>From the instruction manual of the KR-10...
The RICOH XR WINDER-1 can be used with the KR-10. By operating the shutter
release button on the winder, it can be used for rapid sequence photography
at approximate 2 frames per second (at shutter speed of 1/125 sec.) By just
setting the selection sw
On Saturday, June 09, 2001 7:51 AM, Frank Theriault
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
>
> Jim wrote:
>
> > While I'm not 100% sure, I believe that was Ringo's own camera. I've seen
> > other pictures of him toting a Pentax. On a side note, one of Linda
> > McCartneys cameras was a Pentax as wel
For an interesting full moon experiment, pop on about 800mm and shoot the
moon in landscape, in the (just dark) evening on the left side of the frame.
At midnight, press the little rewind release button (or whatever for your
camera) and double expose with the moon in the center of the frame (still
What's "up" depends on the viewing. Just after sunset, you are looking east
and one point, the point furthermost from the horizon seems "up". Just
before sunrise, you are looking west and again the point furthermost from
the horizon seems "up", but this is 180 degrees from the point that seemed
up
Gerald,
Were you by any chance a Motie in any of you previous incarnations?
Seriously, I'm quite impressed. I think you ought to put up a web page when
you are done and embarass the hell out of Kodak with it. Hope you saved
some of your "before" slides so you can do some side by sides.
Dan Sco
Can anyone tell me about and/or what motor drives will work on a Ricoh
KR-10?
James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On 6 Jun 2001, at 11:32, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks for the information -- this was helpful. The ability to disassemble
> might be a handy feature. Ease of making fine adjustments in positioning is an
> aspect I hadn't thought of. If I go with a quick-release head, I'
On 6 Jun 2001, at 14:14, Pål Jensen wrote:
> But the point in this debate is that when using a MF lens on a 35mm camera you
> will actually decrease the resolution of the lens practically speaking. An MF
> lens will perform worse on a 35mm camera than on a MF camera. The resolution of
> the lens
On 7 Jun 2001, at 8:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll bet you within a year every SLR manufacturer will be copying the MZ-s's
> data imprinting feature. It just absolutely rocks. Might be a problem for people
> who shoot reversal film and don't do their own slide mounting though. (I can see
> a
On 6 Jun 2001, at 10:06, Lon Williamson wrote:
> Heck, almost any glue "outgasses".
> Superglue sure does outgas, (lovely odor, btw), but if you use just a
> tad,
> and wave the body around a bit for the first several minutes, most of
> the outgassing is over with. I did attach foam this way, an
Hi Mark,
I'm responsible for one download of each of the ME Super manuals. Thanks
for putting them up.
Dan Scott (waiting my replacement ME Super)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Just downloaded my seb server stats for the past month. My Pentax service
>manual page must have hit the search engines pretty we
Thankyou for your kind comment Collin, yes this shot was taken in my office
at work. I didn't have a tripod or wider lens with me at the time but it
looks like a second tripod may have to reside at work for those short
creative bursts that happen once in a while :)
Ciao for now,
I think you`re right, I flipped it too, and it didn`t look right.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: 1000 shoots the moon
> Just tried flipping th
FYI, I have just put 11 screwmount Takumars up for auction
at ebay and ALL of them are Super-Multi-Coated type.
Include some of the rarer ones too.
For info
follow this link:
http://www.gate.net/~hifisapi/JCO_AUCT.HTM
1244918400 Jun-08-01 Jun-15-01 18:16:45 $99.99 Asahi Pentax 24mm F3.5 SMC
Ta
I would bet that the painting is already a copy of some recognized work
painted by an artist resident in China. These paintings are produced by
the yard and sold like fixtures to hotels and restaurants.
At 12:04 PM 6/8/2001 -0700, you wrote:
>--- "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
He's possibly confusing the terms AF Assist for AF Confirmation. A common
confusion on the list.
A note about the Snap-in, it doesn't work that great for low contrast
subjects...
l8r,
Douglas E Harmon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://personal.mia.bellsouth.net/~genius91/
- Original Message -
J. C. O'Connell writes:
> Just tried flipping the image 180 degrees and it looked very wrong, so I
> think I
> did scan it right side up. One has to tak into account that it was shot at
> the SW skies
> not straight up at midnight.
Check out http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/vphase.html
This will show
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> BTW, did I scan it right side up or is it upside
> down??
Depends, which hemisphere were you on?
:-)
--
---
Juan J. Buhler | Sr. FX Animator @ PDI | Photos at http://www.jb
Just tried flipping the image 180 degrees and it looked very wrong, so I
think I
did scan it right side up. One has to tak into account that it was shot at
the SW skies
not straight up at midnight.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf O
BTW, did I scan it right side up or is it upside
down??
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David A. Mann
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 7:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 1000 shoots the moon
>
>
> J. C. O'Connell w
Great shot JC, I think it is upside though.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 5:12 PM
Subject: RE: 1000 shoots the moon
> BTW, did I scan it right side up or is it u
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
> Edauardo Carone Costa Junior: "Orange Dome"
> I found this image quite compelling. I like the geometric patterns and
> the symmetry. The pattern displayed on the dome interior is interesting.
> It seems to suggest a sun or even a Sun God. It resembles some Mayan
> images I'
Also I forgot to mention I used an mx with dead
batteries, cable release, and a tripod of course.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 6:01 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 1000 shoot
When using the 1000mm on a 35mm camera the moon
diameter covers about 3/5 of the short side of the 35mm frame
so the image was cropped. BTW, the lab printed the image too
light so some of the highlights are washed out. It would
take approx a 1200-1500mm lens to fill the frame with a full moon.
JCO
Or the "Acronymic" design. Puts OSHA's new standard to shame.
Chris
From: "Norman Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Not to mention the detachable "DELUXE" flash!!
> Norm
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directi
J. C. O'Connell writes:
> http://www.gate.net/~hifisapi/moonw1000.jpg
Is that the entire frame or have you cropped it?
Now, let's stack some 2x TC's onto that baby... :)
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
"Why is it that if an adult behaves like a c
After the seminars by Doug Brewer and Tony Sweet I decided to pick up an 81B
warming filter. What I ended up with is a Rolev "Magi-Glas". Anybody ever
hear of them? Glass made in West Germany and assembled in USA
Bill, KG4LOV
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
From: "Gerald F. Cermak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So you think it is a current issue?
I don't know. It was just a wild ass guess.
> Has your LX MD ever done that when your
> nicads were very low? (when the Nicads themselves also become current
> limited.)
It's my MD's standard method for tell
I would be touchy too if I saw someone taking credit for or attempting to
profit by my work. I understood that original works are "automatically"
copyrighted, for what that ends up being worth.
>From what I understand, these paintings were not exactly original works of
art in the conventional se
I am sorry, but you must be wrong: if you use a non-AF lens, no AF body in the world
is
capable of giving an AF-assist light.
Artur Ledóchowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisa³ / wrote:
> Hi,
> In the June edition of the "Photographic" there's a nice article about the
> four best AF 35mm SLR's for
Being Polish I beg you to use correct English: you wrote: "the polish big
magazine "Foto"" - please note down that "polish" means "a substance used to give
smoothness or gloss" versus "Polish" meaning "of, pertaining to, or characteristic of
Poland, its inhabitants, or their language".
Artur L
Jim wrote:
> While I'm not 100% sure, I believe that was Ringo's own camera. I've seen
> other pictures of him toting a Pentax. On a side note, one of Linda
> McCartneys cameras was a Pentax as well.
I've seen several shots of "the famous Ringo" (remember that from "Help"?) with
that pre-Spo
While I'm not 100% sure, I believe that was Ringo's own camera. I've seen
other pictures of him toting a Pentax. On a side note, one of Linda
McCartneys cameras was a Pentax as well.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:31
just to show what the SMCP 1000mm F8 can do I
took a shot of a nearly full moon on kodak 200
film:
http://www.gate.net/~hifisapi/moonw1000.jpg
1/125sec at f16, scanned at 400 dpi from a 4" X 6"
print.
JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdm
The second that any work is ~created~ it is
copyrighted. It does not have to be registered by the
government, although that helps. It does not even have
to say "copyright so and so" on it. I was working at
Eckerda couple of years ago as a photolab manager when
K-Mart was sued for several hundred t
Hi Patrick,
First, welcome to the list. Please use plain text to communicate with the list.
For your answers, see below:
At 7:29 PM +02006/8/01, Patrick Genovese brandished a favorite crayon and scribbled:
Hi,
The spec sheet on the Pentax US Web site says the following:
- High-spee
Hello.
I am doing some further research for a query. Do any of you own a Sunpak gun
with external pack & 510v battery? If so, please mail me off list - I have
some questions for you.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 8, 2001 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: Flash Diffusers & Geekness
> But if the work is not copyrighted, how can it be copyright
infringement?
> From what I understand the work belongs to the corporation
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Interesting web stats
>
> I'll try to start work on the Super Program and/or the
Spotmatic service
> manuals this month.
Thats great. My Super program thanks you!!!
William Robb
Remember, the LX Gallery is coming up.
Please see:
http:
Just downloaded my seb server stats for the past month. My Pentax service
manual page must have hit the search engines pretty well. Looks like I'm
probably taking a bit of income away from the eBay photocopier profiteers
selling service manual copies.
Here are the files and the download numbers f
But if the work is not copyrighted, how can it be copyright infringement?
>From what I understand the work belongs to the corporation not the
individual(s). In that case one could argue that taking a picture of
virtually anything is copyright infringement because it is someones
handiwork...
Just
Bill Peifer wrote:
>
> I seem to remember a suggestion from a list member regarding a cheap and
> easy-to-implement flash diffuser. In fact, I think this was Mafud's idea.
> Get a piece of one of those white styrofoam take-out food packaging
trays --
> like they might use at McDonalds' :-)
Rea
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: June 8, 2001 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Flash Diffusers & Geekness
>
> Are you suggesting negative film because of the latitude for
error?
There can be a lot of contrast issues with using slide film for
Cool. I particularly the first one (and its "No Wiener Dogs" sign).
Have you done a list of all your modifications to the scanner?
Dan Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>After numerous modifications to my RFS3600, I'm finally getting consistently
>good scans from it.
>
>For your viewing pleasure: a coupl
Michel wrote:
> REWINDING ? On the 645N ?
Sorry. I mix up. I believe printing is done while rewinding on the MZ-S.
> What I meant was: Is the data imprinting done
> as one large array of pixel, or like an old-style dot matrix printer, where there is
> only a column of dots that moves across a
Not to mention the detachable "DELUXE" flash!!
Norm
"Gary L. Murphy" wrote:
> Man, have I ever found the motherlode! I think we all need to jump all over this one!
>
> It says that it will, "Meet your Professional Requirements", and it's only selling
>for, $69.00!! Can you believe
> it? A camer
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> " Gingerbread " by Frank Theriault
> Good job getting a feel for the style.
> It was a fascinating era in home styles.
>
Thanks!
-frank
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the d
Edauardo Carone Costa Junior: "Orange Dome"
I found this image quite compelling. I like the geometric patterns and
the symmetry. The pattern displayed on the dome interior is interesting.
It seems to suggest a sun or even a Sun God. It resembles some Mayan
images I've seen.
I'm not surprised t
Many thanks to Albano and his dedication to
maintaining the list.
Being new to the PDML, I wonder
how the users of those bodies regard them. Having many bodies from the
SP,K,M,L,P,PZ series, I like to rate then by their FUN factor. I learned early
on with my original purchase of a SP i
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 05:30:04PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a non-original TTL flash (30 guide number) for my Z1p. If I use it together
>with the built-in flash (14 guide number), is it equal to 44 guide number?
No, guide numbers (GN) don't add together like that.
Two fl
Many thanks to Albano and his dedication to
maintaining the list.
Being new to the PDML, I wonder
how the users of those bodies regard them. Having many bodies from the
SP,K,M,L,P,PZ series, I like to rate then by their FUN factor. I learned early
on with my original purchase of a SP in
Hi
I have a non-original TTL flash (30 guide number) for my Z1p. If I use it together
with the built-in flash (14 guide number), is it equal to 44 guide number?
Please advise.
--
Åwªï¨Ï¥ÎHongKong.com¶l¥ó¨t²Î
Thank you for using hongkong.com Email sy
>Thanks for the interesting story, Ken. Sounds like the choice between the
>field-serviceable 3413 with the big resin ball and the non-serviceable 3262
>with the smaller steel ball is a bit more complicated that it first
>appeared. You make some good points. Perhaps I'll just have to buy both
>
I don't buy the "worthless" settings between shutter speeds mentioned
below.
And here's why: I shot several frames AT the detents of shutter speeds.
The shots I took "in between" were clearly off, judging from what I got
back. WAY noticable, not due to shutter error.
If someone with experience
Obviously focus-free cameras are in high demand among
"perfessionals"...wonder what magazine the seller subscribed to to attain
this modern marvel? Or how many box tops he or she collected? Or where the
time-share condo is?
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Gary L. Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aw, dang! The auction ended, and not one single bid was made! Keppler
would have killed for that bargain!
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Gary L. Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax Users Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 5:45 PM
Subject: Spotted on eBay
> Man, h
I got a mint in box LX motor drive recently for my LX. I'm using my battery
grip M from K2DMD rig, filled with 12 new duracell AAs. Without film in the
camera, it winds fine, all function AOK. However, after putting film in the
camera, and shooting 10-15 frames, the motor drive doesn't advance
"Jaros³aw Brzeziñski" wrote:
>
> Just out of curosity: how did you test shutter speeds that your camera is unable to
> synchronise properly with a flash?
> I am not negating the results; I just cannot imagine what that results of this test
> looked like to give you grounds for stating that the sh
It's not the manual wind per. se. that stops the fogging it's the method of
counting sprocket holes. If the P3t uses a geared sprocket wheel to position
the film for the next frame then it will not fog IR film. I don't know the
answer to this, my knowledge of Pentax cameras skips this generation
59 matches
Mail list logo
