Hi!
I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for some time
now. I've been running SUSE since 9.0 on some computer. Current 10.2
is probably the best so far (although the software management / update
systems still do not work as well as they did for example in 9.3. -
well, at least f
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 13:17 schrieb HG:
> Hi!
>
> I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for some
> time now. I've been running SUSE since 9.0 on some computer.
I've been running suse since before suse even became its own
distribution...
> Current 10.2 is probably the best
Mathias Homann wrote:
I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for some
forget it. home computers are mostly used for games and this
will never work with Linux (sad but true)
for nearly any other thing Linux is much better.
think: when you buy Windows, you can barely do anyth
Hello guys!
I think you missed my points.
On 1/14/07, Mathias Homann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 13:17 schrieb HG:
> Current 10.2 is probably the best so far (although the software
> management / update systems still do not work as well as they did
> for example in
Still to continue...
On 1/14/07, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mathias Homann wrote:
>> I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for some
forget it. home computers are mostly used for games and this
will never work with Linux (sad but true)
I do not want discussion about if my
- Original Message
From: Mathias Homann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Current 10.2 is probably the best so far (although the software
> management / update systems still do not work as well as they did
> for example in 9.3. - well, at least for me they do not work).
Must be your fault. I have fo
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 14:16 schrieb jdd:
> Mathias Homann wrote:
> >> I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for some
>
> forget it. home computers are mostly used for games and this
> will never work with Linux (sad but true)
then why do i have an extra 30gig partition on my
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 15:08 schrieb HG:
> Still to continue...
>
> On 1/14/07, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mathias Homann wrote:
> > >> I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for
> > >> some
> >
> > forget it. home computers are mostly used for games and this
> > will n
Hi!
On 1/14/07, Mathias Homann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
then put your rants on a blog somewhere where we can ignore them, not
on a _discussion list_.
I wanted discussion about what SUSE _could_ do at home. I've given a
use case (backed up by MS), but seems that it's not interesting or
sexy
HG wrote:
You sent this privately to me...
error
which is fine as you and I both know
that what you wrote isn't really true.
no, it's not
have not touched. They can both play DVD's and they both have offices
and all that.
it's only a question of money. have a Linux laptop
configured
Mathias Homann wrote:
and why am i so sure that that partition has to be bigger on my next
harddisk?
anyway, Vista won't be able to run on any of the 5 computers
I have on my home today, and I won't buy a new one for that...
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
Votez pour nous, merci - vote for u
On Sunday January 14 2007 15:32, Mathias Homann wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 15:08 schrieb HG:
> > Still to continue...
> >
> > On 1/14/07, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mathias Homann wrote:
> > > >> I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for
> > > >> some
> > >
> >
jdd wrote:
>
> anybody know Bill gates is a very good seller...
>
>
Sure, if you consider extortion and strong arming to be good sales methods.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HG wrote:
And he will also sell that home server to millions of homes
do you really mean "server"? Windows was never a server (at
home).
If you mean really this I have a small course on the
openSUSE wiki about this, for now only in french, I could
translate it if there was interest (I don
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 15:44 schrieb jdd:
> Mathias Homann wrote:
> > and why am i so sure that that partition has to be bigger on my
> > next harddisk?
>
> anyway, Vista won't be able to run on any of the 5 computers
> I have on my home today, and I won't buy a new one for that...
Well,
I d
Hi!
On 1/14/07, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HG wrote:
> You sent this privately to me...
error
After which I sent you private email also. Which you then quote some
parts without my permission on a public list. Thanks.
anybody know Bill gates is a very good seller...
And he will also s
On 01/14/2007 jdd wrote:
>
> forget it. home computers are mostly used for games and this will
> never work with Linux (sad but true)
OK, I'll give you that a large percentage of home computers are used
just for gaming [ in the under thirty group ], BUT, I seriously doubt
that it's a majority of
HG wrote:
I wanted discussion about what SUSE _could_ do at home.
good. I didn't understand that :-( . probably my fault.
but let me ask something: what exacly do you want to do at
home that you can't with openSUSE?
personnally I have an other window box (other than the Linux
one), mostly
On Sunday 14 January 2007 14:38, HG wrote:
> I wanted discussion about what SUSE _could_ do at home. I've given a
> use case (backed up by MS), but seems that it's not interesting or
> sexy enough for SUSE. I'm asking for user friendliness and
> documentation I guess. And I can understand that it'
HG escribió:
> Hi!
(although the software management / update
> systems still do not work as well as they did for example in 9.3. -
> well, at least for me they do not work).
yes it does work , just dont use ZenWorks.
>
> So far it seems that with SUSE you can do email, web browsing (with
> some
On 01/14/2007 Cristian Rodriguez R. wrote:
> HG escribió:
> > > Hi!
> (although the software management / update
> > > systems still do not work as well as they did for example in 9.3.
> -
> > > well, at least for me they do not work).
>
> yes it does work , just dont use ZenWorks.
>
>
Actuall
"Cristian Rodriguez R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> PEBCAK . all you telling us can be done with yast or with a simple
> tutorial, if you actually dont want to **get a clue ** about basic
> things of an OS, Im not sure if linux is the right choice for you.
And therein lies the problem: the "loo
On Sunday January 14 2007 19:22, Stevens wrote:
> "Cristian Rodriguez R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PEBCAK . all you telling us can be done with yast or with a simple
> > tutorial, if you actually dont want to **get a clue ** about basic
> > things of an OS, Im not sure if linux is the right c
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 19:22 schrieb Stevens:
> "Cristian Rodriguez R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PEBCAK . all you telling us can be done with yast or with a simple
> > tutorial, if you actually dont want to **get a clue ** about basic
> > things of an OS, Im not sure if linux is the righ
jdd wrote:
> Mathias Homann wrote:
>
>>> I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for some
>
> forget it. home computers are mostly used for games and this will never
> work with Linux (sad but true)
LOL, it's sad that you have such a strange idea.
Let's get this right: Linux is
Hi!
On 1/14/07, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HG wrote:
> And he will also sell that home server to millions of homes
do you really mean "server"? Windows was never a server (at
home).
Check the URL that I gave ("Microsoft introduces Windows Home Server" from ARS).
If you mean really this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Elders wrote:
> On Sunday January 14 2007 19:22, Stevens wrote:
>> "Cristian Rodriguez R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> PEBCAK . all you telling us can be done with yast or with a simple
>>> tutorial, if you actually dont want to **get a clue **
On 1/14/07, Mathias Homann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But there lies another problem:
If we make linux as fool-friendly as windows, we get another windows. with the
same problem that windows has.
How did Apple do OS X then?
--
HG.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
On 1/14/07, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HG wrote:
> I wanted discussion about what SUSE _could_ do at home.
good. I didn't understand that :-( . probably my fault.
but let me ask something: what exacly do you want to do at
home that you can't with openSUSE?
I know the correct answer here:
HG wrote:
But in the contect of this discussion, I want to have one place with
reliable and large storage for all the stuff (mostly multimedia) that
I have. Then I can access if from all of the computers I have; 2
laptops, workstation (currently 2 of them) and PDA (in near future). I
do not want
On 2007-01-14 06:17, HG wrote:
>
> - Samba and Linux passwd synchronization... How do you setup Samba in
> SUSE? Well, you open up YaST and start up Samba server. How do you
All you need is one password on the samba server, and then everything
can be set up in SWAT (if you don't know what that is,
On 2007-01-14 08:28, Mathias Homann wrote:
>
>
> then why do i have an extra 30gig partition on my main gaming box
> which is mounted to /usr/local/games?
>
> and why am i so sure that that partition has to be bigger on my next
> harddisk?
Because you have too much spare time on your hands? :-)
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 22:17 schrieb Darryl Gregorash:
> On 2007-01-14 08:28, Mathias Homann wrote:
> >
> >
> > then why do i have an extra 30gig partition on my main gaming box
> > which is mounted to /usr/local/games?
> >
> > and why am i so sure that that partition has to be bigger on my n
On Sunday January 14 2007 19:42, Mathias Homann wrote:
// snip
> That means there are enough fools out there who still do not believe in the
> necessity of antivirus software for their windows systems. Why dont they?
> because they dont have a clue.
> Do we REALLY want more people like that on the
On Sunday 14 January 2007 15:15, Jan Elders wrote:
> I think HG made a valid point.
> Look at the various threads in this list from newbies who are desparate and
> lost how to get for instance their DVD working.
> Yes, for you (and me) it is quite simple because we know what actions we
> must take
On Sunday 14 January 2007 16:15, Jan Elders wrote:
> I think HG made a valid point.
> Look at the various threads in this list from newbies who are
> desparate and lost how to get for instance their DVD working.
His point was that XP could do this. It can not do it without extra
software. It wil
On Sun January 14 2007 3:01 pm, HG scratched these words onto a coconut
shell, hoping for an answer:
> On 1/14/07, jdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > HG wrote:
> > > I wanted discussion about what SUSE _could_ do at home.
> >
> > good. I didn't understand that :-( . probably my fault.
> >
> > but
EXTREMELY well stated, Kevin...
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 21:49 +, Kevin Donnelly wrote:
> On Sunday 14 January 2007 15:15, Jan Elders wrote:XTRE
> > I think HG made a valid point.
> > Look at the various threads in this list from newbies who are desparate and
> > lost how to get for instance thei
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
a community ? sound a bit holy to me, think some and too some who have
left the list because it looks like a very closed community ??
Maybe a good idea to listen to what standard questions the newbies come
with and remake some wikis ?? so all hav
Mathias Homann wrote:
> Well,
>
> I do have a box with a "vista compatible" sticker on it, but i guess I
> wont let vista get close to that box.
>
Many years ago, a friend of mine peeled a "Ready for Windows 95" sticker
off a monitor and stuck it on the toilet. Perhaps you could do the same
wi
On 2007-01-14 16:04, Mike wrote:
> On Sunday 14 January 2007 16:15, Jan Elders wrote:
>
>
>> I think HG made a valid point.
>> Look at the various threads in this list from newbies who are
>> desparate and lost how to get for instance their DVD working.
>>
>
> His point was that XP could do
* Kevin Donnelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-14-07 16:52]:
[...]
> I think one of the problems is that many new users come along and
> expect to be told exactly what to do in their specific situation to
> solve whatever problem they're having. "If Linux is as good as
> Windows, it must be able to do
Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 23:35 schrieb James Knott:
> Mathias Homann wrote:
> > Well,
> >
> > I do have a box with a "vista compatible" sticker on it, but i guess I
> > wont let vista get close to that box.
>
> Many years ago, a friend of mine peeled a "Ready for Windows 95" sticker
> off a moni
On Jan 14, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
I thought along those lines already, but it's a laptop, and i
rather rest my
palm on some stupid sticker than on some place where the palmrest
is sticky
because of the stupid sticker that i peeled off there ;)
In the States we have this wo
Benjamin Rosenberg wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
>
>> I thought along those lines already, but it's a laptop, and i rather
>> rest my
>> palm on some stupid sticker than on some place where the palmrest is
>> sticky
>> because of the stupid sticker that i peeled off th
Stevens escribió:
> "Cristian Rodriguez R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> PEBCAK . all you telling us can be done with yast or with a simple
>> tutorial, if you actually dont want to **get a clue ** about basic
>> things of an OS, Im not sure if linux is the right choice for you.
>
> And therein l
On Jan 14, 2007, at 6:21 PM, James Knott wrote:
Benjamin Rosenberg wrote:
On Jan 14, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
I thought along those lines already, but it's a laptop, and i rather
rest my
palm on some stupid sticker than on some place where the palmrest is
sticky
because of the
Mathias Homann escribió:
> But there lies another problem:
> If we make linux as fool-friendly as windows, we get another windows. with
> the
> same problem that windows has.
The main problem is that people does not understand that Linux is not
windows and will never be.
signature.asc
Desc
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 18:37 -0600, Benjamin Rosenberg wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2007, at 6:21 PM, James Knott wrote:
>
> >
> > I find that ordinary lighter fluid works well for most label glues.
>
> True. It does. But it can also eat through the plastic if one isn't
> careful. :)
I find that wd-40 on
On 2007-01-14 18:35, Cristian Rodriguez R. wrote:
>
>>
>>
>
> Free software isnt really free, it requires at least you to spend some
> of your time to get a least a minimal understanding about how it works.
>
Quite a bit of my revenue comes from a friend who would try to dispute
what you
On Sunday 14 January 2007 7:37 pm, Benjamin Rosenberg wrote:
> > I find that ordinary lighter fluid works well for most label glues.
> True. It does. But it can also eat through the plastic if one isn't
> careful. :)
WD-40 is great for removing adhesive, and it will not eat through the plastic.
On Sunday 14 January 2007 20:36, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
> > Free software isnt really free, it requires at least you to spend some
> > of your time to get a least a minimal understanding about how it works.
> >
>
> Quite a bit of my revenue comes from a friend who would try to dispute
> what you
Benjamin Rosenberg wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
>
>> I thought along those lines already, but it's a laptop, and i rather
>> rest my
>> palm on some stupid sticker than on some place where the palmrest is
>> sticky
>> because of the stupid sticker that i peeled off t
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:38:09PM -0300, Cristian Rodriguez R. wrote:
> The main problem is that people does not understand that Linux is not
> windows and will never be.
Actually, the main problem is that people will never understand that
there's no reason for Linux to be like Windows in the fir
> > Distro and desktop designers, developers and others in the Linux
> > community need to drop their holier-than-thou attitude and concentrate on
> > the masses who need to escape the clutches of M$.
I'm afraid I don't have the original message, otherwise I'd attribute the
above properly. Woul
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 16:01 +0100, Mathias Homann wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 14. Januar 2007 15:44 schrieb jdd:
> > Mathias Homann wrote:
> > > and why am i so sure that that partition has to be bigger on my
> > > next harddisk?
> >
> > anyway, Vista won't be able to run on any of the 5 computers
> > I h
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 21:38 -0300, Cristian Rodriguez R. wrote:
> Mathias Homann escribió:
>
> > But there lies another problem:
> > If we make linux as fool-friendly as windows, we get another windows. with
> > the
> > same problem that windows has.
>
> The main problem is that people does not
On 2007-01-14 19:54, Bruce Marshall wrote:
> On Sunday 14 January 2007 20:36, Darryl Gregorash wrote:
>
>>> Free software isnt really free, it requires at least you to spend some
>>> of your time to get a least a minimal understanding about how it works.
>>>
>>>
>> Quite a bit of my rev
Benjamin Rosenberg wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2007, at 6:21 PM, James Knott wrote:
>
>> Benjamin Rosenberg wrote:
>>> On Jan 14, 2007, at 5:15 PM, Mathias Homann wrote:
>>>
I thought along those lines already, but it's a laptop, and i rather
rest my
palm on some stupid sticker than on some
Yes, they do have a program that analyzes your system. Go to
www.windowsvista.com/upgradeadvisor with a list of requirements at
www.windowsvista.com/systemrequirements.
On Sunday 14 January 2007 21:56, Mike McMullin wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 16:01 +0100, Mathias Homann wrote:
> > Am Sonnta
On 01/14/2007 Benjamin Rosenberg wrote:
>
> In the States we have this wonderful product called GooGone .. I
> don't know if they sell it there, but if so then grab some. After you
> peel the sticker off .. just use some of that on tissue and no more
> sticky spot. :D
WD40 works wonders. Also,
On 01/14/2007 Marc Wilson wrote:
> Actually, the main problem is that people will never understand that
> there's no reason for Linux to be like Windows in the first place.
Actually, except the fact that the icons look funny, in everyday use it
really isn't THAT different. [ IMHO ]
--
(o:]>*HUGG
Billie Erin Walsh wrote:
> On 01/14/2007 Marc Wilson wrote:
>> Actually, the main problem is that people will never understand that
>> there's no reason for Linux to be like Windows in the first place.
>
> Actually, except the fact that the icons look funny, in everyday use it
> really isn't THA
>
> I'm afraid I don't have the original message, otherwise I'd attribute the
> above properly. Would whoever said it like to comment on where either of
> these perceived "needs" derives from? Especially the second one.
From: Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 07:49:45PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> I agree about the icons looking funny, but I find it really different. For
> instance drive letters, LOL, what's that about?
I see no difference there myself... remember the drive letter, or remember
where you mounted the partition. What'
On 01/14/2007 J Sloan wrote:
> I agree about the icons looking funny, but I find it really different. For
> instance drive letters, LOL, what's that about? And one single desktop - bleh.
How many times a day do you even have to think about where something is
on a harddrive, unless your using CLI e
Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 07:49:45PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
>> I agree about the icons looking funny, but I find it really different. For
>> instance drive letters, LOL, what's that about?
>
> I see no difference there myself... remember the drive letter, or remember
> where yo
Billie Erin Walsh wrote:
> On 01/14/2007 J Sloan wrote:
>> I agree about the icons looking funny, but I find it really different. For
>> instance drive letters, LOL, what's that about? And one single desktop -
>> bleh.
>
> How many times a day do you even have to think about where something is
On Sunday 14 January 2007 20:52, J Sloan wrote:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 07:49:45PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > I see no difference there myself... remember the drive letter, or
> > remember where you mounted the partition. What's the difference?
>
> The differenc
Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Sunday 14 January 2007 20:52, J Sloan wrote:
>> Marc Wilson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 07:49:45PM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I see no difference there myself... remember the drive letter, or
>>> remember where you mounted the partition. What's the
On Sunday 14 January 2007 21:06, J Sloan wrote:
> Randall R Schulz wrote:
> ...
>
> > Windows doesn't care whether you use forward or backward slashes.
> > They both work in most contexts.
>
> hmm, didn't know that changed. So it's sort of like the upper/lower
> case distinction - unix cares, and m
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 10:44:35PM -0600, Billie Erin Walsh wrote:
> However, Linux does use a sort of drive letter. FD, HDA, HDB, etc. A, C,
> D, etc are shorter designations. Especially when you have to add the
> partition number, FD0, HDA1, HDA2, HDB1, HDB2, etc. It's all in how you
> keep track
Mike wrote:
On Sunday 14 January 2007 16:15, Jan Elders wrote:
I think HG made a valid point.
Look at the various threads in this list from newbies who are
desparate and lost how to get for instance their DVD working.
His point was that XP could do this.
you forget the main point. I beg you
>
> No, of course I have nothing against usefriendly tools.
> but if you actually need a bit advanced setup, then you actually ***need
> to know** at least **the basics** !!! your company information or future
> can depend of this, this is a really seriuos problem.
>
> f.e having a tractor does n
Stevens schrieb:
> I thought that Suse 10.2 was pretty good until I ran headlong into the
> optical media bug. Maybe when that gets fixed it will be a good distro.
optical media bug? which optical media bug? I'm running 10.2 on three different
systems, and I
havent noticed any optical media bug
Billie Erin Walsh wrote:
I do like the multiple desktops. If I get one to jammed up I can open
the other and start over on a clean page. Kind of like the tabbed
browsing in Konqueror and Firfox. It's a LOT easier, and more efficient,
than having multiple iterations of the same program. It took M
* Billie Erin Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-14-07 23:47]:
[...]
> The major differences I see are the file structure and how you
> install something. I have no clue where stuff is on the hard drives,
> [ there's bits, pieces, and copies of stuff all over the place ] but
> then I don't have to. The
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * Billie Erin Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-14-07 23:47]:
> [...]
>> The major differences I see are the file structure and how you
>> install something. I have no clue where stuff is on the hard drives,
>> [ there's bits, pieces, and copies of stuff all over the place
* J Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-15-07 15:16]:
[...]
> While this is technically true, the fact is that any official suse
> rpm packages install binaries in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, etc. OTOH,
> tarball builds inevitably default to installing binaries in
> /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/sbin, etc, so th
Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * J Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-15-07 15:16]:
> [...]
>> While this is technically true, the fact is that any official suse
>> rpm packages install binaries in /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, etc. OTOH,
>> tarball builds inevitably default to installing binaries in
>> /usr/loca
* J Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-15-07 17:31]:
[...]
> But the rpm database is not a factor here since this is all outside
> the scope of the rpm database. Unlike windoze with the registry,
> Linux will still run and function even if the rpm database is nuked,
> but I agree that it's best to main
On Monday 15 January 2007 15:00, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * J Sloan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-15-07 17:31]:
> At the very least, when installing a tar ball, checkinstall should be
> employed, UNLESS YOU ARE VERY KNOWLEDGABLE ABOUT LINUX STRUCTURE.
>
Take it from someone that used to tar ball al
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 03:39:00PM -0800, Curtis Rey wrote:
> Checkinstall makes it a lot easier to fix problems and keep the rpm database
> coherent.
It is especially critical that people who top post use checkinstall. ;-)
Michael
--
If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute thing
On Monday 15 January 2007 15:39, Michael Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 03:39:00PM -0800, Curtis Rey wrote:
> > Checkinstall makes it a lot easier to fix problems and keep the rpm
> > database coherent.
>
> It is especially critical that people who top post use checkinstall. ;-)
>
> Michae
On Monday 15 January 2007 19:52, Curtis Rey wrote:
> On Monday 15 January 2007 15:39, Michael Nelson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 03:39:00PM -0800, Curtis Rey wrote:
> > > Checkinstall makes it a lot easier to fix problems and keep the rpm
> > > database coherent.
> >
> > It is especially cri
On Monday 15 January 2007 15:39, Michael Nelson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 03:39:00PM -0800, Curtis Rey wrote:
> > Checkinstall makes it a lot easier to fix problems and keep the rpm
> > database coherent.
>
> It is especially critical that people who top post use checkinstall.
> ;-)
Well, t
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 15:44 +0100, jdd wrote:
> Mathias Homann wrote:
>
> > and why am i so sure that that partition has to be bigger on my next
> > harddisk?
>
> anyway, Vista won't be able to run on any of the 5 computers
> I have on my home today, and I won't buy a new one for that...
Ill s
On Sunday 14 January 2007 04:17, HG wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been wanting to replace windows at home with SUSE for some time
> now. I've been running SUSE since 9.0 on some computer. Current 10.2
> is probably the best so far (although the software management / update
> systems still do not work as we
* Niels Øtergaard Kjær <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-14-07 17:34]:
> a community ? sound a bit holy to me, think some and too some who
> have left the list because it looks like a very closed community ??
It is not mandatory to join the 'community' or participate. But, then
you *will* be outside the
89 matches
Mail list logo
