The team size was a minimum, not a maximum - please add your names.
We're currently waiting on the prerequisite blueprint to land before
work starts in earnest; and for the blueprint to be approved (he says,
without having checked to see if it has been now:))
-Rob
On 3 December 2013 20:48,
Hi all
More volunteers for you - myself (Calum Loudon) and Colin Tregenza Dancer from
Metaswitch (http://metaswitch.com).
We're new to OpenStack development, so a bit of context: we develop software
for the telecoms space, ranging from low-level network stacks to voice
applications. We see
Hey OpenStackers,
based on the latest discussions, it was asked if we can try to post
regular updates of what is happening in our community (mostly on Askbot
forum: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com).
In this e-mail, I'd like to summarize ongoing issues and try to cover
updates weekly (or
No, you need to manually arrange to land your changes in first one
repo then the other.
-Rob
On 3 December 2013 19:17, wu jiang win...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, I found a bug at API layer in Cinder, but the modifications relate
to CinderClient Tempest.
So, I'm confused how to
I am aware of this work, in fact I reused a column (pci_stats) in the
compute_nodes table to store a JSON blob.
I track the resource in the resource_tracker and update the column and then
use the blob in a filter.
Maybe I should reformulate my question, How can I add a column to the table
and use
Hi All,
I was performing Copy Image to Volume operation on my controller node
which has glance and cinder installed.
If i wish to create a cinder only node for cinder-volume operations , would
i need to install glance also on this node for performing Copy Image to
Volume operation ?
Thanks,
Jarret Raim wrote:
The TC is currently working on formalizing requirements for new programs
and projects [3]. I figured I would give them a try against this
application.
First, I'm assuming that the application is for a new program that
contains the new project. The application doesn't
Hi All,
I was performing Copy Image to Volume operation on my controller node
which has glance and cinder installed.
If i wish to create a cinder only node for cinder-volume operations , would
i need to install glance also on this node for performing Copy Image to
Volume operation ?
Thanks,
Russell Bryant wrote:
On 12/02/2013 11:41 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
I don't really care that much about deprecation in that case, but I care
about which release the new project is made part of. Would you make it
part of the Icehouse common release ? That means fast-tracking through
incubation
We are also interested in the proposal and would like to contribute
whatever we can.
Currently we're working on nova-scheduler we think that an independent
scheduler
is a need for Openstack. We've been engaging in several discussions on
this topic in
the ML as well as in Nova meeting, thus we were
Hi,
I was reviewing this patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52884/) from Oleg
and I thought that is a bit tricky to deploy an l3 agent with automation tools
like Puppet since you have to specify the uuid of a network that doesn't
already exist. It may be better to bind a l3 agent to an
Hey folks,
I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
Resource Management:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/
- this section was already reviewed before, there is not much surprises,
just smaller updates
- we are about to
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:23:19PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On 02 Dec 2013, at 04:52 , Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com wrote:
This is very cool Alessandro, thanks for sharing! Any plans to try and get
this
nova driver upstreamed?
My personal opinion is that
Gans,
No, you don't need to install Glance on Cinder nodes. Cinder will use the
Glance client, which must be installed on the Cinder node (see
python-glanceclient the requirements.txt file in Cinder's tree).
Thanks,
Avishay
From: gans developer gans.develo...@gmail.com
To:
On 03/12/13 01:26, Maxime Vidori wrote:
Hi!
In order to improve the javascript quality of Horizon, we have to change the
testing framework of the client-side. Qunit is a good tool for simple tests,
but the integration of Angular need some powerful features which are not
present in Qunit.
I am sorry for mistake in tag - fixed in this reply and keeping the
original text below.
On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hey folks,
I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
Resource Management:
Hi,
I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling
decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they
do not have the necessary resources available. It will be interesting to
know how this is going to fit into the new scheduler that is being
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
Following up on some conversations we had at the summit, I’d like to get
folks together on IRC tomorrow to crystalize the design for a notifications
project under the Marconi program. The project’s goal is to create a service
for surfacing events to
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Thanks for writing this up, looking forward to seeing this happen so that
oslo.messaging can be used outside of the core openstack projects (and be
used in libraries that do not want to force a oslo.cfg model onto users of
said libraries).
Any idea
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote:
No, you need to manually arrange to land your changes in first one
repo then the other.
-Rob
On 3 December 2013 19:17, wu jiang win...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, I found a bug at API layer in
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling
decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they
do not have the necessary resources available. It will be interesting to
know how
Am 02.12.13 17:10, schrieb Gregory Holt:
On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Christian Schwede
christian.schw...@enovance.com wrote:
That sounds great! Is someone already working on this (I know about
the ongoing DiskFile refactoring) or even a blueprint available?
There is
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Édouard Thuleau thul...@gmail.com wrote:
And what do you think about the performance issue I talked ?
Do you have any thought to improve wildcarding to use megaflow feature ?
I have invested a little further, here is my environment
X1 (10.0.5.1) --- OVS BR
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:05:02PM -0800, Vui Chiap Lam wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I too found the original bp a little hard to follow, so thanks for
writing up the wiki! I see that the wiki is now linked to the BP,
which is great as well.
The ability to express CPU topology constraints for the
I wrote a blueprint with a little description of features, and those which are
not present in qUnit, tell me if you think it needs more details or the points
which need more details.
Here is the link:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/jasmine-integration.
I think it could be the
On 12/3/13 12:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling
decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if
they
do not have
Hi,
We are targeting to complete adding multi file system support for Glance by
Icehouse-1.
Please review the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58997/
Aswad Rangnekar
Senior Software Engineer RD (Cloud Computing) | NTT DATA Global Technology
Services Pvt. Ltd.
w. +91.20.6604.1500 x 574 |
I have added a number of comments to this. I have also expanded on the
concept of role scoping for your consideration
regards
David
On 02/12/2013 23:21, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
Hi Adam and David,
Thank you so much for all the great comments, seems we are making good
progress.
I have
Hey,
I would like to know (and how do I know that from nova code) what kind of
requests are these two APIs: Synchronized or a-synchronized (using compute v2.0
API):
Server action add Security Group ?
Server action remove Security Group ?
I would like to know if the documented return response
Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc
On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hey folks,
I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
Resource Management:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/
-
Hi,
I think the concept of allowing users to request a cpu topology, but have a few
questions / concerns:
The host is exposing info about vCPU count it is able to support and the
scheduler picks on that basis. The guest image is just declaring upper limits
on
topology it can support. So
+1 from me - would much prefer to be able to pick this on an individual basis.
Could kind of see a case for keeping reset_network and inject_network_info
together - but don't have a strong feeling about it (as we don't use them)
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Laski
Hi all,
Finally found a bit time to write my thoughts.
There are few blockers that make really complex to build scheduler as a
services or even to move main part of scheduler code to separated lib. We
already have one unsuccessfully effort
Hi!
This is just a reminder about the regular meeting of Murano-team in IRC.
The meeting will be held in #openstack-meeting-alt channel at 10am Pacific.
The complete agenda of the meeting is available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
On 03/12/13 03:12 +, Jarret Raim wrote:
There are two big parts to this, I think. One is techincal - a significant
portion
of OpenStack deployments will not work with this because Celery does not
work with their deployed messaging architecture.
See another reply in this thread for an
On 03/12/13 10:29 +, Rangnekar, Aswad wrote:
We are targeting to complete adding multi file system support for Glance by
Icehouse-1.
Please review the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58997/
Please, do not send review requests to this list. Feel free to join
#openstack-glance and
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation
On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote:
I have created a child
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.comwrote:
There are two big parts to this, I think. One is techincal - a
significant
portion
of OpenStack deployments will not work with this because Celery does not
work with their deployed messaging architecture.
On 12/3/13 7:51 AM, Roshan Agrawal roshan.agra...@rackspace.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation
Hi Daniel,
I spent some more time reading your write up on the wiki (and it is a great
write up BTW), and had a couple of further questions (I think my original ones
are also still valid, but do let me know if / where I'm missing the point):
iv) In the worked example where do the
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So next
time you want to fix a typo, instead of just fixing a single one you can go
ahead and fix a whole bunch.
- Original Message -
On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote:
In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make
things easier for projects by maintaining a whitelist. But these bugs in
ceilometer are coming in so
Hey folks,
I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
Resource Management:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/
- this section was already reviewed before, there is not much surprises, just
smaller updates
- we are about to
Great tool !
Just discovered that openstack.common.rpc does have typos, another good
reason to migrate to oslo.messaging.rpc :-)
-Sylvain
2013/12/3 Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
point out a really nifty tool
On 12/03/2013 09:30 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote:
In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make
things easier for projects by maintaining a whitelist. But
On 12/03/2013 04:23 AM, Sylvain Afchain wrote:
Hi,
I was reviewing this patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52884/) from
Oleg and I thought that is a bit tricky to deploy an l3 agent with automation
tools like Puppet since you have to specify the uuid of a network that
doesn't
Chmouel,
We reviewed the design of this feature at the summit with CERN and HP
teams. Centralized quota storage in Keystone is an anticipated feature, but
there are concerns about adding quota enforcement logic for every service
to Keystone. The agreed solution is to add quota numbers storage to
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container
quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and
millions (billions?) of containers in a single Swift cluster)? A centralized
lookup for quotas doesn't really seem to be a scalable solution.
Please, instead of 'enhance', use 'watch':
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRtL3aCuEEc (this link is correct)
Thanks
-- Jarda
On 2013/03/12 12:53, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc
On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hey
On 12/03/2013 09:30 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote:
In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make
things easier for projects by maintaining a whitelist. But
On 12/03/2013 04:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling
decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they
do not have the necessary
Hi,
Sure they must have the same provider.
Loadbalancer instance could be created in two ways:
- implicitly with pool creation, then provider for the pool becomes
provider for the instance.
- explicitly, with pool created later on and attached to the instance.
In that case provider attribute will
Sorry to jump into this late and all, but I am curious.
Why not borrow the concept of flavors from Nova and apply them to quotas?
While it is open to interpretation and I most certainly could be wrong, the
why of flavors is that you want to plan. If you know that you have flavors
that are
We are going to make integration testing gate scheme for Ironic and we've
investigated several cases which are actual for TripleO.
1) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-test-cluster
This is the newest and most advanced initiative. It is something like test
environment on demand. It is still
Hi,
We will hold our first Git Integration working group meeting on Wednesday,
December 4, 2013 1700 UTC / 0900 PST [1].
Since we have about 13 people who wish to participate, Google hangout is no
longer an option. Instead we will fall back
to IRC and hold the meeting on #solum. I have updated
On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container
quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and
millions (billions?) of containers in a single Swift cluster)? A centralized
lookup for quotas
I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP
addresses when a Neutron service is under high load:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1192381
High load causes the DHCP agent's status updates to be delayed, causing the
Neutron service to assume that the agent is
Hi
I think we should do a review of the design doc review and have rough
consensus (that it should work) followed by running code. ….
As of now all the design stuff is supposedly in (as per the scheduler
meeting today)
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler
Hope the core
Hi All,
I have couple of questions wrt to plugin blueprint and ml2 plugin,
1. We are planning to submit the plugin into Openstack Icehouse release.
The question we have is there any deadline for the plugin blueprint
submission ?
2. Is there anything like mandatory for everyone need to
I agree. With many optional parameters possible, positional parameters
would seem to complicate things a bit (even for end users).
On 12/3/13 8:14 AM, Arati Mahimane arati.mahim...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 12/3/13 7:51 AM, Roshan Agrawal roshan.agra...@rackspace.com wrote:
-Original
Hi Naveen:
The sooner you submit your blueprint the better, as Neutron core devs
can comment on it and help answer questions for you. You can implement
an ML2 MechanismDriver or a monolithic plugin, but if you file the BP
we can help you decide which may be better for your environment.
Keep in
I recently ran into this bug while trying to concurrently boot a large number
(75) of VMs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1160442
I see that the fix for the bug added configuration of SQLAlchemy QueuePool
parameters that should prevent the boot failures I was seeing. However, I
I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it should be
positional IMO. I think this actually reduces confusion as you can tell from
the signature alone that this is a value the user must supply to have any
meaningful thing happen.
On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Paul
With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all
incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So
when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official
program yet, it de-facto also applies to be considered a program.
Ahh, understood. So I guess
Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are
talking about optional ones.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
-Arati
On 12/3/13 10:27 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it
should be
I think there's something else you should take under consideration.
Oslo messaging is not just an OpenStack library. It's the RPC library
that all projects are relying on and one of the strong goals we have
in OpenStack is to reduce code and efforts duplications. We'd love to
have more people
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container
quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and
millions (billions?) of
The API and developer documentation is at
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/
This is great, thanks for the link. Would there be any objections to
adding this to the github repo and the openstack wiki pages? I spent a
bunch of time looking and wasn¹t able to turn this up.
Roshan, I have added some comments to the Etherpad -
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MinimalCLI
-Arati
On 12/3/13 10:27 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote:
I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it
should be positional IMO. I think this actually
On 12/03/2013 11:39 AM, Arati Mahimane wrote:
Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are
talking about optional ones.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Russell was specifically talking about required parameters being
positional arguments.
Best,
-jay
On 03/12/13 16:08, Maru Newby wrote:
I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP
addresses when a Neutron service is under high load:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1192381
High load causes the DHCP agent's status updates to be delayed, causing the
Hi there
I read the proposal and related documentation, and intend to start
implementing it into horizon.
Regards
on Wed Nov 20 15:09:05 UTC 2013 C?dric Soulas Wrote
Thanks for all the feedback on the Enhance UX of launch instance form
subject and its prototype.
Try the latest version of
Hello everybody,
Following up the action items from our last meeting and in preparation for
our next IRC meeting on Dec 5th (see below), I have started updating the
google document [1].
I have added the tables describing the attributes of new Neutron objects. I
will be also working on adding a
On Dec 3, 2013 6:45 PM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.com wrote:
With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all
incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So
when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official
program yet, it
On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:13 AM, NAVEEN R K REDDY naveen.kunare...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I have couple of questions wrt to plugin blueprint and ml2 plugin,
1. We are planning to submit the plugin into Openstack Icehouse release. The
question we have is there any deadline for the plugin
On 12/03/2013 11:40 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container
quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of
Hi,
The primary reason for the simple proposal is due to the difficult to reach
consensus on how SSL certificates can be stored in OpenStack.
As there is currently no trusted storage in OpenStack, the simple proposal
overcomes this by pushing the SSL certificates into the load balancers which
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.comwrote:
Sorry, I changed the link. We originally started with hyphenated
noun-verbs but switched to the current proposal upon receipt of advice that
it would be more compatible with the next version of the cliff based CLI
On 11/27/2013 12:45 AM, Takahiro Shida wrote:
Hi all,
I'm also interested in this issue.
Create a unified request identifier
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cross-service-request-id
I checked this BP and the following review.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29480/
There are
On 2013-12-03 16:43:32 + (+), Jarret Raim wrote:
This is great, thanks for the link. Would there be any objections to
adding this to the github repo
I think you meant the git repo. What's a gi-thub?
URL: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/doc/source/
and the
On Dec 3, 2013 6:49 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and
container quotas (especially since there may be
On 12/03/2013 07:22 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Hi all,
Finally found a bit time to write my thoughts.
There are few blockers that make really complex to build scheduler as a
services or even to move main part of scheduler code to separated lib.
We already have one unsuccessfully effort
On 10/31/2013 11:49 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
Another idea that Tom suggested is to use gerrit automation to send back
to first time committers something in addition to the normal 'your patch
is waiting for review' message. The message could be something like:
[...]
Tom sent a patch for
On 12/03/2013 11:40 AM, Jarret Raim wrote:
I think there's something else you should take under consideration.
Oslo messaging is not just an OpenStack library. It's the RPC library
that all projects are relying on and one of the strong goals we have
in OpenStack is to reduce code and efforts
On 12/03/2013 11:45 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/03/2013 11:39 AM, Arati Mahimane wrote:
Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are
talking about optional ones.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Russell was specifically talking about required parameters being
On 12/03/2013 01:26 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
Unless the requirements change, so far it
looks like this request should be deferred a bit longer.
And note that this is just my opinion, and note a statement of position
on behalf of the entire TC. We can still officially consider the
request at
Great tool especially for non-native guys such as me!
Thanks Joe
Best
Nachi
2013/12/3 Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.com:
Great tool !
Just discovered that openstack.common.rpc does have typos, another good
reason to migrate to oslo.messaging.rpc :-)
-Sylvain
2013/12/3 Joe Gordon
On 11/29/13 at 03:56pm, haruka tanizawa wrote:
Thank you for your reply.
I completely misunderstood.
You're correct on request_id and task_id.
What I'm planning is a string field that a user can pass in with the
request and it will be part of the task representation.
That field will have no
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So
next time you want to fix a typo, instead of just fixing a single one
you can go ahead and fix a
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So
next time you want to fix
2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
point out a really nifty tool to detect
(Previous mail went out a bit fast)
These features could be developed iteratively to improve upon the
existing code base:
- First allow the modal view system to expand for better usage of screen
real-estate combined with responsiveness of the whole popin
- Then rework existing menus to
(Previous mail went out a bit fast)
These features could be developed iteratively to improve upon the
existing code base:
- First allow the modal view system to expand for better usage of screen
real-estate combined with responsiveness of the whole popin
- Then rework existing menus to
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few
I totally agree on this meta level scheduler aspect. This should separate the
placement decision making logic (for resources of any type, but can start on
Nova resources) from their actual creation, say VM creation.
This way the placement decisions can be relayed to the individual components
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
point
2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
HI
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
2013/12/3 John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant
Hi,
I have the following configuration in savanna.conf:
# If set to True, Savanna will use floating IPs to communicate
# with instances. To make sure that all instances have
# floating IPs assigned in Nova Network set
# auto_assign_floating_ip=True in nova.conf.If Neutron is
# used for
On 12/03/2013 03:17 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
The team size was a minimum, not a maximum - please add your names.
We're currently waiting on the prerequisite blueprint to land before
work starts in earnest; and for the blueprint to be approved (he says,
without having checked to see if it
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
