Re: Blazor comments

"yay I can C# in the browser and it will be a thing". Yay indeed! When I sat down several weeks ago with 0.7 and got over the hiccups of getting it going (which is normal) I was amazed at how productive it was. Because of the familiar language and libraries you can just hoe into the coding, leavin

Re: Blazor comments

ril 2019 12:25 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Blazor comments Blazor is now in official preview https://devblogs.microsoft.com/aspnet/blazor-now-in-official-preview/ Greg Harris Harris Consulting Group Pty Ltd g...@harrisconsultinggroup.com<mailto:g...@harrisconsultinggroup.com>

Re: Blazor comments

Blazor is now in official preview https://devblogs.microsoft.com/aspnet/blazor-now-in-official-preview/ Greg Harris Harris Consulting Group Pty Ltd g...@harrisconsultinggroup.com www.HarrisConsultingGroup.com phone: (international) +61 407 942 982 ph

Re: Blazor comments

win out, through market forces alone. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com on behalf of DotNet Dude Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 5:30:43 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Blazor comments I believe Silverlight died mainly because of the lack of support for the

Re: Blazor comments

They are not planning on making Winforms cross platform, Windows only. On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 6:47 PM Greg Keogh wrote: > > I note with interest that they’re hiring people to migrate winforms to >> core. >> > > I saw some .NET news articles mentioning that. Jeez, that will be a > helluva job tr

Re: Blazor comments

I thought they were migrating winforms for a version of core that only runs on Windows On Wednesday, 30 January 2019, 8:26:22 AM GMT, Greg Keogh wrote: I note with interest that they’re hiring people to migrate winforms to core. I saw some .NET news articles mentioning that. Jeez, t

Re: Blazor comments

I believe Silverlight died mainly because of the lack of support for the plugin on iPhones. Blame Apple. On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 17:53, Arjang Assadi wrote: > until a rendering engine is included I can not see any benefit to using > blazer or any other WASM equivalents. Flash as bad as it was , w

RE: Blazor comments

We have no plans of porting Windows Forms & WPF to OSX or Linux, it will be Windows only. From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com On Behalf Of Greg Keogh Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 6:48 PM To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Blazor comments I note with interest that they’re hiring peopl

Re: Blazor comments

> I note with interest that they’re hiring people to migrate winforms to > core. > I saw some .NET news articles mentioning that. Jeez, that will be a helluva job trying to unify all the platforms. Think of all the small and large differences in Windows, OS X and Linux … it boggles the mind --* G

Re: Blazor comments

> Flash died because it was bug ridden and provided a huge amount of > backdoors into pc's. Silverlight was only there to take flash's market > share. When flash died so did silverlight it's mission accomplished. > I don't think SL died because it's mission was accomplished. Wasn't it because of a

Re: Blazor comments

behalf of David Rhys Jones Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 5:59 pm To: ozDotNet Subject: Re: Blazor comments Flash died because it was bug ridden and provided a huge amount of backdoors into pc's. Silverlight was only there to take flash's market share. When flash died so did s

Re: Blazor comments

Flash died because it was bug ridden and provided a huge amount of backdoors into pc's. Silverlight was only there to take flash's market share. When flash died so did silverlight it's mission accomplished. Microsoft's goal for many years is to be web based only. The keep trying to push developers

Re: Blazor comments

until a rendering engine is included I can not see any benefit to using blazer or any other WASM equivalents. Flash as bad as it was , was a better solution , no idea what the big idea was to kill it off , or for that matter ms unilaterally killing silver light. On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 5:26 pm Gre

Blazor comments

Folks, has anyone else in here given Blazor a good bash and got comments? I've run some sanity tests on 0.7 and it's looking pretty good. You can reference packages and projects, there's basic binding (which I hope they improve), you can break things up into "components" and nest them, separate cod