On 2006-02-14 at 06:32:21 +0100, houghi wrote (shortened):
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:33:45AM -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> > Anybody knows if Nagios 2.0 will be available with the 10.1 release?
>
> Just look if it is available on the Beta version. That could already be an
> indicator.
It's not
On 2006-02-14 at 03:10:14 -0400, Ciro Iriarte wrote (shortened):
> > It's not in 10.1. It was just released last week which was far too late
> > for 10.1.
> >
> Is it going to be included later?, i could install 10.1 and get the Beta
> packages from 10.2 in that case
It will be included in fu
Hi,
On 2006-03-16 at 22:29:47 -0700, Chad Groneman wrote (shortened):
> It's probably been this way for a long time, but I noticed with beta8 that
> firefox defaults to automatically save to the desktop rather than the home
> folder or some other location. It seems to me that this is a quick way
On 2006-04-25 at 17:27:52 +0300, Silviu Marin-Caea wrote (shortened):
> In RC2 Firefox is 1.5.0.1. This version has security bugs. Shouldn't it
> be updated to 1.5.0.2?
>
> I know about version freeze and all that. However the box should not go
> out with known security vulnerabilities for the sa
On 2006-05-04 at 16:17:22 +0200, Rupert Kolb wrote (shortened):
> (1) I didn't find seamonkey in any of the 10.1 prereleases. ... but it
> should be there!
It's only on the DVD and it wasn't there from the beginning.
> (2) Both, the 10.0-i386 and 10.0-x86_64 version, are working in the
> 10.1-RC
On 2006-05-05 at 08:41:15 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote (shortened):
> > Correct. And this is expected since we don't have a x86-64
> > Java/Flash/Adobe Reader plugin.
>
> Wouldn't it be preferrable to ship/install a 32bit executable of the browser
> for
> archs that support running 32 and 64 bit b
Hi,
On 2006-05-05 at 12:56:12 +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote (shortened):
> > If you think that's useful (I agree at the moment) to ship SeaMonkey in
> > 32bit version on x86-64 please file a bugreport as enhancement.
> > (But the three examples from above should really be solved from their
> > vendo
?
>
> Bugzilla - with /var/log/zmd-messages.log appended.
I'd guess that happens if zmd is not able to clean up until the timeout
in the init script fires.
At least that happens sometimes if I use the init-script to stop zmd.
Wolfgang Rosenauer
--
SUSE - A Novell business-o) Tel
On 2006-06-30 at 07:28:11 +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote (shortened):
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:30:57AM +0200, Andreas Vetter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > whenever there is a update, the first run of you does not show the update.
> > I have to run you again a second time to see the updates.
> >
> >
ailredirect.mozdev.org/
> >
> >Stefan
>
> Thanks for this advise!
> In this case, openSUSE should have this extension compiled in the packages. So
> all openSUSE users can profit from it.
In most packages this is the case,
but it's still only for bouncing.
Wolfgang
Hi,
On 2006-08-13 at 13:34:18 +0200, Pascal Bleser wrote (shortened):
> > I got that. Thunderbird has no list-reply. Thats the fault of
> > Thunderbird. There even are bugreport about it in the mozilla bugzilla.
>
> Right. Unfortunately Thunderbird doesn't have that feature and most
> probably w
Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> On the openSUSE Wiki, it's written that with openSUSE 10.2, Mozilla
> Firefox 2.0 should be delivered (Mozilla is due to be released in October).
> But up to now, even in the current factory tree, there are no traces of
> Firefox 2.0. Only 1.5.0.7 is available.
>
>
Andreas Hanke wrote:
> JP Rosevear schrieb:
>> We are packaging 2.0 for 10.2.
>
> Which leads to the question: What will happen to xulrunner?
>
> There are currently two versions of it in the factory tree (but the
> later one of them is unused).
>
> You are not going to ship both versions in the
Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
> That was the one I did not think of (I think up to now it was always
> 'disable' by default.
> Strangely, I am NOT able to change it using the GUI (by going to edit
> preferences connection, I just get an error.
That error is fixed for beta2 and with the packages a
Andras Mantia wrote:
> Hi,
> I started to download the DVD ISO (x86_64 version) on Friday and it went
> all well until it reached 2.95 GB, but now on Monday (I don't have
> permanent access to this machine) it still didn't finish and KTorrent
> says that the tracker status is "Invalid response". C
Anders Norrbring wrote:
> I get this in huge numbers in my log "imap[3069]: error sending to
> idled: 3"
>
> In /etc/cyrus.conf, I have: idled cmd="idled"
> But nowhere on the disk can I find the idled command.. Ideas anyone?
How about /usr/lib/cyrus/bin/idled ?
Should be there. The pac
Monkey 9 wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> thunderbird
> /usr/bin/thunderbird: line 137: 5248 Segmentatie fout$AOSS
> $MOZ_PROGRAM $@
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>
I wonder how you upgraded to RC2. But anyway that's no useful output.
Do you know how to get a stacktrace?
Wolfgang
--
Peter Czanik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> jdd wrote:
>> could it be possible to have the GM _torrents_ annouced two days
>> before the GM, may be with some trusted seeders allowed to ftp the
>> isos before the others to open the pipe?
> I guess, it's pretty much the current practice. Bringing mirrors up to
Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote:
> I have big problems to contact and login the bugzilla site, firefox hangs by
> secure-www.novell.com.
>
> Is this only a Problem on my site ?
AFAIK no. I guess you see that every time with FF 2.x for the first
connect to bugzilla.novell.com? Then it's caused by
Klaus Kaempf wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jan 18. 2007 09:52]:
>> A good idea,
>>
>> I think it would be enough to have a login and a !!small!! yast for
>> installing more packages.
>
> If we are talking about a _really_ small base system, it should include RPM
> at most
> b
Heiko Helmle wrote:
> Andreas Jaeger schrieb:
>
>> * Enable -fstack-protector for the new distros for every package
>> by default
>
> Gentoo is supporting -fstack-protector for quite some time now and you
> might want to have a look at their ebuild database for some packages
> that have little
Chema Ollés wrote:
> Hi all:
> I try run k3b and see that cdrecord is not on my system...
> It seems there are legar problems...
> What program will openSuse include instead?
wodim is already shipped with 10.2 as cdrtools replacement.
Wolfgang
Gregg Nicholas wrote:
> The workaround was working for me on Alpha2 x86_64. Can't seem to make
> it work on Alpha3. Perhaps we need new instructions now that firefox is
> 64-bit?
There is almost no chance to get Java working in Firefox 64bit yet.
There simply is no real working 64bit plugin for
Alexey,
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> 1. implement custom branding. How to do that ?
Depends on what you want to modify exactly.
> 2, it should run as a separate process, totally independent from normal
> Firefox.
That's not sooo easy. Basically you have to switch the profile dir in
that case. Ther
Hi,
Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> On 5/11/07, Alexey Eremenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have made an overview regarding my plans about AppArmored FireFox.
>> link:
>> http://download.yousendit.com/98BAB4F42629D737
>
> That overview is now also uploaded to the bug report.
>
> But I still can't g
Hi,
Silviu Marin-Caea wrote:
> The previous version didn't crash at all.
>
> I'm gonna install debuginfo and start running firefox from the command line,
> to catch the problem. I don't know why it doesn't start that Talkback thing
> after it crashes.
Because talkback is a proprietary extensi
Silviu Marin-Caea schrieb:
> Is this supposed to work right now? Or is it still work in progress with the
> plugin wrapper...
>
> At least a very positive thing is that java in Konqueror does work.
Please note that I'm not absolutely sure what the decision was actually
but IIRC 10.3 is again su
Daniel Rahn wrote:
> Stephan Kulow wrote:
>> I think reading usenet is far from mainstream - and people that do have
>> usually no problem doing FTP-Installations ;)
>
> Being the maintainer I have to second this. PAN is going through a very
> long development cycle right now and I'd rather have
Daniel Rahn wrote:
> Wolfgang Rosenauer wrote:
>> GNOME:Community seems like a good candidate.
>
> Not really. While you can easily think that Pan is a GNOME program, it
> actually isn't.
It might not be a real Gnome application but there are other examples in
that pro
Pavel Nemec wrote:
>>> pinentry
>>> pinentry-gtk
>> I expect this is required for gpg -agent support in evolution
> And maybe in Thunderbird enigmail too. (not sure about it)
If the gpg-agent is used to open the keys it is.
But it's not only needed for those in that case since just decrypting or
s
Andras Barna wrote:
> So yesterday I searched for one of the my favorite application: xmms
> using webpin, in Factory only one result was: xfce4-panel-plugin-xmms,
> iirc it requires xmms, but where is xmms?? OK in coolo's answer
> there's the "often" word, but I don't understand why was it droppe
Hi,
I just got this one and would have a few questions on that.
h_root wrote:
> here is the log from the commit of package mozilla-nss
> checked in at Fri Sep 14 00:46:19 CEST 2007.
>
>
> --- GNOME/mozilla-nss/mozilla-nss.changes 2007-07-27 17:59:00.0
> +0200
> +++ /mounts
jacob berkman wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Wolfgang Rosenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So where is the bug number in that changelog entry? We are after beta3
>> so I'd expect a bugnumber here.
>
> There is no bug number because nobody has used the functionality t
Andreas Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Martin Schlander wrote:
>
>>> Can I suggest
>>>
>>> - Making the sun plugin conflict with the classpath webplugin.
>>> - Preferably don't install the classpath version at all, if you're
>>> worried about completely free java go for java 7 it would be mo
Florin Samareanu wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 17:32 +0300, Arto Viitanen wrote:
>> We installed it anyhow and it seemed to work, but firefox
>> print preview crashed the
>> firefox. We assumed it was because of problems with update.
>>
>
> i experience the same problem here. it was a clean 10.3
Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Not sure there is a lot to status report, but I try:
>
> - the number of incoming bugs is growing, for some
> components almost dramatically. So much time is
> spent in screening at the moment. For a glimpse,
> check http://tinyurl.com/2cxbto
> (you're very
Felix Möller wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Also, Mozilla applications compiled with this gcc 4.3 from the factory
>> repo are crashing on any mouse action here - independent if
>> self-compiled or from the build service. Builds compiled a few days
>> ago with gcc 4.2 work fine though.
> I do not know whether
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 17:27 +0100, Will Stephenson wrote:
>> On Friday 23 November 2007, Rodrigo Moya said:
>>> So, first, I would like people to test the packages we've built, and
>>> second, what needs to be done to put this into the distro for 11.0? Are
>>> KDE people aware
Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Saturday 22 December 2007, Günther J. Niederwimmer wrote:
>
>> with the last Mozilla, Flash Update is also not working ?
>
> are you really talking about factory? What is not working? do you use x86_64
> or i586? did you file a bugreport?
>
>> Mozilla don't find the plu
Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Mittwoch 09 Januar 2008 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer:
Stephan Kulow wrote:
- Factory dependencies were broken over christmas, but should be fine
again
At least not in the buildservice. It still shows expansion errors
because of libtasn1.so3 :-(
The sync is still done
Stephan Kulow wrote:
- Factory dependencies were broken over christmas, but should be fine again
At least not in the buildservice. It still shows expansion errors
because of libtasn1.so3 :-(
Wolfgang
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
Hi,
I'm wondering if there is any internal policy at Novell about security
updates for Factory?
I just found an example what shouldn't happen:
MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates while it's
still on 2.0.0.6 in Factory.
Since in 10.3 it was a security update I wonder why i
Stephan Kulow wrote:
Am Donnerstag 10 Januar 2008 schrieb Wolfgang Rosenauer:
Hi,
I'm wondering if there is any internal policy at Novell about security
updates for Factory?
I just found an example what shouldn't happen:
MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates
Michael Wolf wrote:
MozillaThunderbird is on version 2.0.0.9 on 10.3-updates while it's
still on 2.0.0.6 in Factory.
Since in 10.3 it was a security update I wonder why it can be that it's
still old in Factory.
I would expect a policy that Factory should get necessary updates at
around the same t
Felix Möller wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that I am encountering a few "buffer overflows" but I don't see any
relevant reports in bugzilla, so it might be something specific to my
system. Could someone confirm before I enter a bunch of bugs?
The two executables that come to mind, are /usr/bin/dvd+
45 matches
Mail list logo
