Hi,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, Christoph Thiel wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
Which is a redirector to dozens of mirrors, all not quite in sync
;)
Which is a royal PITA. Being re-directed to a site that is either
not in sync or is off line is not good. Perhaps the system
On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 07:28 +0200, Christoph Thiel wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
Which is a redirector to dozens of mirrors, all not quite in sync
;)
Which is a royal PITA. Being re-directed to a site that is either
not in sync or is off line is not
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Best would indeed be to decide the redirecting per-file, and redirect a
single file always to the same mirror to achieve the best cache effects.
I think I noted something similar with jigdo.
as jigdo calls for files independantly (each file=one ftp
session), it
I'v just pushed those files out to
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/cthiel/jigdo-test/
They should hit the mirrors as they sync with the master server.
It looks as if mirrors have stopped mirroring the peoples' directory? Or
at least the 2 or 3 I checked.
Testing those would be much
Just reading ZDNet news that Novell/SUSE have picked up 12,000 new desktops,
with around 300 a day currently being converted.
The migration is from Solaris x86 version 8 to SUSE running under KDE at the
Hannover based Lower-Saxony tax office. The deal, run by basysKom has been
kept under wraps
houghi wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:15:32PM +0100, Thomas Hertweck wrote:
Please have a look at http://www.thomashertweck.de/hypetombox.pl - the
command perl ./hypetombox.pl -d 1997-Aug -m mbox.1997Aug worked for me
without problems for the archive that was provided.
The original did
houghi wrote:
[...]
The issue is still, I believe, that communication is lacking and lacking
seriously.
OK, that's your point of view and it's a fair opinion. At the end of the
day, it means that Novell employees might have more work and should
change their behaviour of communicating with
Am Friday 09 June 2006 22:12 schrieb Manfred Tremmel:
Am Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2006 16:03 schrieb Adrian Schröter:
Please give us any kind of feedback. We know that we are the package
manager is not yet yet perfect, but this update should improve the
situation a lot :)
Hm, suseRegister
Am Samstag, 10. Juni 2006 02:46 schrieb Andreas Hanke:
Hi,
Manfred Tremmel schrieb:
That's what I've done.
OK, fine, but could you please remove the line
Obsoletes: suseRegister
from Kick-suseRegister.spec ASAP? The line
Provides: suseRegister
is more than enough.
Am Samstag, 10. Juni 2006 12:47 schrieb Adrian Schröter:
Can you please create a bugreport to track it down ?
Bug 183656
We should of course obsolete any dependencies which are really
needed.
Would be nice, harddisks get big and bigger, but we shouldn't waste it.
--
Machs gut|
Thomas Hertweck wrote:
day, it means that Novell employees might have more work and should
change their behaviour of communicating with us
not only them :-)...
but
Is there already a place where we could list the todo things
discussed but not already done, like
* may we have a forum
*
On 6/10/06, David Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just reading ZDNet news that Novell/SUSE have picked up 12,000 new desktops,
with around 300 a day currently being converted.
The migration is from Solaris x86 version 8 to SUSE running under KDE at the
Hannover based Lower-Saxony tax office.
houghi wrote:
As everything I write seems to be ending in a needless discussion, I am
unsubscribing from opensuse. This so that I won't be tempting to defend
my points of view each and every time.
I know this will be a relief for most.
Perhaps in a few months I get back ...
Don't forget
Adrian Schröter wrote:
Hi,
I did not really find out, if the opensuse-project mailing list suggestion was
liked or not.
Please protest now, if you think it does not make sense to found this list or
the list name is wrong.
Does it make sense to create this list ?
I would think the
Hi,
Manfred Tremmel schrieb:
I don't see any technical difference, but ok, yast asks befor removing,
wihtout Obsoletes.
Manfred, the technical difference is _huge_. Really. Try apt or smart or
yum, they all evaluate Obsoletes as being newer and want to perform an
upgrade as if
Rajko M wrote:
BTW, I'm evaluating present status of suse-linux-e.
With 100 mails every day, where informational noise is majority of
total posts, it is difficult to find and follow topics/treads of interest.
couldn't we think about _one_ moderated list?
I know I would work as a moderator
jdd wrote:
Rajko M wrote:
BTW, I'm evaluating present status of suse-linux-e.
With 100 mails every day, where informational noise is majority of
total posts, it is difficult to find and follow topics/treads of
interest.
couldn't we think about _one_ moderated list?
I know I would work as
On Saturday 10 June 2006 14:13, jdd wrote:
Is there already a place where we could list the todo things
discussed but not already done, like
The action items filed to Bugzilla?
Bye,
Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
I purchased a Linspire5.0 box from Fry's for a $150.00 and I don't care
for Linspires ploy
of charging a fee for downloading Open Source software.
I want to install Suse-10.1, for a new Linux user in my family, but is
10.1 stable enough?
Or is 10.0 a better Ideal?
I'am mainly a Fedora user but
On Saturday 10 June 2006 17:04, jim tate wrote:
I purchased a Linspire5.0 box from Fry's for a $150.00 and I don't
care for Linspires ploy
of charging a fee for downloading Open Source software.
I want to install Suse-10.1, for a new Linux user in my family, but
is 10.1 stable enough?
Or is
BandiPat wrote:
On Saturday 10 June 2006 17:04, jim tate wrote:
I purchased a Linspire5.0 box from Fry's for a $150.00 and I don't
care for Linspires ploy
of charging a fee for downloading Open Source software.
I want to install Suse-10.1, for a new Linux user in my family, but
is 10.1
Am Saturday 10 June 2006 18:48 schrieb jdd:
Rajko M wrote:
BTW, I'm evaluating present status of suse-linux-e.
With 100 mails every day, where informational noise is majority of
total posts, it is difficult to find and follow topics/treads of
interest.
couldn't we think about _one_
Adrian Schröter wrote:
Am Saturday 10 June 2006 18:48 schrieb jdd:
Rajko M wrote:
BTW, I'm evaluating present status of suse-linux-e.
With 100 mails every day, where informational noise is majority of
total posts, it is difficult to find and follow topics/treads of
interest.
couldn't we think
Right clicking on Suse UpdaterConfigureServicesAddServices
The headings:
Server Type: Yum
Service URI: ?
Service Name: ?
Using the below Server:
http://mirrors.kernel.org/suse/update/10.1/rpm/x86_64
What do I enter in for;
Service URI:
Service Name
No matter what I enter it won't
Hi,
Rajko M schrieb:
But I could imagine a list only for approved subscribers, for example
opensuse-core or something like this.
Probably the only way to keep things on topic :-)
Why? Where the hell are all these off-topic posts everyone seems to talk
about?
Seriously: I don't remember an
On 6/11/06, Adrian Schröter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I could imagine a list only for approved subscribers, for example
opensuse-core or something like this.
I see the following conditions, that would probably satisfy most SUSE
community members
1. Clear requirements for what is required
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Right clicking on Suse UpdaterConfigureServicesAddServices
The headings:
Server Type: Yum
Service URI: ?
Service Name: ?
Using the below Server:
http://mirrors.kernel.org/suse/update/10.1/rpm/x86_64
What do I enter in for;
Service URI:
Service
On 6/10/06, Adrian Schröter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I did not really find out, if the opensuse-project mailing list suggestion was
liked or not.
Yes I think the list is liked, we just need to make sure that the name
is the most descriptive.
As the openSUSE Project creates a
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Right clicking on Suse UpdaterConfigureServicesAddServices
The headings:
Server Type: Yum
Service URI: ?
Service Name: ?
Using the below Server:
Peter Flodin wrote:
On 6/11/06, jim tate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Right clicking on Suse UpdaterConfigureServicesAddServices
The headings:
Server Type: Yum
Service URI: ?
Service Name: ?
Using the below
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Right clicking on Suse UpdaterConfigureServicesAddServices
The headings:
Server Type: Yum
Service URI: ?
Service Name: ?
Using the below Server:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006, jim tate wrote:
Right clicking on Suse UpdaterConfigureServicesAddServices
The headings:
Server Type: Yum
Service URI: ?
Service
Andreas Hanke wrote:
Hi,
Rajko M schrieb:
But I could imagine a list only for approved subscribers, for example
opensuse-core or something like this.
Probably the only way to keep things on topic :-)
Why? Where the hell are all these off-topic posts everyone seems to talk
about?
Seriously:
On 6/11/06, jim tate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In yast2 you have the ServerName and Directory on Server and what
ever you put in it won't accept.
http://ftp-1.gwdg.de/pub/suse/update/10.1
There has got to be a better way.
Thanks for your help guys.
Yes instead of adding HTTP or FTP, select the
34 matches
Mail list logo
