The team size was a minimum, not a maximum - please add your names.
We're currently waiting on the prerequisite blueprint to land before
work starts in earnest; and for the blueprint to be approved (he says,
without having checked to see if it has been now:))
-Rob
On 3 December 2013 20:48, Wang,
Hi all
More volunteers for you - myself (Calum Loudon) and Colin Tregenza Dancer from
Metaswitch (http://metaswitch.com).
We're new to OpenStack development, so a bit of context: we develop software
for the telecoms space, ranging from low-level network stacks to voice
applications. We see en
Hey OpenStackers,
based on the latest discussions, it was asked if we can try to post
regular updates of what is happening in our community (mostly on Askbot
forum: http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com).
In this e-mail, I'd like to summarize ongoing issues and try to cover
updates weekly (or e
No, you need to manually arrange to land your changes in first one
repo then the other.
-Rob
On 3 December 2013 19:17, wu jiang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Recently, I found a bug at API layer in Cinder, but the modifications relate
> to CinderClient & Tempest.
> So, I'm confused how to commit it. Can
I am aware of this work, in fact I reused a column (pci_stats) in the
compute_nodes table to store a JSON blob.
I track the resource in the resource_tracker and update the column and then
use the blob in a filter.
Maybe I should reformulate my question, How can I add a column to the table
and use i
Hi All,
I was performing "Copy Image to Volume" operation on my controller node
which has glance and cinder installed.
If i wish to create a cinder only node for cinder-volume operations , would
i need to install glance also on this node for performing "Copy Image to
Volume" operation ?
Thanks,
Jarret Raim wrote:
>>
>> The TC is currently working on formalizing requirements for new programs
>> and projects [3]. I figured I would give them a try against this
>> application.
>>
>> First, I'm assuming that the application is for a new program that
>> contains the new project. The applicati
Hi All,
I was performing "Copy Image to Volume" operation on my controller node
which has glance and cinder installed.
If i wish to create a cinder only node for cinder-volume operations , would
i need to install glance also on this node for performing "Copy Image to
Volume" operation ?
Thanks,
Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 12/02/2013 11:41 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> I don't really care that much about deprecation in that case, but I care
>> about which release the new project is made part of. Would you make it
>> part of the Icehouse common release ? That means fast-tracking through
>> in
We are also interested in the proposal and would like to contribute
whatever we can.
Currently we're working on nova-scheduler we think that an independent
scheduler
is a need for Openstack. We've been engaging in several discussions on
this topic in
the ML as well as in Nova meeting, thus we were
Hi,
I was reviewing this patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52884/) from Oleg
and I thought that is a bit tricky to deploy an l3 agent with automation tools
like Puppet since you have to specify the uuid of a network that doesn't
already exist. It may be better to bind a l3 agent to an net
Hey folks,
I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
Resource Management:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/
- this section was already reviewed before, there is not much surprises,
just smaller updates
- we are about to implem
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 07:23:19PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
>
> On 02 Dec 2013, at 04:52 , Kyle Mestery (kmestery) wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> > This is very cool Alessandro, thanks for sharing! Any plans to try and get
> > this
> > nova driver upstreamed?
>
> My personal opinion is that dr
Gans,
No, you don't need to install Glance on Cinder nodes. Cinder will use the
Glance client, which must be installed on the Cinder node (see
python-glanceclient the requirements.txt file in Cinder's tree).
Thanks,
Avishay
From: gans developer
To: [email protected],
On 03/12/13 01:26, Maxime Vidori wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In order to improve the javascript quality of Horizon, we have to change the
> testing framework of the client-side. Qunit is a good tool for simple tests,
> but the integration of Angular need some powerful features which are not
> present in Q
I am sorry for mistake in tag - fixed in this reply and keeping the
original text below.
On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hey folks,
I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
Resource Management:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resour
Hi,
I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling
decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they
do not have the necessary resources available. It will be interesting to
know how this is going to fit into the new scheduler that is being
discussed
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
> Following up on some conversations we had at the summit, I’d like to get
> folks together on IRC tomorrow to crystalize the design for a notifications
> project under the Marconi program. The project’s goal is to create a service
> for surfacing events
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Thanks for writing this up, looking forward to seeing this happen so that
> oslo.messaging can be used outside of the core openstack projects (and be
> used in libraries that do not want to force a oslo.cfg model onto users of
> said libraries).
>
> Any
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> No, you need to manually arrange to land your changes in first one
> repo then the other.
>
> -Rob
>
> On 3 December 2013 19:17, wu jiang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Recently, I found a bug at API layer in Cinder, but the modifications
>
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
> Hi,
> I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling
> decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they
> do not have the necessary resources available. It will be interesting to
> know
Am 02.12.13 17:10, schrieb Gregory Holt:
> On Dec 2, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Christian Schwede
> wrote:
>
>> That sounds great! Is someone already working on this (I know about
>> the ongoing DiskFile refactoring) or even a blueprint available?
>
> There is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/r
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Édouard Thuleau wrote:
> And what do you think about the performance issue I talked ?
> Do you have any thought to improve wildcarding to use megaflow feature ?
>
I have invested a little further, here is my environment
X1 (10.0.5.1) <---> OVS BR <---> X2 (10.0.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:05:02PM -0800, Vui Chiap Lam wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I too found the original bp a little hard to follow, so thanks for
> writing up the wiki! I see that the wiki is now linked to the BP,
> which is great as well.
>
> The ability to express CPU topology constraints for
I wrote a blueprint with a little description of features, and those which are
not present in qUnit, tell me if you think it needs more details or the points
which need more details.
Here is the link:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/jasmine-integration.
I think it could be the go
On 12/3/13 12:08 PM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling
>> decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if
>>they
>> do not have the nece
Hi,
We are targeting to complete adding multi file system support for Glance by
Icehouse-1.
Please review the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58997/
Aswad Rangnekar
Senior Software Engineer R&D (Cloud Computing) | NTT DATA Global Technology
Services Pvt. Ltd.
w. +91.20.6604.1500 x 574 |
I have added a number of comments to this. I have also expanded on the
concept of role scoping for your consideration
regards
David
On 02/12/2013 23:21, Tiwari, Arvind wrote:
> Hi Adam and David,
>
> Thank you so much for all the great comments, seems we are making good
> progress.
>
> I have
Hey,
I would like to know (and how do I know that from nova code) what kind of
requests are these two APIs: Synchronized or a-synchronized (using compute v2.0
API):
Server action > add Security Group ?
Server action > remove Security Group ?
I would like to know if the documented return respons
Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc
On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hey folks,
I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
Resource Management:
http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/
- th
Hi,
I think the concept of allowing users to request a cpu topology, but have a few
questions / concerns:
>
> The host is exposing info about vCPU count it is able to support and the
> scheduler picks on that basis. The guest image is just declaring upper limits
> on
> topology it can support.
+1 from me - would much prefer to be able to pick this on an individual basis.
Could kind of see a case for keeping reset_network and inject_network_info
together - but don't have a strong feeling about it (as we don't use them)
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la
Hi all,
Finally found a bit time to write my thoughts.
There are few blockers that make really complex to build scheduler as a
services or even to move main part of scheduler code to separated lib. We
already have one unsuccessfully effort
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/oslo-schedul
Hi!
This is just a reminder about the regular meeting of Murano-team in IRC.
The meeting will be held in #openstack-meeting-alt channel at 10am Pacific.
The complete agenda of the meeting is available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MuranoAgenda
--
Regards,
Alexander Tivelkov
On 03/12/13 03:12 +, Jarret Raim wrote:
There are two big parts to this, I think. One is techincal - a significant
portion
of OpenStack deployments will not work with this because Celery does not
work with their deployed messaging architecture.
See another reply in this thread for an exampl
On 03/12/13 10:29 +, Rangnekar, Aswad wrote:
We are targeting to complete adding multi file system support for Glance by
Icehouse-1.
Please review the patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58997/
Please, do not send review requests to this list. Feel free to join
#openstack-glance and ge
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation
>
> On 12/02/2013 07:03 PM, Roshan Agrawal wrote:
> > I have created
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Jarret Raim wrote:
> > There are two big parts to this, I think. One is techincal - a
> significant
> > portion
> > of OpenStack deployments will not work with this because Celery does not
> > work with their deployed messaging architecture.
> > See another reply
On 12/3/13 7:51 AM, "Roshan Agrawal" wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Russell Bryant [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 8:17 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] CLI minimal implementation
>>
>> On 12/0
Hi Daniel,
I spent some more time reading your write up on the wiki (and it is a great
write up BTW), and had a couple of further questions (I think my original ones
are also still valid, but do let me know if / where I'm missing the point):
iv) In the worked example where do the preferred_topo
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So next
time you want to fix a typo, instead of just fixing a single one you can go
ahead and fix a whole bunch.
https://github.com/lyda/misspell-che
- Original Message -
> On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote:
> >
> >> In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make
> >> things easier for projects by maintaining a whitelist. But these bugs in
> >> ceilometer are
> Hey folks,
> I opened 2 issues on UX discussion forum with TripleO UI topics:
> Resource Management:
> http://ask-openstackux.rhcloud.com/question/95/tripleo-ui-resource-management/
> - this section was already reviewed before, there is not much surprises, just
> smaller updates
> - we are abou
Great tool !
Just discovered that openstack.common.rpc does have typos, another good
reason to migrate to oslo.messaging.rpc :-)
-Sylvain
2013/12/3 Joe Gordon
> HI all,
>
> Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
> point out a really nifty tool to detect commonl
On 12/03/2013 09:30 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote:
>>>
In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make
things easier for projects by maintaining
On 12/03/2013 04:23 AM, Sylvain Afchain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reviewing this patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/52884/) from
> Oleg and I thought that is a bit tricky to deploy an l3 agent with automation
> tools like Puppet since you have to specify the uuid of a network that
> doesn't a
Chmouel,
We reviewed the design of this feature at the summit with CERN and HP
teams. Centralized quota storage in Keystone is an anticipated feature, but
there are concerns about adding quota enforcement logic for every service
to Keystone. The agreed solution is to add quota numbers storage to
K
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container
quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and
millions (billions?) of containers in a single Swift cluster)? A centralized
lookup for quotas doesn't really seem to be a scalable solution.
Please, instead of 'enhance', use 'watch':
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oRtL3aCuEEc (this link is correct)
Thanks
-- Jarda
On 2013/03/12 12:53, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Wireframes walkthrough: https://www.youtube.com/enhance?v=oRtL3aCuEEc
On 2013/03/12 10:25, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hey folks,
On 12/03/2013 09:30 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/02/2013 10:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29 2013, David Kranz wrote:
In preparing to fail builds with log errors I have been trying to make
things easier for projects by maintaining a whitelist. But thes
On 12/03/2013 04:08 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 01:47:31AM -0800, Gary Kotton wrote:
Hi,
I think that this information should be used as part of the scheduling
decision, that is hosts that are to be selected should be excluded if they
do not have the necessary resources
Hi,
Sure they must have the same provider.
Loadbalancer instance could be created in two ways:
- implicitly with pool creation, then provider for the pool becomes
provider for the instance.
- explicitly, with pool created later on and attached to the instance.
In that case provider attribute will
Sorry to jump into this late and all, but I am curious.
Why not borrow the concept of "flavors" from Nova and apply them to quotas?
While it is open to interpretation and I most certainly could be wrong, the
"why of flavors" is that you want to plan. If you know that you have "flavors"
that ar
We are going to make integration testing gate scheme for Ironic and we've
investigated several cases which are actual for TripleO.
1) https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-test-cluster
This is the newest and most advanced initiative. It is something like "test
environment on demand". It is stil
Hi,
We will hold our first Git Integration working group meeting on Wednesday,
December 4, 2013 1700 UTC / 0900 PST [1].
Since we have about 13 people who wish to participate, Google hangout is no
longer an option. Instead we will fall back
to IRC and hold the meeting on #solum. I have updated
On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container
quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and
millions (billions?) of containers in a single Swift cluster)? A centralized
lookup for quotas
I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP
addresses when a Neutron service is under high load:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1192381
High load causes the DHCP agent's status updates to be delayed, causing the
Neutron service to assume that the agent is do
Hi
I think we should do a review of the design doc review and have rough
consensus (that it should work) followed by running code. ….
As of now all the design stuff is supposedly in (as per the scheduler
meeting today)
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler
Hope the core de
Hi All,
I have couple of questions wrt to plugin blueprint and ml2 plugin,
1. We are planning to submit the plugin into Openstack Icehouse release.
The question we have is there any deadline for the plugin blueprint
submission ?
2. Is there anything like mandatory for everyone need to implement
I agree. With many optional parameters possible, positional parameters
would seem to complicate things a bit (even for end users).
On 12/3/13 8:14 AM, "Arati Mahimane" wrote:
>
>
>On 12/3/13 7:51 AM, "Roshan Agrawal" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Russell Bryant [mail
Hi Naveen:
The sooner you submit your blueprint the better, as Neutron core devs
can comment on it and help answer questions for you. You can implement
an ML2 MechanismDriver or a monolithic plugin, but if you file the BP
we can help you decide which may be better for your environment.
Keep in mi
I recently ran into this bug while trying to concurrently boot a large number
(75) of VMs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1160442
I see that the fix for the bug added configuration of SQLAlchemy QueuePool
parameters that should prevent the boot failures I was seeing. However, I
don'
I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it should be
positional IMO. I think this actually reduces confusion as you can tell from
the signature alone that this is a value the user must supply to have any
meaningful thing happen.
On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:13 AM, Paul Montgo
>With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all
>incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So
>when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official
>program yet, it de-facto also applies to be considered a program.
Ahh, understood. So I gu
Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are
talking about optional ones.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
-Arati
On 12/3/13 10:27 AM, "Randall Burt" wrote:
>I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it
>should be positional IMO. I think this act
>I think there's something else you should take under consideration.
>Oslo messaging is not just an OpenStack library. It's the RPC library
>that all projects are relying on and one of the strong goals we have
>in OpenStack is to reduce code and efforts duplications. We'd love to
>have more people
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
>> How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container
>> quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and
>> millions (billions?) of containers in a
> The API and developer documentation is at
>http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.messaging/
This is great, thanks for the link. Would there be any objections to
adding this to the github repo and the openstack wiki pages? I spent a
bunch of time looking and wasn¹t able to turn this up.
Add
Roshan, I have added some comments to the Etherpad -
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MinimalCLI
-Arati
On 12/3/13 10:27 AM, "Randall Burt" wrote:
>I disagree. If a param is required and has no meaningful default, it
>should be positional IMO. I think this actually reduces confusion as you
>can
On 12/03/2013 11:39 AM, Arati Mahimane wrote:
Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are
talking about optional ones.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Russell was specifically talking about required parameters being
positional arguments.
Best,
-jay
__
On 03/12/13 16:08, Maru Newby wrote:
I've been investigating a bug that is preventing VM's from receiving IP
addresses when a Neutron service is under high load:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1192381
High load causes the DHCP agent's status updates to be delayed, causing the
Neutron
Hi there
I read the proposal and related documentation, and intend to start
implementing it into horizon.
Regards
on Wed Nov 20 15:09:05 UTC 2013 C?dric Soulas Wrote
>
>
>Thanks for all the feedback on the "Enhance UX of launch instance form"
>subject and its prototype.
>
>Try the latest versi
Hello everybody,
Following up the action items from our last meeting and in preparation for
our next IRC meeting on Dec 5th (see below), I have started updating the
google document [1].
I have added the tables describing the attributes of new Neutron objects. I
will be also working on adding a fe
On Dec 3, 2013 6:45 PM, "Jarret Raim" wrote:
>
>
> >With the introduction of programs (think: official teams), all
> >incubated/integrated projects must belong to an official program... So
> >when a project applies for incubation but is not part of an official
> >program yet, it de-facto also appl
On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:13 AM, NAVEEN R K REDDY
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have couple of questions wrt to plugin blueprint and ml2 plugin,
>
> 1. We are planning to submit the plugin into Openstack Icehouse release. The
> question we have is there any deadline for the plugin blueprint submissio
On 12/03/2013 11:40 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and container
quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of accounts and
Hi,
The primary reason for the "simple" proposal is due to the difficult to reach
consensus on how SSL certificates can be stored in OpenStack.
As there is currently no "trusted" storage in OpenStack, the "simple" proposal
overcomes this by pushing the SSL certificates into the load balancers wh
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Adrian Otto wrote:
> Sorry, I changed the link. We originally started with hyphenated
> noun-verbs but switched to the current proposal upon receipt of advice that
> it would be more compatible with the next version of the cliff based CLI
> for OpenStack. If I rem
On 11/27/2013 12:45 AM, Takahiro Shida wrote:
Hi all,
I'm also interested in this issue.
> Create a unified request identifier
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cross-service-request-id
I checked this BP and the following review.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29480/
There are
On 2013-12-03 16:43:32 + (+), Jarret Raim wrote:
> This is great, thanks for the link. Would there be any objections to
> adding this to the github repo
I think you meant the "git" repo. What's a gi-thub?
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging/tree/doc/source/ >
> and the
On Dec 3, 2013 6:49 PM, "John Dickinson" wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> > On 12/03/2013 10:04 AM, John Dickinson wrote:
> >> How are you proposing that this integrate with Swift's account and
container quotas (especially since there may be hundreds of thousands of
a
On 12/03/2013 07:22 AM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Finally found a bit time to write my thoughts.
>
> There are few blockers that make really complex to build scheduler as a
> services or even to move main part of scheduler code to separated lib.
> We already have one unsuccessfully e
On 10/31/2013 11:49 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
> Another idea that Tom suggested is to use gerrit automation to send back
> to first time committers something in addition to the normal 'your patch
> is waiting for review' message. The message could be something like:
[...]
Tom sent a patch for re
On 12/03/2013 11:40 AM, Jarret Raim wrote:
>
>> I think there's something else you should take under consideration.
>> Oslo messaging is not just an OpenStack library. It's the RPC library
>> that all projects are relying on and one of the strong goals we have
>> in OpenStack is to reduce code and
On 12/03/2013 11:45 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 11:39 AM, Arati Mahimane wrote:
>> Randall, I think you are talking about required parameters and we are
>> talking about optional ones.
>> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Russell was specifically talking about required parameters being
On 12/03/2013 01:26 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> Unless the requirements change, so far it
> looks like this request should be deferred a bit longer.
And note that this is just my opinion, and note a statement of position
on behalf of the entire TC. We can still officially consider the
request at
Great tool especially for non-native guys such as me!
Thanks Joe
Best
Nachi
2013/12/3 Sylvain Bauza :
> Great tool !
> Just discovered that openstack.common.rpc does have typos, another good
> reason to migrate to oslo.messaging.rpc :-)
>
> -Sylvain
>
>
> 2013/12/3 Joe Gordon
>>
>> HI all,
>>
>
On 11/29/13 at 03:56pm, haruka tanizawa wrote:
Thank you for your reply.
I completely misunderstood.
You're correct on request_id and task_id.
What I'm planning is a string field that a user can pass in with the
request and it will be part of the task representation.
That field will have no m
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> HI all,
>
> Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
> point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So
> next time you want to fix a typo, instead of just fixing a single one
> you can go ahead and fi
I agree with RussellB on this … if the forklift's goal is to just separate
the scheduler, there should be no new features etc till the forklift is
done and it should work as is with very minor config changes.
A scheduler has several features like place resources correctly, for
example. Ideally, th
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> HI all,
>>
>> Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
>> point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So
>> next time you want to fix a typo,
2013/12/3 John Griffith :
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>> On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>>> HI all,
>>>
>>> Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
>>> point out a really nifty tool to detect commonly misspelled words. So
>>>
(Previous mail went out a bit fast)
These features could be developed iteratively to improve upon the
existing code base:
- First allow the modal view system to expand for better usage of screen
real-estate combined with responsiveness of the whole popin
- Then rework existing menus to simp
(Previous mail went out a bit fast)
These features could be developed iteratively to improve upon the
existing code base:
- First allow the modal view system to expand for better usage of screen
real-estate combined with responsiveness of the whole popin
- Then rework existing menus to simp
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> 2013/12/3 John Griffith :
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
HI all,
Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
point out a re
I totally agree on this meta level scheduler aspect. This should separate the
placement decision making logic (for resources of any type, but can start on
Nova resources) from their actual creation, say VM creation.
This way the placement decisions can be relayed to the individual components
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM, John Griffith
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant
> wrote:
> > On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> >> HI all,
> >>
> >> Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I would like to
> >> point out a really nifty tool to detec
2013/12/3 John Griffith :
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>> 2013/12/3 John Griffith :
>>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
> HI all,
>
> Recently I have seen a few patches fixing a few typos. I
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
> 2013/12/3 John Griffith :
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
>>> 2013/12/3 John Griffith :
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> On 12/03/2013 09:22 AM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> HI all,
>>
>>>
Hi,
I have the following configuration in savanna.conf:
# If set to True, Savanna will use floating IPs to communicate
# with instances. To make sure that all instances have
# floating IPs assigned in Nova Network set
# "auto_assign_floating_ip=True" in nova.conf.If Neutron is
# used for networ
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
