On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, MPozzi wrote:
(interesting to see how Milnolta and Canon fare.)
I have a friend who works for Canon UK (photocopier division). She is
being made redundant (along with a lot of others) in May. She tells me
that Canon have made serious losses this last year.
Chris
-
This
David wrote it shows that in 2000 the employees number more then doubled
from about 2300 to more then 6000.
Although I couldn't open the referenced page, I'm sure that this is not the
case. In 2000 they announced 2,000 to 2,500 job cuts - mostly in Japan and
many through early retirements.
Thanks for the great info on this exhibit. I plan to go to Chicago this
weekend to visit my daughter, and this is on our list of things to do.
Several weeks ago we tried to get in, but the line was way too long and we
didn't have time to wait at that time. Can't wait to see AA's work in
Bill's description of 165 leaf shutter operation is correct. Thus, I
don't use the TTL meter with this lens. It's easier, faster, and safer,
to just keep the focal plane shutter set at 1/8th. The operation is then
simply: cock the shutter, focus, and shoot.
Paul
William Robb wrote:
-
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27 Mar 2002 at 13:13, Mark Roberts wrote:
Interesting. This could change with the Foveon chip: one of its benefits
is reduced computing/processing power since any camera that uses it doesn't need
to do all the complicated mathematics of interpolation.
Thanks for the tip. I'm a big fan of Adams and hope to make a trip to
see the show. I saw one of his prints at MOMA in New York a couple of
years ago and understand what you're saying about seeing the nuances of
the actual silver print. It's quite a thrill.
Paul
Bolo wrote:
In the '67 Mania
On 28 Mar 2002 at 2:03, Evan J Dong wrote:
Mike Fourman is the owner of Kiev Camera. He is the one to deal with.
KievUSA buys some of his stuff from MIke.
I was under the impression Mike sells them 'as-is', while Kiev USA at least inspects,
and if necessary, readjusts what they sell.
- Original Message -
From: Nitin Garg
Subject: Re: Pentax WILL produce a digital SLR!
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:50:44AM -0500, Doug Brewer wrote:
Okay, I'll play.
a.) Yes, that's likely true for a significant percentage of
them. Read my post in answer to Bruce.
I presume you
Thanks Bruce.I use a Vivitar 285HV with the D1.
It has a good 'sun tan factor' at full power,i think.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 14:23:04 -0800
To: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[3]: After a delay...question
I tried a few weeks ago,puting a Kleenex over
the 285HV.Even at f2.8 it was very underexposed and
no details at 20'.I think in my dark arena the Omni might
be to much cut,however in the arean that is better
lit,windows on north/south and on roof,it might act as
more a fill flash.That might help
Hi,
I'm off for Easter but here's something for those big boys of
the bruvverhood to slobber over...
http://digilander.iol.it/clabo/flexpen/
Have fun,
mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Bruce
What sort of price are you looking at for the 20/2.8.
Carl
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:23 AM
Subject: 67 Enabling
Well, through some sales of 35 gear I have just purchased that 67 SMC
300/4 lens.
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 09:37 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
More and more of us are using medium format along with our 35mm K-mount
systems. How do you cope with this? Are you shooting MF under certain
circumstances and 35mm at other?
When I need long lenses or lenses faster than f2.8, I
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 12:29 AM, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
It's considerably more expensive than any of these cameras. I suspect
that the
number of cameras sold, over $500, isn't very big. Pentax needs
something more
competitive in the $350 - $500 class.
What are the Elan 7, N80
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, at 08:20 PM, Bolo wrote:
An ATL3? At first I thought that was a Jobo processor, but checking
their WWW pages, there isn't such a thing. Is it an older processor,
or something else?
It's one of their big processors. I don't know if it has been recently
Hi,
I saw that exhibit, and while the prints are gorgeous, only a small
portion of Adams' work was shown, that devoted to his better known
landscape photography. That's a poor way to show a retrospective of a
man's work. Missing completely were his portraits, his commercial
photography, the
Doug. I am reduced to contacting you in this manner.
Approximately how many PDML recipients are there, currently?
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Stan.
You do not have to bid for those LX sync covers on ebay! Those auctions are
just a way of fining folks for not joining the list.
Kind regards
Peter
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
A friend of mine, and myself, have purchased cameras and lenses from Mike
Fourman. There were a couple of instances when we sent things back for
replacement. Mike sent replacement items quickly with no problems at all.
He is the first to admit that factory QC is not as good as it should be, and
Warmest Passover greetings to all ...
--
Shel Belinkoff - munching on a Matzo from Israel with my morning coffee.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
Just wondering if any of our Canadian list
members have dealt/bought from KEH and if so
are there any border crossing problems to be aware
of??
I was on their site earlier and some things interested
me.
Dave
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj
Sign up
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/humor/easter.html
Feel free to pass it on.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/darkroom-rentals/index.html
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Good question Dave.
I too have been using the KEH site for a number of things:
1) as a thermometer for prices/grades of equipment I see elsewhere (i.e. Ebay)
2) as a comparison to local (i.e. Henry's / Downtown Camera) shops that sell similar
used goods.
I'd like to hear about the issues at the
Can anyone speak to the optical quality of Contax filters? I would think the their T*
coating would match Pentax's SMC in glare control.
I'm shopping for a 67mm multicoated UV filter, and at $32 (BH), Contax is
attractively priced; Pentax is $55, B+W $45, and Heliopan (from elesewhere) $47.
While I agree it is a poor way to show Ansel's work, most of us only ever
see the landscapes. To organise such an exhibition would be a nightmare, I
would not like the job. Many of the types work you mentioned, are most
likely in private hands or galleries, where they are reluctant to send them
I've not used Contax filters, Paul, but I have compared results with a
Contax T*85/1.4 and the Pentax A*85/1.4, and the results were very
similar. I'd say that the Contax filter would be a good choice based on
price and the glass. However, I'm unsure as to how the filters would
compare with the
Uh, $350 - $500 with Minolta at the high end of the range. I just picked the
more popular bottom end serious amateur cameras and looked up their prices.
By price the PZ1-p also fits.
It's not a question of how well these cameras actually function, but of
perceived value based on cost, paper specs
Dave use KEH for items that you can't find here, if
you can find it here bargin with the shop ( Henry's
you can ) and get a better price than KEH offers,
remember Henrys has a 1 year store warranty on their
used equipment and are local.
--- David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave.
I
Joe,
Nope.
Dave
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
I'm willing to delve for you Dave :)
I'm going to go drop into Henry's later this afternoon. I was eyeing a Vivitar 105
f2.5 1:1 Macro lens that is up for bids on Ebay (brand new). Thought I could snag it
by dropping a high enough bid on it. Guess what, the bid wasn't high enough (My tops
I saw the exhibit at the SFMOMA (where it opened). I go
to the SFMOMA pretty often, and the way people approached
this exhibit was quite strange.
At a typical exhibit, people generally wander around,
spend more or less time at different works, and ponder
them at different distances. The day I
Mark Roberts wrote:
Ann Sanfedele
Who was it that made the flip remark (well, maybe not flip)
that his photos were postcards? this came up over dinner
with friends who were excedingly reverential toward Adams. My
recollection was it was another photog of some standing. Also
thoght we
Hi all,
Just picked a 5 pack of this film to try out but I'm just curious if anyone
has had any experiences they would like to share. I'll be taking my kids
out for some pictures with the Bluebonnets so I was looking for a little
more contrast/pop than what I've experienced with NPS.
Thanks!
If I'm out of line, please forgive me, but I want to bid on a Nikon outfit
on Ebay. I have been in contact with the seller, and he will only ship UPS.
As I have had major problems with UPS to Canada, is there anyway I could
have it delivered to a PDML member in WA, where I could collect it.
In a message dated 28-Mar-02 1:13:53 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, the worlds first Kentucky Fried Chicken Restaurant is in Salt
Lake City, Utah. (go figure)
Huh ... The one in Corbin, Ky, claims to be first.
Or maybe you mean the first KFC not connected
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 12:13:45PM -0700, William Johnson wrote:
Nitin Garg wrote:
much snipping
I dont have an opinion of Kentucky: never been
there, dont know anything about it except for KFC started from there and
being a vegetarian know nothing about KFC beyond its name.
Hey,
This lens definitly needs a good tripod to mount it on.
I'm planning on shooting with my k-mount version this coming week.
I'll test it both on my tripod (if I can get it ack from my ex) and also
using a pistol grip I recently purchased.
The seller lists the price @ BH in the
I've never shot it at anything other than 160 unfortunately but I have heard people
state 100 or 125 maximum rating.
If you've got a 5 pack, you've got room to play with - so maybe shoot a roll at 100 or
even, dare I say, 80 (if the day is bright and sunny and all).
You'll get a similar
Cool. there was a KFC connected to the Sanders' motel ?
I'd hate to be in the room next to the restaurant... smelling those 11 secret herbs
and spices all night long would drive me bonkers.
Smirkingly,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Mar
Hi,
I use Contax filters on all my Carl Zeiss lenses. They're very good,
and very well made. Apparently they're made by Hoya, but they are very
different, and much better, than Hoya's own-brand products. I'd rate
them better than B+W, but that's a subjective rating. There is no
noticeable
If you are having it done at a commercial lab, i.e. not custom processing, it
will make no difference since the printer will auto compensate for any
difference and try and produce what it considers a properly exposed print.
Jerry in Houston
Subj:RE: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
Hi,
I think it was Elliott Erwitt who made the 'postcards' remark, but I
can't find a source for it. Erwitt's jokes are all very serious.
I'm not a great fan of St. Ansel, although I understand his
significance in photo history, and in the US environmental movement.
So I might be considered one
Hi,
Supposedly, the one in Kentucky wasn't originally called Kentucky Fried
Chicken. At some point, Colonel Sanders was vacationing out west and
stayed with the owner of a restaurant in Salt Lake City. The Colonel
made some of his famous chicken, and his host was so impressed that he
talked
You have grey cells?
I believe the original comment was made by our boy Elliott Erwitt,
although it's been used by many people over the years, and it was
discussed here at least a couple of time over the past year or two.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Who was it that made the flip remark (well,
He's looking for more than $700.00, too.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote to the seller to ask why he's selling it. His reply:
I shot it last weekend..
It is not for me.. Most of the shots were blurry.. I would need a bigger
tripod ball-head or something.
My bogen doesn't cut it.
It
Hi,
Elliott and Ansel strip down and get dirty:
http://www.shermanhinesphotographymuseum.com/exhibits/2001/peter_adams/erwitt.html
Cheers,
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Bob Walkden wrote:
I'm not a great fan of St. Ansel, although I understand his
significance in photo history, and in the US environmental movement.
So I might be considered one of the people who 'diss' him (what an
odd word). This is, I believe, at least partly a well-deserved corrective
to the
I don't think any serious photographer will dis' Adams Now, the idiot's who
deify him, that is another matter.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL
Smith's work can be seen at: http://www.singergallery.com/
Barry Singer had a great show about 18-months ago in which many of
Smith's prints were available, both for exhibition and purchase. He
still has some Smith originals - if you're in the area, the gallery is a
great place to visit. There
Three is another possibility, Ann, I didn't think of it before even though I
have one for my 283.. Vivitar makes a remote cord for the 285 (the one for
the 283 is not interchangeable). You unplug the sensor/dial from the flash
and plug the cord into the flash where sensor was. Then you pug the
Youìll see something about PhotoShow, AOHC desk and PDML meeting at:
http://digilander.iol.it/aohc/pshow02e.htm
Dario Bonazza
http://digilander.iol.it/aohc/
Quick note to say that finally, most of us Italian
PDLMers met up at the Rome photo show yesterday. It
Jerry,
It's my understanding that if you shoot at 80 (or 100 or 125) and you drop it into the
lab, and not say boo to them about what you shot it at, they'll process it as though
it were 160. Every retail outlet that I've taken my stuff to (from specialized labs
to WalMart - ya ya.. I went
It is a common, but unattractive, characteristic of lesser persons to prove their
sophistication by belittling the work of great artists. Most of those who slight
Adams are only familiar with his western landscapes and have never seen his portraits,
product photography, still life shots, Photos
You need more shots of Alessia ;-)
--- Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Youìll see something about PhotoShow, AOHC desk and
PDML meeting at:
http://digilander.iol.it/aohc/pshow02e.htm
Dario Bonazza
http://digilander.iol.it/aohc/
Quick note
From: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Web-Options Ltd.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 20:14:27 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Celebrity photographers topless mud wrestling!
Hi,
Elliott and Ansel strip down and get dirty:
Like the quote. Can't
In a message dated 28-Mar-02 2:07:47 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Supposedly, the one in Kentucky wasn't originally called Kentucky Fried
Chicken. At some point, Colonel Sanders was vacationing out west and
stayed with the owner of a restaurant in Salt Lake City.
On 28 Mar 2002 at 8:30, Paris, Leonard wrote:
A friend of mine, and myself, have purchased cameras and lenses from Mike
Fourman.
Have you tried the fisheye?
All
things considered, he is a good person to deal with.
Thanks, that's what I wanted to hear...
tv
-
This message is from the
Mine is a Super Multi-Coated Takumar. Don't know if a screw mount was made
with just SMC on it. I use mine to exercise my arms.
Jim A.
From: William Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 13:28:30 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax 500mm/4.5
At 01:24 PM 3/28/02 -0500, Nitin wrote:
Identifying is different (somewhat) from feeling pride. If the basis of
Joe Nikon's pride is the same as that of Moe Pentax, and Joe gets to
identify with a lot more shooters than Moe does, I dont see why Moe
should feel pride while Joe is having his
James Adams wrote:
If I'm out of line, please forgive me, but I want to bid on a Nikon outfit...
Don't do it. Take two aspirin and call me in the morning.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Bob Walkden wrote:
This is, I believe, at least partly a well-deserved corrective
to the semi-religious and thoughtless fawning of some of his fans, and
to the tradition he spawned, probably unwittingly, of treating
negative and print quality as important ends in themselves,
But the
O! HHH!
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
If photography was just about seeing, we wouldn't have to process our
film, would we?
Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
Elliott and Ansel strip down and get dirty:
http://www.shermanhinesphotographymuseum.com/exhibits/2001/peter_adams/erwitt.html
Cheers,
Bob
-
This message is from the
No artist should be deified. They all have their limits. But Adams'
clarification of the process earned him a special place in photographic
history.
Paul
T Rittenhouse wrote:
I don't think any serious photographer will dis' Adams Now, the idiot's who
deify him, that is another matter.
Ok...I'm looking around and find a nice 200 F 4 SMC...the info says its a
58mm (filter). I thought the 200 was a 52mm. Am I wrong? Is this an A lens
(I assumed it was an M)? Do I need to open a window when I use this glue? A
little help here... : )
Thanks.
Dave
--
David Spaulding
Photographer
I am not sure if I understand this. You want a portrait film, which has a
low contrast, and by setting the ISO setting lower you increase the
contrast? Is this why this advise is given? I have read the same advise on
Portra 160NC. I am confused, please help me. What is the advantage?
Frits
I have seen the 200mm F4 in 58mm and 52mm I have no
idea of the differences between the K and M versions,
the A version was 52mm, the A macro I have seen in
58mm.
--- David Spaulding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok...I'm looking around and find a nice 200 F 4
SMC...the info says its a
58mm
Dave,
I have one in front of me, and a 52mm clip-in cap slips inside, so it looks
like it might be a 58mm filter thread.
James
BTW, I'm after a Pentax hood for SMC 200/4 if anyone has one to sell.
- Original Message -
From: David Spaulding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 04:21:39PM -0500, Doug Brewer wrote:
At 01:24 PM 3/28/02 -0500, Nitin wrote:
Identifying is different (somewhat) from feeling pride. If the basis of
Joe Nikon's pride is the same as that of Moe Pentax, and Joe gets to
identify with a lot more shooters than Moe does, I
my m42 smc 200/4 is 58mm filter. Dont know about K-mount versions...
what does boz's site say ?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 02:52:53PM -0700, David Spaulding wrote:
Ok...I'm looking around and find a nice 200 F 4 SMC...the info says its a
58mm (filter). I thought the 200 was a 52mm. Am I wrong?
- Original Message -
From: David Spaulding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok...I'm looking around and find a nice 200 F 4 SMC...the info says its a
58mm (filter). I thought the 200 was a 52mm. Am I wrong? Is this an A lens
(I assumed it was an M)? Do I need to open a window when I use this glue?
A
Oops,
Mine are the M42 and K. The M and A are 52.
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:13:06 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help w/ 200 F4 - my brain is mush
I have seen the 200mm F4 in 58mm and 52mm I have no
idea of the differences between the K and M versions,
the A
Dave,
I have one in front of me, and a 52mm clip-in cap slips inside, so it looks
like it might be a 58mm filter thread.
James
Ok...that makes sence...I guess I'm not going crazy.
Thanks for the info all.
Dave
--
David Spaulding
Photographer
http://d.spaulding.tripod.com
-
This message
- Original Message -
From: James Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, I'm after a Pentax hood for SMC 200/4 if anyone has one to sell.
The hood for the K is the same as the K135 f2.5 and 85-210 f4.5 K zoom and
it is a dandy. Made of plastic, it clips on by internal clips that work both
for use
This particular lens is an excellent one. I had one for about a year and I
loved it. It was exceptionally sharp and contrasty. The optics are
excellent. On the down side it was somewhat heavy and was prone to flare
(inherent problem with most wide angle fisheyes) since there really isn't
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, David Spaulding wrote:
Ok...I'm looking around and find a nice 200 F 4 SMC...the info says its a
58mm (filter). I thought the 200 was a 52mm. Am I wrong? Is this an A lens
(I assumed it was an M)?
You can get more info here:
It's not too wierd. It's on the Pentax USA website under
lenses.
FA 28-80 f/3.5-5.6 AL. It's a little slower at the long end
than
the Power Zoom model.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Steven Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 5:40 PM
That, or they just think the film is overrated, and a bit more exposure is needed to
get adequate shadow detail.
tv
On 28 Mar 2002 at 18:21, Len Paris wrote:
It's just sage advise given by someone who believes that their
way of seeing is the only way to see.
Len
---
- Original
Well then share, Dario, share!
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: Rome Photo show
Got them ;-)
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Well gang,
It's off to Yosemite for a day and caving for a day. Wish I had
longer. Anyway, taking the big 67 and a bunch of film. Hope to have
an enjoyable time and actually get a few good shots.
Bruce Dayton
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Bob's got it right. Older models are 58mm, newer are 52mm.
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oops,
Mine are the M42 and K. The M and A are 52.
Bob
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't
That sort of stuff usually happens because a person's equipment
isn't perfect. We all know that we have to test all of the
films we shoot in order to determine what corrections our
cameras require. We should know that the corrections necessary
for one camera may not be the corrections needed
Have fun, Bruce. Burn lots of film.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 6:47 PM
Subject: I'm off
Well gang,
It's off to Yosemite for a day and caving for a day. Wish I
had
longer. Anyway,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:19:02PM +0100, Pål Jensen wrote:
Nitin wrote:
If the basis of
Joe Nikon's pride is the same as that of Moe Pentax, and Joe gets to
identify with a lot more shooters than Moe does, I dont see why Moe
should feel pride while Joe is having his insecurities
To expand upon TV's comment.
Actually, if you are a pro, and use a pro-lab. The lab will probably tell
you to use something like 100 to get the best from their set up. Of course,
you can always use the manufactures rating. Because the guys running the lab
just believe their way is the only way
Local dealer gave me a roll, which I used in fieldwork here in New
Mexico. Lovely blue skies, but contrast and landscape distinctions were
so muted that I consider it unsuitable for landscape work (at least in
places where the landscape is primarily brown). Probably good for
people. YMMV.
Joe
-
In a message dated 28-Mar-02 4:49:57 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wouldn't be surprised if you hear a more interesting story about it...
I'm going off memory and I think that I read the story in the
restaurant itself.though I believe it is basically true, it
And, actually, I can agree with that. If you are using a
pro-lab, they can tell you what ISO to use to get the best
results with their processing. They should be familiar with
your exposures and, as long as you are consistent in using your
camera, they know which way you should adjust to make
I've just been to Kerrisdale Cameras in Richmond to ask if they had any
hoods for a Pentax SMC(K) 200/4, and they said no. I pointed to the back of
a shelf, and asked what is that?. Turned out they had two hoods for Pentax
1:2.5 135mm 1:4 200mm they never new they had. Charged me $10 CDN($11.45
BH will sell you as many as you want for $89.95 each, which is less
than this guy's opening.
Joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
It's hardly sage adviCe.
What it is, is just based on my little.. very little experience with the
film and what I've read and heard from other folks who've used the film.
All of this stuff will definitely depend on how/where you get your film
processed and printed. As Tom said in this thread,
- Original Message -
From: David Brooks
Subject: Canadian Pdmlers and KEH
Just wondering if any of our Canadian list
members have dealt/bought from KEH and if so
are there any border crossing problems to be aware
of??
I was on their site earlier and some things interested
me.
I
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1341968758
*
Get over it.
Dr. Laura
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Interesting camera
Hi,
I'm off for Easter but here's something for those big boys of
the bruvverhood to slobber over...
Thats all very well and good, but the amount of movements will
be very limited by the flange to focal plane
Hi Doug,
Ever since you changed my user settings - e.g.
cancel registration as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
added [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I receive only yours and my postings to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on my
hotmail account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Figure that one out
James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
I've been using sunny f16 for years with
color negative film except I cheat and
open up (overexpose) a half stop. GREAT
results in bright sun. Call it sunny
f13.5??
For slides I usually use sunny f16 and
and shoot at f16 and at f19 (underexpose)
on critical shots. i.e. bracket. I never
- Original Message -
From: David Chang-Sang
Subject: RE: Re: Any experience with Fuji NPC?
All of this stuff will definitely depend on how/where you get
your film
processed and printed. As Tom said in this thread,
the lab will or should be able to give further insight as to
how to
William,
I know what you are saying, the folks(suckers) here in BC kicked out the
commies, and voted in the Libs, thinking they would do wonders.
All they have done is fd up the economy, cut for a quick fix, and no
thought to any hope of future wealth creation.
James
Thankfully I am not yet
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl
Subject: The Lizard LX Big Brother!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1341968758
Wow!! That sucker is uglier than the LX2000, the gold LX all of
Césars LX's and the
candy coated 'blads combined.
William Robb
-
This
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
