mechanical
processing, as well as galvanizing.
Would you like to learn more about the possibilities of producing customized
structures tailored to your needs?
Best regards
Petr Kadlec
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.o
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ode", &button->code)) {
--
2.39.2
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ONE
>> > regarding WireGuard performance?
>> >
>> > https://forum.openwrt.org/t/a-wireguard-comparison-db/187586/1
>> >
>> > It's an important use-case and a factor affecting the decision for next
>> > hardware purchase (for me, anyway
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ethod to disassemble the RE200v1 (it is welded
together) and there is no know recovery method in U-Boot. When users
install any of these OpenWrt versions, their device is basically trash.
Is there any process/possibility to remove the builds for the affected
devices?
I only had a brief look
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ectly meet the current needs and preferences of consumers.
Are you interested in a detailed offer?
Best regards
Maxwell Atlee
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listin
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
:26, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel writes:
I acquired an HP 1920-24G and gave this branch a spin. Unfortunately,
it does not boot with this branch. Booting 23.05.4 and current main
branch are fine.
System application is starting...[0.00] Linux version 6.6.41
(bas@len
itted this patch as a GitHub PR
(https://github.com/openwrt/ubus/pull/3) but I’m not sure anyone actually looks
there for contributions, so I’m submitting it as a patch here as well.
-- >8 --
C++ is picky about initializer order, and (depending on flags) missing fields.
This fix makes UBUS
itted this patch as a GitHub PR
(https://github.com/openwrt/ubus/pull/3) but I’m not sure anyone actually looks
there for contributions, so I’m submitting it as a patch here as well.
-- >8 --
C++ is picky about initializer order, and (depending on flags) missing fields.
This fix makes UBUS
ow. All use GCC 13.3.0. There isn't even
an GCC 13.3.4 release.
BR,
Bas.
--- End Message ---
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
6:39, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:
The realtek target supporting the Realtek switches is the only target in
OpenWrt main still on Linux kernel 5.15, all other targets are at least
on kernel 6.1, most of them are on Linux kernel 6.6.
The next OpenWrt major release will use kernel 6.6 only, all t
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
thanks for the insights and a fast reply!
/ Daniel
On Saturday, August 10th, 2024 at 21:22, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> On 2024-08-10, Daniel Nilsson via openwrt-devel wrote:
>
> > I was taking a look at the ipq60xx target, and noticed that none of
>
el Nilsson via openwrt-devel wrote:
> I was taking a look at the ipq60xx target, and noticed that none of
> it's devices are available on the firmware selector. I saw on
> https://buildbot.openwrt.org/images/#/builders that the target doesn't
> have a builder, is this the re
ould be good to have that configured so it at least gets
built as part of the next release.
/ Daniel
--- End Message ---
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
done some very minor work to add support for some
Realtek switch variants (not merged as-yet).
If anyone would like to get involved with this, it might be worth
looking for a used HP 1920-24G switch. This has good support in OpenWrt
23.05, reasonable storage, lowish power usage (for a 24 port
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
No one has one yet mate. I have bin asking, but
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-dev
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
uch doubt it will be reverted.
On typical desktops, you'd use udev to rename the node to something
static, or add a symlink, etc.
OpenWRT has its hotplug via procd, which is different, but it should
still be usable for that kind of *required* functionality. What the
wiki describes for &q
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
d, reindexed with
> "scripts/feeds update -i && scripts/feeds install -a", and did "make
> oldconfig defconfig", nothing in my kernel-config seemed to change.
>
> And when I built, I got this:
>
> ...
> + x86_64-openwrt-linux-musl-ld -m el
ing
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/the-openwrt-firmware-selector/81721/818, I stumbled
across this:
$ curl -s
https://downloads.openwrt.org/snapshots/targets/mediatek/mt7622/profiles.json |
jsonfilter -e '$.version_code'
r26912-3c95641366
$ curl -s
https://mirror-03.infra.openwrt.org/snapsh
nd did "make oldconfig
defconfig", nothing in my kernel-config seemed to change.
And when I built, I got this:
...
+ x86_64-openwrt-linux-musl-ld -m elf_x86_64 -z noexecstack
--no-warn-rwx-segments -z max-page-size=0x20 --build-id=sha1 -X
--orphan-handling=warn --script=./a
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Thank you :-)
On 7/5/24 09:12, Gio wrote:
Hi!
The first file of this patchset
https://github.com/G10h4ck/openwrt/commit/555fd77fdeaaf2a893c5d41180b84e693b43b336
should answer your question ;-)
Cheers
On 2024-07-04 22:08, Moritz Warning via openwrt-devel wrote:
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/
ntain
the newly added option.
Can someone tell how to accomplish this?
thank you,
mwarning
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
a bytes
^C
--- 2a03:b0c0:3:d0::1574:1 ping statistics ---
26 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
LWN has an excellent article from Corbet [1] that
comes up with questions to be taken seriously by the FOSS community and
especially communities such as OpenWrt that distribute (binary) releases.
One of the comments [2] names some practical rules that may help to
compartmentalise the build pr
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
us Walleij ha scritto:
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 2:00 PM Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
OpenWrt project (with the help of MediaTek and Banana Pi) has produced
its very first own hardware. It needs its own prefix.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij
Hello
4 13:59:30 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> OpenWrt project (https://openwrt.org/) celebrates its 20 years by
> releasing an OpenWrt One product. Early units have been produced and
> will be followed by DVT samples really soon. Then the mass produ
ał Miłecki ha scritto:
On 3.06.2024 09:37, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 29/05/24 09:42, Linus Walleij ha scritto:
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 2:00 PM Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
OpenWrt project (with the help of MediaTek and Banana Pi) has produced
its very first own ha
'Z',
},
"components" => [@components],
};
--
2.45.1
--- End Message ---
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
us Walleij ha scritto:
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:32 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
wrote:
Isn't the OpenWRT One made by BananaPi?
In that case this would be bananapi,openwrt-one I guess?
Is there any OpenWRT contact that can please help clarifying this?
Both Rafal and me are members
ał Miłecki ha scritto:
From: Rafał Miłecki
OpenWrt One is the first ever OpenWrt product. It's based on MT7981B and
has entered an early production stage.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
ał Miłecki ha scritto:
From: Rafał Miłecki
OpenWrt project (with the help of MediaTek and Banana Pi) has produced
its very first own hardware. It needs its own prefix.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
--- E
ał Miłecki ha scritto:
From: Rafał Miłecki
OpenWrt One is the first ever OpenWrt product. It's based on MT7981B
(AKA Filogic 820) and has 1 GiB or DDR4 RAM. The rest of peripherals
remains to be added later.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
ał Miłecki ha scritto:
From: Rafał Miłecki
OpenWrt One is the first ever OpenWrt product. It's based on MT7981B and
has entered an early production stage.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+
:59, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
OpenWrt One is the first ever OpenWrt product. It's based on MT7981B
(AKA Filogic 820) and has 1 GiB or DDR4 RAM. The rest of peripherals
or -> of
remains to be added later.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
LWN which some of you may find interesting
https://lwn.net/Articles/972467/
Regards,
--
Paul Oranje
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
knows compatibility on V2, I may buy a third antenna and
sacrifice it to get answers.
Regards
Brice
--- End Message ---
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
if
+ }
+--- a/src/ap/ucode.c
b/src/ap/ucode.c
+@@ -811,3 +811,21 @@ void hostapd_ucode_free_bss(struct hosta
+ ucv_put(wpa_ucode_call(2));
+ ucv_gc(vm);
+ }
++
++#ifdef CONFIG_APUP
++void hostapd_ucode_apup_newpeer(
++struct hostapd_data *hapd, const char *ifname )
++{
++
ot;get_proto_handlers", .handler = netifd_get_proto_handlers },
UBUS_METHOD("add_dynamic", netifd_add_dynamic, dynamic_policy),
+ UBUS_METHOD("add_dynamic_device", netifd_add_dynamic_device,
dynamic_device_policy),
UBUS_METHOD("netns_updown", netifd_netns_updown, netns_updown_policy),
};
--
2.43.2
--- End Message ---
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
till build.
I’ll dig into it if I get a chance. The suspect part is here:
x86_64-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -mcmodel=large -I./purgatory/include
-I./purgatory/arch/x86_64/include -I./util_lib/include -I./include -Iinclude
-I/home/philipp/lede/staging_dir/toolchain-x86_64_gcc-13.2.0_musl/lib/gcc/x86_
l/kexec-tools-2.0.28/.built_check
make -C /home/philipp/lede/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/kexec-tools-2.0.28
DESTDIR="/home/philipp/lede/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/kexec-tools-2.0.28/ipkg-install"
all install
make[4]: Entering directory
'/home/philipp/lede/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl
_64_musl/kexec-tools-2.0.28
DESTDIR="/home/philipp/lede/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/kexec-tools-2.0.28/ipkg-install"
all install
make[4]: Entering directory
'/home/philipp/lede/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/kexec-tools-2.0.28'
x86_64-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -mcmodel=large -
tions in your dts not 17.
There are 18 partitions in total (0 to 17).
15 in nand and 3 in virtual_flash.
> What is /dev/mtd17 and how does the original partition table look like?
This is from a running OpenWrt:
root@OpenWrt:~# cat /proc/mtd
dev:size erasesize name
mtd0: 0008 000200
n your dts not 17.
What is /dev/mtd17 and how does the original partition table look like?
Regards
Felix Baumann
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
@@ define Device/jcg_y2
endef
TARGET_DEVICES += jcg_y2
+define Device/keenetic_kn-1910
+ $(Device/nand)
+ $(Device/uimage-lzma-loader)
+ IMAGE_SIZE := 56832k
+ DEVICE_VENDOR := Keenetic
+ DEVICE_MODEL := KN-1910
+ DEVICE_PACKAGES := kmod-mt7615-firmware kmod-usb3
+ IMAGES += factory.bin
+ IMAGE/facto
working on support for the HPE
1920-48G switch. He came up with a very similar patch and also with
patches for the RTL8214FC. I'm using his version for quite some time now
on my HPE switch.
Here is his commit:
https://github.com/janh/openwrt/commit/ee5d8a17b540a3a9aa7b666a679b479903799d10
_64_musl/kexec-tools-2.0.28
DESTDIR="/home/philipp/lede/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/kexec-tools-2.0.28/ipkg-install"
all install
make[4]: Entering directory
'/home/philipp/lede/build_dir/target-x86_64_musl/kexec-tools-2.0.28'
x86_64-openwrt-linux-musl-gcc -mcmodel=large -
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
We operate internationally, gaining recognition from clients in Europe, Asia,
Africa, South America, and Australia, effectively competing in foreign markets.
Would you like to check what we can offer?
Best regards
Hannes Frankrone
--- End Message ---
_____
sistent product
availability. Can we discuss further?
Best regards
Maxwell Atlee
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
h, 2024 at 22:19, Denver Gingerich
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 06:34:08AM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
>
> > On 12.04.24 02:19, David Bauer via openwrt-devel wrote:
> >
> > > can you share which identifier was assigned for OpenWrt? I don't see it
> > &
hare which identifier was assigned for OpenWrt? I don't see it in the
list of the
IEEE yet.
Best
David
On 4/10/24 21:10, John Crispin wrote:
Hi
We will auction off one or two OpenWrt One.
The first 15 EVT samples have been tested, and a new production run of 100 DVT
samples will start sho
responding also so no problem.
On Apr 8, 2024, at 9:48 PM, INAGAKI Hiroshi wrote:
>
> Hi Raylynn,
>
> sorry for late reply.
>
> From my understanding...
>
> On 2024/04/05 4:42, Raylynn Knight via openwrt-devel wrote:
>> If I understand the issue correctly
4, at 6:03 PM, Paul D wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-09 23:30, Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel wrote:
>> I'm trying to modify a script generates a list of filenames one per
>> line, but should be filtered against a blacklist of file globs.
>>
>> Something like:
9th, 2024 at 13:52, Jonas Gorski jonas.gor...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> > Can you open an issue for that at
> > https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues ?
Done, reported in https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/23861
--- End Message ---
_____
ail secure email.
On Tuesday, April 9th, 2024 at 13:52, Jonas Gorski
wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 18:59, Eric via openwrt-devel
> openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org wrote:
>
> > The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
> > se
I could try to mangle the globs patterns into regular-expressions,
but I was hoping for something simpler.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
-Philip
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/l
I could try to mangle the globs patterns into regular-expressions,
but I was hoping for something simpler.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
-Philip
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/l
citly removed due to this
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/20994
Somehow it's being built just fine in main, so at least the package is
available for users of snapshot builds...
Eric
--- End Message ---
___________
openwrt-devel mailing list
but never looked at it. snort3 is building packages for
all releases and snapshot since it was introduced, but it is not building in
23.05.
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/snort-on-openwrt-23-05-3/194225
If I run
$ scripts/feeds clean
$ make clean
$ git checkout main (or v23.05.3)
$ scripts/feeds
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
11:09 MESZ schrieb w.hadife@crs-network.solutions:
>Dear,
>
>We are building our project on orange PI R1 H3 and we want to use openwrt os
>last version.
>It seems that we have a problem with the WLAN driver RTL8189ES ,
>
>
>Is there a way to deploy a driver for this card using
4, at 2:50 AM, INAGAKI Hiroshi wrote:
>
> Hi Raylynn,
>
> omap target was disabled due to the VLAN issue on using cpsw-switch driver.
>
> see details: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/11953
>
> Best,
> Hiroshi
If I understand the issue correctly then it do
05:13 MESZ schrieb Fernando Frediani :
>Hello there
>
>Good work so far.
>Did I miss anything, but I couldn't find a SD Card slot. Isn't there one ?
>
>Regards
>Fernando
>
>On 04/04/2024 07:00, John Crispin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just dropping a quic
, ponieważ transakcje są zabezpieczone i posiadają gwarancję
spłaty.
Chcą Państwo przeanalizować dostępne opcje?
Z pozdrowieniami
Urszula Wasiak
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.o
et was not included in the 23.05 release, but I don’t know
the history of why. The current snapshot builds are no longer building omap
as
https://git.openwrt.org/?p=openwrt/openwrt.git;a=commit;h=626f5f77f76ac01a562df5423fe43bb1ecfdbc05
marks it source only and indicates the target is broken
4 at 03:34:09PM +0200, Mirko Parthey wrote:
> OpenWrt's busybox supports it.
Please disregard this, support is required on the build host.
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.or
4 at 10:25:11AM +, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> + bs=1048576 count=$(shell expr $(2) / 1048576) \
How about using dd iflag=count_bytes instead?
OpenWrt's busybox supports it.
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
orgot to send a second commit that fixes this issue comprehensive.
> Thanks for the reminder.
>
>> So I just sent a patch to fix it:
>> http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2024-March/042452.html
>
> Yours change looks exactly like my modification. So I don'
ian Eckert wrote:
> If a target is not upstream because it is still under development, it
> can still be added to the openwrt via a feed and can be build. Although
> the build is successful, no new images can be build with the new board,
> because it cannot find them.
>
> To fix t
ub ]; then \
$(CP) $(TOPDIR)/staging_dir/host/lib/grub/
$(PKG_BUILD_DIR)/staging_dir/host/lib; \
fi
--
2.39.2
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
n it, provide reasonable explanations and help
> others work on gaining proper understanding, isn't that good enough?
Ever considered to implement the kernel bumps based on 'git fast-import' in sh
script in stead of perl ?
As Chuanhong Guo wrote that patches written in perl are mo
)
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
c-ed Olliver to let him know about this mail thread.
Regards
Felix Baumann
--- End Message ---
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
.psk
> + [ -z "$wpa_psk_file" ] && {
> + [ -d /etc/hostapd ] || {
> + mkdir /etc/hostapd
> + chown network:netwrok /etc/hostapd
Typo: network:network
> + }
> + set_default wpa_psk_file /etc/hostapd/hostapd-$ifname.psk
> + ln -s /etc/hostapd/hostapd-$ifname.p
--- End Message ---
_______
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
2024 at 12:02 AM, Denver Gingerich
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:26:05AM +0100, Felix Baumann via openwrt-devel
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just saw your mail from last year (22nd of march)
> > No your EX510 is not supported.
> > Look here: https
1 - 100 of 1166 matches
Mail list logo
