Hi,
Here is question,can you help me out? Thanks.
Background:
I am working to write an openssl engine to use cryptographic algorithm in a
hardware device. The hardware device support asymmetric/symmetric algorithm,
for example:rsa/aes.
Question:
When I write openssl engine, I shall use
Hi,
I am using openssl engine with nginx.
openssl: OpenSSL_1_1_1f
If the engine does not include rsa, everythings works well
If the engine retister rsa, even the empty
IMPLEMENT_DYNAMIC_BIND_FN(bind_fn)
bind_fn
ENGINE_set_destroy_function(e, destroy_fn);
ENGINE_set_RSA(e, RSA_meth_new(&quo
Hello,
I have a custom OpenSSL engine and it is working fine with pthread. I was
trying to use a third-party thread library
<https://github.com/stonebuddha/uthread> by linking this library with my
engine. However, upon linking and running the engine, I'm getting a
Segmentation fault. I
OpenSSL doesn't have a global lock.
You could implement a single lock in the engine. Grab it immediately on
entry and release just before exit.
Pauli
On 11/11/21 8:24 am, Shariful Alam wrote:
Hello,
I understand this is a weird question. I have an OpenSSL engine only
for RSA. And I
Hello,
I understand this is a weird question. I have an OpenSSL engine only for
RSA. And I have apache installed that uses this OpenSSL engine for the
HTTPS connection.
I was wondering if it is possible to use a global lock with the OpenSSL on
mod_ssl call? So that, only one mod_ssl thread cal
Hello,
Usually you don't, and if you compile it against the same major release, no
problems happen.
I'd suggest you to look at the backtrace.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 3:03 AM Shariful Alam wrote:
> Hello,
> I have installed OpenSSL 1.1.1c. I'm trying to make a custom Ope
Hello,
I have installed OpenSSL 1.1.1c. I'm trying to make a custom OpenSSL engine
for RSA. The following sample code is copied from the engine *e_dasync.c. *
Following is a sample code for my RSA engine (*rsa-eng
Hello,
I have a custom OpenSSL engine for experiment purposes. I'm trying to load
my engine automatically. I intend to use my custom engine instead of the
default OpenSSL engine. I have installed *OpenSSL 1.1.1c *from the source
code with,
*./config --prefix=/opt/openssl -DOPENSSL_LOAD
L version...
Cheers,
Richard
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:06:53 +0200,
Swamy J-S wrote:
>
>
> Am working in Ubuntu 18.04 with openssl 1.1.0g version. I built a custom
> openssl engine and now i
> want to use this engine instead of default openssl engine.
>
> My engine library name
Just now I created a dummy file “*config*” and added the details you sent
> in this file.
>
>
>
> Also added “*export OPENSSL_CONF=path_to_config*” in /etc/environment
> file. And ran the command “*openssl engine store -t -c*”.
>
Did you specify the correct dynamic_path?
Does
added “export OPENSSL_CONF=path_to_config” in /etc/environment file. And
ran the command “openssl engine store -t -c”.
Still am getting same error as store not found when I run my application.
Thanks and Regards,
SWAMY J S
From: Dmitry Belyavsky
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 1:44 PM
To: Swamy J
application should load the config file, the way it works is different
for different versions.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:07 AM Swamy J-S wrote:
> Am working in Ubuntu 18.04 with openssl 1.1.0g version. I built a custom
> openssl engine and now i want to use this engine instead of default o
Am working in Ubuntu 18.04 with openssl 1.1.0g version. I built a custom
openssl engine and now i want to use this engine instead of default openssl
engine.
My engine library name is libstoreengine.so and i copied this to
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openssl-1.0.0/engines/ path.
When i run my
Hello all,
I am currently having some trouble using an openssl engine with nginx.
I was having no problems using it for loading private key through my engine.
However after adding new capabilities about symmetric encryption (AES) to the
engine, nginx is trying to use my engine instead of the
ashah) via openssl-users wrote:
> I get the following error when I try to access the ed25519 key stored in
> SoftHSM via the openssl engine interface using engine_pkcs11.
>
>
>
> []:~$ openssl pkey -in
>
"pkcs11:model=SoftHSM%20v2;m
Perhaps the pkcs11 engine does not support ed25519 keys?
Matt
On 17/09/18 22:05, Paras Shah (parashah) via openssl-users wrote:
> I get the following error when I try to access the ed25519 key stored in
> SoftHSM via the openssl engine interface using engine_pkcs11.
>
>
>
I get the following error when I try to access the ed25519 key stored in
SoftHSM via the openssl engine interface using engine_pkcs11.
[]:~$ openssl pkey -in
"pkcs11:model=SoftHSM%20v2;manufacturer=SoftHSM%20project;serial=6a160d52b750862f;token=token%202.5.0-rc1;id=%22%22;object=ed25519%2
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 Jayalakshmi Bhat wrote:
>
> Engine usage is application specific.There are couple of applications
> dependent on RSA TPM? engine. And are few applications dependent on
> RSA smart card engine.?
>
> We wanted to know if there are any APIs provided by OpenSSL to make the
> eng
bhat [mailto:bhat.jayalaks...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 19 February 2018 7:16 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: [openssl-users] How to make OpenSSL engine usage application specific?
Hello All,
We have 2 RSA OpenSSL engines in our product. Both the engines performs same
RSA encyrpt/decrypt operations.
Hello All,
We have 2 RSA OpenSSL engines in our product. Both the engines performs
same RSA encyrpt/decrypt operations. For easy explaination I am naming
engines as
1. RSA smart card engine
2. RSA TPM engine
Engine usage is application specific.There are couple of applications
dependent on RSA
Hi Jayalakshmi,
Is your implementation OSS or intellectual property? If it is OSS can you
please provide the URL?
Regards,
Freemon
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Jayalakshmi bhat <
bhat.jayalaks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Our device uses TPM to protect certificate private keys. We hav
> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
> Of Michael Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 18:37
>
> Jakob Bohm wrote:
>
> > Please beware that many TPM chips were recently discovered to contain a
> > broken RSA key generation algorithm, so publi
On 10/26/2017 3:33 AM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Michael Richardson wrote:
Jakob Bohm wrote:
wow, further evidence that everything needs an upgrade path.
From the viewpoint of hardware vendors the upgrade path is selling new
hardware. It's simply like that. Not very sustainable...
All the T
In message
on Wed, 25 Oct 2017 22:36:45 +0530, Jayalakshmi bhat
said:
bhat.jayalakshmi> Our device uses TPM to protect certificate private
bhat.jayalakshmi> keys. We have written engine interface to integrate
bhat.jayalakshmi> TPM functionality into OpenSSL. Thus TPM gets loaded
bhat.jayalaksh
Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Jakob Bohm wrote:
> >> I wanted to know when we use engine instance for encyrption/decryption
> >> operation, can it be done selectively?
>
> > Please beware that many TPM chips were recently discovered to contain a
> > broken RSA key generation algo
Jakob Bohm wrote:
>> I wanted to know when we use engine instance for encyrption/decryption
>> operation, can it be done selectively?
> Please beware that many TPM chips were recently discovered to contain a
> broken RSA key generation algorithm, so public/private key pairs keys
On 25/10/2017 19:06, Jayalakshmi bhat wrote:
Hi All,
Our device uses TPM to protect certificate private keys. We have
written engine interface to integrate TPM functionality into OpenSSL.
Thus TPM gets loaded as an engine instance.
Also we have mapped RSA operations to TPM APIS as like
encry
Hi All,
Our device uses TPM to protect certificate private keys. We have written
engine interface to integrate TPM functionality into OpenSSL. Thus TPM gets
loaded as an engine instance.
Also we have mapped RSA operations to TPM APIS as like
encryption/decryption etc.
Now we are into few issues.
as used to encrypt the keys with).
>
> "really secure" is not a useful phrase. Security is a set of
> asymptotic trade-offs between attacker and defender work-factors under a
> threat model. Nothing ever achieves "really secure".
>
> Even a hypothetical OpenSS
> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
> Of Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 10:03
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL Engine for TPM
>
> And in most cases (except those involvi
fender work-factors under a threat model.
Nothing ever achieves "really secure".
Even a hypothetical OpenSSL engine that performed all cryptographic
operations on the TPM wouldn't achieve specified security under the TPM threat
model unless the engine, all of OpenSSL,
tic
> trade-offs between attacker and defender work-factors under a threat model.
> Nothing ever achieves "really secure".
>
> Even a hypothetical OpenSSL engine that performed all cryptographic
> operations on the TPM wouldn't achieve specified security under the TPM
>
was used to encrypt the keys with).
"really secure" is not a useful phrase. Security is a set of asymptotic
trade-offs between attacker and defender work-factors under a threat model.
Nothing ever achieves "really secure".
Even a hypothetical OpenSSL engine that performed
from the TPM. If you look at the way it is designed, it is not really secure (as it's not impossible to find the
password that was used to encrypt the keys with).
Am 5. Juli 2017 06:47:24 MESZ schrieb Devang Kubavat
:
Hi All,
1. Is there any built-in OpenSSL Engine to acces
The trousers project has one.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/trousers/files/OpenSSL%20TPM%20Engine/
Christian
Am 5. Juli 2017 06:47:24 MESZ schrieb Devang Kubavat
:
>Hi All,
>
> 1. Is there any built-in OpenSSL Engine to access the TPM ?
>2. Is there any other OpenSSL Engi
> 1. Is there any built-in OpenSSL Engine to access the TPM ?
No.
> 2. Is there any other OpenSSL Engine to access the TPM ? If Yes, How can we
>configure in OpenSSL libraries to use that engine ?
If someone has written one, and can make it available, they should post here.
I d
Hi All,
1. Is there any built-in OpenSSL Engine to access the TPM ?
2. Is there any other OpenSSL Engine to access the TPM ? If Yes, How can we
configure in OpenSSL libraries to use that engine ?
Please guide me. Thanks.
Best Regards,
Devang
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe
ay not (really ask a lawyer)
> be legally (not technically) required to treat any keys, passwords
> etc. handed from one "device" to another AS IF those keys were traveling
> over an insecure connection even though they never leave your process
> address space on an EAL-whate
Hi Kyle,
Thanks a lot for detailed explaination, it helped me lots.
Regards
Jayalakshmi
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 2:44 AM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
>
> On 7/5/2014 10:51 AM, Jayalakshmi bhat wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the explanation. We have range of products that
> > provides network connectivity.
connection even though they never leave your process
address space on an EAL-whatever-level certified operating system on an
EAL-whatever-level certified computer.
TECHNICALLY:
If you want to combine the use of multiple FIPS validated "devices",
one of which happens to be the OpenSSL FIPS
On 7/5/2014 10:51 AM, Jayalakshmi bhat wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the explanation. We have range of products that
> provides network connectivity.
>
> 1. On these we would be using TPM to provide additional security.
>
> 2. On the products that are bit slow in software cryptographic
> operation,
Hi Steve,
Thanks a lot for the explanation. We have range of products that provides
network connectivity.
1. On these we would be using TPM to provide additional security.
2. On the products that are bit slow in software cryptographic operation,
we also would be using hardware acceleration ch
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014, Jayalakshmi bhat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We want to support a hardware accelerator on our device. We are using
> OpenSSL with OpenSSL FIPS Object module. I wanted to know if we can add
> engine support in OpenSSL FIPS Object module.
>
If you literally mean adding ENGINE suppo
On 07/05/2014 02:09 AM, Jayalakshmi bhat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We want to support a hardware accelerator on our device. We are using
> OpenSSL with OpenSSL FIPS Object module. I wanted to know if we can add
> engine support in OpenSSL FIPS Object module.
>
> I welcome all valuable inputs.
First,
Hi All,
We want to support a hardware accelerator on our device. We are using
OpenSSL with OpenSSL FIPS Object module. I wanted to know if we can add
engine support in OpenSSL FIPS Object module.
I welcome all valuable inputs.
Regards
Jayalakshmi.
Thank you for your reply Stephen.
In that is the case, then how would you explain the following phenomenon-
1. Start a SSL connection using private key stored on a HSM, protected using a
smart-card,
2. Let the SSL connection run for a bit
3. Unplug the smart card from HSM,
4. SSL connection stop
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012, Sunjeet Singh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stupid question-
>
> If I use a HSM to store private key used for SSL connections using the
> CryptoAPI engine for OpenSSL, is all data to be encrypted/decrypted going
> through my HSM? I'm-
>
> 1. Registering my HSM as a Cryptographic Serv
Hi,
Stupid question-
If I use a HSM to store private key used for SSL connections using the
CryptoAPI engine for OpenSSL, is all data to be encrypted/decrypted going
through my HSM? I'm-
1. Registering my HSM as a Cryptographic Service Provider, and
2. Setting my application code to initializ
Is there any sort of a guide as to what is needed to create an openssl
engine?
It's not clear to me what interface needs to be provided nor exactly
what functionality can be moved to an engine.
I have an idea I'd like to experiment with for an approach to
parallelising encryption/
Hi,
I need some help with a special case: a dynamic engine with non-static
or configureable ciphers.
While I do not use cryptodev, the code provides a good example of the
intial problem:
http://cvs.openssl.org/fileview?f=openssl/crypto/engine/eng_cryptodev.c&v=1.23
I basically have it wor
Ralf Hornik Mailings wrote:
[Success]: SO_PATH:/usr/lib/engines/engine_pkcs11.so
[Failure]: MODULE_PATH:/opt/cserver/lib/libcs2_pkcs11.so
7104:error:260AC089:engine routines:INT_CTRL_HELPER:invalid cmd
name:eng_ctrl.c:134:
7104:error:260AB089:engine routines:ENGINE_ctrl_cmd_string:invalid
Hello List,
is there any working engine for Utimaco CryptoServer?
Using Utimacos libcs2_pkcs11.so and OpenSCs pkcs11-tool it is possible
to import and/or generate keys on the HSM but trying the openSC's
engine for openssl I get:
modrow:~# openssl engine -t dynamic -pre
SO_PATH:/us
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 23:16:10 Shasi Thati wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question regarding the openssl speed command. When I use this
> command to test the crypto offload engine performance what is the
> right command to use?
>
> Is it
>
> openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -engine xx -elapsed
>
>
> Is it
> openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -engine xx -elapsed
> or
> openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -engine xx
It depends what you want to measure.
> I have seen examples with both of them on the internet and I get
> different results with each of them. What exactly does "elapsed"
> opt
Hi,
I have a question regarding the openssl speed command. When I use this
command to test the crypto offload engine performance what is the right
command to use?
Is it
openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -engine xx -elapsed
or
openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -engine xx
I have seen example
Hi all,
I was asked to forward this to the list.
I've been working on an OpenSSL engine to support the Cell processor's
(Playstation 3 etc.) vector processors (SPU's)
I've (finally!) got a rough version glued together using the IBM
multi-precision library from the C
Hi all,
I was asked to forward this to the list.
I've been working on an OpenSSL engine to support the Cell processor's
(Playstation 3 etc.) vector processors (SPU's)
I've (finally!) got a rough version glued together using the IBM
multi-precision library from the C
Hello everybody,
I have a problem in making our OpenSSL Engine that drives our HW
accelerator work fine for hash (SHA1 in particular).
The problem seems to be related to my "Digest_Copy" or (less likely)
"Digest_Cleanup" implementation (I'll explain this further on).
The
>you could use RSA_set_method with RSA_PKCS1_SSLeay for example
That was all I needed. I've got it working now.
Thanks,
Christopher
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing L
Christopher Nebergall wrote:
I've been working with some patches to curl I found on the curl mailing
list to support openssl and opensc's engine_pkcs11.
Basically it consists of
Curl 7.14 + patch which adds dynamic engine support -> opensc-20050826
[engine_pkcs11.so] -> soft-pkcs11 1.2
o
I've been working with some patches to curl I found on the curl mailing
list to support openssl and opensc's engine_pkcs11.
Basically it consists of
Curl 7.14 + patch which adds dynamic engine support -> opensc-20050826
[engine_pkcs11.so] -> soft-pkcs11 1.2
on
Ubuntu Linux (5.04) Kernel 2.6
Hi,
I always heard that the openssl uses the default
openssl engine if the engine is not specified. I would
like to know what's the default openssl engine. In
another word, how could I tell which is the default
openssl engine when I use openssl?
thanks
hao
Best R
hi,
does someone have an example of an openssl.cnf file to configure an SSL
accelerator like an ATALLA board ?
JPV
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Triple-des with openssl engine and ncypher hardware.
Hi,
I'm trying to integrate ncipher hardware (nshield) with openssl.
I want to implement triple-des with internal keys. I've seen that we can
access the "chil" engine
Hi,
I'm trying to integrate ncipher hardware (nshield)
with openssl.I want to implement triple-des with internal keys. I've seen
that we can access the "chil" engine with the new openssl engine. How can i use
it to encrypt data with triple-des algorithm and keys store
ng NFast and openssl-0.9.5.
olivier.michiels> I've updated my code to use the openssl-engine.
olivier.michiels> Everything works perferctly with some modifications.
olivier.michiels> Now, I would like to use the ENGINE concept with my NFast.
olivier.michiels> I've already underst
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:04:45 +0200,
Michiels Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
olivier.michiels> I'm trying to uderstand how the engine object is
olivier.michiels> working with openssl-engine.
olivier.michiels> I'm using a NFast
Hi,
I'm trying to uderstand how the engine object is working with
openssl-engine.
I'm using a NFast crypto device (chil) and when I look into hw_ncipher.c
I found three interristing functions:
static int hwcrhk_insert_card(const char *prompt_info,
const char *
Hi,
Currently I've an application that creates keys, certificate requests
and certificates using NFast and openssl-0.9.5.
I've updated my code to use the openssl-engine.
Everything works perferctly with some modifications.
Now, I would like to use the ENGINE concept with my NFast.
I&
19, 2002 10:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Using ENGINE in openssl-engine-0.9.6g
Hi there,
Has anybody had any problems using the ENGINE API's in
openssl-engine-0.9.6g on Windows. I downloaded
openssl-engine-0.9.6g and built it. No errors were
encountered during build. I have the f
Hey there,
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Frederic DONNAT wrote:
> A sample of programming with engine is mod-ssl (initialize ENGINE before
> everything else). You can also see "apps" directory of OpenSSL s_client,
> s_server ... files
>
> Be also carefull between openssl-engine
Hello
everybody,We are implementing an new engine (based on openssl 0.9.6c) to use
the RSAPKCS11 interface of our crypto hardware (Bull Trustway
CC2000).We would like to access our C_GenerateKeyPair PKCS11 function
through theopenssl RSA_generate_key.So we are adding a new entry gen_key
in
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> I write from Italy, and I'd like to use openssl and I would want to know which
>differences are between openssl and openssl-engine.
The openssl-engine version contains support for hardware crypto
devices. You can use either version for r
I write from Italy, and I'd like to use openssl and I would want to know which
differences are between openssl and openssl-engine.
Thank you in advance.
Cinti Pietro
Rome -Italy-
__
OpenSSL Pr
At 20:33 12.10.2001 +0200, Helmut Heilig wrote:
>can anybody tell me the difference between openssl and openssl-engine.
>Couldn't find anything about that in the FAQ.
See: http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html
[MISC] 6. What is an 'engine' version?
Ciao,
Richard
--
D
Hi,
can anybody tell me the difference between openssl and openssl-engine.
Couldn't find anything about that in the FAQ.
I am not subscribed. Please give me a cc.
Regards
__
OpenSSL Pr
Are
you at OpenSSL engine 0.9.6 or 0.9.6b? There were some fixes to the engine
code between 0.9.6 and 0.9.6b which will be relevant to you if you are on
FreeBSD, AIX, or HP UX (particularly HP UX, but FreeBSD and AIX do require some
extra options to be passed to config, at version 0.9.6
Hello,
I would like if anybody have a patch for cryptosiwft HSM with
openssl-engine like "load-private-key"
Thanks
Bahram BASSIRI
OMNICERTIS
3 bis rue cité Bergère 75009 Paris
Tél direct + 33 1 44 83 88 25
Tél général + 33 1 44 83 88 10
Fax + 33 1 44 83 88 29
<mailto:[EM
Hi:
Could you help me answer this question? I was not able to conclude one way
or the other by browsing the source (crypto/engine/vendor-defns). Which
piece of code would I look to see how the offload is performed?
Thanks,
ganesh.
___
Ganesh Venkatesan
LAN Access Divi
Hello,
after I grep the whole include/ssl directory in the source-tree I had found
it.
Thankyou
>
> Use "chil" instead of "ncipher". The reason for this is that the
> interface used is called "CHIL" (C{something} Hardware Interface
> Library, IIRC, but nCipher folks will most probably have to
Hi, I've stumbled over two problems with building the OpenSSL engine
0.9.6a for Windows-NT:
1) It automatically adds the advapi32-library to the libs.
While this is probably fine when building a DLL, you'll get problems
(dupliate symbols) when using a statically linked OpenSSL.
Fix:
the engine is a design architecture to allow the use of hardware crypto devices
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 10:10:20AM -0500, Aslam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What exactly is the difference between a OpenSSL and OpenSSL Engine ?
>
>
>
001 6:30 AM
To: 'lgazis'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; De Taeye, Herman; Gyutani
(E-mail)
Subject: RE: Apache_1.3.17, Openssl-engine-0.9.6, mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17
Sol aris 2.7,CryptoSwift accelerator board
Thanks for the diagnostic program. With the delivery by Sun an other program
call
Best regards,
Herman De Taeye
Unisys Belgium.
-Original Message-
From: lgazis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:30 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; De Taeye, Herman
Subject: RE: Apache_1.3.17, Openssl-engine-0.9.6, mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17 Sol
aris 2.7,CryptoS
ED] for help).
Lynn Gazis
-Original Message-
From: adrien mistretta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 5:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; De Taeye, Herman
Subject: Re: Apache_1.3.17, Openssl-engine-0.9.6, mod_ssl-2.8.0-1.3.17
Solaris 2.7,CryptoSwift accelerator bo
> 3. How can I really test that the board is used and not the internal
> engine?
you can use the csdiag command to see if request are made to the crypto card,
but I don't remember the option.
Adrien
__
OpenSSL Project
Has anybody ever used profiling(CFLAGS=-pg) to analyze the amount of time
spent in each routine in openssl? I tried it in openssl-engine-0.9.6. But
the option -pg seemed to conflict with the option of -fomit-frame-pointer,
so I got rid of the latter. But when I tried to do speed test(apps
From: Peter Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pclark> OpenSSL> speed -engine chil
pclark> can't use that engine
pclark> 29176:error:25067066:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:could not load the
pclark> shared library:dso_dlfcn.c:157:
pclark> 29176:error:25072066:DSO support routines:DSO_load:could not load
I've compiled and installed the latest Apache / mod_ssl and
openssl-engine-0.9.6-beta2 on a solaris 7/sparc system.
Everything works fine until I try to use the engine part, eg:
OpenSSL> speed -engine chil
can't use that engine
29176:error:25067066:DSO support routines:DLFCN_LOAD:c
I've had the same problem and discovered the following patch:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=96923042325868&w=2
The functions are loaded dynamically, so it is necessary to check whether they
loaded or not (or your executable will crash on all machines which don't provide
the NetSt
Try replacing LMSTR with LPWSTR in crypto/rand/rand_win.c
> I tried to compile on a Win32 platforom openssl engine beta2, and the
> OpenSSL beta2, and I recieve in both case this error:
>
> cl /Fotmp32dll\rand_win.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32dll /MD /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox /O2 /Ob2
> /Gs0
I tried to compile on a Win32 platforom openssl engine beta2, and the
OpenSSL beta2, and I recieve in both case this error:
cl /Fotmp32dll\rand_win.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32dll /MD /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox /O2 /Ob2
/Gs0 /GF /Gy /nologo -DWIN32 -DWIN3
2_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DL_ENDIAN /Fdout32dll /GD -D_WINDLL -D_DLL
92 matches
Mail list logo
