Title: Message
Hey
guys,
Anyone who has
commit access or open issues in Jira for XWork 1.0 or WebWork2 2.0, please take
some time to get your fixes / patches in... I'd like to see us release final
versions before the end of the year...
Thanks to everyone
for all your hard work!
Jason
Oops, my bad. I thought you meant two *different* Action classes with
the same action name in different namespaces...
Do you really think this is an issue? If you don't want the same
validation for the 2 in different namespaces, then name them
differently. On the other hand, if you wanted to have
Jason,
Either you misunderstood me... or I'm being incredibly thick (I'm leaning
towards the latter)...
But if 2 actions are
1) of the same class
2) and have the same action name
3) but reside in 2 different namespaces
then they'd *have to* have the same validation.
I don't see why you say the
ParameterInterceptor is only there to set properties from the Parameter map (in WW2
this is the parameters from the HttpRequest).
If you're chaining and want to set the properties from one action to the next, you
want the ChainingInterceptor.
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Smith [m
No, because the validation files are named
ClassName-validationContext-validation.xml
Therefore the context is just a further specifier on top of the class
name. All of the validations are class specific, with class defaults in
ClassName-validation.xml
And have more specific validations which a
In the code snippet below, the context string = the action name.
Doesn't that mean that if 2 actions (of the same class) have the same name,
but live in different namespaces, that they have to use the same validation?
Wouldn't it be better if the context string contained the namespace as well?
Hey Robert,
I am so sorry, my head wasn't working quite right. I see now what you
are saying (or at least, I see it much clearer than I did before):
In packages, you define stacks with but you set the
default stack with .
In actions you set the default (only 1 can exist) stack with
.
Why aren
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/WebWork lists some applications that are using WebWork 1.x.
Regards,
Bruce Ritchie
Matthew E. Porter wrote:
Is there a page anywhere that lists the commercial and open-source
products based upon OpenSymphony components, especially WebWork 1 & ? I
looked for
Is there a page anywhere that lists the commercial and open-source
products based upon OpenSymphony components, especially WebWork 1 & ?
I looked for it and could not find one.
Cheers,
matthew
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net
I actually thought this was a joke at first until I looked it up... Strange
name for a class =).
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!
Blake
- Original Message -
From: "Cuong Tran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:32 PM
Subject: Re
I have a question about ParameterInterceptor. Is it expected behaviour to limit the
parameters that are to be chained from one action to another to those in the HTTP
request and to not allow updates to the parameter values outside of the HTTP request,
say, from an action prior to a chain?
The i
Use the CoolUriServletDispatcher instead of the default
WebWorkServletDispatcher (in web.xml). Isn't that a cool feature?
--- Michael Blake Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> What's the best method to avoid using a QUERY_STRING in URIs?
>
> For example, I'd like to use the foll
Hi everyone!
What's the best method to avoid using a QUERY_STRING in URIs?
For example, I'd like to use the following:
http://www.mydomain.com/cart/add-item/1/
Instead of:
http://www.mydomain.com/cart/add-item.do?itemId=1
If it matters, I'd like to use Orion as my application server. Also, in
Thanks for the suggestions but I think that the Filter approach is simpler
and more search engine friendly.
The question was actually asking for a method of doing an internal
'forward' (dispatcher.forward()), rather than a 'redirect'
(response.sendRedirect() or html refresh). This means one less
Yep...
Here's the before() method from the ValidationInterceptor:
protected void before(ActionInvocation invocation) throws Exception
{
Action action = invocation.getAction();
String context = invocation.getProxy().getActionName();
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
Is XWork's validation framework usable with
non-actions (e.g. POJOs or JavaBeans) too?
If yes, where can I find sample code?
Cheers,
Torsten
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
--
US Stock Market - Stock Profile of the Week
Symbol: HTDS
Market: PK
Sector: MEDICAL RESEARCH
BARCHART Rates HTDS an 80% BUY - http://quotes.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=HTDS
Before we begin our profile we have very exciting, breaking news...
Tubercin Passes Toxicity Trials - Ready To Proceed
Done.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de
Jason Carreira
Envoye : mardi 2 decembre 2003 20:18
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [OS-webwork] Conversion Bug
Great catch! Can you open a few Jira issues for these? Thanks!
> -Original Message-
Great catch! Can you open a few Jira issues for these? Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred Lamuette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] Conversion Bug
>
>
>
> With a CheckboxList returning an array o
With a CheckboxList returning an array of strings, if this array has a
length of 2 elements or more and the target class is not resolved in
XWorkBasicConverter, a StackOverflow error is thrown. As a target class, you
can take a TreeSet for instance.
The involved code from XWorkBasicConverter, you
...unbookmarkable pages, but a simple approach :)
-Mensagem original-
De: Anoop Ranganath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: terça-feira, 2 de dezembro de 2003 15:04
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: Re: [OS-webwork] Tomcat forward
Or just make the page at your domain one big frame, an
Or just make the page at your domain one big frame, and have the frame
point to your home page.
On Dec 2, 2003, at 11:55 AM, John Patterson wrote:
Hi, I know this is off topic but I was wondering how others handle
this issue.
I want my domainwww.domain.co.ukto forward directly to my home pag
Hi,
I've got a problem with the select tag. I am declaring the select tag like
this:
Where affiliateTransport.affiliateCategories represents transport object
which has a getter/setter (affiliateCategories) for a List object and
valueStore.allCategories a getter for a List which contains all sel
You could use sitemesh to decorate a remote url, but really, what you
want to do is fairly silly, since you're incurring an extra network trip
(from the server to your homepage) for no reason other than to have a
slightly prettier url.
John Patterson wrote:
Hi, I know this is off topic but I
Hi, I know this is off topic but I was
wondering how others handle this issue.
I want my domain www.domain.co.uk to forward directly to my
home page. That is, I do not want it to *redirect* making the browser's URL
change.
Is making a Filter the only cross platform way to
do?
Thanks,
Well, I don't think we're up for doing a ton of refactoring right now,
as we're trying to get 2.0 out the door.
For unit testing, you can just directly use ActionProxyFactory to create
ActionProxies, which do most of what you're looking for.
As far as having multiple dispatchers running at the s
> I have some JSP 2.0 pages that I would like to port over to webwork 2,
> and was wondering if there is any way to access the value stack?
> It just seems cooler to convert my ${id} statements to ${stack.id},
> rather than
> Basically, I am asking if the value stack has been put into the request
First, let me say I really like Webwork2/XWork. Struts tries to do the
job of mbeans, security, and other tasks the container already handles.
Webwork's interceptors, IoC, all in one actions, the ActionContext,
concise set of tags, support for Velocity are all focused on generating
dynamic co
> I've got a problem with the select tag. I am declaring the select tag like
> this:
>
> list="valueStore.allCategories" ... />
This usage seems wrong to me. The 'name' attribute will be mapped to the
'name' attribute of the resulting HTML tag (you will get ). What you are
looking for ist someth
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/space/Using+JSTL+seamlessly+with+WebWork
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Sergiy Barlabanov
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Accessing the
If I need to access the value stack programatically from my JSP I currently use
<%
OgnlValueStack stack = ActionContext.getContext().getValueStack();
%>
If need to access it through tags I use as you already
mentioned.
Is there any other way?
Regards,
Sergey
-Original Message-
From: Ta
Ok. Thank you all.
I've written my own tag extending textfield tag with cssclass attribute. It turned to
be quite easy :).
Regards,
Sergey
-Original Message-
From: Robert Nicholson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-w
Hi,
I've got a problem with the select tag. I am declaring the select tag like
this:
Where affiliateTransport.affiliateCategories represents transport object
which has a getter/setter (affiliateCategories) for a List object and
valueStore.allCategories a getter for a List which contains all sel
I have some JSP 2.0 pages that I would like to port over to webwork 2,
and was wondering if there is any way to access the value stack?
It just seems cooler to convert my ${id} statements to ${stack.id},
rather than
Basically, I am asking if the value stack has been put into the request
or sessi
Tell Mike... I made him responsible for shepherding in your changes :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Ross Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] [OS-xwork] Change to the xwork.dtd
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> The
35 matches
Mail list logo
