Hi do you have there version of the mad plug in.
That will work with the newest version of win amp?
If you do would you please send it to me.
On 12/3/2011 11:20 AM, Dane trethowan wrote:
that's not quite true, there are different quality decoders out there
for MP3 files for example, the Mad
Hello isn't that out datated? or did they improve on it?
last I checked you couldn't listen to aac plus feeds and certain stuff
with that has this changed?
Hank
On 12/3/2011 10:20 AM, Dane trethowan wrote:
that's not quite true, there are different quality decoders out there
for MP3 files for
I use Winamp full time for just about everything except buy music or
manage my iDevices, which I use iTunes for. I say this as Winamp can
apparently manage your iPod in a limited way, but choose to use iTunes
for that and Winamp for others. I know you didn't want anything to rip
or burn, but I
that's not quite true, there are different quality decoders out there
for MP3 files for example, the Mad plug-in for Winamp is one of the
nicest I've heard. There are others.
On 3/12/2011 10:22 AM, Dave Scrimenti wrote:
You're not going to hear any difference in sound quality from player
I'll throw a forth player into the discussion, I like Itunes, the people
at GW Micro have - at long last - done a great job with the iTunes
scripts and it works like clockwork.
the software can be a little challenging for beginners but there are
plenty of help guides and tutorials around.
I
Winamp should suffice most uses yep, I thought Real Player was a part of
history now?
I've used VLC with the Mac and love it! a very nice player though as yet
haven't tried it under Windows, I'm told that its accessible? Certainly
the last Windows version I tried quite some years ago wasn't.
Subject: Re: Winamp Versus wmp Versus VLC Versus
that's not quite true, there are different quality decoders out there for
MP3 files for example, the Mad plug-in for Winamp is one of the nicest
I've heard. There are others.
On 3/12/2011 10:22 AM, Dave Scrimenti wrote:
You're not going
Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: Winamp Versus wmp Versus VLC Versus
that's not quite true, there are different quality decoders out there
for MP3 files for example, the Mad plug-in for Winamp is one of the
nicest I've heard
, December 03, 2011 12:20 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Winamp Versus wmp Versus VLC Versus
that's not quite true, there are different quality decoders out there
for MP3 files for example, the Mad plug-in for Winamp is one of the
nicest I've heard. There are others.
On 3/12
You're not going to hear any difference in sound quality from player to
player. The only ways to improve sound quality are to use uncompressed
files, or a better audio card. Winamp and Foobar 2000 are both very
accessible.
- Original Message -
From: Walter w...@blueyonder.co.uk
To:
I like Winamp because I can always go to the title bar and tell what's
playing. I have never figured out a way to get WMP to display that, unless
I am looking in the wrong place.
I like the Winamp Book feature, but I can't figure out a way to categorize
things.
To unsubscribe from this
I haven't tried all of the players you mentioned. But I have used WMP, Real
Player and Winamp; I like Winamp the best! For one thing, with Winamp, it's
quite easy to get from point A to point B in a file; you can adjust the
volume (without having to worry that you'll also mess up the volume
What are you looking for in a media player? I like Winamp because I can
manage my local libraries, my portable media players and my podcasts. I
also like the bookmarks feature and the ability to skip around in a
file. Handling content over the internet isv't very accessible though.
I like FooBar
Of Christopher Chaltain
Sent: 03 December 2011 00:23
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Winamp Versus wmp Versus VLC Versus
What are you looking for in a media player? I like Winamp because I can
manage my local libraries, my portable media players and my podcasts. I
also like the bookmarks
Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 8:54 PM
Subject: RE: Winamp Versus wmp Versus VLC Versus
Hi. Well mainly I want other options other than the two I currently use.
The ability to navigate with in a file and particularly the bookmark
facility would be most
It does use scripts, but they come with Jaws. Most plug-ins are free.
- Original Message -
From: Walter w...@blueyonder.co.uk
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 8:54 PM
Subject: RE: Winamp Versus wmp Versus VLC Versus
Hi. Well
Walter
Don't forget foobar2000 also. This is what I use for most of my playing.
The downside is that you have to designate your own shortcut keys but this
can be very easily done.
Another interesting option for really a very small fee is Mapler which is
a small media player written
Hello what is the website fore Mapler?
also can you send me off list your keyboard shortcut file fore foobar?
Hank
On 12/2/2011 9:57 PM, André van Deventer wrote:
Walter
Don't forget foobar2000 also. This is what I use for most of my playing.
The downside is that you have to designate your own
worth the small sum they
charge for the full version.
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On
Behalf Of Hank Smith
Sent: 03 December 2011 07:33 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Winamp Versus wmp Versus VLC Versus
19 matches
Mail list logo
