
you want:
commit 30fbe92c78981a417718bcbf25d295d16c5b7ed9
Author: Dr. Stephen Henson
Date: Fri Aug 8 11:24:25 2014 +0100
Fix SR
Hi Viktor,
From the server:
(gdb) p s->session[0]
$1 = {ssl_version = 770, key_arg_length = 0, key_arg =
"\000\000\000\000\000\000\000", master_key_length = 48,
master_key =
"\000Eθ\371\266\225\202\062\370\336x\324*\251\016\336\344\372\221\302\031\002\351\322Zk\373G\342x\273u\274|\210\362\36
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 02:36:20PM -0700, Norm Green wrote:
> Thanks Victor. I don't have a handshake recording for these stacks. The
> problem occurs intermittently.
Any chance you can capture enough sessions to also nab one (full-size
packet capture) that ran into the problem?
> I've dumped
Thanks Victor. I don't have a handshake recording for these stacks.
The problem occurs intermittently. I've dumped the SSL state and method
objects for the server and client. Anything else you want to see while
the processes are still alive?
Norm
Here's the SSL state and method from the
On Mon, Sep 08, 2014 at 11:45:59AM -0700, Norm Green wrote:
> Were are occasionally seeing hangs when establishing an SSL connection with
> OpenSSL 1.0.1i. This connection uses SRP and both the server and the client
> sockets are in blocking mode (thus the hang).
>
> Is there anything I can do t
Were are occasionally seeing hangs when establishing an SSL connection
with OpenSSL 1.0.1i. This connection uses SRP and both the server and
the client sockets are in blocking mode (thus the hang).
Is there anything I can do to debug this problem?
Client side:
gdb) where
#0 0x7f91e412dd
On 04/14/2014 03:01 PM, Benjamin Schulz wrote:
>
> Hello,
> The openssl foundation writes here:
>
> https://www.openssl.org/support/acknowledgments.html
>
> ...
>
> So I think the openssl foundation should take some measures that perhaps may
> help to scare intelligence agencies away from o
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
> us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Benjamin Schulz
> Sent: Monday, 14 April, 2014 15:01
>
> Could the openssl foundation add official rules that
This list is probably not the place to discuss this at any length, but I for
one find the
Hello,
The openssl foundation writes here:
https://www.openssl.org/support/acknowledgments.html
"Please note that we ask permission to identify sponsors and that some sponsors
we consider eligible for inclusion here have requested to remain anonymous.""
and here:
https://www.openssl.org/
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 07:49:06AM -0700, Roger Miller wrote:
> My initial call to 'connect' was returning 'WSAEWOULDBLOCK' (to
> be expected on a non-blocking socket).
At that point the appropriate thing to do is to select the socket
for write in your event loop. Once the socket reports ready
(
> -Original Message-
> From: Roger Miller
>
> Using OpenSSL libraries to provide basic encryption between client and
> server.
> Using non-blocking sockets, and client can connect to multiple servers.
>
> I have an intermittent issue where server reports
> 'SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version n
> -Original Message-
> From: bensonkwok...@air-watch.com [mailto:bensonkwok...@air-watch.com]
>
> I have a similar problem and have found a fix for it. Please see the
> thread below to see if your problem is the same:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg33010.html
I have a similar problem and have found a fix for it. Please see the
thread below to see if your problem is the same:
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg33010.html
Benson Kwok
Development
Www.air-watch.com
On 9/25/13 6:35 PM, "Roger Miller" wrote:
>Using OpenSSL librari
Using OpenSSL libraries to provide basic encryption between client and server.
Using non-blocking sockets, and client can connect to multiple servers.
I have an intermittent issue where server reports 'SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong
version number' during client hello.
I have added trace statements to the
ou can open the socket
with socket() gethostbyname() bind() listen() connect() accept()
as applicable, and then SSL_set_fd, which wraps it in a BIO.
> Or do I have to re-write somehow with non-blocking sockets
> and/or using
> signals for my timeout rather than select()? Or ... ?
>
Yo
minated all of my BIO usage. I'm using normal TCP/IP bind(),
> select(), accept(), and then SSL_set_fd(ssl, socket) and SSL_accept(); I
> then use SSL_read() to read data on the session. It seems to be working
> (with some loose ends, but I am getting farther than before).
>
>
Okay, I think I get it. Every OpenSSL example I have seen uses BIO, but
there is no need to use BIO, right (unless one wants I/O-type-independence)?
I have eliminated all of my BIO usage. I'm using normal TCP/IP bind(),
select(), accept(), and then SSL_set_fd(ssl, socket) and SSL_accept(); I
the socket is ready it starts a thread that issues an accept and goes
into a receive loop. Otherwise it does some housekeeping like checking for a
"quit" flag. In any event it loops back around to the select. Pretty typical
I think.
Most of that ports fairly straightforwardly to OpenSSL.
your thread;
if you need or want concurrency you must then manage it
at the thread or process level, not a 'work-item' level.
>
> Interestingly, in a situation where two apps open a number of
> SSL connections between each other (over time) I get a
> deadlock - where a
etween each other (over time) I get a deadlock - where a client blocks on the
SSL_Connect, and the server on the general (socketIO) accept. Any hints?
> You are but invisibly; SSL_set_fd() creates a socket-BIO
> internally.
That's fine
> You can actually use socket-BIO, and/or acc
but instead using SSL_set_fd().
> This is because the application uses many sockets, but only
> sometimes uses SSL.
>
You are but invisibly; SSL_set_fd() creates a socket-BIO
internally. But when SSL_* then does I/O on that BIO
the BIO does it on your socket, which is what you want.
You
org"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 10 April 2012, 14:24
Subject: Accept failing - SysCall error - advice?
Hi there,
I'm having trouble getting the SSL Connect/Accepts to work.
For the client, SSL_Connect returns -1. Raising SSL Error = 2,
SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
For the server, SSL_ACCEPT retur
Hi there,
I'm having trouble getting the SSL Connect/Accepts to work.
For the client, SSL_Connect returns -1. Raising SSL Error = 2,
SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ
For the server, SSL_ACCEPT returns 0 (or -1 if non blocking), raising SSL Error
5 = SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL.
ERR_ERROR_STRING() prints:0005:lib
Thanks for the reply and apologies for the awkward description of the
problem.
I had moved the SSL initiation until after the exchange of the 1st clear
text request/reply but was getting errors, which prompted the original post.
Subsequently I discovered in the move I had swapped the SSL_CTX_new()
> the protection until it exchanges a couple of clear text
> messages over the
> same port it will use SSL. Is it possible to do this with
> openSSL? That is,
> use accept/connect and send/receive to establish
> communications and then
> begin the SSL handshaking etc.?
Absolutely.
L? That is,
use accept/connect and send/receive to establish communications and then
begin the SSL handshaking etc.? I had created the application using openSSL
that uses SSL_accept etc. that works well talking to a copy of the same code
running elsewhere. However, I've since learned that
Hello,
I am writting a client\server application(game) using openssl API for the
network.
I am ablie to connect with openssl s_client to openssl s_server. I am also able
to connect with my own game client to openssl s_server(with the same
parameters).
However, I am unable to accept any
Am 14.10.2010 01:58, Mounir IDRASSI schrieb:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> The value of the Basic Constraint extension of this website self-signed
> certificate is "End Entity" and, more importantly, it is set to
> Critical. So, technically speaking, this certificate can not be a CA and
> it can't certify
gned cert and all of the nokia cell phones, i get my
hands on refuse to accept this cert when trying to import it
manually in the cert store. It is working without problems for
example with a signed cert from cacert (where the root-CA-cert is
also not in the default cert store) I'm asking f
Dear Openssl-Users,
i recently came across a problem with the offered ssl-cert on
www.mastersnet.de
It's a self signed cert and all of the nokia cell phones, i get my
hands on refuse to accept this cert when trying to import it
manually in the cert store. It is working without problem
e
listening port by configuring the proxy
7. Accept the connection using socket function and read data from it
8. Called SSL_accept function for handshaking with the browser, but it
failed
Can anybody tell me what went wrong ?
Platforms of my application
MS
Deepak Mundra wrote:
> I have written a server client application in which im using self signed
ssl
> certificates .. How can i make sure that only known clients can connect to
my
> server using ssl connection?
Simply define *precisely* what you mean by "known clients" and test for
that. If a co
Have you looked at stunnel with verify options 2 or 3?
Carter
Carter Browne
CBCS
cbro...@cbcs-usa.com
781-721-2890
Deepak Mundra wrote:
> Dear All,
>
>
>I have written a server client application in which im using
> self signed ssl certificates .. How can i make sure that only known
>
On 2009.10.20 at 16:50:59 +0530, Deepak Mundra wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>══ I have written a server client application in which im using self
>signed ssl certificates .. How can i make sure that only known clients can
>connect to my server using ssl connection?
There is three answ
Dear All,
I have written a server client application in which im using self
signed ssl certificates .. How can i make sure that only known clients can
connect to my server using ssl connection?
im creating certificates as below
Server Side:
===
Server Side
--
(pas
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Dylan Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, 15 September, 2009 13:42
> Hi all, I need to connect to an LDAP server with a self-signed cert.
> I cannot get s_client to verify OK.. I have gathered the
> server cert by running s_client and then copying the ser
Hi all, I need to connect to an LDAP server with a self-signed cert.
I cannot get s_client to verify OK.. I have gathered the server cert
by running s_client and then copying the server cert out of the output
from s_client. Then I run s_client with the -CAfile option pointed to
that file and it s
Chase Douglas wrote:
> I'm reading the actual X.509 (03/2000) specification and it refers to
> a subjectPublicKeyInfo field. Is this what you are meaning by
> "subjectKeyIdentifier"?
These fields are not useful because they are not required to be hashes of
the public key. You should use a hash o
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> Dave S, I wish that you would read the entire message and maybe clear
> your system of a bit of the current X.509 FUD kool-aid. This is
> "person to his own server at home". This does not require any kind of
> third-party reference (asking someone else to introduce your c
> This is an SSH-like scenario (meaning, the subject is already known to
> the principal, who has made a choice to use the services provided by
> that subject). Instead of trying to display the contents of a
> self-signed webserver certificate, the only thing that you can really
> truly verify is
Dave S, I wish that you would read the entire message and maybe clear
your system of a bit of the current X.509 FUD kool-aid. This is
"person to his own server at home". This does not require any kind of
third-party reference (asking someone else to introduce your computer
to you? That's a waste
Chase Douglas wrote:
> I am developing an iPhone app that will incorporate SSL for encryption
> of network communication. The encrypted connection will be between
> average users and their home servers. Most of the time I envision
> people having SSL certificates that cannot be validated with the
I am developing an iPhone app that will incorporate SSL for encryption
of network communication. The encrypted connection will be between
average users and their home servers. Most of the time I envision
people having SSL certificates that cannot be validated with the
default iPhone root certificat
same
> time connections are created to others whenever they're needed). Whenever I
> accept an incoming connection, I'd like to be able to retain the IP address
> which has just connected (for future use and logging).
>
> I thought I'd be able to achieve this by usi
're needed).
Whenever I accept an incoming connection, I'd like to be able to retain
the IP address which has just connected (for future use and logging).
I thought I'd be able to achieve this by using the following code
(truncated to essentials, left out error handling):
if (BIO_
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008, Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
Hi all,
I was playing around with the 0.9.8g version (actually I am wrapping the
CLI to use with python) and I stumbled across the following:
when I do:
openssl rsa -outform NET -in test.pem -out test.net -passout pa
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008, Martin P. Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was playing around with the 0.9.8g version (actually I am wrapping the
> CLI to use with python) and I stumbled across the following:
> when I do:
> openssl rsa -outform NET -in test.pem -out test.net -passout pass:test
> It still ask
Hi all,
I was playing around with the 0.9.8g version (actually I am wrapping the
CLI to use with python) and I stumbled across the following:
when I do:
openssl rsa -outform NET -in test.pem -out test.net -passout pass:test
It still asks me on the command line for an password while I expected i
AuthLDAPBindPassword "[BLANK]"
Require valid-user
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/--client-Apache-2.2.3---%3E-FAILED-%28tls_read%3A-want%3D11%2C-got%3D0--TLS%3A-can%27t-accept.%29-tp16467510p16467518.html
Sent from the OpenSSL -
TLS: can't
accept.)
In openldap-2.3.37/libraries/libldap/tls.c:
err = SSL_accept( ssl );
if ( err <= 0 ) {
...
Debug( LDAP_DEBUG_ANY,"TLS: can't accept.\n",0,0,0 );
...
a) how can we have more TLS-ldap trace?
b) what can be the failure? any idea?
MY CONFIG:
openssl.org
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: why winxp openssl based server can only accept 16 client?
>
>I write an openssl based multi-threads server program. But it
>can only support 16 thread on the WinXP. Exceeding that, the
>SSL_accept() will failed. I use the
>Initialize
I write an openssl based multi-threads server program. But it can only
support 16 thread on the WinXP. Exceeding that, the SSL_accept() will
failed. I use the
InitializeCriticalSection/EnterCriticalSection/LeaveCriticalSection to do
the thread lock.
And i also compiled the program with /MD.
I co
> Well, client initially sends a http request to port 80 and my web
> server redirects the client to use https using 302 http header if
> SSL is enabled in my switch. As a result of that, client would resend
> https request to port 443. However I do not understand why that should
> cause this prob
Hello,
> Well, client initially sends a http request to port 80 and my web
> server redirects the client to use https using 302 http header if SSL
> is enabled in my switch. As a result of that, client would resend
> https request to port 443. However I do not understand why that should
> cause thi
Well, client initially sends a http request to port 80 and my web server
redirects the client to use https using 302 http header if SSL is enabled in
my switch. As a result of that, client would resend https request to port
443. However I do not understand why that should cause this problem. There
> I see this error in my web server log when I try to connect
> using IE or Firefox. Does anybody know why this could be happening ?
> 04/15/2007 03:36:22.22 SSL_accept failed -
> error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol
> 04/15/2007 03:35:52.08 SSL_accept failed -
I see this error in my web server log when I try to connect using IE or
Firefox. Does anybody know why this could be happening ?
04/15/2007 03:36:22.22 SSL_accept failed -
error:140760FC:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol
04/15/2007 03:35:52.08 SSL_accept failed -
error:14076
Hi,
> Make a CA cert, and sign a server cert with it, and use this in the
> verify locations call in the client.
I tried this and instead I get the error:
-Error with certificate at depth: 0
issuer = ...
subject = ...
err 20:unable to get local issuer certificate
Best Regards,
Mark W
Make a CA cert, and sign a server cert with it, and use this in the
verify locations call in the client.
Mark wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the help from everyone with regards to certificates. I now
have
an error when attempting to run my application.
On the server side when I call SSL_accept() I
Hi,
Thanks for the help from everyone with regards to certificates. I now
have
an error when attempting to run my application.
On the server side when I call SSL_accept() I get the error:
error:14094418:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert unknown ca
and on the client side when I call SSL_
No one can help me? :(
Alexis Lefort wrote:
I have forgotten one thing, the call to SSL_connect() returns "-1", and
SSL_get_error() returns SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL.
The error string is empty and errno is NULL.
Alexis Lefort wrote:
Hi list,
When my client (0.9.8a) tries to con
I have forgotten one thing, the call to SSL_connect() returns "-1", and
SSL_get_error() returns SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL.
The error string is empty and errno is NULL.
Alexis Lefort wrote:
Hi list,
When my client (0.9.8a) tries to connect (SSL_connect) to an "openssl
s_server"(0.9.7g) (openssl
Hi list,
When my client (0.9.8a) tries to connect (SSL_connect) to an "openssl
s_server"(0.9.7g) (openssl s_server -cert server_cert.pem -key
server_priv_key.pem), the server crashes:
gethostbyname failure
0 items in the session cache
0 client connects (SSL_connect())
0 client renegotia
Cisco has sent several documents on how to make
> this work, generally with all other products accept
> for openssl. Still the instructions are quite clear
> and should work with openssl just fine.
>
> FYI - Version 4.1.7.D
>
> --- David Gianndrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wro
ee if there is a difference.
BTW Cisco has sent several documents on how to make
this work, generally with all other products accept
for openssl. Still the instructions are quite clear
and should work with openssl just fine.
FYI - Version 4.1.7.D
--- David Gianndrea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you installed the CA cert on the cisco?
David Gianndrea
Senior Network Engineer
Comsquared Systems, Inc.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.comsquared.com
ray v wrote:
Has anyone been able to get a certificate signed by
openssl CA to accept the identity certificate?
1. Gen manual pkcs10
Has anyone been able to get a certificate signed by
openssl CA to accept the identity certificate?
1. Gen manual pkcs10 req on 3kvpn
2. Sign 3kvpn req and make cert
3. install cert through cut and paste or file transfer
error message
Error installing SSL certificate: Incomplete chain.
I
eater than 2048 This includes the CA
>
>
>
> ray v <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 05/12/2005 01:16 AM
> Please respond to
> openssl-users@openssl.org
>
>
> To
> openssl-users@openssl.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Cisco concent
Subject
Cisco concentrator not accept
certificate from openssl
Hi All, Hi Steve!
Does anyone have documentation on how to get a
concentrator to accept certificate signed by openssl?
Cisco VPN 3030 4.x
On the concentrator I have install both my Root CA
certificate and the Sub CA I u
Hi All, Hi Steve!
Does anyone have documentation on how to get a
concentrator to accept certificate signed by openssl?
Cisco VPN 3030 4.x
On the concentrator I have install both my Root CA
certificate and the Sub CA I used to sign request for
internal devices. Next I generate a manual request
I'm a little confused as to how to manage a non-blocking accept call.
Specifically I don't understand what the expected return from
BIO_do_accept() should be when non-blocking is turned on. How can I tell
that the BIO_do_accept() call returned because it is non-blocking vs. an
ac
context. What might this mean?
[Server : SSL State: before/accept initialization, where=0010,ret=0001[Server : SSL State: before/accept initialization, where=2001,ret=0001
[Client : SSL State: before/connect initialization, where=0010,ret=0001[Client : SSL S
Is server can only accept ssl clients to the
> limit of 64 on same port, can I enlarge the number, Urgent! Thanks!
>
> Hi Edward, Steve,
>
> Problem solved, thank you! :)
>
> Is there any magic numbers like this in socket or openssl
> libraries, more thanks!
>
:29 AM
Subject: RE: Is server can only accept ssl clients to the limit of 64 on
same port, can I enlarge the number, Urgent! Thanks!
> I'm not sure why the SSL_accept() is blocking, but on Windows, 64 does
seem
> to be a magic number for things such as select(). FD_SETSIZE is defined
to
sure if
this is the problem.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr.
> Stephen Henson
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Is server can only accept ssl clients to
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004, Eric Lai wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Thank for your reply!
>
> Let me explain my problem: If I tried to connect 100 SSL client to my
> server, only 64 clients can connected, the other 36 clients remain in SSL
> Accepting state (or SSL Accept got blocking).
Hello,
How to generate private key format accept by microsoft signcode tool ?
Thanks for advance
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:19:08PM +0200, Lugeon Blaise wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I implemented a client-server application with openssl version 0.9.6c
> (engine) and everything works fine on Win32 platform.
>
> I try to do the same on tru64 and I get the following error d
Hi everybody,
I implemented a client-server application with openssl version 0.9.6c
(engine) and everything works fine on Win32 platform.
I try to do the same on tru64 and I get the following error during the
accept:
error:0005:lib(0):func(0):bad asn1 object header
I use a client
Thank you for giving me advice. I will check "timing out slow
operations" out.
Thank you,
Atsushi
hierophant> You may want to review the section on "timing out slow operations" as well
hierophant> as blocking/non-blocking I/O in the "Programming Perl" book. IIRC, this
hierophant> behav
on 4/30/02 10:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] purportedly said:
> Hi,
>
> if anybody know this problem, please give me some advice.
> I made a simple web server with SSLeay in perl, but sometime it
> hangs up. It hangs up in accept(). accept() calls read() system call
> and the rea
Hi,
if anybody know this problem, please give me some advice.
I made a simple web server with SSLeay in perl, but sometime it
hangs up. It hangs up in accept(). accept() calls read() system call
and the read() system call is always waiting for coming data when it
hangs up. I read a manual
Accept is returning me a bad asn1 object header
error can nebody explain me what are the possiblw causes of this
error
i am using sslv23server method and have
initailized SSL _CTX SSL SSL method objects without any errors
-SIGTERM
amit
I think I have this sussed. Calls to methods that manipulate SSL_CTX
aren't always thread safe and I was assuming they were (without checking
- doh!).
Andy S.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Schneider
> Sent: 26 November 2001 13:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subj
0. Does anyone have any ideas, "oh yeah, it's bug '
etc. Are there time outs in the accept code I should be worrying about?
Andy S.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.o
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
