Hi Sandy.
El Viernes, 25 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
> Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
> >> Okay, I finally realized just what you wanted to do. This is a script I
> >> adjusted for your purpose.
This worked like a charm. :-D
Many Thanks
--
Un saludo.
Carlos Lorenzo Matés.
clma
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Okay, I finally realized just what you wanted to do. This is a script I
adjusted for your purpose.
You need to add error handling to your faxmail routine to achieve a robust
transport.
#-
#!/bin/sh
# I set this up
Hi Sandy.
El Viernes, 25 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
> Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
> >>> I'm having a lot of feedback in the hylafax list, i'm playing around a
> >>> few ideas they told me. But i will try in the postfix list if i don't
> >>> find a good solution
> >>
> >> Have you tr
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
I'm having a lot of feedback in the hylafax list, i'm playing around a
few ideas they told me. But i will try in the postfix list if i don't
find a good solution
Have you tried to use the command in mailbox_command as I suggested? That
would take care of the user rig
Hi.
El Jueves, 24 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
> Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > I'm having a lot of feedback in the hylafax list, i'm playing around a
> > few ideas they told me. But i will try in the postfix list if i don't
> > find a good solution
>
> Ha
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Hi.
El Jueves, 24 de Enero de 2008, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) escribió:
Yes, it is notifying the user passed in $(user) but the job of the fax
belongs to the user who call faxmail
Well, i will try in the HylaFax list.
You might also try the Postfix users list at by
Hi.
El Jueves, 24 de Enero de 2008, Hylton Conacher (ZR1HPC) escribió:
> > Yes, it is notifying the user passed in $(user) but the job of the fax
> > belongs to the user who call faxmail
> >
> > Well, i will try in the HylaFax list.
>
> You might also try the Postfix users list at by sending an m
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
> Hi.
>
> El Domingo, 20 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
>> Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
>>> Well, the case is exactly this one.
>>>
>>> I have a mail to fax gateway, but the fax jobs are sent always with the
>>> same user (the sendfax). What i want is that the
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Hi again.
El Lunes, 21 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Hi.
El Domingo, 20 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Well, the case is exactly this one.
I have a mail to fax gateway, but the fax job
Hi again.
El Lunes, 21 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
> Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > El Domingo, 20 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
> >> Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
> >>> Well, the case is exactly this one.
> >>>
> >>> I have a mail to fax gateway, but the fax jo
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Hi.
El Domingo, 20 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Well, the case is exactly this one.
I have a mail to fax gateway, but the fax jobs are sent always with the
same user (the sendfax). What i want is that the fax job is sent each
Hi.
El Domingo, 20 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
> Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
> > Well, the case is exactly this one.
> >
> > I have a mail to fax gateway, but the fax jobs are sent always with the
> > same user (the sendfax). What i want is that the fax job is sent each
> > time with
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Well, the case is exactly this one.
I have a mail to fax gateway, but the fax jobs are sent always with the same
user (the sendfax). What i want is that the fax job is sent each time with
the user who really send the mai
Now i have this line in the master.cf
fax
Hi.
El Viernes, 18 de Enero de 2008, Sandy Drobic escribió:
> Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
> > Hi to All.
> >
> > Is possible to use a variable user in the pipe option?
>
> Yeees... that is possible. Though I don't know if it is exactly what you
> require. "man 8 pipe" will tell you that the pip
Carlos Lorenzo Matés wrote:
Hi to All.
Is possible to use a variable user in the pipe option?
Yeees... that is possible. Though I don't know if it is exactly what you
require. "man 8 pipe" will tell you that the pipe deamon expands the localpart
of the recipient address (the part left of the
Hi to All.
Is possible to use a variable user in the pipe option?
ie:
procmail unix - n n - - pipe
flags=R user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/procmail -t -m /etc/procmailrc ${sender}
${recipient}
in this line change the user=nobody to user=${user}
it is not exactly
16 matches
Mail list logo
