Thanks Pat!
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
>
>
> Here it is...
>
-
Here it is...
- Original Message -
From: "Kirk Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
> Hi Pat,
> Any chance you could post that here?
>
> Thanks,
Hi Pat,
Any chance you could post that here?
Thanks,
Kirk Rasmussen
Lucasfilm Lt.d
> -Original Message-
> From: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 5:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
>
the tag code and not the "fetching" of data from
the action.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Kirk Rasmussen
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 9:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webw
.2 build.
>
> Has anyone profiled webwork with JProbe or similar tools to look for hot
> spots that could be optimized?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Cannon-Brookes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 5:56 PM
>> To: [EMAIL
Dick,
The changes you've submitter have been added to CVS. Thanks!
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: "Dick Zetterberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:25 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
> Mike,
>
&
Kirk Rasmussen wrote:
Has anyone profiled webwork with JProbe or similar tools to look for hot
spots that could be optimized?
Yes, but it was some time ago. I'm probably going to profile it again once
I decide to update the webwork version that Jive is using (currently 1.2.1
+ a lot of cvs cha
gt; Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
>
>
> Kirk,
>
> Well - yes and no. JIRA uses OSCache, but not for the UI
> tags. None of those
> are cached at all, and we have literally hundreds ;)
>
> OSCache is only used where certain pages take a long time to
&g
20 seconds.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:23 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
>>
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> We use J
: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 5:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
>
>
> Could this be applied as a patch of some sort to the template for the
> select ui component?
>
---
This SF.NET em
ED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 5:34 PM
Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
I assume that JIRA uses OSCache, right? Jive 3.0 default skin
uses webwork also but they avoid the UI tags completely.
Here is what I did to make my countries list very fast.
It
Could this be applied as a patch of some sort to the template for the
select ui component?
> -Original Message-
> From: Kirk Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
&
om 13 seconds to 0.0020 seconds.
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
>
>
> Mike,
>
> We use JIRA and the performance i
ersion of a product
> > instead of the latest cutting edge version especially when documentation is
> > lacking.
> >
> > What do you guys think? Is 1.2 a lost cause at this point? Is it better
> > to focus on the 1.3 release only?
> >
> > Regards,
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
> Kirk,
>
> > I think new users will tend to download the most stable version of a
product
> > instead of the latest cutting edge version especially when documentation
Kirk,
I think new users will tend to download the most stable version of a product
instead of the latest cutting edge version especially when documentation is
lacking.
What do you guys think? Is 1.2 a lost cause at this point? Is it better
to focus on the 1.3 release only?
I agree completel
in WW1.2.1, so for that reason it would be nice
to have the 1.3 release soon.
Cheers,
Dick Zetterberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Cannon-Brookes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 6:00 AM
Subject
o focus on the 1.3 release only?
>
> Regards,
> Kirk Rasmussen
> Lucasfilm Ltd.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:17 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: [OS-we
t? Is it better
to focus on the 1.3 release only?
Regards,
Kirk Rasmussen
Lucasfilm Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Carreira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [OS-webwork] Scope for 1.4
>
>
&
So, after we finally push 1.3 out the door, we're going to need an idea
of what should be in 1.4. My suggestion would be refactor the
GenericDispatcher and ActionFactory to put the Interceptor code in, and
have a relatively quick release after 1.3 with that stuff added (and any
bug fixes).
Though
20 matches
Mail list logo
