PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
WagonerSent: 03 December 2003 14:25To: Multiple
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE: partitioning option
licensing
As of 9iR2, partitioning is still licensed separately as a
$10K (retail) extra charge per processor. So, the total retail comes to
a
. Also, remember that support costs X% of the licensing per year,
depending on your support level. You'll have to confirm the exact numbers with your
sales rep. You can estimate about 22%, as I recall.
We just increased our licensing a few months ago. Get the fastest processors you can.
Anyone
never pay retail with oracle licensing. who pays the full $10k? If your buying other
stuff you should be able to knock off alot. Never pay the full amount.
>
> From: David Wagoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/12/03 Wed AM 09:24:38 EST
> To: Multiple recipients of lis
> -Original Message-
>
> Hi,
> We're looking into migrating from SQL server to Oracle. Does
> anyone know if
> Partitioning option is still licensed separately?
>
> Thanks.
>
> pat
Having just met with an Oracle rep yesterday. Yes, it is still
licensed separately.
--
Please see the o
Title: RE: partitioning option licensing
As of 9iR2, partitioning is still licensed separately as a $10K (retail) extra charge per processor. So, the total retail comes to a painful $50K per processor for 9i + Partitioning. Also, remember that support costs X% of the licensing per year
Hi,
We're looking into migrating from SQL server to Oracle. Does anyone know if
Partitioning option is still licensed separately?
Thanks.
pat
_
Our best dial-up offer is back. Get MSN Dial-up Internet Service for 6
months @ $9.95
Dear All,
Oracle licensing has been a subject that often is risen by somebody.
I though I shall share this with you.
Regards,
Hatzistavrou Yannis
Oracle_SW_License_Guide.pdf
Description: Binary data
Title: Message
LOGIC would dictate that, because the database that ships with the 11i
installation CDs comes configured that way, and you have 11i licensed, you
should be okay... in fact if you DON'T leave it alone you are probably going to
be unsupported.
April Wells Oracle DBA/Oracle Apps
licensing fees in connection
with its new 10g database and application server, analysts are
predicting the arrival of a new utility pricing model.
For the full details, click:
http://searchoracle.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid41_gci928015,
00.html
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle
Patrice,
ANALYSTS: PER-PROCESSOR PRICING TO DIE OUT | SearchOracle.com
As Oracle Corp. prepares to release new licensing fees in connection
with its new 10g database and application server, analysts are
predicting the arrival of a new utility pricing model.
For the full details, click:
http
Did Oracle release any info on their licensing changes?
I read something about site-based licensing a couple of weeks ago, haven't
heard anything else since.
There doesn't seem to be anything new on the Canadian Oracle Store web site.
Patrice.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L
TED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:35 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Oracle Collaboration Suite Licensing.
>
>
> Ali,
>This announcement may be of interest to you.
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/06/24/HNoraclecollaboration_1.html
Thanks for that.
Looks like they are moving ahead fast with this product suite.
Patrice.
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Ali,
This announcement may be of interest to you.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/06/24/HNor
Ali,
This announcement may be of interest to you.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/06/24/HNoraclecollaboration_1.html
Dennis Williams
DBA, 80%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:35 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list OR
Ali,
From previous discussion with Oracle on the subject. It includes the
Collaborative suite software, and a limited license to use Oracle 9iAS and 9i
database. Limited means that you can use it for Collaborative suite purposes only.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i D
Hi All,
What is included in Collaboration suite 9.0.2 license? As collaboration
suite license cost 60 $ per user, we are not sure that whether Oracle 9i
Database and Application server will be included in collaboration suite
9.0.2 license or we need to purchase Oracle Database 9i and 9ias
sep
Oracle's Software Investment Guide talks about these things, and it's
avalable from Oracle.com . Basically, if a machine can be fitted with
more than four processors (even if only one or two have been placed in
the box), then you have to buy the CPU option. However, if the machine
architecture
Our systems folks are talking about consolidating a couple of machines by using LPARs.
If we have a machine running AIX with 6 processors, can we license Oracle with 2
processors if those are segmented out within an LPAR?
It's always a challenge to get hold of our sales rep, so I thought I woul
>Oracle highness so with hyperthreading you could only have 2 real CPU's.
>Finally, I only got 3 hits on Metalink where Oracle support drones said you
>didn't have to do anything Oracle-wise to adjust for doubling the number of
>O/S visible CPU's. They did not respond
2 real CPU's.
Finally, I only got 3 hits on Metalink where Oracle support drones said you
didn't have to do anything Oracle-wise to adjust for doubling the number of
O/S visible CPU's. They did not respond to init.ora tuning questions and
they refered us to our Oracle sales dro
for Oracle? --As if I really did have 8 CPU's? How does
>this work? For init.ora tuning parameters should I count the 4 physical
>CPU's or the 8 virtual CPU's? Any reports on running Oracle/Linux on these
>hyperthreaded Pentium4 Xeon CPU's?
>
>I'm afraid to ask
ntium4 Xeon CPU's?
I'm afraid to ask Oracle about the licensing since they always answer with
the higher number. ;-)
Steve Orr
Bozeman, Montana
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Orr, Steve
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Service
How does Oracle handle the licensing of the
Dev and Test servers. Does an OTN license need to be purchased
for this or does the purchase of the
production server license allow for the Test
and Dev servers.
thanks,
caj
From:
Paulo Gomes
To: Multiple recipients of list
Hello Peter
The easiest way to do this is to put the product in a separate directory on
a server with permissions only to the named users.
AFAIK oracle is not likely to come and check your computers the way
Microsoft do. At least here(Israel) they believe us (Mehish computer
services) about what
You have that right. :(
Thankfully their much less inclined to check than on the database side.
Dick Goulet
Reply Separator
Author: "Schauss; Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 8/20/2002 11:38 AM
As far as I can tell from the Oracle store web page,
t
As far as I can tell from the Oracle store web page,
the Oracle Programmer product (pro*c, et al.) is only sold under
a "named user" license. If I buy, for example, licenses for
five named users, how am I supposed to enforce or prove to an
Oracle auditor that we only have five developers using th
License,,, license We don't need no stinkin license.
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I leave licensing discussions to the company CIO & Lawyers. Way too complicated
for me.
I leave licensing discussions to the company CIO & Lawyers. Way too complicated
for me.
Reply Separator
Author: "Jay Hostetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 7/12/2002 8:23 AM
"Kimberly Floss, database administrator team lead
"Kimberly Floss, database administrator team leader at Quaker Oats Co., in Chicago,
said she hopes the guide helps resolve Oracle's issues. Floss, who manages Oracle
databases, has not had licensing problems herself ..."
She obviously has never been involved in any Oracle licens
Evidently Oracle is going to build some web pages to spell out licensing
issues and definitions. Wonder how often that web site will need to be
updated. And of course everything will be crystal clear when it's done. ;-)
Check it out...
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,361471,00.asp
Best quote from this article describing California's recent purchase of
Oracle software:
"No [California] state agency has started using the Oracle software under
the licensing agreement, signed almost a year ago. But the tab by June is
expected to be $17 million."
- O
Humm, Can you say 'AW Sh&t!!!'
Dick Goulet
Reply Separator
Author: "Witold Iwaniec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 4/19/2002 8:08 AM
Hi
There have been some postings related to Oracle licensing.
An interesting article:
Hi
There have been some postings related to Oracle licensing.
An interesting article:
http://www.sacbee.com/content/politics/story/2219532p-2613285c.html
Witold
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Witold Iwaniec
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/27/02 07:23 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: Oracle CPU Licensing
An analyst recently made a statement that under CPU licensing &quo
recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Oracle CPU Licensing
Dennis,
This doesn't sound right. Oracle will not try to extort, er, charge money
for CPU's that aren't installed. Merely having the slots doesn't coun
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: Oracle CPU Licensing
An analyst recently made a statement that under CPU licensing "Oracle is
charging for unused CPU slots". I found this very surprising. I can see
two
poss
An analyst recently made a statement that under CPU licensing "Oracle is
charging for unused CPU slots". I found this very surprising. I can see two
possible interpretations:
1. If the system is capable of holding 8 CPUs, but I only have 4 CPUs
installed, Oracle would charge me for 8 CP
like this
sell or don't. (Hard to say since we want to have the product).
So have to live with it.
Aleem
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 9:43 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Re[2]: Oracle Licensing - Concurrent users
Wedn
Someone posted the original on this topic, which I sort of stayed away from, I
too often on those types of topics put my foot into the mouth. Anyway, the
following came across the wires this morning from Information Week. Some of you
may be interested, me I'm off to do some more with PostGres &
database software customers has
IT analyst firm Meta Group urging customers not to pay the database software maker
additional licensing fees.
The dispute relates to how Oracle charges its customers when they transfer large
amounts of data, known as batch feeds, to the Oracle database. These batch
Since the topic of Oracle licensing has come up, I'm wondering how
many organizations have site licensing and of what type (concurrent
user, named user, or processor).
We have a network license agreement for a set number of concurrent
licenses and w
Since the topic of Oracle licensing has come up, I'm wondering how
many organizations have site licensing and of what type (concurrent
user, named user, or processor).
We have a network license agreement for a set number of concurrent
licenses and we are c
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
---
of list ORACLE-L
Our management has started asking questions about how Oracle's licensing
costs compare to other database vendors. Specifically, DB2 and Sql Server.
I think I am pretty well armed with the "features" arguments, at least for
Oracle vs. Sql Server, but I really have n
ecipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Oracle Licensing vs. The Others
>
> >-This probably pales when compared to mainframe maintenance fees.
>
> And don't forget that mainframes also "rent" the OS for a hefty fee!!
>
> Dave
>
> -Origina
have equivalent documents on
their sites. Hope that helps.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 8:03 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Our management has started asking questions about how Oracle's licens
ort cost. This is apparently not unusually high.
We were quote a 22% for an application last week. This probably
pales when compared to mainframe maintenance fees.
Jared
On Friday 22 February 2002 06:03, Jay Hostetter wrote:
> Our management has started asking questions about how Oracl
ing questions about how Oracle's licensing
> costs compare to other database vendors. Specifically, DB2 and Sql Server.
> I think I am pretty well armed with the "features" arguments, at least for
> Oracle vs. Sql Server, but I really have no clue about licensing and
> suppor
Our management has started asking questions about how Oracle's licensing costs
compare to other database vendors. Specifically, DB2 and Sql Server. I think I am
pretty well armed with the "features" arguments, at least for Oracle vs. Sql Server,
but I really have no clue
Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 5:58:19 PM, you wrote:
KL> For example, we support a 911 center. An Oracle-based application
KL> displays the caller's information on a screen to the call taker. If you
KL> look in our database, you will see one user - it is the connection made by
KL> the software t
Nuclear Plant? Don't say Larry didn't warn you:
"The Programs are not intended for use in any nuclear, aviation, mass
transit, medical, or other inherently dangerous applications. It shall be
the licensee's responsibility to take all appropriate fail-safe, backup,
redundancy, and other measure
m licenses also. See
http://www.computerworld.com/storyba/0,4125,NAV47_STO61415,00.html
Rest assured - as soon as you figure it out, they will change it.
Jay
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/20/02 12:30PM >>>
Adary - Wow that is not good! Has anyone else encountered this situation?
Does th
>>>
Adary - Wow that is not good! Has anyone else encountered this situation?
Does the licensing fee have a name? Any indication if it differs between US
and non-US licensing?
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 200
er but several thousand connections. We had this problem when
implementing CICS for Oracle on the mainframe. Even Tuxedo on client/server
has this issue. These transaction monitors act as gates to the Oracle
world. We had to price average usage amount to accommodate our Oracle
licensing.
More likely how close Uncle Larry is to Bill Gates in the World's Richest Man contest.
Jerry Whittle
ACIFICS DBA
NCI Information Systems Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
618-622-4145
> -Original Message-
> From: Farnsworth, Dave [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> From following this thread on Oracles p
e it.
Jay
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/20/02 12:30PM >>>
Adary - Wow that is not good! Has anyone else encountered this situation?
Does the licensing fee have a name? Any indication if it differs between US
and non-US licensing?
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
with your 911 center, if your using a backend processor to refresh the
screens then all of your screens are in fact users. I know, kind of overkill,
but we've had to count each and every bar code scanner we had on the assembly
line as each one is a "user". End result, we went with C
Has anyone else encountered this situation?
Does the licensing fee have a name? Any indication if it differs between US
and non-US licensing?
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Multiple recipients of li
and connections. We had this problem when
implementing CICS for Oracle on the mainframe. Even Tuxedo on client/server
has this issue. These transaction monitors act as gates to the Oracle
world. We had to price average usage amount to accommodate our Oracle
licensing.
Hope this helps.
Th
Title: RE: Oracle Licensing - Concurrent users
Maybe it has something to do with whether you post your data to an internet or intranet site. ??
-Original Message-
From: Steve McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of
ww.computerworld.com/storyba/0,4125,NAV47_STO61415,00.html
Rest assured - as soon as you figure it out, they will change it.
Jay
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/20/02 12:30PM >>>
Adary - Wow that is not good! Has anyone else encountered this situation?
Does the licensing fee have a name? Any ind
ad this problem when
implementing CICS for Oracle on the mainframe. Even Tuxedo on client/server
has this issue. These transaction monitors act as gates to the Oracle
world. We had to price average usage amount to accommodate our Oracle
licensing.
Hope this helps.
Thank You
Stephen P. Karniotis
Techni
There are only 2 license types: named user and CPU.
There isn't any 'web' licensing.
Oracle will require you to purchase the CPU license for systems that:
1) are on the internet
2) on the intranet, unless all employees are covered under a site license
3) feed other database sys
anyone else encountered this situation?
Does the licensing fee have a name? Any indication if it differs between US
and non-US licensing?
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:58 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list OR
Our Oracle rep fully understood that our DB is accessed via our intranet, a
large third party network, and the internet. We were only required to
purchase CPU based licensing. There was no additional "Web" licensing fee.
After reading this, I am concerned they will be back to discuss
Adary - Wow that is not good! Has anyone else encountered this situation?
Does the licensing fee have a name? Any indication if it differs between US
and non-US licensing?
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 9:58 AM
2 3:43 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Oracle Licensing - Concurrent users
>
> Can anyone provide more details on "Web licensing"? I asked our manager
> that
> negotiates the Oracle licensing and he was only aware of Named and CPU
>
Can anyone provide more details on "Web licensing"? I asked our manager that
negotiates the Oracle licensing and he was only aware of Named and CPU
(formerly UPU) licensing for unlimited users. I checked at Oraclestore, and
it only shows Named and Processor licensing. If we are missing
Web Licensing means that you use the DB for applications that are accessed
through the internet,
NOT INTRANET.
Yechiel Adar, Mehish Computer Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: DENNIS WILLIAMS [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wed, February 20, 2002 12:0
The named user license is concurrent per session/connections to the
> database.
> Although you have 1 userid defined you will not be allowed to have more than
> 5 users connect to the instance simultaneously.
>
> Regards
> $uhen
>
> While we are on the topic of oracle licensi
Leo,
The named user license is concurrent per session/connections to the
database.
Although you have 1 userid defined you will not be allowed to have more than
5 users connect to the instance simultaneously.
Regards
$uhen
While we are on the topic of oracle licensing, can someone help to clear
While we are on the topic of oracle licensing, can someone help to clear up some
doubts on named user licensing that I have?
We have an existing 5-named user license for a small oracle 8i (8.1.5) database we
have, but right now, it seems to be restricting the number of user sessions to 5
While we are on the topic of oracle licensing, can someone help to clear up some
doubts on named user licensing that I have?
We have an existing 5-named user license for a small oracle 8i (8.1.5) database we
have, but right now, it seems to be restricting the number of user sessions to 5
Title: RE: Oracle Licensing - Concurrent users
I too went through this mess (twice). A CPU license gets you unlimited. If it's on the web, they don't like the idea of using an application server that utilizes one connection with internal login/logout capability/security. Why twic
Our site just went through this, and Oracle determined that we needed to use
CPU licenses. We actually replaced our 4 cpu DG Aviion with a new Sunfire
3800 with two sparc3 processors. The money saved in Oracle licensing paid
for the new equipment. They simply came in and told us that the
unlimited-user CPU-based
> licensing?
> Thanks.
> Dennis Williams
> DBA
> Lifetouch, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:05 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> you need to be careful if y
Rachel - By Web license, do you mean the unlimited-user CPU-based licensing?
Thanks.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
you need to be careful if you are also using
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
02/19/02 01:04 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Oracle Licensing - Concurrent users
you need to be careful if you are also usin
cipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Oracle Licensing - Concurrent users
"Smith, Ron L." wrote:
>
> We have been asked to gather statistics on the number of clients using
> Oracle. This is being done to determine if we have s
etermine if we have sufficient licensing.
> We have about 100 instances to monitor.
>
> Has anyone done this? Any ideas on what "Concurrent users" might mean to
> the majority of people?
>
> We have both Oracle 7 and Oracle 8.
>
> Ron Smith
> DBA
> Kerr-McGee Co
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Smith, Ron L." wrote:
> >
> > We have been asked to gather statistics on the number of clients
> using
> > Oracle. This is being done to determine if we have sufficient
> licensing.
> > We have about 100 instances to m
"Smith, Ron L." wrote:
>
> We have been asked to gather statistics on the number of clients using
> Oracle. This is being done to determine if we have sufficient licensing.
> We have about 100 instances to monitor.
>
> Has anyone done this? Any ideas on what &quo
then the rules may change.
Bunyamin Karadeniz
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:00 PM
> I suggest you talk to your Oracle rep before getting started.
>
> 'Concurrent'
I suggest you talk to your Oracle rep before getting started.
'Concurrent' licensing is no longer a valid licensing model for Oracle.
They sell by named user or per CPU. Their criteria for making you
use the CPU licensing is rather broad.
Just went through a licensing audit here.
the requirements we were asked to follow.
1. The DBA's must provide the 5 critical pieces of info( for each database)
necessary in order to start our licensing auditing:
Server name (must be in DNS)
Database Name
Connect String
Oracle Version
Application Type
2. DBA's must create a us
We have been asked to gather statistics on the number of clients using
Oracle. This is being done to determine if we have sufficient licensing.
We have about 100 instances to monitor.
Has anyone done this? Any ideas on what "Concurrent users" might mean to
the majority of people?
eorge Hofilena wrote:
> I can't seem to find anything clear on licensing rates at Oracle's site
> anymore. Maybe it's my eyes, but I just couldn't find it. Only thing I
saw
> was their claim that they have now changed their licensing scheme to user
> and cpu units but
r the
same are $300 and $800 respectively. At least that's according to the
information that I have.
Don't forget that their are optional componenets such as RAC, Partitioning,
Advanced Security, etc.
George Hofilena wrote:
> I can't seem to find anything clear on licensing
I can't seem to find anything clear on licensing rates at Oracle's site
anymore. Maybe it's my eyes, but I just couldn't find it. Only thing I saw
was their claim that they have now changed their licensing scheme to user
and cpu units but I wanted the the rates.
I need
Hi,
Can someone explain how the named-user licensing
works? Also, has concurrent usage licensing gone away?
We have a need for an additional database to use for
mapping/geo-coding purposes. The primary application
will periodically perform a query against this new
database to "look up&
Hi,
Can someone explain how the named-user licensing
works? Also, has concurrent usage licensing gone away?
We have a need for an additional database to use for
mapping/geo-coding purposes. The primary application
will periodically perform a query against this new
database to "look up&
Title: RE: Licensing cost for 1000 concurrent users?
Yes you are getting screwed, but for that matter we all are. Oracle licensing always reminds me of an acronym I learned in the military...BOHICA...You can get the definition at either of the following links.
http://ase.isu.edu/ase01_07
Title: Licensing cost for 1000 concurrent users?
We are in the process of negotiating our contract with Oracle.
I've been asked to inquire as to how much other sites are paying
for a license for 1000 concurrent users. We are looking in
the ballpark of $400-$500k according to the O
> I
understand about how concurrent and named user
> licensing works for the
> most part. What I don't understand is when you have
> a web application that
> gets people from all over coming into our site and
> then routed through MTS
> to be sent to the Oracle dat
I understand about how concurrent and named user licensing works for the
most part. What I don't understand is when you have a web application that
gets people from all over coming into our site and then routed through MTS
to be sent to the Oracle database for info. How does the web stuff
Title: RE: Oracle Licensing for a Clustered Server Configuration
Our failover server neither has a standby database nor oracle binaries.
In our Clustered server configuration, when a fail over happens
the entire diskgroups will be de-ported from the primary and imported on the failover
Title: Oracle Licensing for a Clustered Server Configuration
John, are/were you in a similiar
env..
..very curious..coz Oracle is forcing us
to buy a second license for the passive fail-over server ..
Thanks
-Original Message-From: Shaw, John B
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent
Title: Oracle Licensing for a Clustered Server Configuration
Only
if it's active on the fail over node - if it's passive you don't need a second
license.
-Original Message-From: Srinagesh Battula
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 1:07
Title: Oracle Licensing for a Clustered Server Configuration
Hi,
Does Oracle Corp. require you to buy the RDBMS license for the fail-over server (as well) in a
2-node cluster server environment?
Thanks
Nagesh
s.edu> cc: (bcc: Jack van
Zanen/nlzanen1/External/MEY/NL)
Sent by: Subject: Licens
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
