In a message dated 2/15/01 11:07:37 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Only .4" narrower, .4" shorter(depthwise) and almost the same height. I
thought it was a lot smaller than that. >>
A handful with the vertical shutter/grip, as I'd noted before.
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Wells, I did it. Went for an inexpensive "M" lens.
Was going to get the 3.5 135mm M that KEH had for $79, but by the time I got
back there some @#()*%^& had beat me to it
But say, lookee here Homer, there's a 75-150 f4 M zoom that looks to be
still there, and for only $59. Hmm! (With my
Pentax got three patents this week that look like MZ-S patents. They are
6188845, 6188846, and 6188848. Here is a link to them in the U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office database:
http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?TERM1=6188845+OR+6188846+OR+6188848
&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fn
That was great reading, the MZ-S sounds perfect for what i need if i get
ride of a few bodies i should be able to change over with out to much more
money leaving my pocket...
But i think i to will wait til there hopefully around $600us
- Original Message -
From: "Tiger Moses" <[EMAIL
Where did you find this price? I just went to www.costco.com and did a search for
batteries. The only 2CR5's I could find were Energizer e2's, at $7.29 a piece..
Could you post the link to this price? Thanks!
John
- Original Message -
From: "Vadim Meleshuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the original url worked ok for me
- Original Message -
From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: Check out brochure info on new SLR and lenses.
César writes:
> http://cesar_abdul.homestead.com/MZ_S.html
Th
Wow, that was nice viewing!
I decided after findong out for the first time (though it may have been
posted, first time it clicked with me!) that the MZ-S has a PC connection
for studio flash built in! Once the MZ-S is at B&H for $600 or less, I am
buying one and selling my 3 Spotmatics and all my
It only matters if you were to position both at the same place
With the 77mm you probably just take a step forward, maybe no even that
much, right?
At 07:35 PM 2/15/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Fred,
>
>This is very helpful indeed. What I'm trying to ascertain is
>about how much more image I'd captur
Pentax produced a KX MOT body which accepted a 2?
frame per. second motor drive. You can see a picture
of it at Boz's site.
http://www.phred.org/pentax/k/
--- Gerald Cermak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> K2DMD is what you are referring to.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "William
Mark Roberts writes:
>No membership dues!
>No membership benefits!
>No prestige!
>No kidding!
So is this "acoustic" club for those of us who like to make lots of noise with
our big AF lenses and high-speed motordrives? :) I can just imagine a
Pentax symphony...
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Ma
César writes:
> http://cesar_abdul.homestead.com/MZ_S.html
This URL is incorrect. After a little trial & error I've found what I believe to be
the right one:
http://www.homestead.com/cesar_abdul/MZ_S.html
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.digistar.c
- Original Message -
From: Mafud
Subject: Re: MZ-S better than Z-1p?
> You wouldn't expect PENTAX to shine even dully if being judged
by a
> Nikon-Canon-Leica crowd, or would you?
>
Actually, the Leica users I know universally respect Pentax. The
seem to be a better educated, more refi
So the MZS is the flagship indeed if what the page
http://cesar_abdul.homestead.com/files/MZ_S/MZ-S_info14.jpg
says is true.
Herbet.
--- "Matamoros, Cesar A."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my way home I stopped by the photo shop. They
> had just received
> an envelope from Pentax USA wit
I was comparing the MZ-S's dimension's with the Z1-p's and was pleasantly
surprised to find that the MZ-S is almost the same size. Only .4" narrower,
.4" shorter(depthwise) and almost the same height. I thought it was a lot
smaller than that.
-paul
Surely the definition of irony can be found here somewhere.
Har
Wheatfield Willie
- Original Message -
From: "Phillip Feichko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 15, 2001 11:14 AM
Subject: unsubscribe pentax-discuss
> unsubscribe pentax-discuss
>
> -
> This messag
On my way home I stopped by the photo shop. They had just received
an envelope from Pentax USA with the information on the new stuff. I will
not be in town this weekend so I figured the next best thing was to use my
digital camera to take shots of the 35mm SLR and 35mm lens info.
Go to
It is due for an update, and I just got a new fast computer which will get
me back into a more frequent (less painful) updating routine. Right now I
don't belive I even have the 77mm listed, and a few of the older lenses have
been commented but I haven't updated the site. Real soon now.
I
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:49:12 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Seriously, didn't we have some folks who fried their MZ-5's with rechargable
>batteries...something about current limits?
I think I remember something about that.
I use the alkaline rechargables in my FG grip for the ZX-5n. I emailed
Fred,
This is very helpful indeed. What I'm trying to ascertain is
about how much more image I'd capture using the 77mm lens as
opposed to one of the 85mm lenses for a specific situation.
Since I don't have a 77mm lens at the moment, it's hard to make
a comparison. Your brick wall comparison
To those who responded
thanks.
Bird
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I just heard about the f-stop method of printing B&W, and of the
f-stop compensating timer designed for cold light heads. While
I understand what a compensating timer is, I've no idea about
the f-stop method of printing. Any help out there?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> which PENTAX bodies "beep" to confirm focus?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The MZ3 does, and the audible signal can be turned off as well.
...the exact same as with the ME-F, too.
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 2/15/01 7:16:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << Could that be the FA*250-600/5.6? Yummy... >>
>
> Oh no, I've shot ~that~ one. I get to shoot it every Spring during Polo
> matches [Chukkas]. One of the first of the 250
>I'm proud to say that the Guild QUINTUPLED its membership today!
>
>John Edwin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Subject: Join the Acoustic Photographer's Guild
>>
>>>No membership dues!
>>>No membership benefits!
>>>No prestige!
>>>No kidding!
>>
>>>
In a message dated 2/15/01 7:16:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Could that be the FA*250-600/5.6? Yummy... >>
Oh no, I've shot ~that~ one. I get to shoot it every Spring during Polo
matches [Chukkas]. One of the first of the 250-600 models, this one is still
an impre
In a message dated 2/15/01 5:19:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Now - if Mafud would send me a roll or two of the Supras, I'm sure I
could repent from the "evil greenish ways" into which I find myself forced at
times ;^)
Bill >>
I only have Supra 800 on han
>I'm just wondering, does the FA 35/2's barrel extend when focusing?
>
>-paul
Yes. ~5/16".
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at h
I'm proud to say that the Guild QUINTUPLED its membership today!
John Edwin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Join the Acoustic Photographer's Guild
>
>>No membership dues!
>>No membership benefits!
>>No prestige!
>>No kidding!
>
>>http://www.ro
ZX/MZ-50
- Original Message -
From: "John Coyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: MF lens block...
> On Friday, February 16, 2001 7:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >
> > OK Tiger ~anyone~: wh
In a message dated 2/15/01 5:11:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< We do have to take proper technique into account, as well >>
I would never ~think~ to caution PDML members about their shooting
techniques, knowing that such a suggestion would be in fact - preaching to
On Friday, February 16, 2001 7:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> OK Tiger ~anyone~: which PENTAX bodies "beep" to confirm focus?
ZX/MX-5
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and
Alan wrote:
> >Pentax Japan site has not shown even that there will be
> an >MZ-S. Or they won't sell S in Japan, though I
> don't >think they won't.
>
> Perhaps they have something even better for themselves?
> MZ-S Limited?
>
> regards,
> Alan Chan
Or maybe "MZ-S 2001 Ltd" w/ FA31, 43, an
I`ve already got my $50 in a pool, GO DODGERS!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "John Glover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: OT Geography
> Pitchers and catchers report today!!! First ga
K2DMD is what you are referring to.
- Original Message -
From: "William Kane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: A KX that takes a Motor Drive ?
> saw it on ebay last night myself. The pics of THAT KX definitly
> indicat
Seriously, didn't we have some folks who fried their MZ-5's with rechargable
batteries...something about current limits?
Would you risk a $500 camera to save $20 per year on batteries?
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Just be sure and wear protective clothing.
- Ori
I'm just wondering, does the FA 35/2's barrel extend when focusing?
-paul
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go t
> > Don't really know about Pentax history on this, but the
> > price is mentioned on the German Pentax web-site now:
>
>Pentax Japan site has not shown even that there will be an
>MZ-S. Or they won't sell S in Japan, though I don't
>think they won't.
Perhaps they have something even better for
Why no FA*85/1.4. I remember they gave it a rare "*".
regards,
Alan Chan
>In the article they announce that in the the following
>month (october '99 - issue 217) they would list the
>'absolute' best ones in every particular application
>(regardless its price). Too bad I didn't buy it.
>
>The
J. Hein wrote:
> Hi, Pentax Germany updated their website www.pentax.de for the MZ-S. They
> call it `semiprofessionell' and quote a price of 2500 DM which is about
> $1200.
Pentax US call it MZ-S Professional. No semi there
Pål
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To uns
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> << I've been looking for a film that can blow up to
at least 16X20 with little or no grain. >>
Mafud replies ...
>KODAK SUPRA 100. After that, it's up to your lens.
Easy now, Mafud ;^)
We do have to take proper technique into accou
tom wrote:
> > Hmmm, if that's the case - that does sound a bit nutzo
> > what's the scoop, Shel ???
>
> Well, that's what Anchell says in a very informative book. I entertained
> the thought myself, but just thought a fudge factor of 2.5x was too
> much.
> Basically, I think Shel and I are
Takehiko Ueda wrote:
>
> Believe me a Mini is most appropriate for photo shooting.
> It can carry, at least, an LX and a Super-A with six SMC
> lenses and a Sigma 400/5.6. If you feel like, you can
> add two tripods. The best thing is you can park it
> almost everywhere you like.
A serious poi
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Brogden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:43 AM
Subject: E-mails or no e-mails; Was: Re: cities vs. no cities
Hello Chris
My vote:
In order to make it easy to communicate with someone in a
particular loca
After his "SERIOUSLY UNSCIENTIFIC REASONING WAS APPLIED", Fred estimated
the focal length at close focus of one of the very few lenses CdI has
every canonized ( ;^) ) with a 5/5/5 star rating as, "For close shots of
bricks: 81.4 mm - FA* 85/1.4", which agrees closely with the
measurements posted b
> Would this be LIST price or expected street price?
>
> Michel
>
I believe it is list, but normally in Europe this is not as ridiculous as
in the US. Especially for newly marketed items. I would expect one has to
pay within 10% of that in the shops, at least for the first few months
until the n
Dear Tiger,
did I read right, you bought the new 2.8 version which goes down to 1:1,
correct?
I am not really sure I want/need that, but one of my concerns is its
manual focus capability. I understand on MF it goes in less than a full
turn (330 deg or so) from infinity to 1:1. The 90/2.5 MF I ha
tom wrote:
> Give in! You can't beat the smell of fresh glass!
(Inhaling deeply) AAAhhh ... I love the smell of K-mounts in
the mornin.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the dire
I know that the PZ-1P, MZ-5N and MZ-50 do ? the others AF I
did not have chance to use yet...
Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 2/15/01 3:46:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << have! I once got the 100mm/2.8 and the 200mm/4.0 for $120 total!
> Y
Hey, the 2CR5 battaries are real cheap: costco.com sells them for something
like US12.99 per 6 of them. That is 2.17 a battery. I don't see much
potential economy in using AAs. I had some funny problems with ordering from
Costco, though: first time they sent me CR5 battaries instead, second time I
In a message dated 2/15/01 7:20:13 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< zoom lenses, the 85/1.4 keeps being > my only option... Well, I think I
could use the > 135/2.8 too, but a Pro told me that 85´s are the best > for
portraits. Is that true? :)>>
As you've been advised,
Hi
I always use Paterson tanks. I have all sizes 1-5 rolls of 35mm film. In the
buttom of the tank is written how many ml of developer is required for 1, 2,
3, 4 or 5 rolls. I simply follow instructions (290ml/35mm roll - 500ml/120
roll). I use Ilford ID11, diluted 1+1 almost all the time. Of cour
John Edwin Mason wrote:
>
> Dark indoors, Delta 3200 at 1600 or 3200, depending on
> conditions. Souped in Microphen.
That's what I had loaded for the Waterson: Carthy concert last
night. It's in at my friendly B&W lab now - I pick it up tomorrow.
That was breaking one of the cardinal rules -
Hi
Price tag is not that importent.
I think I spent 10,000-20,000$ photographing during the last eight-nine
years (when I got the Z1). Hundreds of rolls, thousands of prints and
slides. 100$ more or less is of no importens what so ever, as long as we
enjoy working with the camera. The camera body
> at my site in the URL below you can also find many made
> w/ the SuperTakumar 85mm f1.9 & a few w/ the SMCT 135mm f3.5
>
> in the "People Who Have Stood Still for My Lens" section off
> the opening page
>
>
> Bill
>
>-
In a message dated 2/15/01 4:21:26 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< he MZ3 does, and the audible signal can be turned off as well.
Michel >>
Thanks Michel!
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe
No membership dues!
No membership benefits!
No prestige!
No kidding!
http://www.robertstech.com/apg.htm
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komko
Would this be LIST price or expected street price?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "J. Hein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:21
Subject: MZ-S semiprofessionel
> Hi, Pentax Germany updated their website www.pentax.de
I have shot a fair bit of Kodachrome over the years. In this case I am
actually looking for a negative film rather than a transparency. Any other
suggestions? Any Reala users care to comment?
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: "Tiger Moses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
The MZ3 does, and the audible signal can be turned off as well.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 14:09
Subject: Re: MF lens block...
> In a message dated 2/15/01 3:46:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL
I have an N80 brochure. With AI-P lenses, all metering is available. With
AI lenses, no metering is available.
Thanks,
Ed
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandre A. P. Suaide" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Fast
In a message dated 2/15/01 3:46:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< have! I once got the 100mm/2.8 and the 200mm/4.0 for $120 total!
Your ZX-5n will beep for you when you are in what it thinks focus is!
Tiger Moses >>
OK Tiger ~anyone~: which PENTAX bodies "beep" to con
There are lots of genies out of the bottles, but what became of the
31mm...? Well, time for another rub with that patience-ointment.
:-(
Jostein
--
_
Jostein Øksne | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oslo, Norway. | http://home.c2i.net/jostein.oksne/
Pentax made a KX that takes a motor drive this doens't
appear to be one of them though.
--- Collin Brendemuehl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1214968670
>
> What cha think? :)
>
> ***
>
> "The accumulation of all powers legislati
I just acquired the 90mm 2.8 AF in our mount in January, from B&H.
Awesome lens!
I am quiet please with its speed and performance as a 90mm and as a macro.
It even had a $50 rebate when I bought it!
At 07:34 PM 2/15/2001 +, you wrote:
>Hi, anyone knows, whether the older Tamron 90/2.5 was ev
> Unfortunately no. There was an engineer that actually made a prototype
> some time ago but never overcame the problem of the batteries. It seems
> Pentax never made an AA adapter because there was no way a Z1-p might
> have worked with non lithium batteries.
>
> Flavio
I actually just ordered a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - what does your club do? - main interests of group? - competition or/and
> image education?
I have been member of 3 very different clubs in different cities in
Norway. I have checked out a few other clubs too, and once I was also
co-founder of a small new one.
My ge
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1214968670
What cha think? :)
***
"The accumulation of all powers legislative,
executive and judiciary in the same hands . . .
may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."
--James Madison, Federalist 47
-
This mes
> Okay; I find my ZX-M to have a good viewfinder (bright, clear, and
> understandable) when it comes to manually focusing lenses.
>
> Can the same be said for all other ZX (AF) bodies? (I do not have a store
> nearby that carries anything but the ZX30, to check this out, and I am not
> intereste
TOP RUMOR ANTIGLARE
>From the early rumor mill...
Practical, hard multi-coating was developed in the 50's and early 60's for airborne
reconnaissance. Lenses were produced within the US by a US manufacturer by persons with
security clearances. I cannot say if it was "OCLI". The technology was lat
At 09:42 AM 2/15/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>Bill,
>
>I've been looking for a film that can blow up to at least 16X 20 with little
>or no grain. What would you consider the next best thing to RG25? I was
>thinking of maybe Konica Impressa 50. Ever try it?
>
>Bruce Dayton
>Sacramento, CA
>
KODACHROM
At 01:57 PM 2/15/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>This is strange, but I find myself reluctant to jump in and purchase any of
>Pentax's good older (and less expensive) manual focus lenses (such as the
>f3.5 135mm "M") because I intend to obtain a ZX5n AF body soon.
>Some kind of "photographers block" here,
I'll make a try with it and the 43mm Limited. I recently bought 20 rolls
and so far, it looks good. I just haven't blown anything up past 8 X 10
yet. Thanks for the tip.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
regardless of tank capacity, it depends how much chemistry you put in, right?
I put in like 300ml per roll.
At 10:26 AM 2/15/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Mike, I recently read something you said on the list in regards to number
>of film rolls developed at one time. I think you said something like yo
Dosk wrote:
>Okay; I find my ZX-M to have a good viewfinder (bright, clear, and
>understandable) when it comes to manually focusing lenses.
>Can the same be said for all other ZX (AF) bodies? (I do not have a store
>nearby that carries anything but the ZX30, to check this out, and I am not
>inte
Hi,
I have been asked whether one can use original K and M
lenses on the ZX50 / MZ50. I think the answer is: Metering
works correctly only at open aperture as the ZX50 lacks the
aperture simulator. But what about screw mount lenses with a
K mount adapter - would the ZX50 meter work correctly with
Dosk,
The real difference between the AF ZX's and the ZX-M is the lack of manual
focus aids (split-image & microprism collar). If you mostly use the matte
area of the viewfinder to focus with you won't notice much difference. If,
however, you heavily use those aids, you might not be quite as ha
In a message dated 2/15/01 12:45:11 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I've been looking for a film that can blow up to at least 16X 20 with
little
or no grain. >>
KODAK SUPRA 100. After that, it's up to your lens.
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This messa
Tom wrote.
>BTW, the title of this thread sounds like a bad show on local cable.
Mike, if you read this and decide to do it, I think Tom and I should get partial
credit, at least, if not some of the residuals. Jim
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
I've not used the MZ-M, but I've got an MZ-5n and an MX. The MZ is
great to manual focus with as I find the viewfinder much brighter than
the MX. I often use my M50F2 on it with no trouble using the standard
screen in the MZ.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: dosk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
White sox? WHo are they?
GO CARDS!!
Although I am a redskins fan not a rams fan.
jeepgirl (its defiantly a baseball town.)
I do hope they would have the good sense to be White Sox fans. After
all, they do live in Illinois, and they are South of the Aparicio/Banks
line. (Base
In a message dated 2/15/01 11:00:25 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I thought it was a pro film? >>
It is. Maybe Bill thought he said
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.
In a message dated 2/15/01 10:47:32 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< The paper was Fuji Crystal Archive, glossy. >>
Do you like the Crystal Archive paper?
Mafud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
g
> This is strange, but I find myself reluctant to jump in and purchase any of
> Pentax's good older (and less expensive) manual focus lenses (such as
> the
> f3.5 135mm "M") because I intend to obtain a ZX5n AF body soon.
> Some kind of "photographers block" here, maybe?
> Dosk
Hi Dosk, no real r
In a message dated 2/15/01 10:47:27 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< hate to point this out, but the only reason I can see for objecting to
comparing Pentax to other brands is because you don't think Pentax would look
good with that kind of scrutiny.
William Robb >>
I
>This is strange, but I find myself reluctant to jump in and purchase any of
>Pentax's good older (and less expensive) manual focus lenses (such as the
>f3.5 135mm "M") because I intend to obtain a ZX5n AF body soon.
>Some kind of "photographers block" here, maybe?
>Dosk
>
Dosk,
I have a ZX-5n an
It should have no effect since the volume of developer is increased to
provide the correct amount for each roll. This works fine if each roll
requires the same processing. Problems can come about if any of the
included rolls require specialized processing in which case these should be
developed
unsubscribe pentax-discuss
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Shel wrote:
> That's how I feel about Agfa APX 25
Me too - and I had more or less just discovered it as it
was being discontinued :(
> The last time I saw him, John Francis gave me a roll of RG 25,
> but it's just sitting in the freezer. Some day I'll shoot it,
> but with
Probably referring to Fuji Superia...
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 43mm Lens & Supra 400
William Robb wrote:
> Glad you like the Supra 400.
> It is at present, the best
- Original Message -
From: "Bill D. Casselberry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: February 15, 2001 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: Developing B/W Film w/ Mike J.
> Jim Meeks wrote:
>
> > Mike, I recently read something you said on the list in
regards to number
> > of film rolls d
> Don't really know about Pentax history on this, but the
> price is mentioned on the German Pentax web-site now:
Pentax Japan site has not shown even that there will be an
MZ-S. Or they won't sell S in Japan, though I don't
think they won't.
Sincerely,
Take Ueda,
Last week I used the 43mm Ltd lens for aa couple of days,
shooting with Supra 400. I was just trying to get a feel for
the lens and a sense of what Supra 400 was like. Yesterday I
picked up the prints from the lab, and, for the most part, I was
very happy.
I've already commented on how nice
Jim Meeks wrote:
> Mike, I recently read something you said on the list in regards to number
> of film rolls developed at one time. I think you said something like you
> were developing 3 rolls at one time and I would guess you were using a 4
> roll tank. Is this so you don't put a strain on the
Dan (>) wrote:
>
> >If you are interested I can post a
> >couple of photos I shot with the 85/2.
> >Flavio
> I'm interested, Flavio.
at my site in the URL below you can also find many made
w/ the SuperTakumar 85mm f1.9 & a few w/ the SMCT 135mm f3.5
in the "People Who
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:12:54 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>someone mentioned here some time ago that there could be a problem to use the new
>MZ-S with the Metz 40MZ3i flash. Why? What's the problem?
>Gimme a hint please. :o)
It will probably work fine on the MZ-S, however, it will pr
Alex, on Nikon metering compatability, wrote:
> Just a few minutes after I send this mail my
> "Nikon" friend called me again and said he is
> not 100% sure about this Ask Nikon
;^) you actually expected him to *admit* such a thing??
!8^D
---
Hi all,
can those of you who do your own prints comment on the enlargers you use for
B&W printing? I'm really interested in getting one and am just not too
familiar with them enough to know what to look for. Is it somewhat the same
as cameras -- you may be able to go with a budget enlarger and
After reading the recent thread on "who invented SMC" (again ;(,
I decided to throw oil into the fire here:
1) Even on AOHC pages, it's said that MC was developed by OCLI, US company
doing work for NASA. Asahi licensed (parts?) of the process to form SMC.
//that's what's AOHC article says.
now i
Willy wrote:
> Oops, misinterpreted Supra for Superia . I wonder if
> Kodak did that deliberately . I haven't used Supra yet, but I
> have processed a few rolls. It looked pretty good to my eye. I
> was wondering what film to use for the auto racing this weekend.
;^) as I suspected - m
"Bill D. Casselberry" wrote:
> Supra/Superia YellowBox/GreenBox
> alas, what are either of them compared to RG25
That's how I feel about Agfa APX 25
>
> a Supra 25 would be a very welcome new film, IMHO
> ... especially if also in 120 rolls (my fridge still harbors
> one last roll of
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
