Claude Heiland-Allen a écrit :
PSPunch wrote:
I thought the dgemhead and repeat methods were just a matter of
preference. If one is trendy and the other out dated, I guess I can just
drop the one said to be less efficient.
as far as I understand it, there are now 3 methods:
1: double
PSPunch a écrit :
The attached example works great.
Going slightly off topic, if I am not mistaken, the rectangle on the top
of the cube is rendered twice as seen in some other cases I've seen in
patches using the dual gemhead technique.
Disabling the [gemhead] by sending it a 0 seems
Hi cyrille
what is the problem with :
[loadbang]
|
[0
Yes, that will work.
For example, [gemwin] starts out disabled and without the window
showing, or say, [metro] being off by default.
It is reasonable that [gemhead] is on by default, but being able to
state in the object itself,
Quoting PSPunch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, that will work.
For example, [gemwin] starts out disabled and without the window
showing, or say, [metro] being off by default.
It is reasonable that [gemhead] is on by default, but being able to
state in the object itself, self concluding, that it is
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, since i am currently planning to replace [gemhead] with an
abstraction, which would allow you define the behaviour as you like
it, i don't want to add complexity to the current implementation.
don't know when this
Frank Barknecht a écrit :
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
however, since i am currently planning to replace [gemhead] with an
abstraction, which would allow you define the behaviour as you like
it, i don't want to add complexity to the current
Hallo,
cyrille henry hat gesagt: // cyrille henry wrote:
the best would be not to use the double gemhead trick, but the repeat (or
until) trick instead : it's faster, and don't have this problem, so i think
it's easier to understand.
Yes: Everyone is on the latest Gem should use gemlist
Jack a écrit :
We are talking about [gemlist].
Is there a difference with [any] ?
gemlist is a gem object, that work only with gem data
any is an (iem) external that work with any data.
you can replace gemlist with any in your patch, but gemlist should work
without any dependency (except
OK, thank you for the precisions.
++
Jack
Le 25 août 08 à 19:32, cyrille henry a écrit :
Jack a écrit :
We are talking about [gemlist].
Is there a difference with [any] ?
gemlist is a gem object, that work only with gem data
any is an (iem) external that work with any data.
you can
Thanks all for the ideas.
I thought the dgemhead and repeat methods were just a matter of
preference. If one is trendy and the other out dated, I guess I can just
drop the one said to be less efficient.
--
David Shimamoto
___
Pd-list@iem.at
PSPunch wrote:
I thought the dgemhead and repeat methods were just a matter of
preference. If one is trendy and the other out dated, I guess I can just
drop the one said to be less efficient.
as far as I understand it, there are now 3 methods:
1: double [gemhead]
2: [repeat]
3: [until] with
11 matches
Mail list logo
