Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-16 Thread Robert Kehl
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:37 PM Daniel Seifert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> To sum up: We need to quote out the round brackets, as Perl otherwise > I already reported this bug 7 months ago (on August 19, 2003, also by > mail in this very mailing list with topic "Subqueues hiding tickets") > - s

Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-16 Thread Daniel Seifert
Hi, > > It seems to be the brackets. When the Queue just has one ( Apache > > ErrosLog says: > > > > [Tue Mar 16 13:36:11 2004] [error] 982: ModPerl::Registry: Unmatched > > ( in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/^Netage::INTERN ( <-- HERE $/ at > > /opt/otrs//Kernel/System/Queue.pm line 866.! > > >

Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-16 Thread Robert Kehl
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:47 PM Thorsten Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to be the brackets. When the Queue just has one ( Apache > ErrosLog says: > > [Tue Mar 16 13:36:11 2004] [error] 982: ModPerl::Registry: Unmatched > ( in regex; marked by <-- HERE in m/^Netage::INTERN ( <-- HE

RE: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-16 Thread Thorsten Philipp
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Robert Kehl > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:53 PM > To: User questions and discussions about OTRS. > Subject: Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost > > On Tuesday, March 16,

Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-16 Thread Robert Kehl
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:13 PM Thorsten Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only way I found to get the relation back after renaming, is to > change the names of subqueues > In the table 'queues' directly, since the subquees are not visible > anymore in OTRS->Admin->Queues. > > The other

RE: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-16 Thread Thorsten Philipp
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Robert Kehl > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:13 AM > To: User questions and discussions about OTRS. > Subject: Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost > > On Tuesday, March 16,

Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-16 Thread Robert Kehl
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:40 AM Thorsten Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This isn't normal, as the queues are chained via their IDs, >> not via their names. > Could you tell me how exactly OTRS does this ? Perhaps something went > wrong in our DB, > And i could fix it manually. Sorry, it

RE: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-16 Thread Thorsten Philipp
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Robert Kehl > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:51 AM > To: User questions and discussions about OTRS. > Subject: Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost > > On Monday, March 15,

Re: [otrs] 3nd Subque Leve lost

2004-03-15 Thread Robert Kehl
On Monday, March 15, 2004 2:24 PM Thorsten Philipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We currently have the problem that we do not see 3rd layer queues in > the Queue View anymore. > > We dont see Queue E and F. Are you sure they are not empty? > If i do change the Name of Queue C I also > dont see E &