> On Nov 8, 2016, at 4:26 AM, Erwann Abalea wrote:
>
> The root certificate is not expected to be sent by the server, as it already
> needs to be known and trusted by the client.
> However, you’re free to configure your server to send it, for debugging or
> informational purposes.
A root CA c
Bonjour,
The root certificate is not expected to be sent by the server, as it already
needs to be known and trusted by the client.
However, you’re free to configure your server to send it, for debugging or
informational purposes.
Cordialement,
Erwann Abalea
Le 8 nov. 2016 à 03:36, Mofassir Ul
es I won't mention appear to be a
continuation of the spamming. We are ignoring them.
If you are a legitimate OpenSSL user who made such a request, please
keep that in mind and try again in a week or so. The last thing we want
to do is discourage legitimate participation. On the other hand,
clean
m: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
Salz, Rich
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2016 3:20 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [openssl-users] Getting error 'SSLv2_client_method':
identifier not found
Do not use SSLv2.
--
openssl-users mailing
Bonjour,
CCM mode is already implemented in OpenSSL.
Cordialement,
Erwann Abalea
Le 24 mai 2016 à 17:43, Christian Adja
mailto:christian_a...@yahoo.it>> a écrit :
Il Martedì 24 Maggio 2016 17:21, Christian Adja
mailto:christian_a...@yahoo.it>> ha scritto:
Good morning, i'm a master studen
Mr. Salz:
despite mr dukhovni's assertion that spam is not a problem and that people that
are concerned about it are a problem, i contend that the seeming laxness of list
controls is the core problem and spam is just an indicating vector. to wit:
'/List membership is not public/&
> the wider problem case is how non-subscribers are given two-way access to the
> list that exposes so much subscriber info (name, professional affiliation,
> email addr, ...) to whomever. i cannot fathom why the list does not make use
> of aliases so that each subscriber can control what they
Folks, we're here to discuss using OpenSSL, not email list management.
Junk mail is a a negligible issue for this list. Discussion of junk
mail causes a lot more distraction that the junk mail itself.
Therefore, unless the list becomes substantially dominated by junk
mail, please keep your though
who might have differing opinions from
his own. hopefully, that will not happen here.
in re the recent Brazilian Portuguese (note the 'R$' symbol for ISO BRL rather
than Euro) spam: what was wrong with that posting that should have been caught:
* the IP of origin 52.165.41.104 is an M
Am 20.04.2016 um 01:05 schrieb Scott Neugroschl:
> Can the spam filters on the listserv be updated? Got two today in
> Spanish and Portuguese for monetary scams. Anyone else getting these?
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Scott Neugroschl | XYPRO Technology Corporation
>
> 41
Can the spam filters on the listserv be updated? Got two today in Spanish and
Portuguese for monetary scams. Anyone else getting these?
---
Scott Neugroschl | XYPRO Technology Corporation
4100 Guardian Street | Suite 100 |Simi Valley, CA 93063 | Phone 805
583-2874|Fax 805 583-0124
Hello,
I am currently out of office and will not read your email untill Monday, the
23rd of January. In urgent cases please contact managed.serv...@lcsystems.ch.
Best regards,
Isaac Hailperin
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.o
> and how do I generate an ECDSA certificate?
To generate a selfsigned ECDSA cert the same ways you do RSA,
except use EC instead of RSA.
- use req -new with EC key or -newkey with EC parms and -x509
to generate selfsigned cert directly.
- use req -new with key or -newkey to generate CSR,
then
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Walter H.
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 13:58
> does anybody know what to write in the extension config to get this
> X509v3 Name Constraints as the attached certificate (intel-ca.pem,
> intel-ca.text)?
>
http://www.openssl.org/docs/apps/x509
https://www.openssl.org/docs/ssl/SSL_load_client_CA_file.html
Load names of CAs from file and use it as a client CA list:
SSL_CTX *ctx;
STACK_OF(X509_NAME) *cert_names;
...
cert_names = SSL_load_client_CA_file("/path/to/CAfile.pem");
if (cert_names != NULL)
SSL_CTX_set_client_CA_list(
...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 01:34
To: openssl-users
Subject: *** Spam *** Re: 0.9.8 RSA 2048, was Re: Need understanding on
certutil output.
What is your platform? When were each of 0.9.8 (unpatched, it appears) and
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Hum Brai
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 15:27
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: *** Spam *** Re: *** Spam *** Unable to create Version 3
> certificates with subjectAltName using my own CA
>
> Oh, sorry my messag
Oh, sorry my message got labeled as spam, is it because I pasted the
conf? THANK YOU for replying anyway. Question:
>> Summary: CSR has x509v3 extensions, certificate does not
>
>> I found on internet how we can make CSR (request) have subjectAltName,
> (and verified)
>
&g
On 10/4/13, Hum Brai wrote:
> Oh, sorry my message got labeled as spam, is it because I pasted the
> conf? THANK YOU for replying anyway. Question:
>
>>> Summary: CSR has x509v3 extensions, certificate does not
>>
>>> I found on internet how we can make
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Hum Brai
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 12:00
> Summary: CSR has x509v3 extensions, certificate does not
> I found on internet how we can make CSR (request) have subjectAltName,
(and verified)
> PROBLEM is when take a request to make new use
On 02/21/2013 08:35 AM, The Doctor wrote:
> Anyone having problems accessing ftp.openssl.org as of 21 Feb 2013 noon GMT?
>
We had some issues with that server (bad DNS). They now appear to be
resolved.
-Steve M.
--
Steve Marquess
OpenSSL Software Foundation, Inc.
1829 Mount Ephraim Road
Adamst
Anyone having problems accessing ftp.openssl.org as of 21 Feb 2013 noon GMT?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 amn
>From make test
signed content DER format, RSA key: OK
signed detached content DER format, RSA key: OK
signed content test streaming BER format, RSA: OK
signed content DER format, DSA key: OK
signed detached content DER format, DSA key: OK
signed detached content DER format, add RSA signer: OK
sig
Thanks David,
That worked a treat. I missed it somehow when I was adding a return.
Matt
On 31 May 2011 21:32, Dave Thompson wrote:
>> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
>> Sent: Thursday, 26 May, 2011 21:28
>
>> It looks like you've base64-encoded the actual cipher
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
> Sent: Thursday, 26 May, 2011 21:28
> It looks like you've base64-encoded the actual ciphertext.
$alg(enc) -d -a decodes base64 AND decrypts.
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Matt Thompson
> wrote:
> > I get an error when I
Bonjour,
Hodie post. Kal. Sep. MMX, John Doe scripsit:
> I have some issues with chained certificates.
> I am trying to verify my certificate with the intermediate certificate of my
> registrar...
>
> my.crt:
> Issuer: C=FR, O=GANDI SAS, CN=Gandi Standard SSL CA
> Subject: OU=Domain Control Vali
Thanks TIM, it works as expected.
On 6/5/10 2:20 AM, "Tim Hudson" wrote:
> On 5/06/2010 12:56 AM, Fares Gianluca wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I¹m try to figure out why my X509_REQ signature is always not verified.
>> I¹m using openssl-1.0.0 and gclib.dll provided by gemalto.
>
> It is helpful to actu
On 5/06/2010 12:56 AM, Fares Gianluca wrote:
Hi all,
I’m try to figure out why my X509_REQ signature is always not verified.
I’m using openssl-1.0.0 and gclib.dll provided by gemalto.
It is helpful to actually provide a complete working example rather than just a
subset. However in this case t
Hi,
> > >> I would like to request that this list become moderated
> as it is now
> > >> inundated by spam. I have a strict quota for email
> lists at work (which
> > >> also
> > >> includes the spam) and after the quota is up I get no
Hi,
> >> I would like to request that this list become moderated as it is now
> >> inundated by spam. I have a strict quota for email lists at work (which
> >> also
> >> includes the spam) and after the quota is up I get no more emails for
> >> the
On 2009.06.02 at 12:15:54 +0100, Rob Stradling wrote:
> openssl-build for reporting build errors with the OpenSSL sources.
May be I should make our autobuilder post results of automated builds
and test on 50+ platforms there? Now I typically first investigate test
failures myself and then send
out how to use the OpenSSL C API.
> openssl-cmd for asking questions about how to use the OpenSSL command-line
> tool.
> openssl-users for anything else.
>
> On Tuesday 02 June 2009 09:02:51 Mark wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to request that this list becom
asking questions about how to use the OpenSSL command-line
tool.
openssl-users for anything else.
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 09:02:51 Mark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request that this list become moderated as it is now
> inundated by spam. I have a strict quota for email lists at
Hi,
I would like to request that this list become moderated as it is now
inundated by spam. I have a strict quota for email lists at work (which
also
includes the spam) and after the quota is up I get no more emails for
the rest of the month. Last month it stopped on the 20th.
Mark
o responsabile per queste
evenienze. Il mittente si riserva il diritto di archiviare, ritenere e
controllare i messaggi di posta elettronica.
- Original Message -
From: "BiGNoRm6969" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 7:01 PM
Subject: [?? Probable Spa
Hi Kyle,
Thanks for your help. Yes, I found the CA.pl in my open ssl
distribution. Also I found some useful information in the following URL.
*
http://security.leisink.org/openssl*
Thanks for your security concern about world.png. I understand, I'll use
the /dev/random instead of using world.
David Schwartz wrote:
Of course, for the reasons I told, I did not subscribe to:
"openssl-dev open subscribers Discussions on development of the
OpenSSL library.
Note that this is for development *of* *OpenSSL*. Just like the OpenSSL
users list is for users *of* *OpenSSL*.
Pretty sure you're
Hi,
> OpenSSL is *NOT* intended to be 'used' by people who use programs that use
> it. It is intended to be used by programs and by people who make them.
I'll stick my 0.01 euro cent in here and state i disagree with this
hypothesis. whether you are a user via a 3rd party program (as almost
all
> I am newly looking into the openSSL code part and trying to understand.
> I have a few silly doubts regarding the usage and implementation of
> openSSL along with Heimdal Kerberos. Could you please let me know whom
> can I contact?
Ask your question in this newsgroup. It is for users of OpenSSL
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gunivortus Goos
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 11:39 AM
To: David Schwartz
Subject: Re: [!! SPAM] RE: Re[2]: Vista 64 bit
Hello David,
> Then why are you downloading OpenSSL? It's a library, a toolkit.
> It has no enduser applicatio
> Hello David,
> > Then why are you downloading OpenSSL? It's a library, a toolkit.
> > It has no enduser application.
> Are you really sure?
> I subscribed, while at the openssl.org site for this list
> the description was given:
> "openssl-users open anybody Application Development, OpenSSL Us
Hello David,
> Then why are you downloading OpenSSL? It's a library, a toolkit.
> It has no enduser application.
Are you really sure?
I subscribed, while at the openssl.org site for this list
the description was given:
"openssl-users open anybody Application Development, OpenSSL Usage,
Installat
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 01:33:17PM +0300, Arne Ansper wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, Darryl Miles wrote:
>> Bodo Moeller wrote:
>>> When using SSL_write() over a non-blocking transport channel, you may
>>> have to call SSL_write() multiple times until all your data has been
>>> transferred. In thi
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006, laura wrote:
> Thanks! but i can't use them. The error is"undefined reference to
> `POLICY_CONSTRAINTS_free'". i can't find any files including these macros.
>
They are real functions but their definitions and implementation is through
the ASN1 macros.
If you get undefine
Thanks! but i can't use them. The error is"undefined reference to
`POLICY_CONSTRAINTS_free'". i can't find any files including these macros.
=== 2006-12-21 14:47:00 ===
>On Thu, Dec 21, 2006, laura wrote:
>
>> hi
>>where can i find the definition of these functions:
>> POL
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006, laura wrote:
> hi
>where can i find the definition of these functions:
> POLICY_MAPPING_free,NAME_CONSTRAINTS_free,POLICY_CONSTRAINTS_free etc?
> i can't find them in openssl0.9.8b.
>
They are defined through the ASN1 macros. All they do is to free up the
corresponding
> The part about the PRNG is in question? How did people pre-OpenSSL FIPs
get
> validated when they used OpenSSL? Did they have to modify the OpenSSL
code
> and add their own PRNG that would pass?
Are there any FIPS certified apps that use openssl?
If there are any, the short answer is that ye
PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: SPAM-URL Re: Another RAND question...
Ummm
have you even looked at the FIPS testing criteria? Have you looked at
the FIPS 140-2 standard? Just because you have a well-known FIPS
company guiding you through the process doesn't mean you're goi
Hi -
I understand 0.9.8a has no FIPs code and we will not have to have it
validated, but rather we are using this in our PDA product to force TLS and
to allow selecting of correct cipher suites and that product will be the
thing to be validated and so since OpenSSL 0.9.8a is not FIPs validated we
(openssl-users) This is way off-topic, so let me apologize in advance.
Here's some of my own email numbers to give a piece of my perspective of
the talk about spam on the openssl list and why I just don't see a real
problem.
I run a pair of email servers on a very small domain t
e with admin powers block these spams?
This is no spam, but, according to our mail virus scanner, a worm named
WORM_NETSKY.B. Btw, how can a content-free mail be spam? ;-)
Ciao,
Richard
--
Dr. Richard W. Könning
Fujitsu Siemens Co
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The spammer who zapped the mod_ssl list (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modssl&r=1&b=200403&w=2) has now
moved onto this list (see content-free mail apparently from rse...)
Can someone with admin powers block th
good number of my posts just got
timed out by my legitimate SMTP relay.
On Mar 2, 2004, at 2:15 PM, L Nehring wrote:
Have we now crossed the threshold where there are more off-topic
messages discussing spam than spam messages themselves?
There just doesn't seem to be a real need to take
Boyle Owen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I disagree.
I've lost the thread... You want to limit posting to subscribers only or
you don't?
I don't.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to what a man
by my legitimate SMTP relay.
On Mar 2, 2004, at 2:15 PM, L Nehring wrote:
Have we now crossed the threshold where there are more off-topic
messages discussing spam than spam messages themselves?
There just doesn't seem to be a real need to take any action at all
given the small number of UCE or
> I think just simply requiring people to be list members before posting
> would be enough to make a big impact.
You dont necessarily have to force people to become members. Just
ensure that all anonymous posts are be moderated, and the problem
is solved. The spam, viruses and anonymous
Have we now crossed the threshold where there are more off-topic
messages discussing spam than spam messages themselves?
There just doesn't seem to be a real need to take any action at all
given the small number of UCE or antivirus bounce messages.
r,
makers had realized these messages would
be sent to mailing lists, they wouldn't be sending them at all.
And while spammers _could_ subscribe to mailing lists before sending a
bunch of spam, they typically don't, based on my experiences wit
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 11:47:43AM -0600, Scott Lamb wrote:
>
> On Feb 24, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Rich Salz wrote:
>
> >> I think I misunderstood that question. I honestly don't know what we
> >> would lose. Maybe a sense of openness.
> >
> > In the past -- at least, say, 2-3 years ago -- we had a c
On Feb 24, 2004, at 9:55 AM, Rich Salz wrote:
I think I misunderstood that question. I honestly don't know what we
would lose. Maybe a sense of openness.
In the past -- at least, say, 2-3 years ago -- we had a couple of
anonymous posters who made very worthwhile contributions. Haven't
seen that
Rich Salz wrote:
Probably not worth supporting any more.
Ben Laurie wrote:
I disagree.
Ben's voice carries way more weight than mine :) I stand down...
/r$
--
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gatew
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Laurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I disagree.
I've lost the thread... You want to limit posting to subscribers only or
you don't?
BTW, the mod_ssl list has been swamped by some spammer. Would this list
be immune to these posts (the spammer is craftily
Rich Salz wrote:
I think I misunderstood that question. I honestly don't know what we
would lose. Maybe a sense of openness.
In the past -- at least, say, 2-3 years ago -- we had a couple of
anonymous posters who made very worthwhile contributions. Haven't
seen that recently. Also, it used t
This chain of email regarding SPAM originated with the topic to reduce
the SPAM in this group email...
The only way to moderate a group email list is to formalize the method
of how it is delivered. If interested people are asked to join as a
member, they can be turned off if proved to be malicious
> I think I misunderstood that question. I honestly don't know what we
> would lose. Maybe a sense of openness.
In the past -- at least, say, 2-3 years ago -- we had a couple of
anonymous posters who made very worthwhile contributions. Haven't
seen that recently. Also, it used to be in the spi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:54:57 +0100, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
mads> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:40:03PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
mads> > mads> get someone to moderate the list - problem solved.
mads> >
mads> > *cough* you do know what
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:40:03PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> mads> get someone to moderate the list - problem solved.
>
> *cough* you do know what you're talking about, right?
>
yes. Allow members to post and only non-members if moderated through -
I wouldn't suggest it if I d
Richard Levitte wrote:
> Ted Lyngmo wrote:
> >
> > Is it possible to post messages to the mailing list without
> > being a member? If so, what would we lose by changing that?
>
> I honestly don't know what we would lose. Maybe a sense of
> openness.
True, but considering how easy it is to become
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 13:32:40 +0100, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
mads> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:27:05PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
mads> >
mads> > I think I misunderstood that question. I honestly don't know what we
mads> > would lose.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:59:37 +0100, "Lyngmo Ted"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ted.lyngmo> Is it possible to post messages to the mailing list
ted.lyngmo> without being a member?
Yes, openssl-users is completely open.
ted.lyngmo> If so, what would we lose by changing
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 12:59:37 +0100, "Lyngmo Ted"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
ted.lyngmo> If so, what would we lose by changing that?
I think I misunderstood that question. I honestly don't know what we
would lose. Maybe a sense of openness.
-
Please consider s
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:27:05PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> I think I misunderstood that question. I honestly don't know what we
> would lose. Maybe a sense of openness.
>
get someone to moderate the list - problem solved.
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who spiked my coff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] has chosen one approach to stop spam, I've chosen
another: http://au.spamassassin.org/index.html
Rather than force an entire mailing list to authenticate itself, I'm
simply able to do this:
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which flushes him down /dev/null
Sorry, t
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Fulmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: open-ssl user using spam filters?
The who command is disabled but it looks like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has a spa
The who command is disabled but it looks like "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has a spam filter applied that requires a user
to respond with a code in order to send mail to rangeos. I receive
this request every time I post to this list. If my interpretation is
correct, th
The spam is getting more aggressive now. Please make posting to the list available for
members only!
Kind regards,
Ted Lyngmo
Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DO YOU THINK IT'S FUNNY?
>
> FUCK YOU !!!
>
> IYQFLMJTUOHBKVLYTD
mpany's IT team to believe that the
> OpenSSL list is a virus source :-)
:-)
Anyway, I've sent a report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (origin of the spam) and I suggest all
of you who received this does the same. If you do, attach the original spam emails and
extract the header information o
Hi,
It's the third spam I've received throught the mailing list.
Two words to say : annoying and useless. Amen.
---
Pascal Rodrigue
Analyste de l'informatique
Division de l'exploitation
Service de l'informatique et des télé
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Typically, these trojans are dialers or spyware of some sort that
install themselves when some unsuspecting person opens them. If you
ever have one installed on you, you'll very likely start getting
random popups to some Russian porn site. These trojans are usually
base64 enc
t; solution to stop that.
>
> I wouldn't like my company's IT team to believe that the OpenSSL list is
> a virus source :-)
ANY open mailing list is a potential source of spam/virus email. It's
the one downfall to the venue. I haven't checked yet, but if I got
this, i
Hi all!
Does anyone else but me on this list receive a lot of spam like this?
"Could you, please, give me more information about your offers. I'm very interested in
this. My questions is in attachment.
Best Regards
NBRFQQXHNNWCNENLSMXBLCWSBLJUPPMWNLTXCO"
...and also...
&q
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>At the risk of going *completely* off topic, what is TDMA in this
>context?
Whoops, I actually meant to say TMDA, which stands for
Tagged Message Delivery Agent. See http://tmda.net for details.
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
There is an emerald here the size of a plover'
On 07/17/03 10:06 AM, Aleix Conchillo Flaque sat at the `puter and typed:
>
> hi,
>
> i have sent a message to the list, and some anti spam software that this
> user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has installed has sent to me an email asking
> me to accept it if i really wanted to send
Hi, List!
> At the risk of going *completely* off topic, what is TDMA in this
> context?
TDMA is a "Tagged Message Delivery Agent". It's a nice idea, i am also using it.
Just send the persone once the link to http://tmda.net/config-filter.html,
there is written, how to deal with lists.
Bye, Rai
: more spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I've complained about this member before (and I block him as well).
>Auto-responders (whether vacation or anti-spam) are totally
inappropriate
>on an opt-in mailing list.
This sounds like TDMA to me.
Does anyone know? I am thinking of using TDMA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I've complained about this member before (and I block him as well).
>Auto-responders (whether vacation or anti-spam) are totally inappropriate
>on an opt-in mailing list.
This sounds like TDMA to me.
Does anyone know? I am thinking of using TDMA
but msgs
I've complained about this member before (and I block him as well). Auto-responders
(whether vacation or anti-spam) are totally inappropriate on an opt-in mailing list.
If I was the owner of the list I'd suspend him (with a friendly eMail warning).
-- Dean
Steven Reddie wrote on 200
Yeah, I get the same. I've added this user to my spam list.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aleix Conchillo
Flaque
Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: more spam
hi,
i have sent a me
Readjust your spamfilter,
my spamfilter has marked it as Spam :-))
Regards
Christian
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 10:06:28AM +0200, Aleix Conchillo Flaque wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i have sent a message to the list, and some anti spam software that this
> user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has instal
hi,
i have sent a message to the list, and some anti spam software that this
user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has installed has sent to me an email asking
me to accept it if i really wanted to send the message to him.
what is this? i do not want more spam. it is really annoying.
anti-spam filters are
Message rejected as SPAM by ANT
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL
Message rejected as SPAM by ANT
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL
Title: Spam gripe ... day 2 (was: RE: Better than Sex! Register your .Sex Domain! 58876)
The spam the past few days has been getting exponentially worse. It is getting to the point that I am considering dropping off of this list ... something I really don't want to have to do.
Som
little net.dictators. If *any* IP address
> has *ever* been the source of even one spam, they block anything
> from that IP address forevermore.
Not true! Close your open relay, submit it for a retest and the
server will be removed.
> They won't accept anything
> from Erols, my ISP, a
Jeremy Smith wrote:
> > There appears to be an increasing amount of spam that is being
> > transmitted via this forum. This is in addition to all the virus
> > notifications from recipient servers.
> >
> > Can anything be done to try and filter this stuff out?
&g
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:41:11AM -0400, Mark Annal wrote:
> There appears to be an increasing amount of spam that is being transmitted
> via this forum. This is in addition to all the virus notifications from
> recipient servers.
>
> Can anything be done to try and filter
> There appears to be an increasing amount of spam that is being
> transmitted via this forum. This is in addition to all the virus
> notifications from recipient servers.
>
> Can anything be done to try and filter this stuff out?
I was going to suggest only accepting digitally
Title: Spam and the OpenSSL User Forum
There appears to be an increasing amount of spam that is being transmitted via this forum. This is in addition to all the virus notifications from recipient servers.
Can anything be done to try and filter this stuff out
http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
>
> BTW: this email can easily be produced by addressing your SPAMMER at the
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address, as
BTW: this email can easily be produced by addressing your SPAMMER at the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] email address, as specified in the SPAM email itself.
I he doesn't like you (100% percent of the time), you get SPAMMED just a bit
more.
Thanks for your cooperation and have nice day yourselves too.
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
