On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:12 PM, David Kean david.k...@microsoft.com wrote:
Actually Scott, we have met. On many occasions. You might remember a little
Aussie activity that
your wife (and yourself) had a lot to do with on Saturdays in Redmond.
I'll leave the discussions on future versions of
...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 12:00 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Is Silverlight dead ?
The quirks mode is only due to Silverlight 4 switching over to the CLR instead
of the SLR, which also raises a point that you can bake your own version
selection tool via
2010 3:19 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Is Silverlight dead ?
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:12 PM, David Kean david.k...@microsoft.com wrote:
Actually Scott, we have met. On many occasions. You might remember a
little Aussie activity that your wife (and yourself) had a lot to do with on
Saturdays
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:
Some people want to know whether it's worth investing in a platform - i.e.
will it have a foreseeable
future, or is it a dead end?
Sure, but how do you rate such a thing? Based on requirements and
context. Evangelists
: RE: Is Silverlight dead ?
RE: David Kean.
David, we've never meet so i'm guessing you're assuming either the worst or
prefer character attacks vs answering the hard questions ;) like is WPF is
Dead? given you have @microsoft.com how about we spend more energy in
clarifying the remarks
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Scott Barnes scott.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
David with glasses? the one who falls asleep allot after 1x beer?
aren't you a tester or something?
Anyway, I am more than happy to openly debate and discuss my opinions
/ remarks but i think the attack posture you
David with glasses? the one who falls asleep allot after 1x beer?
aren't you a tester or something?
Urrh, can this stuff be kept offlist please? -- Greg
Sorry, will take it offline.
Regards,
Scott Barnes
http://www.riagenic.com
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Greg Keogh g...@mira.net wrote:
David with glasses? the one who falls asleep allot after 1x beer?
aren't you a tester or something?
Urrh, can this stuff be kept offlist please? --
, September 22, 2010 12:22 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: Is Silverlight dead ?
That's also not correct (SLR has always been a build of the CLR). Quirks mode
was added so that we don't break applications built against previous versions
when we make changes or fix bugs. An example of this recently
...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Richard Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:48 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: Is Silverlight dead ?
On a side note,I have read about the ethos at Microsoft that they have teams
battle it out for technologies such as LinqToSQL
Silverlight is not dead.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Richard Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:15 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Is Silverlight dead ?
I don't want to start a flame war however I have been talking to some
Oh, and from the Silverlight blog..
http://team.silverlight.net/announcement/the-future-of-silverlight/
It just covers the innovate/standardize cycle..
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Eddie de Bear eddie.deb...@gmail.comwrote:
I think a lot of this has come about from a blog post by Scott
going away.
-Original Message-
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Richard Jones
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:48 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: RE: Is Silverlight dead ?
On a side note,I have read about the ethos at Microsoft
? -
that or learn to evangelize more effectively :) - as you will note,
i've consistently said i'm a fan of WPF and Silverlight and THUS why
the motivation behind what i have done to draw attention to the
reality of the future of both WPF/Silverlight given the current
internal climate.
RE: Silverlight
14 matches
Mail list logo
