Rajko M a écrit :
The names existed before whole hype and I'm sure that no one will change them
to accommodate daily needs for appropriate naming. I guess that jdd will vote
for PetiteSUSE, but that has nothing to do with a hype ;-)
:-)
not really, a name with equal meaning in all countries
just a question: is the install christmas screen just
related to the system date, or is it to be the install
screen for all the 8 mont release duration?
thanks
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://dodin.org/mediawiki/index.php/GPS_Lowrance_GO
On Wednesday, 6. December 2006 10:32, jdd wrote:
just a question: is the install christmas screen just related to the system
date, or is it to be the install screen for all the 8 mont release duration?
Change your system date to find out? :-)
Bye,
Steve
Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
Reply on 06-12-2006 9:46:09
BTW: The Lindows debacle should serve to remind us what can happen when
the beast from Redmond considers itself (or its income streams!)
threatened...
Don't get this one: lindows got quiet a bunch of Money from Microsoft, so
Hi,
when having a look on the commit mailinglist, it seems development for
10.3/11.0/xx.xx just started, right?
There are several base packages which would never have got an update
during 10.2 release (coreutils, bash)
Maybe some words about the strategy for the upcoming release? What is
planned
On Wednesday, 6. December 2006 12:17, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
when having a look on the commit mailinglist, it seems development for
10.3/11.0/xx.xx just started, right? There are several base packages which
would never have got an update during 10.2 release (coreutils, bash)
The same
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 12:17:21PM +0100, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
Hi,
when having a look on the commit mailinglist, it seems development for
10.3/11.0/xx.xx just started, right?
There are several base packages which would never have got an update
during 10.2 release (coreutils, bash)
Hello,
Marcus Meissner wrote:
Well, new package versions, new features, better stability? :)
There are no specific outshining features yet.
For 10.2 'smart card' integration was mentioned a long time ago, but I
never heard about it again. I used smart cards in Sun labs, and it was a
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:25:34PM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
[...]
This brings to another wish: LTSP integration, like in 'Edubuntu'. A
diskless thin client solution using distribution binaries and LTSP support
scripts.
Once we have the details on what is needed for the LTSP integration, we
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the correct place to raise this question.
Please direct me to other lists if that is appropriate.
I wonder if there is an interest in making a openSUSE Home Server solution?
It should caer for real life requirements like:
- Users that are not compatible with the
Hello,
Christoph Thiel wrote:
This brings to another wish: LTSP integration, like in 'Edubuntu'. A
diskless thin client solution using distribution binaries and LTSP support
scripts.
Once we have the details on what is needed for the LTSP integration, we will
be able to size this project
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 14:30, Christoph Thiel wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 01:25:34PM +0100, Peter Czanik wrote:
[...]
This brings to another wish: LTSP integration, like in 'Edubuntu'.
A diskless thin client solution using distribution binaries and
LTSP support scripts.
Once
Birger Kollstrand a écrit :
I wonder if there is an interest in making a openSUSE Home Server solution?
there is, of course, I have even a hole course on it
http://fr.opensuse.org/Formation_d'administrateur_Baby
but not yet translated to english by lack of time/interest
jdd
--
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:04:37PM +0100, jdd wrote:
Birger Kollstrand a écrit :
I wonder if there is an interest in making a openSUSE Home Server solution?
there is, of course, I have even a hole course on it
http://fr.opensuse.org/Formation_d'administrateur_Baby
When I went to that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Tuesday 2006-12-05 at 19:20 -0600, Rajko M wrote:
I thought that more people with underpowered machines are present on
openSUSE,
but that is obviously not the case :-)
Why do you say that? I'm interested, but I'm no developper, I don't
On 2006/12/06 10:32 (GMT+0100) jdd apparently typed:
just a question: is the install christmas screen just
related to the system date, or is it to be the install
screen for all the 8 mont release duration?
I have about 5 10.2s. Only the least recently updated retains the
Christmas theme.
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:55:05AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/06 10:32 (GMT+0100) jdd apparently typed:
just a question: is the install christmas screen just
related to the system date, or is it to be the install
screen for all the 8 mont release duration?
I have about 5
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 14:59 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:55:05AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/06 10:32 (GMT+0100) jdd apparently typed:
just a question: is the install christmas screen just
related to the system date, or is it to be the install
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Marcel Hilzinger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 14:59 schrieb Marcus Meissner:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:55:05AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/06 10:32 (GMT+0100) jdd apparently typed:
just a question: is the install christmas screen just
related to
On 2006/12/06 14:59 (GMT+0100) Marcus Meissner apparently typed:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:55:05AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/06 10:32 (GMT+0100) jdd apparently typed:
just a question: is the install christmas screen just
related to the system date, or is it to be the install
On 2006/12/06 15:53 (GMT+0100) Steffen Winterfeldt apparently typed:
It is random (check the sources) and depends on the date. And today in
particular you will get it all the time.
Funny, I just booted to test on a box I thought it was permanently gone
from, but it came up.
BTW, the online
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 17:17 schrieb Felix Miata:
On 2006/12/06 15:53 (GMT+0100) Steffen Winterfeldt apparently typed:
It is random (check the sources) and depends on the date. And today in
particular you will get it all the time.
Funny, I just booted to test on a box I thought it
On 2006/12/06 17:27 (GMT+0100) Marcel Hilzinger apparently typed:
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 17:17 schrieb Felix Miata:
On 2006/12/06 15:53 (GMT+0100) Steffen Winterfeldt apparently typed:
BTW, the online help mentions how to configure it.
It says:
Like it or hate it? Edit
because this is french (?), I cannot help you much.
Except to say that openSUSE works excellently as Home Server.
Running SUSE Linux 10.0 w/ apache2.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:23:59PM +0100, jdd wrote:
houghi a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:04:37PM +0100, jdd wrote:
Birger Kollstrand a écrit :
I wonder if there is an interest in making a openSUSE Home Server
solution?
there is, of course, I have even a hole course on it
Hello,
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 03:03 schrieb houghi:
If you want rebranding for any of those, look at
http://repos.opensuse.org/home:/jnweiger/SUSE_Factory/repodata/ and
obviously http://en.opensuse.org/Making_a_SUSE_based_distribution
I have made the page
* houghi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-06-06 13:22]:
Neither in Lynx or w3m or Opera. It gives a warning in Firefox 2.0 in SUSE
10.0. The message I get is:
This page has been reported as a web forgery designed to trick users into
sharing personal or financial information. snip
must be a localized
http://fr.opensuse.org/Formation_d'administrateur_Baby
Neither in Lynx or w3m or Opera. It gives a warning in Firefox 2.0 in SUSE
10.0. The message I get is:
This page has been reported as a web forgery designed to trick users into
sharing personal or financial information. snip
I think
jdd wrote:
houghi a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:04:37PM +0100, jdd wrote:
Birger Kollstrand a écrit :
I wonder if there is an interest in making a openSUSE Home Server
solution?
there is, of course, I have even a hole course on it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2006-12-06 at 12:04 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
cpio -i /boot/message
All that has done is removed my shell prompt from the screen. What next?
I'm not familiar with cpio options, but I think that should have extracted
the files in
houghi a écrit :
When I let Google check (and them knowing each and every site I visit) I
do not get the error. Obviously also not when I disable the detection of
forgery.
such algorythm detection are not reliable :-(, probably the
' was seen as separating the url in two (like it was in the
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 09:04, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/06 17:27 (GMT+0100) Marcel Hilzinger apparently typed:
Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2006 17:17 schrieb Felix Miata:
On 2006/12/06 15:53 (GMT+0100) Steffen Winterfeldt apparently
typed:
BTW, the online help mentions how to
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 07:35:06PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2006 03:03 schrieb houghi:
If you want rebranding for any of those, look at
http://repos.opensuse.org/home:/jnweiger/SUSE_Factory/repodata/ and
obviously
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2006-12-06 at 11:29 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
...
CPIO is definitely a horse of a different color in the Unix archive tool
world. Apart from the fact that it is the basis of the RPM format, it's
really an archaic standard,
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 12:35, Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Wednesday 2006-12-06 at 11:29 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
...
CPIO is definitely a horse of a different color in the Unix archive
tool world. Apart from the fact that it is the basis of the RPM
format, it's really an archaic
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 11:51, richard (MQ) wrote:
First I've heard about them getting paid to go away by the beast - more
relevantly though they *did* change their name, presumably as a direct
result of those 'discussions'.
Then you missed a big part of the news from that trial. In an
On 2006/12/06 11:29 (GMT-0800) Randall R Schulz apparently typed:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 09:04, Felix Miata wrote:
Naturally, cpio --help and man cpio will give you the information
you need.
Naturally to you maybe. To me, they are like most man pages, lucid as
mud. I changed
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 18:19, houghi wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 06:23:59PM +0100, jdd wrote:
houghi a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 02:04:37PM +0100, jdd wrote:
Birger Kollstrand a écrit :
I wonder if there is an interest in making a openSUSE Home Server
solution?
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:26:22PM +, Pete Connolly wrote:
I'm not getting that in FF 2.0 on 10.2 RC1 with updates. I'm running the
Google toolbar as well, which complains on 'phishy' sites quite a lot.
Strange, unless the Google toolbar interferes somehow with the
tandard test and does
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 14:35, Carlos E. R. wrote:
I tried - info cpio, actually, man is almost empty - and I almost run
away.
If you're using KDE, you can go to Konqueror and type in info:cpio,
it's not quite as painful.
--
Glenn Holmer (Q-Link: ShadowM)
Christopher Bonner wrote:
Hi,
I am currently running openSUSE 10.2 rc2 on my laptop. When the power is
plugged in it is incredibly slow! I had the same problem with Fedora,
but this was solved because the wrong kernel architecture was installed.
i586 instead of i686.
How can I install a
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 13:16, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2006/12/06 11:29 (GMT-0800) Randall R Schulz apparently typed:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 09:04, Felix Miata wrote:
Naturally, cpio --help and man cpio will give you the
information you need.
Naturally to you maybe. To me,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Wednesday 2006-12-06 at 12:45 -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
I read once that the cpio archive is more solid.
If the tar.gz archive is broken, all of it is broken. The backup
program that claimed this explained that instead they used
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 07:48, Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Tuesday 2006-12-05 at 19:20 -0600, Rajko M wrote:
I thought that more people with underpowered machines are present on
openSUSE, but that is obviously not the case :-)
Why do you say that? I'm interested, but I'm no developper, I
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 19:35, Carlos E. R. wrote:
...
But the tradeoff with per-file compression is that you typically
get rather poor compression for archives that contain many small
files.
Yes, the compression ratio is a bit worse, but that's something I
will happily sacrifice
45 matches
Mail list logo
