[opnfv-tech-discuss] FUEL COLORADO 3.0 doesnt work

Hello. Reporting that the latest release of FUEL Colorado 3.0 does not work. Symptoms include: -Someone has added an "atop" command in a OSNAILFACTER plugin that is being executed at the end of installation - this Bad "error'code causes the installation to fail and deployment to cease

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Opnfv colorado

<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org> Cheers, D From: Lemay, Patrick [mailto:patrick.le...@bell.ca] Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 1:25 PM To: Daniel Smith <daniel.sm...@ericsson.com> Cc: Bernier, Daniel (520165) <daniel.bern...@bell.ca> Subject: FW: Opnfv colorado Hi Da

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Recall: [COLORADO RELEASE] Bug in release-note pages from release-notes

Daniel Smith would like to recall the message, "[COLORADO RELEASE] Bug in release-note pages from release-notes". ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow up on Upstreaming Questions

by the masses). Regards, Daniel Smith From: Heather Kirksey [mailto:hkirk...@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 6:11 PM To: Dave Neary <dne...@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Smith <daniel.sm...@ericsson.com>; David McBride <dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>; Fatih Degirmen

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [fuel] Nominating of Alexandru Avadanii

+1 From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Bjurel Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 2:36 PM To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Alexandru Avadanii Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] [opnfv-helpdesk] FW: Removal As Committer from NetReady

to not commit / make relationships that I wont be able to follow through into the new Year, I am letting them know now (as D-release starts up), since it made sense to me. Daniel From: Fatih Degirmenci Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 3:31 AM To: Jack Morgan <jack.mor...@intel.com>; Daniel

[opnfv-tech-discuss] ERICSSON OPNFV LAB Migration Update - PLEASE READ.

Hello Everyone. Today we brought the CI/CD pipeline (more or less) online in the new Datacenter. The following labs have been built in the past 2 days and handed over to Fatih who will do his magic and bring them into the fold as he deemed appropriate in Jenkins. ERICSSON-POD3 (BareMetal)

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow up on COMMON Discussion from the Release meeting today

in the loop and there is an JIRA ticket for you on this exact subject - so its not really a question of "not hearing in a given call" - this issue has been documented. https://jira.opnfv.org/browse/GENESIS-90 Thank you D From: Daniel Smith Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:05 PM To: Dav

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Follow up on Upstreaming Questions

upstream (from an OPNFV overall standpoint). Would any of you be able to shed some light on this? The current impression that I have is we have the docs that sit in a repo and that's it. Thank you [Ericsson]<http://www.ericsson.com/> Daniel Smith Sr. System Designer Ericsson Inc

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] And the OPNFV D-release name is....

☺ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDIA6ragkPM Love it! D From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Zhipeng Huang Sent: Friday, September 09, 2016 9:46 PM To: Ray Paik Cc:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Following up on Project Health metrics discussion

Hello All. My take on this and sorry maybe a bit blunt, but I don’t see what the purpose is here? While guideline, guidance and such are good things, the discussion below seems awfully heavy and very boxed in. As Chris in the evaluation on how to improve the community, I am not sure how

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-tsc] harmonized configuration set for OPNFV

Hey All Just as a question of JIRA - this is/was a defined goal of Genesis, back when the original PHAROS specification (which is basically support for the 5 basical OStack networks (tagged/untagged), 3 Controller/2Compute Topology and supporting either VLAN or VXLAN (so as to support ODL) as

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Infra Working Group Weekly Meeting

Hello Jack et al I have an offsite meeting tomorrow at 1pm and have to travel there in advance so I wont be able to make the call. >From my side (INFRA): - I have 3 slides almost ready (should post by end of the week) on possible approaches to having multi-scenario (thus multi-installer)

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfv.org is not resolving

Hello. I am having this issue. DNS for North America seems to be funky - reporting a no answer for OPNFV.org Cached DNS responses are working for DNS servers in Sweden and China that I tried, but their TTL will expire shortly. I have tested with the following Nslookup wiki.opnfv.org - using

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] opnfv.org is not resolving

Hey there. I think there is probably someone doing some work on the back side of LF - since looking at DNS records for the last bit I can see the the result is flipping back and forth between resolving opnfv.org to 'dev.opnfv.org" (alias for wiki) and a authoritative answer (wiki). This

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] Requirements Projects in C Release - continued

Hey there. To continue the discussion on Requirements Projects and how they are released. I will try to listen in, however I am triple booked at this time slot this morning at 9am local. I think the idea of the page is fine. I don't think it should be called "Future Projects" since these

[opnfv-tech-discuss] How are Documentation/Reference Projects Published in C release

in the release. Some input was that Requirements projects, since they don't deliver code are not part of the release? That didn't sound correct me, so please clarify when you have time. Thank you [Ericsson]<http://www.ericsson.com/> Daniel Smith Sr. System Designer Ericsson Inc. 8400 D

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Requesting 5 Minutes block in INFRA Meeting for this week

for this week Dan, Feel free to add your agenda item to the wiki. We don't have a large number of agenda items so should have time to discuss. thanks https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/INF/Infra+Working+Group On 08/23/2016 08:26 AM, Daniel Smith wrote: Hello. I would like to request 5 minutes of time

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Common configuration files

Hello Todd. This is a long standing discussion and was something that GENESIS has an action to solve within OPNFV _ not really from PHAROS> The have been well established specifications for what we call a lab, how the networks and network cards are named. Where and when we want to draw the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [PHAROS] - Virtual Deployment Automation

give this information, then we can ensure that the outcome/deliverables of the POC is something that takes us forward and is something that I can implement in the lab as soon as its ready. Best Regards Daniel [Ericsson]<http://www.ericsson.com/> Daniel Smith Sr. System Designer Ericsso

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Pharos Planning Week

will be Validator or Dashboard then? From the list below, can you outline what is set for C-release and the C deliverables for those project (I see the intern reports, but I don’t see what the target deliverables are for C). Regards, Daniel Smith From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [pharos] Pharos Spec improvements.

Hello. In terms of PHAROS Specification. The current agree upon specification (that Functest, Yardstick and installers must provide installation instructions for) outlined the following: 5 Nodes (3 Controller, 2 Computes) required for HA. The 4 Basic Openstack Networks must be respected