Hi there,
the next openSUSE status meeting will take place at the official
#opensuse IRC channel on freenode (irc://irc.freenode.net/openSUSE)
next Tuesday at
2006/07/04 18:00 CET (16:00 GMT)
This meeting is meant to discuss the latest developments in and around
openSUSE. Please add
Is there any info availble on control.xml? I have found many references to
the file, but not one explaining anythiong about the file.
Changing the file sometimes can be obvious, like removing a module or
changing a 'yes' into a 'no' or 'true' into 'false.
Other things are less obvious what the
* houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jun 28. 2006 18:55]:
Is there any info availble on control.xml? I have found many references to
the file, but not one explaining anythiong about the file.
This should help you further:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:37:06PM +0200, Klaus Kaempf wrote:
* houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Jun 28. 2006 18:55]:
Is there any info availble on control.xml? I have found many references to
the file, but not one explaining anythiong about the file.
This should help you further:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:50:46PM +0200, jdd wrote:
I noted several times that there are very valuable info in
forgeftp. Can we link freely the wiki to this site? or is
that somewhat private?
If it is accesible without a password, it is available for everybody to
link to. If Novell does not
houghi wrote:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:50:46PM +0200, jdd wrote:
I noted several times that there are very valuable info in
forgeftp. Can we link freely the wiki to this site? or is
that somewhat private?
If it is accesible without a password, it is available for everybody to
link to. If
Before I dig in YaST sources, does anybody know a simple way
to skip the YaST partition module at install time.
I mean, giving an already partitioned disk, install at first
in a hard (compile time) given partition.
it's this module that uses the most memory and block some
memory disabled
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:46:30PM +0200, jdd wrote:
Before I dig in YaST sources, does anybody know a simple way
to skip the YaST partition module at install time.
I mean, giving an already partitioned disk, install at first
in a hard (compile time) given partition.
it's this module
From http://reverendted.wordpress.com/
A colleague of mine and I just ordered 7,500 DVD's copies of
the 10.1 release of openSUSE. Novell does hand them out
freely, but mostly at events. We also make openSUSE freely
available for download from openSUSE.org.
we definitively need to rethink
Onsdag 28 juni 2006 09:08 skrev jdd:
From http://reverendted.wordpress.com/
A colleague of mine and I just ordered 7,500 DVD's copies of
the 10.1 release of openSUSE. Novell does hand them out
freely, but mostly at events. We also make openSUSE freely
available for download from
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:02:56AM +0200, Martin Schlander wrote:
Onsdag 28 juni 2006 09:08 skrev jdd:
From http://reverendted.wordpress.com/
A colleague of mine and I just ordered 7,500 DVD's copies of
the 10.1 release of openSUSE. Novell does hand them out
freely, but mostly at
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Just call it SUSE and tell everybody it is open.
Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Just call it SUSE and tell everybody it is open.
Nah, just call it it :)
--
James Ogley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://usr-local-bin.org
Packages for SUSE: http://usr-local-bin.org/rpms
Help end poverty: http://oxfam.org.uk/imin
Onsdag 28 juni 2006 11:06 skrev Marcus Meissner:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Not sure whether that was meant to be a sarcastic remark.. :)
But renaming the distro opensuse will also cause problems.
- openSUSE Linux 10.2 - that's quite a mouthfull.
- All the infrastructure of
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 11:06 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
I guess there should be a clear difference between Novell business products
such as SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and Novell-sponsored projects such as
openSUSE. Have a look at Redhat. Their
On 6/28/06, Eberhard Moenkeberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Just call it SUSE and tell everybody it is open.
This does lead to the question, why is it called SUSE Linux in the
first place? Why isn't just
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 13:22, Peter Flodin wrote:
On 6/28/06, Eberhard Moenkeberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Marcus Meissner wrote:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Just call it SUSE and tell everybody it is open.
This does lead to the question, why is it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Bertolo wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 11:06 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
I guess there should be a clear difference between Novell business products
such as SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:22 +0100, James Ogley wrote:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Just call it SUSE and tell everybody it is open.
Nah, just call it it :)
Wouldn't that more likely be IT instead of it :-))
IT Linux, if you are looking for linux this is IT.
--
Ken
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 12:38 +0200, Daniel Bertolo wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 11:06 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
I guess there should be a clear difference between Novell business products
such as SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and Novell-sponsored
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 14:27 +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Bertolo wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 11:06 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
I guess there should be a clear difference between Novell
--snip--
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Marcus is correct. At corporate marketing discussions are ongoing to rename
SUSE Linux with 10.2. The project name stays as is and the distribution will
be renamed. Afaik openSUSE is on the short-list.
The confusion with openSUSE.org, the
Michael Loeffler wrote:
--snip--
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Marcus is correct. At corporate marketing discussions are ongoing to rename
SUSE Linux with 10.2. The project name stays as is and the distribution will
be renamed. Afaik openSUSE is on the short-list.
The
Pascal Bleser wrote:
New users might now be interested in SUSE Linux because it is part of
Novell.
But I can tell you for sure that a lot of people like and use SUSE Linux
because it is still produced by the highly skilled technical staff that
has been doing S.u.S.E. Linux and SuSE Linux in
On Jun 28, 06 15:38:55 +0200, jdd wrote:
Michael Loeffler wrote:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Rename it as you like, as long as SUSE is part of the name.
The confusion with openSUSE.org, the project and SUSE Linux, the
distribution is obvious ...
Add a third name, and you will
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
SUSE Linux Retail
SUSE Linux Community Edition
2ยข
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Kenneth Schneider wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 10:22 +0100, James Ogley wrote:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
Just call it SUSE and tell everybody it is open.
Nah, just call it it :)
Wouldn't that more likely be IT instead of it :-))
IT Linux, if you
If it would be me I would stay with SUSE Linux or if this cuases too
much confusion - change to openSUSE Linux but *not* to something
entirely different.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Martin Schlander schrieb:
- the name opensuse would imply that closedsuse also exists.
closedsuse existed in the past, before the Novel takeover. Yast was
not GPLed for example, which caused the GPL zealots to call it non-open.
Ciao
Siegbert
Daniel Bertolo wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 11:06 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
We will likely rename it for 10.2 anyway.
I guess there should be a clear difference between Novell business products
such as SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and Novell-sponsored projects such as
openSUSE. Have a
Siegbert Baude wrote:
Martin Schlander schrieb:
- the name opensuse would imply that closedsuse also exists.
closedsuse existed in the past, before the Novel takeover. Yast was
not GPLed for example, which caused the GPL zealots to call it non-open.
not GPL, but not closed, it was never
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 14:27 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
SUSE has been around for a long time, as a name (even if it was
S.u.S.E. and SuSE in the past).
I did not say that SUSE should be renamed. I just suggested to seperate the
community based SUSE Linux from the Novell business products.
On 6/28/06, Daniel Bertolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 14:27 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
SUSE has been around for a long time, as a name (even if it was
S.u.S.E. and SuSE in the past).
I did not say that SUSE should be renamed. I just suggested to seperate the
community
On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 19:30 +0200, Daniel Bertolo wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006 14:27 schrieb Pascal Bleser:
SUSE has been around for a long time, as a name (even if it was
S.u.S.E. and SuSE in the past).
I did not say that SUSE should be renamed. I just suggested to seperate the
L. Mark Stone wrote:
[...]
Similarly, I like the Enterprise name for the maintenance-backed
products.
We then call the normal version SuSE Linux Voyager and the factory
build becomes SuSE Linux Deep Space Nine. Really striking names! ;-)
Beam me up, Scottie!
SCNR,
Th.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks
Could be the wrong list; if another list is already in place for that
topic, please let me know ;)
Would it be possible to get access to (open)SUSE artwork ?
I mean stuff like the logo as SVG.
I'd like to gimp a few wallpapers with a nice,
L. Mark Stone wrote:
My two cents for product naming/differentiation:
I quite like the naming and the pricing (too low pricing is
of no interestn given there is a downloadable version, so
make all the manual printed and make them for a fee)
Novell's SuSE Linux Professional (boxed, with
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Could be the wrong list; if another list is already in place for that
topic, please let me know ;)
Would it be possible to get access to (open)SUSE artwork ? I mean stuff
like the logo as SVG.
I'd like to gimp a few wallpapers with a nice, big
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Thiel wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Could be the wrong list; if another list is already in place for that
topic, please let me know ;)
Would it be possible to get access to (open)SUSE artwork ? I mean stuff
like
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Could be the wrong list; if another list is already in place for that
topic, please let me know ;)
Would it be possible to get access to (open)SUSE artwork ? I mean
stuff like the logo as SVG.
I'd like to gimp a few wallpapers with a nice,
Christoph Thiel wrote:
Well, but that would have been to easy, wouldn't it?
link added here:
http://en.opensuse.org/Buttons,_Icons,_Themes__Wallpapers
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/galerie_photo_web/expo/index.html
http://lucien.dodin.net
not GPL, but not closed, it was never (AFAIK) - it was only
asked to quote when modified
It was open source in so far as the source was available and included
on release media.
It was non-free in so far as unacceptable[1] restrictions were placed on
how one could or could not redistribute it.
L. Mark Stone wrote:
[...]
Similarly, I like the Enterprise name for the maintenance-backed
products.
We then call the normal version SuSE Linux Voyager and the factory
build becomes SuSE Linux Deep Space Nine. Really striking names! ;-)
Beam me up, Scottie!
SCNR,
Th.
Or let's make it
Would it be possible to get access to (open)SUSE artwork ? I mean stuff
like the logo as SVG.
I'd like to gimp a few wallpapers with a nice, big openSUSE logo on it.
This has been asked a few times but stayed without a solution until now,
AFAIK.
The logo svn is available in bugzilla ;)
James Ogley wrote:
not GPL, but not closed, it was never (AFAIK) - it was only
asked to quote when modified
It was open source in so far as the source was available and included
on release media.
It was non-free in so far as unacceptable[1] restrictions were placed on
how one could or could
Hi,
Very sorry about resend this mail. But I think someone forgot it :(.
On 5/28/06, Phan Vinh Thinh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I finish it :). Now my work meet minimal requirement. What must I do
now to have vi.opensuse.org works? Or only wait?
All translated pages attached with this email.
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 14:05, Phan Vinh Thinh wrote:
Hi,
Very sorry about resend this mail. But I think someone forgot it :(.
nope, we are on it ... the problem is, as always, i'm quite busy right now.
vi ru are the next wikis i setup. We usually sync it outside on Thursdays,
but i guess
thanks
On 6/28/06, Martin Lasarsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 28 June 2006 14:05, Phan Vinh Thinh wrote:
Hi,
Very sorry about resend this mail. But I think someone forgot it :(.
nope, we are on it ... the problem is, as always, i'm quite busy right
now.
vi ru are the next wikis
48 matches
Mail list logo
