Re: OpenWrt One / project update

On Mon, 29 Apr 2024, Michael Richardson wrote: {sorry for the long delay, been unwell} Bjørn Mork wrote: > Maybe it is possible to deploy the system with secure boot and a > protected IDevId key by default, but allowing the user/owner to erase > the key and disable secure boot? This

Re: OpenWrt One - celebrating 20 years of OpenWrt

idea in the long run, but is it really a requirement to start with? David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: DSA Terminology

following those instructions, and they need to either work, or give good information about what's going wrong. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: DSA Terminology

more complex configurations are possible, and as people start using the power, the confusion of terms causes problems) David Lang Network: A network represents a group of computers communicating with each other. Interface: Short for network interface. Network Interface: A network

Re: DSA Mini-tutorial still marked as Work In Progress

ity was dissolved into a bunch of ethernet devices > inside a bridge... +1 One thing that we do need to show is what ethernet devices are on the switch, there is a considerable CPU load to routing traffic through the processor vs through the switch, so when people are deciding what ports to u

Re: DSA Mini-tutorial still marked as Work In Progress

sending some of it to the CPU (the CPU would be a very significant bottleneck if I tried to send everything though it) David Lang On Wed, 7 Sep 2022, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote: Hi Rich, that tutorial is good ground work imho. One thing I repeatedly noticed (not in the document, but in forum and irc

Re: Best VSDL modem-router to target?

Are there any devices out there that support bonded DSL under openwrt? David Lang On Sat, 4 Dec 2021, Andre Heider wrote: Hi, On 03/12/2021 05:28, Andrew Punch wrote: Hi, I live in a small unit, so the usual advice to have a separate VDSL modem, router and ATA isn't great space wise

Re: Re: SELinux status report and call to action

e results)? Yes other distros had to go through this same pain, but that doesn't mean that the pain isn't there for OpenWRT as well. David Lang On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Dac Override wrote: Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:34:56 +0100 From: Dac Override To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subje

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt Roadmap

large GUI on the small devices. Trying to backport 'critical fixes' to an old version (especially a version 3+ years old) is just not going to work. Even the "Enterprise" distros do a horrible job with that, and they have very large teams working to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Images are too big in LEDE but not in OpenWRT

it hits a limit? David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Remerge logo ideas

the vote on the name was held several months ago, please stop trying to re-do the vote just because it didn't come out the way you wanted it to. k ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWrt and Open Compute Project (OCP)

On Tue, 2 May 2017, tapper wrote: Hi you should look at LEDE: https://lede-project.org/ The LEDE Project (“Linux Embedded Development Environment”) is a Linux operating system based on OpenWrt. It is a complete replacement for the vendor-supplied firmware of a wide range of wireless routers

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Using kdump... persistent logs, etc. (Syrone Wong)

If you run into problems configuring rsyslog, we have a fairly active mailing list at rsyslog-users <rsys...@lists.adiscon.com>, or ask questions here and I'll be happy to answer them. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: On 22/12/2016 09:42, David Lang wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, John Crispin wrote: Yes, the name is pointing at a product that doesn't exist any longer, but Deb and Ian aren't involved with Debian any longer either. At some point the fact that a name

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

that can be solved by a http redirect ... Is that going to break all links in discussions that point at OpenWRT docs and/or forum threads? That's a high cost. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Stefan Monnier wrote: - While brands have value, you can change a name without losing all the brand recognition. I'm thinking here of cases like XBMC->Kodi or OpenOffice->LibreOffice. I would point at OpenOffice -> LibreOffice as a failure of name changes. D

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote: On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:29 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Kathy Giori wrote: From a PR perspective, I strongly suggest keeping the term OpenWrt as part of the branding of the project moving forward. It can just be co

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Talks between OpenWrt and LEDE

that brand attached to the development moving forward. I agree, I think this is an obvious choice to make. OpenWRT has a lot of name recognition, it would be foolish to throw that away. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Is there a way I can restore balance to the force?

what happened with the in-person discussions in Berlin between the OpenWRT folks and the LEDE folks? David Lang On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, Sami Olmari wrote: Long time lurker here. I personally wish we'd get things rolling again nicely... I don't know what would be the ultimate doctorine

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFD] Future

other things do you think the Devs should not be doing? and what do you think about the items that the LEDE Devs said were a problem? David Lang On Thu, 30 Jun 2016, Tom Psyborg wrote: Looks like a common problem is when devs get paid well, they are coming up with more and more problems, ideas

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

that LEDE is an experimental testbed (the way that Fedora is seen as a testbed for RHEL), then people should not be told to go away if a lede question is posted on the OpenWRT forums (something I've seen a few times so far) David Lang Eric On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Zoltan HERPAI <wi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

On Sat, 28 May 2016, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: On 05/27/2016 12:43 PM, David Lang wrote: On Thu, 26 May 2016, Delbar Jos wrote: We are conscious of the fact that together with the proposals made by Felix, Luka and Wojtek we are now looking at many "competing" proposals. As a nex

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 for OpenWrt

rent distros is much easier (just write your daemon with the expectation that the input and output details are going to change, so don't get fancy with them). David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PROPOSAL] move OpenWrt codebase to Git and GitHub

d I'll be sending out an email to get access to more build servers so this new build infrastructure can properly support the project in a timely fashion. why should providing more build servers be contingent on moving to a commercial hosting provider vs running things themselves? David Lang Please shar

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] busybox: sysntpd - Support for NTP servers received via DHCP(v6)

you the wrong IP for the NTP server If I can control your gateway, I can redirect all your NTP queries to someone else (NAT, redirects, etc) so why not trust the NTP server being provided? David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood)

On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote: On 16 May 2016 at 11:12, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: On Mon, 16 May 2016, Roman Yeryomin wrote: On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@g

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [Make-wifi-fast] OpenWRT wrong adjustment of fq_codel defaults (Was: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood)

o one bucket so that one will affect the other more. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project

think about the larger issues and figure out what to do about them. And the LEDE folks have a lot of infrastructure to setup (and there will be a lot of bikeshedding going on while they do this), so they are going to take some time to get everything going and get a release out. David Lang

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Calmer heads than mine...

. LEDE needs to get infrastructure setup, make a release, and show that they can maintain it and respond to bug reports. Let's let everyone get to work rather than defending themselves or lashing out at the other side, and see how things go over the next several months. David Lang On Thu, 5

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project

On Thu, 5 May 2016, Carlos Ferreira wrote: I don't see the end of OpenWRT as a bad thing. If LEDE is basically a fork but without the development bottlenecks that seem to be affecting OpenwRT, then the change can be easily done by the industry segment that uses OpenWRT for their products. In

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project

are management, not technical. David Lang On Wed, 4 May 2016, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote: It is really strange that the decision to create a new project was so opaque when it was motivated to be a more "transparent project". They could've started to be more transparent already with th

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question about custom script at init on Trunk.-

, make the file files/etc/config/wireless) much easier than maintaining a different version of the package just to change a couple files. David Lang On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Guillermo Javier Nardoni wrote: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:19:54 -0300 From: Guillermo Javier Nardoni <gui

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] use NTP server received via DHCP

in the config should be changed to what's actually used and the extra copy should be eliminated. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question about custom script at init on Trunk.-

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Karl Palsson wrote: David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: Now, yes, I can have my 80_mystuff script go and try and create the package config files it might want to modify, but really, I want "mystuff" to run _last_ or at least, after all the packages have r

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question about custom script at init on Trunk.-

them pull in variables from elsewhere) you can run a S01 script in init.d (or something late enough to work, early enough to run before whatever you need to change) and have it populate the variables that other things will use. David Lang ___ openwrt-dev

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question about custom script at init on Trunk.-

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Karl Palsson wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Schultz wrote: Guillermo, It's always best to use a custom package if you can. Modifying upstream leads to problems like this. I don't think you'd need those changes in

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Question about custom script at init on Trunk.-

On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Karl Palsson wrote: Along these lines, I've tried putting in something like 80_mystuff, where I want to set some configurations options for various packages that depend on the hardware they're running on. However, the uci-defaults files are run in alphabetical order, so

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] First boot provisioning

catching up on old e-mail On Wed, 9 Dec 2015, Lukáš Macura wrote: Hello, I would want to start some discussion about first boot provisioning and theoretical inclusion of some script into default images. Today, if somebody want some automatic way to autoconfigure OpenWrt boxes, he has to

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

is smart enough to commit something locally then he knows what he is doing and is smart enough to report the changes he made. It's so simple. I think the concern is that someone may do this and then make the resulting images available to others to install. David Lang

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Roman Yeryomin wrote: On 13 October 2015 at 23:08, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Roman Yeryomin wrote: Would it be possible to track the revision number in an automated way even in a git repo? So store the r number, and automatically inc

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2015-10-12 22:06, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Jonathan Bennett wrote: His point is that users don't ever do an SVN checkout. Because the r number is baked into the image, it's a really easy and obvious way for an end user to report

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

and the current head) David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2015-10-12 22:28, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2015-10-12 22:02, Javier Domingo Cansino wrote: Would it be possible to track the revision number in an automated way even in a git repo? So store the r

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] SVN to GIT transition

the -dirty info that was mentioned earlier could also be embedded to show the development since it branched from the main OpenWRT repo. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] AR9344 OpenWrt GUI

the settings, it needs to do what you told it to do, and that involves resetting the radio(s) to make sure they now do everything you told it to do. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] AR9344 OpenWrt GUI

cted to, it is going to bounce. Which is why it's suggested that you configure the wireless through a wired link. But once the wifi is reset, you should be able to reconnect, login again and continue. Is this not working? If not, what is happening? David

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

want? we can't read your mind. David Lang Thanks, On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 2:18 PM, David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: But i dont think so this driver might be the problem, Because when i am doing using GUI its working so there will be not driver problem

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

you have a working config but you want to do something by default what you want to do is different at different times. what is it that you want to be the default? when do you want this default to apply? This isn't clear. David Lang On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Date: Tue, 11 Aug

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

. If you are meaning something else, I'm still not understanding what you are trying to do. David Lang On Tue, 11 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:20:58 +0800 From: John kerry kerry9...@gmail.com To: David Lang da...@lang.hm Cc: Alex Weedy weedy2...@gmail.com, OpenWrt

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: 3-address Wi-Fi bridging

with that, since the driver and probably other parts of the code that you're running are not made or maintained by the OpenWrt team. - Felix Felix, I don't remember him saying what he's using, how did you spot that? David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

), then take the /etc/config/wireless and /etc/config/network files and add them to your build under /files David Lang On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:18 PM, David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote: On Mon, 10 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:10:14 +0800 From: John kerry kerry9...@gmail.com

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Fwd: 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

to connect to. the order may make a difference. David Lang config wifi-device 'wifi0' option type 'qcawifi' option macaddr '00:01:11:00:01:00' option hwmode '11ng' option txpower '17' option htmode 'HT20' option disabled '0' option channel '1' config

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

) the files/ process lets you put whatever files you want in place to then use via your change to LUCI. for details of how to change the LUCI code, you should ask on it's development mailing list. David Lang On Sun, 9 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 12:42:49 +0800 From

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

/etc/config/networks (under files/) David Lang On Sun, 9 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Hi, Could anyone Please guide me how i can create 2 separate default settings for 2.4GHz and 5GHz. Thanks, On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:26 PM, John kerry kerry9...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have to keep 2 default

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

this in backend, how i can add file which handle this and configure 2 separate default settings for 2.4GHz and 5GHz. It's not clear what you are asking to do. Please explain in more detail. David Lang Thanks, On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:50 PM, David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote: You cannot use both

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] 3-address Wi-Fi bridging (was: Multiple Wi-Fi client/AP interfaces on one radio)

to it. David Lang On Fri, 7 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Hi, I have one and i configured as below: config wifi-device 'wifi0' option type 'qcawifi' option channel 'auto' option macaddr '00:26:75:bd:37:24' option hwmode '11ng' option txpower '16' option htmode

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings

the other radio (assuming you have two) to act as an AP for local clients. David Lang On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Hi, Its working, i am able to access internet but there is one problem, When i scan the wireless devices, its gives the list of devices are there nearby, then i

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings

Lang On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:41:38 +0800 From: John kerry kerry9...@gmail.com To: David Lang da...@lang.hm Cc: Weedy weedy2...@gmail.com, N. Leiten nicklei...@gmail.com, OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings

to a remote AP (say the 5GHz band) and then use the other (the 2.4GHz band) to provide service to nearby equipment. I actually just finished setting up this exact configuration to extend service into a nearby building across a parking lot. David Lang Thanks, On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:56 PM, David Lang

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings

just changes doesn't help a lot (and it's rather hard to see what's what with the wireless file) but it doesn't look like the wireless interfaces are configured to be part of the LAN interface. David Lang On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:07:38 +0800 From

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings

can you connect via a wired port? given that you've been changing /etc/config/network and /etc/config/wireless, could you show us what you ended up with there? David Lang On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Hi, I am using ar71xx OpenWrt. I have connected internet connection to WAN port

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings

to make the config be there after a factory reset, you need to put the changes into the image that you build. you already did this for /etc/config/network, do the same thing for /etc/config/wireless David Lang On Sun, 2 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Hi Leiten, I have one issue, after

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings

how to configure the files from the documentation, configure them from the GUI and then look at the resulting files. David Lang On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, John kerry wrote: Hi All, I created separate files directory and added network and wireless files and its working everything but still i am

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings

/etc/config/wireless On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, N.Leiten wrote: Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:32:14 +0300 From: N.Leiten nicklei...@gmail.com To: openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Change OpenWrt Wifi default settings In email dated Пятница - 31 июля 2015 17:08:23 user John

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OpenWrt] 2.4Ghz limited to 50mW in DFS-ETSI

full power + high gain antenna David Lang On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Ben West wrote: You can look up your respective country's spectrum regulations. It is possible prior versions OpenWRT didn't fully conform to each regulatory domain and were fixed in more recent versions (just as the converse

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] openwrt-ar71xx GUI

On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, John kerry wrote: I am working on openwrt-ar71xx. After upload the image file the GUI will be access on some IP address. Now I want to change the GUI, Could anyone tell how I can change the GUI, i means to say which file shall I modify. There are a lot of different files,

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Chaos Calmer 15.05-rc3

someone in the meantime) David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver

+1 On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Hartmut Knaack wrote: Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 21:47:35 +0200 From: Hartmut Knaack knaac...@gmx.de To: edgar.sol...@web.de, OpenWrt Development List openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Designated Driver That Doodle poll turned out to be

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dark Destroyer

On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Peter Lawler wrote: On 08/04/15 05:47, Hartmut Knaack wrote: Give your +1 answer on this mail if you prefer Dark Destroyer. How does that even work? You're not giving an option to vote for anything else. There are three different subthreads, each looking for answers on

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple OpenWrt devices collectively managed?

simple. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple OpenWrt devices collectively managed?

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Bastian Bittorf wrote: * David Lang da...@lang.hm [23.03.2015 20:19]: question is around having something to automatically assign channels amoung the different APs to minimize interference between the APs and between the APs and other things in the area. we just use

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Building OpenWRT static kernels

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote: Le lundi 23 mars 2015 à 16:21 +0100, Jonas Gorski a écrit : This is currently not easily possible with OpenWrt, as it contains several out-of-tree kernel modules, which aren't part of the kernel sources and thus can't be statically linked

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple OpenWrt devices collectively managed?

never seen a commercial system work well when there is really a load on the system (i.e. conference or classroom environments) David Lang On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, xxiao8 wrote: Isn't CAPWAP designed for this? xxiao On 03/23/2015 07:42 PM, openwrt-devel-requ...@lists.openwrt.org wrote: Re: Multiple

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Multiple OpenWrt devices collectively managed?

end up connecting to a more remote AP (assuming there is one in range) David Lang On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Janne Cederberg wrote: Oh, sorry Bastian I forgot to comment on your suggestion earlier! Question: how does that constant restarting affect network QoS/throughput? -Janne 2015-03-23 23:17

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why OpenWrt sucks?

in Linux that have been developed by developers who have signed NDAs to get access to the detailed specs and access to developers. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why OpenWrt sucks?

On Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Felix Fietkau wrote: On 2015-03-10 20:22, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: On 03/09/2015 11:28 PM, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, José Vázquez wrote: This gives at least two sources for optimization for the reference driver: 1) save inter-layer processing overhead (passing

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Why OpenWrt sucks?

On Mon, 9 Mar 2015, José Vázquez wrote: OpenWRT is a linux distro oriented to networking so the kernel and drivers are important, but you must not forget that the init process (procd and related after AA) is one of the cores of this distro and makes it work. The most relevant packages are

[OpenWrt-Devel] Re: UCI overlay proposal

On Friday, March 6, 2015 11:11:07 PM PDT, Matthias Schiffer wrote: On 03/05/2015 08:25 PM, David Lang wrote: On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 13:36:10 +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote: ... At the moment we use scripts to edit /etc/config/* to our needs. There are multiple reasons why we'd like to get rid

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] UCI overlay proposal

earlier), to have tools to assemble/generate the configs, but requiring changes to every piece of software to just change the format requires more than every langauage can understand JSON David Lang On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: Hello Matthias, can't provide qualified feedback

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] UCI overlay proposal

can use one of those config languages (either as-is or with an automated conversion back and forth) David Lang On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, David Lang wrote: changing the format doesn't solve the problem, it just causes churn in all the software. The problem is the lack of standardization

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] UCI overlay proposal

to change to them. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH][bcm63xx]: Add DGND3700 v1 / DGND3800B support

Is this going to include support for the DSL on these boxes? the Table of Hardware page still says that the DSL is not and will never be supported. I've seen enough changes in such things over the years to hope that this is no longer the case. David Lang On Sun, 1 Mar 2015, dani wrote

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] General questions about the direction of switch drivers

to be) David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] General questions about the direction of switch drivers

the Enterprise APs with the advanced capabilities. David Lang On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote: I for one would love to see brctl and vconfig disappear completely in favour of ovs-* based standard toolchain for all switch interaction. Certainly in the Bigger iron area, and things like core

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] General questions about the direction of switch drivers

On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Charlie Smurthwaite wrote: Hi David, On 16/02/15 21:03, David Lang wrote: A work-around for many of the items other than the basic VLAN membership and tagging is to force the traffic between the different switch ports to go through the CPU by putting the different ports

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] General questions about the direction of switch drivers

-chain another AP off of. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] enabling seccomp by default in kernel

to enable seccomp filter. It needs the kernel support to use the seccomp filter, but why is this so critical that it must be enabled by default? David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin

[OpenWrt-Devel] chance to gather info from a high density deployment

'scale' and the 2.4GHz network 'scale-slow') It was suggested that I see if I can gather /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy*/netdev:*/stations/*/rc_stats and xmit stats frequently (every 10s or so). What else can/should I gather? David Lang ___ openwrt

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Is Linksys/Belkin lying (again) about being open source (WRT1200AC router) ?

that they haven't improved. Now, this isn't the same as having the support upstream in openwrt, which is what we all want, but if they do release the full source at the time of the router release, it is better than most. David Lang On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Fernando Frediani wrote: Hi, Great email Valent

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dual Wifi for OpenWRT

On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, Bruno Randolf wrote: On 01/10/2015 08:38 PM, David Lang wrote: I would not expect to find consumer hardware that had two radios on the 2.4GHz band, the problems that you would run into trying to keep the output of one radio from deafening the other (if not outright popping

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Dual Wifi for OpenWRT

multiple radios tends to have problems with this. It takes having very directional antennas to try and keep as much of the signal away from the other radio to even start. What is it that you are trying to accomplish? David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] why is 'wan' port missing in luci switch vlan setup page for Netgear WNR2200 ?

On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Urs Rau (UK) wrote: Hi Jo-Philipp, On 26 Sep 2014, at 09:55, Jo-Philipp Wich j...@openwrt.orgmailto:j...@openwrt.org wrote: Hi. The wan port is likely a dedicated, non-switch interface (e.g. eth1) on this model. If you want to declare VLANs on it then simply create a new

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC PATCH] packages: Smart Queue Management for AQM Packet Scheduling and Qos from CeroWrt

the pastebin link Dave listed below, they have it up to ~80Mb now David Lang On Oct 2, 2014 9:55 AM, Dave Taht dave.t...@bufferbloat.net wrote: On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:10:46PM -0400, Weedy wrote: On 30/03/14 06:29 PM, Dave Taht wrote: On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 02:24:44PM -0400, Weedy wrote: On Sat

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] overcommit memory/ratio

On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 18:39 -0700, David Lang wrote Well being used to something bad, doesn't mean things cannot get better. Routers (to which I have some experience at), rarely have processes running that wouldn't matter

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] overcommit memory/ratio

. In spite of what some people say, it's far from a clear-cut win to disable overcommit. David Lang ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Moving all feeds to OpenWrt GitHub organisation

On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Florian Fainelli wrote: Hello, Le 10 août 2014 09:44, Etienne Champetier champetier.etie...@gmail.com a écrit : Le 10 août 2014 18:18, Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca a écrit : It would be great to have all feeds in one place, on GitHub. I think making

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OT] Anyone interested in donating Broadcom development?

On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, John Crispin wrote: On 27/07/2014 23:07, Rafał Miłecki wrote: Note: this is *not* anyhow officially related to the OpenWrt! This is my private request, I use OpenWrt ML just to reach ppl interested in this topic. Also I can't guarantee my development will success and can't

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [OT] Anyone interested in donating Broadcom development?

On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, John Crispin wrote: On 28/07/2014 10:41, David Lang wrote: On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, John Crispin wrote: On 27/07/2014 23:07, Rafał Miłecki wrote: Note: this is *not* anyhow officially related to the OpenWrt! This is my private request, I use OpenWrt ML just to reach ppl

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT IPv6 firewall

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Gert Doering wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 03:50:24PM -0700, David Lang wrote: I'm well aware of all the bullshit that is knocking on my doors all day. Point is, firewalls on the *routers* are not goint to help the laptop that moves around, attaches to a Wifi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] OpenWRT IPv6 firewall

On Mon, 21 Jul 2014, Gert Doering wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:18:46AM -0700, David Lang wrote: While it is nice to say that IPv6 has a large address space and so nobody will ever scan it, I don't believe it. Don't believe. Try math. 2^64 is big enough that if you manage to send a few

  1   2   >