RE: [OT] Redirecting to Gmail

There are still ways to get Free Google Apps accounts. The catch is that it will have an upfront cost and that you have to buy a domain and renew it each year. Essentially people are selling domain names which just happen to come with a grandfathered free googles apps account. I picked on up a 2

Re: [OT] Redirecting to Gmail

Well chaps, I'm even more pissed off than usual. Whatever account I created this morning in Google, I don't even know what it is. No kidding. I now have two Gmail accounts including the useless new one which is somehow linked to my primary business domain. I have trawled the web for instructions on

Re: [OT] Redirecting to Gmail

Hurrah! I found HERE how to delete my googleapps trial account. It turns out it was hidden under 'Billing' and a tiny grey icon on the far right -- Greg K On 26 November 2013 11:15, Stephen Price wrote: > I use dnsimple (https://dnsimple.com/r/

Re: [OT] Redirecting to Gmail

I see it! next to the sign saying 'beware of the leopard' What I was going to suggest was googling for how to do it. Mike On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Greg Keogh wrote: > Hurrah! I found HERE how > to delete my googleapps trial account.

dotnetobfuscator

Looking at obfuscating my code..anyone recommend a an easy\cheap solution? Is a dotnet 4 app harder to reverse engineer than a dot 3 for example? Anthony Melbourne StuffUps.learn from others, share with others! http://www.meetup.com/Melbourne-Ideas-Incubator-Stuffups-Failed-Startups/ --

Re: dotnetobfuscator

All managed code obfuscation can be broken, usually fairly easily. Mixed mode C++ /CLI for your IP sensitive code is one option, but to a determined reverse engineer even un-managed code is no big deal. The cost of protection should be in line with the value of the IP you're trying to protect. Jos

RE: dotnetobfuscator

Just want to make it a little harder.changing function names etc can add dramatically to reverse engineering I would think Anthony Melbourne StuffUps.learn from others, share with others! http://www.meetup.com/Melbourne-Ideas-Incubator-Stuffups-Failed-Startups/ -

RE: [OT] Public SQL Server [answer found]

Hi Greg, Back in the dreamtime, you could only have a single copy of SQL Server installed on a computer. When SQL Server 2000 appeared, they provided the ability to install additional copies (ie: named instances) of SQL Server in addition to the "default" instance. At the time, you could have 1

Re: [OT] Public SQL Server [answer found]

Thanks Doctor L, thank makes pretty good sense about the fixed/dynamic ports. It's funny no one mentioned this issue to me before. I don't like having non-standard setups, so I'd actually prefer to leave all the ports the way they were for my SQLExpress instance, but then I don't know how to connec

RE: [OT] Public SQL Server [answer found]

All good Greg. When you have it set to dynamic, there are a few things you have to do: 1. Make sure that TCP/IP is enabled as a protocol using SQL Configuration Manager. (By default SQLEXPRESS doesn’t want external people connecting). 2. Open 1434 for UDP inbound for the SQL Brow