7, 2023 3:39 AM
To: Cheng Li ; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Cc: Lizhenbin
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
> Many thanks for your comments, I have accepted most of the comments
> from you, and would like to discuss with you about th
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Hi Quan,
We have addressed your comments in the latest version, please check it.
Thanks,
Cheng
The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc
> Many thanks for your comments, I have accepted most of the comments
> from you, and would like to discuss with you about the rest. Please see my
> reply inline.
Great. Thanks, Cheng. Continuing the discussion in line.
Snipped all of the resolved stuff.
> Because we have a lots of comments. It
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 9:41 AM
To: Chongfeng Xie ; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Thank you Chongfeng, will fix it next revision.
BR,
Cheng
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chongfeng Xie
Sent
To: d...@dhruvdhody.com
Cc: Cheng Li ; pce@ietf.org;
draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verificat...@ietf.org; Zhangka
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Hi Dhruv,
Thanks for your reply!
I agree with you and it is much better to align with SR-MPLS using
LSP
@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Hi,
Here is my WG last call review of this document. Thanks to the authors for all
of the work that has gone in.
[A note for the chairs: Was this last call shared with SPRING?]
Cheers,
Adrian
===
Abstract
Hi all,
This WGLC has ended. Authors, please address the open comments and
update accordingly.
Thanks,
Julien
On 13/02/2023 18:38, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
Ketan
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 11:09 PM wrote:
> Dear PCE WG,
>
> This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
> comments you have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
>
> This WGLC will end on Tue
This ID provides a key component of SRv6 TE solution.
I support as a co-author.
Thanks,
Siva
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:39 PM wrote:
> Dear PCE WG,
>
> This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
> comments
Hi Julien and all, I read the draft and support publication. The work is important for customers. Agree with Dhruv comments about using LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV.As a side comment I would love to see more extended list in the Implementation status section, hopefully in the next versions. SY,Boris
, February 21, 2023 5:14 AM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Hi,
Here is my WG last call review of this document. Thanks to the authors for all
of the work that has gone in.
[A note for the chairs: Was this last
com>>;
Cc: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org> mailto:pce@ietf.org>>;
Date: 2023年02月20日 15:14
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Hi Quan,
The usage is the same as defined in RFC9256. Do you have any suggested text?
Thanks,
Cheng
-Origin
...@huawei.com
;
Date: 2023年02月27日 13:06
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Hi Quan, Cheng,
I think it is best if this is aligned with SR-MPLS i.e this draft-
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-sr-mpls-sid-verification/
That draft
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments you
have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC will end on Tuesday
tify
> the PCE when the candidate path is invalid.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Quan
>
>
>
>
>
> Original
> *From: *ChengLi
> *To: *熊泉00091065;julien.meu...@orange.com ;
> *Cc: *pce@ietf.org ;
> *Date: *2023年02月20日 15:14
> *Subject: **RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for
&g
o: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
>
> Dear PCE WG,
>
> This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
> comments you have about this document using
AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
>
> Dear PCE WG,
>
> This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments
> you have about this document using
-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments you
have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February 2023.
Thanks,
Julien
--
[1] https
table had the same names as you use in
the text.
---
9.4
The table headings are missing "-----" separators
---
9.4
You need to tell IANA how many bits can be allocated. Otherwise they may try to
allocate bit 16 to the next request.
---
11.1
I think that 8402 is only an inform
e.com ;
Cc: pce@ietf.org ;
Date: 2023年02月20日 15:14
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Hi Quan,
The usage is the same as defined in RFC9256. Do you have any suggested text?
Thanks,
Cheng
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org]
ing "-----" separators
---
9.4
You need to tell IANA how many bits can be allocated. Otherwise they may
try to allocate bit 16 to the next request.
---
11.1
I think that 8402 is only an informative reference.
---
Appendix A.
s/Contributor/Contributors/
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
I support the WG LC of this draft. I reviewed this document in details and I
think it is useful and reasonable for SRv6 networks with PCEP extension.
Thanks the authors for the well-written draft and I have
Hi Julien and WG,
I have read the draft, and I think it's ready for publication.
Best Regards,
Ran
Original
From: julien.meu...@orange.com
To: pce@ietf.org ;
Date: 2023年02月14日 01:39
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE
Thank you Chongfeng, will fix it next revision.
BR,
Cheng
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chongfeng Xie
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 9:05 PM
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Hi folks
of this document.
Best Regards,
Daoning Lai
la...@chinatelecom.cn
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 1:39 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
s message starts a 2-week WG last call on
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
> comments you have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
>
> This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February 2023.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julien
>
> --
>
Date: 2023-02-14 01:38
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
comments you have about this document using the PCE mailing list
e-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> julien.meu...@orange.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 1:39 AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
>
> Dear PCE WG,
>
> This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
> draft-ietf-pce-se
ation" bit usage is as per Section
5.1 of [RFC9256]." Maybe it is better to add more description on how to
use the V bit for SID verification.
Best Regards,
Quan
<<[Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-
Hi WG, I support the WGLC. As for the gradual deployment of SRv6 network, the
draft is very timely and the extensions are reasonable.___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments you
have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February 2023.
Thanks,
Julien
--
[1
-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 1:39 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please
Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
comments you have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February
Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 1:39 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments you
Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
comments you have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February
AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any comments you
have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC
Dear PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG last call on
draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 [1]. Please, be express any
comments you have about this document using the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC will end on Tuesday 28th February 2023.
Thanks,
Julien
--
[1] https
37 matches
Mail list logo
