RE: TypeScript summary

gt; Subject: Re: TypeScript summary Thomas, You can just add aurelia to the head and be done and started just like Angular(1) albeit your productivity will be slow. Your issues sound to me like saying I can just open Notepad and start coding my C# project. Why would I install Visual Stu

Re: TypeScript summary

Thomas, You can just add aurelia to the head and be done and started just like Angular(1) albeit your productivity will be slow. Your issues sound to me like saying I can just open Notepad and start coding my C# project. Why would I install Visual Studio? Why would you install Nuget or MSBuild

Re: TypeScript summary

this time, but many are. > > > > - Glav > > > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: > ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tony Wright > *Sent:* Wednesday, 26 August 2015 12:11 PM > *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> > *Subject:* R

Re: TypeScript summary

> > Compared to Augular2 Aurelia simply rocks and it's so dead easy to setup. > My 2 cents from a non JS developer. > OK, Ta! I'll bear this in mind when I return to JS related work next time. I see Aurelia is a split off from Angular, and it's the next-next-next-next-gen JS framework ... I'm

Re: TypeScript summary

On 9 September 2015 at 13:18, Corneliu I. Tusnea wrote: > Compared to Augular2 Aurelia simply rocks and it's so dead easy to > setup. Aurelia looks interesting, but a quick scan through "Getting Started" [1] reveals that you need the following to, ah, get started: -

Re: TypeScript summary

Jake Ginnivan gave a talk on React during DDD Melbourne recently, a video of it was posted recently if anyone is interested in that. http://tv.ssw.com/6369/why-react-really-is-different-jake-ginnivan-ddd-melbourne-2015 On 26 August 2015 at 12:10, Tony Wright wrote: > I

RE: TypeScript summary

are. - Glav From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Tony Wright Sent: Wednesday, 26 August 2015 12:11 PM To: ozDotNet ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com Subject: Re: TypeScript summary I wouldn't mind knowing what is so good about React. I'm not enjoying

Re: TypeScript summary

+1 for Greg's comments. Coming from a sql background I found it relatively easy to jump into c# and .net but my jump to JS wasn't so smooth On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Greg Keogh gfke...@gmail.com wrote: I hope this is my final essay on JavaScript (and so do you!). In summary, a few weeks

TypeScript summary

I hope this is my final essay on JavaScript (and so do you!). In summary, a few weeks ago I volunteered to write an in-browser script driven demo app which is simply a navigation stack of 4 screens. Angular is so currently so trendy I spent several hours attempting to learn and use it, but due to

Re: TypeScript summary

RE: DOM manipulation. Here's a (intro and) comparison between DOM manipulation jQuery and React http://reactfordesigners.com/labs/reactjs-introduction-for-people-who-know-just-enough-jquery-to-get-by/ On 26 August 2015 at 10:03, Bec C bec.usern...@gmail.com wrote: +1 for Greg's comments.

Re: TypeScript summary

I wouldn't mind knowing what is so good about React. I'm not enjoying the syntax of React so far. At the moment if I was to build a new substantial app it would be using Angular. I feel that you can write some pretty substantial applications in Angular. Having had a dabble with React, I don't get