Paul B. Henson wrote:
On a currently open support request, Sun is complaining that the patches on
our server are way out of date and we should install the recommended patch
cluster.
...
A number of the patches they indicate should be installed do not appear to
be marked as recommended in the patc
Hi,
The issues with the patch download service on SunSolve have been fixed.
The problem was found to be in a middle tier application between
SunSolve and the recently deployed Patch Entitlement & Download Service.
The issue has now been fixed and patch downloads are working again.
Can you ple
Don,
The issues with the patch download service on SunSolve have been fixed.
Good to hear that, as always :)
Can you please let me know if you are continuing to have issues?
All downloads of patchdiag.xref, READMEs and patches I tried worked fine.
I see a new design of the SunSolve main p
Hi Martin,
See inline comments (denoted with DOM> /DOM>)...
Martin Paul wrote:
Don,
The issues with the patch download service on SunSolve have been fixed.
Good to hear that, as always :)
Can you please let me know if you are continuing to have issues?
All downloads of patchdiag.xref,
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
>
> On a currently open support request, Sun is complaining that the patches on
> our server are way out of date and we should install the recommended patch
> cluster.
Did you send them an explorer?
> We don't do patch clusters; we do pca :
Don,
It seems as if no update to patchdiag.xref has been published today,
as I still get yesterday's version "Oct/19/09" instead of the expected
"Oct/20/09".
http://sunsolve.sun.com/pdownload.do?target=patchdiag.xref appears to be
correct:
Yes, that link has the current file. It's not the
Hi Martin,
Yip, I remember the previous conversation we had on this (and indeed the
one that I had internally to get SunSolve to keep
http[s]://sunsolve.sun.com/patchdiag.xref as a plain text file).
I'll have to ask around and see what I can find out.
It seems a little coincidental that this
Don,
It seems a little coincidental that this version of patchdiag has not
been updated after moving to the new SunSolve release.
Yes, that's what makes me extremely nervous ..
As a workaround for now, pca users can set xrefurl to get the current
xref file:
pca --xrefurl='https://sunsolv
Hi Martin,
It appears that http[s]://sunsolve.sun.com/patchdiag.xref was impacted
by an outage on servers hosting the latest version of the file.
The servers are now back up, so we should see
http[s]://sunsolve.sun.com/patchdiag.xref fall back in sync overnight.
If not, I'll do more investi
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:54:42AM -0700, Martin Paul wrote:
> Don,
>
> > It seems a little coincidental that this version of patchdiag has not
> > been updated after moving to the new SunSolve release.
>
> Yes, that's what makes me extremely nervous ..
>
> As a workaround for now, pca users ca
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 09:29:51AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 05:54:42AM -0700, Martin Paul wrote:
> > As a workaround for now, pca users can set xrefurl to get the current
> > xref file:
> >
> >pca --xrefurl='https://sunsolve.sun.com/pdownload.do?target=' ...
>
>
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Martin Paul wrote:
> I compared them, and after sorting out those which don't apply to my
[...]
> concluded that the lists are essentially the same. So for this example,
> installing the "missingr" patches with pca will give you the same patch
> state as installing the Recomme
An admin here was bitten by the 141445-09 issue yesterday. Our
symptoms match exactly those described here:
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-263928-1
Without 119255-70 installed, I wonder if this would have occurred even
in single user mode?
In any case, we ended up bo
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Ben Taylor wrote:
> Did you send them an explorer?
Yes, it was based on that that they were complaining about missing patches.
> If you have NFS problems, then it's no wonder they're saying you're out
> of date.
I didn't mind them saying we might want to try these patches,
> Also, because of a horrible lack of scalability with sharing zfs
> filesystems over NFS (which I have had an open case on for well over a
> year), it takes a bit over two hours to completely reboot our x4500 servers
> with about 8000 filesystems each, which makes it rather difficult to
> schedu
I am out of the office until 23/10/2009.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "?Re: [pca] failing
patch downloads" sent on 21/10/09 17:23:53.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
16 matches
Mail list logo